Compare actual results to expected results. Explain unexpected/expected results by linking this to general biological principles. Evaluate the hypothesis (Describe what the p value means). Describe future experiments that could further the research on this topic.

Procedure 2: Oil and Feathers

The results section is two parts. There is a written part, and there is a graphical part. In the graph part, you should create your own unique visual representation of the data collected from the experiment. You only need to include one image.

DO NOT use the table from the Excel spreadsheet, or the summary chart for the Excel spreadsheet. You need to come up with your own way of representing the data graphically. Again, DO NOT use the Excel spreadsheet, or cut and paste those columns into your paper.

YOU CAN ONLY USE THESE 4 reference BELOW

1.VALDEZ SPILL IN ALASKA. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1996.tb00304.x

2.Yamamoto, J., & Michel, J. (2021). Oil spill. AccessScience. https://doi-org.library.collin.edu/10.1036/1097-8542.467450

3.J. Beyer et al., Environmental effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: A review, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 110:28–51, 2016 DOI: https://doi-org.library.collin.edu/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.027

4.B. Laffon, E. Pasara, and V. Valdigiesias, Effects of exposure to oil spills on human health: Updated review, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B, 19(3–4):105–128, 2016 DOI: https://doi-org.library.collin.edu/10.1080/10937404.2016.1168730

Discussion:

37. Re-state expected findings.

38. Compare actual results to expected results.

39. Explain unexpected/expected results by linking this to general biological principles.

40. Evaluate the hypothesis (Describe what the p value means).
Scientists do not PROVE anything in lab reports. Instead the data supports or fails to support hypothesis.

41. Describe future experiments that could further the research on this topic.

42. State real world applications of the information.