What changes would you make in the university training evaluation? What questions would you add, what questions would you delete, and what questions would you revise to improve the effectiveness of the training evaluation?

You will complete this assignment as a paper, not a worksheet. Using the evaluation model in Table 6.1 and the Kirkpatrick evaluation model described on page 259 in the Noe textbook, address the questions below.

Compose a 1,000-word expository paper that must have a highly developed viewpoint and purpose, be written in Standard English, and demonstrate superior organization. You must communicate in a highly ordered, logical, and unified manner and display exceptional content, organization, style, and mechanics. In addition to fulfilling the specifics of this assignment, APA citation style should be followed. Cite and reference your sources using APA style.

Use the following headers to organize your paper:

Introduction
Describe the situation. Develop a clear viewpoint and purpose.

Evaluation: Level of Evaluation
First, what level does this evaluation address? Is this the best level to assess? Why or why not? Should some other level be targeted? If so, what, why, and how?

Evaluation: Changes
Second, after identifying the level of evaluation, what changes would you make in the university training evaluation? What questions would you add, what questions would you delete, and what questions would you revise to improve the effectiveness of the training evaluation?

Evaluation: Strength and Weaknesses
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the EOT student evaluation?

Evaluation: Improvements
How should the evaluation be used to actually improve the instruction that you receive?

Conclusion
One-paragraph summary of your main points.