Compare and contrast concepts, ideas and/or approaches from two key thinkers (philosophers or early pioneers) which support and/or challenge contemporary practice with children and/or young people.
You should use reading and focused examples from practice to support your discussion and justify your views.
Anonymity of individuals, workplaces, schools and settings must be maintained throughout the essay.
Students working towards JNC professional status are invited to annotate their text to illustrate links with professional standards.
1.Demonstrate detailed knowledge and understanding of underpinning philosophies of education, as appropriate to the work sector and area of study.
3.Evaluate the impact of underpinning philosophy, significant policy and legislation in the context of day to day provision and practice.
4.Demonstrate the ability to communicate accurately and reliably, and make structured arguments.
Example.
Intro – about 200 words
Context philosophy 1 and 2 explore key points of each philosophy separately. (each paragraph based around comparing or contrasting one key point in both philosophies) – about 400 words.
Main body – (point of comparison, point of contrast) -demonstrate your understandings of links and connections. (Point of comparison, point of contrast) – can construct a broader argument or narrative by order of points – about 1200 words.
Conclusion – about 200 words
Use citations and references as necessary.
