Cite and discuss at least one other student’s response to the student’s brief synopsis or if there are no responses to the brief/synopsis that you chose then provide your own personal response to the chapter.

Critique and Mentor

READ, REVIEW, CRITIQUE and MENTOR: THIS IS NOT AN OPINION PIECE! YOUR OPINION OF THE TOPIC AND ISSUES DOES NOT MATTER. YOUR JOB IS TO MENTOR. TO READ WITHOUT ANY PREDISPOSITION AND TO PROVIDE USEFUL GUIDANCE.

Your response must be IN THIS ORDER, in paragraph form. You must provide a prompt (restating the question) or copy and paste the question before your response. (-50pts for not following this format).

1. IDENTIFY the Chapter that you chose to read from your assigned reading (Emanuel and Gluck, 2020). ALSO IDENTIFY one (1) student’s brief, synopsis (INCLUDE THE STUDENT’S NAME SO THAT IT IS EASILY IDENTIFIED AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE OR IN THE TITLE OF THE UPLOADED FILE). You will be reading the chapter with the student’s brief synopsis in mind and providing a critique of the student’s work. (5 points)

2. BRIEFLY RESTATE the student’s viewpoint, in your own words in the first or second paragraph. (5 points)

3. In no less than 1000 words, but no more than 2000 words:

-PROVIDE A REVIEW on how the student responded to the chapter. (5 points)

-PROVIDE CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENTS to the student with regards to their read and review of the chapter. You must provide at least one recommended adjustment or “negative” comment without being negative but supportive. (20 points)

5. CITE AND DISCUSS at least one other student’s response to the student’s brief synopsis or if there are no responses to the brief/synopsis that you chose then provide your own personal response to the chapter. Also, you must provide an APA citation of the source(s) of your Critique (i.e. student’s post and the assigned book) or you may copy and post the original posting to the end of your Critique. (5 points)