My classmate should have done the following:
Introduction (1 paragraph)
The introduction should also provide your reader with a little background so that he or she will understand why this critique is worth reading. What do you know about the issue under discussion? Is it of current or historical interest? Is it at the heart of a controversy? At the end of the introduction, you should clearly state the point(s) you are to critique and the arguments you intend to make about it.
Summary 1-2 pages
Don’t use any references. Identify the author’s main point (thesis) and list the types of proof she or she employs to persuade the reader to believe or accept the thesis. For example, does the author use historical perspectives, quote noted authorities, provide statistical evidence, or appeal to a reader’s common sense? You should also try to figure out why the author is writing, and to whom. Now, set your own agreement or disagreement with the author aside for a moment and investigate the validity of his or her argument. Does the author provide complete and accurate information? Some authors may leave important facts out of their presentations in order to avoid dealing with them, or they may give inaccurate data either through ignorance or in a deliberate attempt to mislead readers. Does the author provide information that is relevant to the issue? Does the author define key terms adequately and clearly? Is the author’s argument logically consistent? Is there other evidence that would support a counterargument? Once you have examined carefully the text you intend to critique, use the information you have collected to draft a response. Do you agree or disagree with the author’s views and proofs? Be sure to discuss specific reasons why you agree or disagree with something. The critique’s value as an academic document rests on your ability to say precisely why you agree or disagree.
Analysis-(2 pages)
Use current/recent empirical studies. Present an in-depth analysis of the validity of the author’s logic and use of evidence in supporting the selected point(s). Be sure to present your information in a form, which is easy to follow, using transitional elements whenever necessary to preserve the smooth flow of your writing.
Your own response to the argument (5-6 pages)
Use current/recent empirical studies. Your own response to the argument. As discussed above, you may agree or disagree with the author’s point(s), and this is the part of the critique where you make your own views on the point(s) clear. Remember that your own arguments must be well-supported through the extensive use of references, evidence and/or logic. You must give compelling reasons for your agreement or disagreement with the author. Discuss the limitations, weaknesses, or problems of the text that relate to your thesis statement and use empirical articles to support the information.
Conclusion (1 page)
Synthesize your critique. Evaluate the author’s overall success or failure in achieving his or her point(s). Also remind your reader of the strengths and weaknesses of the paper.
