Final Project
INSTRUCTIONS
PHILISOPHY- KINDLY HELP WITH ONLY NUMBER 4 AS HIGHLIGHTED BELOW (RETRANSLATION) AS I HAVE WORKED ON THE OTHERS.
- English Argument:
P1: Abortion is a woman’s right
P2: If Abortion is a woman’s right, then women have the right to control their bodies.
P3: If women have the right to control their bodies, then abortion should be allowed.
P4: Abortion should be allowed, so it could decrease the rate of women dying from unsafe abortion, and abortion is not a crime.
P5: 25 million unsafe abortions takes place each year (https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/sexual-and-reproductive-rights/abortion-facts/)
P6: If 25 million unsafe abortions take place each year, then either abortion is not a women’s right or abortion is a crime
Conclusion: Abortion is not a crime
- Translation
p – Abortion is a woman’s right
q – Women have the right to control their bodies.
r – Abortion should be allowed.
s – It could decrease the rate of women dying from unsafe abortion.
t – Abortion is a crime.
v – 25 million unsafe abortions takes place each year.
- Proof
- p Premise
- p → q Premise
- q → r Premise
- r → (s & ~t) Premise
- v Premise
- v → (~p V t) Premise
___________________
C: ~t
- p → r HS (2, 3)
- r MP (1, 7)
- (s & ~t) MP (4, 8)
- ~t Simp. (9)
- Re-translation- SEE THE SAMPLE EXAMPLE ATTACHED
- Explaination and Summary
- Do you think your valid argument is also sound?
- Do we need empirical research to tell us if the premises are true?
- Are there possible ambiguities in how the argument has been translated? Would a reasonable person disagree with any of your translations?
- What other information besides symbolic logic might we need to decide whether to accept this argument as sound and believe the conclusion?
- In your opinion, did symbolic logic add anything useful to the discussion of this issue?
- Did it help you understand it better, or make a better argument for your point of view? Did it just make things more complicated?
- If some members of the group disagree on translations, the validity or soundness of the argument as presented, this is the place to include that!