Why do you think the objective you wrote has an opposing philosophical position and methodology to the original one? What design would you choose to achieve the new proposed objective? And why?

Write the title of the paper you would like to use in answering this assignment:

Section 1:

What is the philosophical position used in this article? (2 marks)
Why do you think the researcher/s adopted this philosophical position? Make sure you discuss the ontological and epistemological stances in your answer. (4 marks)
What is the methodology used in this article? Include all specific details about methodology in your answer (2 marks)
Why do you think the researcher/s adopted this methodology? Make sure you discuss the suitability of this methodology for the research aim/s. (4 marks)
What is the data collection method used in this article? (2 marks) Suitability of the collection method for the research aim/s. (2 marks)
How suitable is the sample of this study to achieve the aim/s? Justify your answer (2 marks)

After answering questions a to g, move to section 2.

Section 2:

Based on your reading and answers in section 1, propose a new aim for the study so it would have an opposing philosophy and methodology.

Change the article objective so it would have an opposing philosophy and methodology. For example, if you had a quantitative article, then change the objective to be qualitative. (2 marks)
Why do you think the objective you wrote has an opposing philosophical position and methodology to the original one? (5 marks)
What design would you choose to achieve the new proposed objective? And why?(5 marks)
What data collection method would you choose to achieve the new proposed Objective? Justify your answer? (5 marks)
What should be the characteristics of the new study sample? Justify your answer and provide all the required details? (5 marks)