Research Presentation Peer Reviews

1. Select two presentations on topics that you are interested in learning more about. The peer presentations you review should be on two different types of technology, each unrelated to your research presentation subject. Credit will not be given if the two reviews are on the same technology or if either is on the same technology you presented. The purpose of this criteria is for you to further explore the diverse use of technology in healthcare.

2. Use a table like the one shown below to structure your responses.

Presentation # 1
Title of Presentation:
Student Presenter(s):

*Discuss three key things you learned about this topic based on the presentation. You must use complete sentences (not bullet points) and provide a reasonable description of each item. Your summary should be a minimum of 200 words.

*Pose two questions that you still have about this topic. Consider areas that may need more clarity and depth or challenge the student’s assumptions. Use current literature to find the answer to these questions and summarize what you learned. Your answers should be at least 100 words per question. Provide 2 peer-reviewed references for each question. See Research Resources opens in new window if you need help with finding sources or a refresher on peer-reviewed literature.

*Score the presentation content and delivery based on the following scoring criteria. Provide comments where indicated.
1-Strongly Agree 2-Agree 3-Disagree 4-Needs Substantial Improvement

*The presenter clearly described the healthcare problem and the technology.
Score:

*Identify the following from their presentation:
the healthcare problem-
the applied technology-

*The choice of topic has value for the healthcare community.
Score:

*Explain in 1-2 sentences why or why you feel the topic contributes to healthcare.

*The content provided was relevant and appropriate to increase the audience’s knowledge of the main topic.
Score:

*Information was presented in a logical, interesting sequence that was easy to follow.
Score:

*The presenter provided a succinct concluding summary emphasizing the main points.
Score:

*The oral presentation conveyed enthusiasm and emphasis appropriately; delivery added interest to the presentation. Minimal reading of slides; the speaker was confident in their understanding of the material.
Score:

Additional recommendations for a successful paper:
*The student addresses each of the questions as defined in the instructions. Two presentations must be reviewed to receive any credit for this assignment. Incomplete submissions will not be graded.

*Reviews must be on two different, unrelated topics. For example, both presentations can not be on some aspect of telehealth.

*Responses demonstrate original thought, substantial depth of thinking, and relevance to the original topic.

*Responses are well-written and clearly articulated. Both reviews should be submitted as one document.

*References should be cited in APA. You must use a minimum of 2 sources for each presentation you review.