This task is 750 plus 10% words for each question, there are two questions as below (Topic 1) and (topic 3). They are the yellow highlighted parts. Answer each question in two separates Microsoft word. Each questions’ answer must be 750 words limits plus 10%, so means maximum 825-word limits.
- Please follow the instructions carefully ( Yellow & grey highlighted part) and use the sample as a guide and don’t copy from it.
- Paraphrase everything that you take from the resources.
- Check the attached file (sample for topic 3).
- Try to use heading to organize the paper.
- Use academic vocabulary words and good analytic arguments
- Please Attach to the reference the DOI.
- Use the most recent updated citation and references.
- Task Topics
You need to answer each topic and substantiate your answers in 750 plus 10% words, using correct references to the literature and your personal experience.
Task A
Details of Task: Assessment for Learning – Critical Analysis of Key Principles
This Task requires you to reflect critically on TWO of three important components of the Disaster and Humanitarian Crises Framework in this Unit.
Topic 1
All students complete Topic 1. Discuss the following statement:
“The PPRR disaster cycle model has been around for over 20 years and is no longer as relevant today as it was when first introduced”.
Task B: CHOICE: Complete EITHER topic 2 OR topic 3.
Topic 2
What commonalities do you observe between the Sustainable Development Goals and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction? Do you think your country or region demonstrates these principles? If so, how?
Topic 3
How can disaster and humanitarian professionals use the concept of ‘Resilience’ to improve prevention, mitigation, response and recovery in the setting of disasters and humanitarian crises?
Word Limit
TWO 750-word written Tasks.
Presentation Requirements
Well-structured 750-word arguments that answers the question in a word document with the appropriate use of readings, formatting and referencing.
Referencing Requirements
use APA 6th edition for references list and citation as well.
Criteria for Marking
- Assignment Writing
Assignments at this level are more than just ‘the facts’ or ‘the what’s’. They are more about you analysing the question/topic, defining your argument to answer the topic, analysing the issues in the topic and synthesising a response to answer the question with references from the literature to support your claims. You need to reference all material from other sources correctly, and demonstrate your experience and awareness of the topic within the context of the field of study and your professional practice. You are encouraged to relate your analysis and response to your own country (Saudi Arabia).
A structure as a guide, for consideration:
- Cover sheet. You sign that this is your own work. Be aware of the University plagiarism policy stated in your Unit Guide
- Identifier: name, student number
- Include the topic/task/question “as stated in the task guide” – this helps you stay focused.
Do not precis the topic.
- Introduction: How do you interpret the question, why it is important, define the space, and
state the aim of your response. That is, tell us what you are going to do – the plan for your
assignment
- Body: usually 3 – 5 main points in a 750-plus 10% words for each task questions.
. Do not overstretch your response. Sustain your argument by correct
referencing. Do what you said you were going to do.
- Conclusion: No new information! Tell us what you have done.
- Bibliography: Referencing style – be consistent – use the same style.
