Summarize the ideas of the architect, school of thought or theorist, explaining the theoretical work you have chosen to discuss in simple, easy to understand, clear terms.

Reading Response on Andres Lepik.  Small scale, big change: new architectures of social engagement.

Department of Architectural Science
You are to summarize the ideas of the architect, school of thought or theorist, explaining the theoretical work you have chosen to discuss in simple, easy to understand, clear terms. While this summary and most of the ideas about the writings are to be your own, you may also use
additional scholarly resources (to bolster your claims, etc) including scholarly journals and architectural journals. For instance, most JSTOR journals qualify. Biographies and monographs of architects also qualify. Wikipedia doesn’t qualify, although it is a good source thre

c) Logical sequence. You are telling a story. Begin with an overview of the most important points. Grab your audience by posing a major question or thesis statement or an argument that the rest of the presentation and paper will be addressing. Proceed with points that bolster your arguments, including evidence to support what you are claiming and points that clearly explain or illustrate the issues and/or the importance of your subject and the particular question(s) thesis or argument you are exploring. Conclude with a summary that situates the work or theory within its context