How does Paine respond to those who believe it is possible to work out their differences with Great Britain? Describe the reasoning the author uses to support his points. How effective is Paine’s reasoning?

Read the excerpt from Common Sense.

Men of passive tempers look somewhat lightly over the offenses of Britain, and, still hoping for the best, are apt to call out, Come, we shall be friends again for all this. But examine the passions and feelings of mankind. Bring the doctrine of reconciliation to the touchstone of nature, and then tell me, whether you can hereafter love, honor, and faithfully serve the power that hath carried fire and sword into your land? If you cannot do all these, then are you only deceiving yourselves, and by your delay bringing ruin upon posterity. Your future connection with Britain, whom you can neither love nor honor, will be forced and unnatural, and being formed only on the plan of present convenience, will in a little time fall into a relapse more wretched than the first. But if you say, you can still pass the violations over, then I ask, Hath your house been burnt? Hath your property been destroyed before your face? Are your wife and children destitute of a bed to lie on, or bread to live on? Have you lost a parent or a child by their hands, and yourself the ruined and wretched survivor? If you have not, then are you not a judge of those who have. But if you have, and can still shake hands with the murderers, then are you unworthy the name of husband, father, friend, or lover, and whatever may be your rank or title in life, you have the heart of a coward, and the spirit of a sycophant.…
Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning—and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of Europe absolute… Wherefore since nothing but blows will do, for God’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child.…
Respond to the prompt.
How does Paine respond to those who believe it is possible to work out their differences with Great Britain? Describe the reasoning the author uses to support his points. How effective is Paine’s reasoning? Use evidence from the text to support your response.

What do the gender differences between the stories reveal about the purpose of the defining characteristics of local color?

Woman vs Man Writers

Define the function of one characteristic in local color realism by contrasting one work by a woman (Freeman, Jewett, Chopin, etc) to one by a man (either Twain or Harte). What do the gender differences between the stories reveal about the purpose of the defining characteristics of local color?

Choose one characteristic of sentimentalism and one of realism and discuss the function of each in “Life in the Iron Mills”. How does each help convey the theme of the work?

Life in the Iron Mills

Choose one characteristic of sentimentalism and one of realism and discuss the function of each in “Life in the Iron Mills”. How does each help convey the theme of the work? Start with a thesis in your first sentence that defines the overall function of mixing the two modes of fiction (sentimentalism and realism)

Learning objectives: strong opening thesis, development (500 words), support (quotations), objective tone (no use of I us or we)

Analyze the differences and similarities between “The Gift of the Magi” and “The Tell-Tale Heart.”

The Gift of the Magi  and  The Tell-Tale Heart.

Analyze the differences and similarities between “The Gift of the Magi” and “The Tell-Tale Heart.”

Discuss the given perspective(s) that would support the opposing argument. Explain why you disagree with the opposing perspective Discuss flaws in reasoning. Give a specific example that could be used to support the opposing perspective. Discuss how the opposing logic doesn’t work when compared to your position.

Has Technology changed.your everyday lifestyle

Introduce your perspective
Include how the other two contrast your perspective.
Body (Paragraphs 2) – Assertion
Start with a transition/topic sentence that discusses YOUR POSITION on the central issue
Explain your position including any of the given perspectives that support your position
Give an example that supports your position and explain how the example supports your position
End the paragraph by summarizing the paragraph
Refutation (Paragraphs 3)
Concession: Start with a transition/topic sentence that discusses the OPPOSING SIDE of your argument
Discuss the given perspective(s) that would support the opposing argument
Counter: Explain why you disagree with the opposing perspective
Discuss flaws in reasoning
Give a specific example that could be used to support the opposing perspective
Be sure to discuss how the opposing logic doesn’t work when compared to your position.
Conclusion (Paragraph 4)
Recap your discussion
Restate your perspective and arguments
Provide a final overarching thought on the topic

With reference to phrases and lines from this song, compose an extended or long form essay. Your essay must incorporate dominant ideas of Self, Solitude , Isolation and Society from the pieces of American Literature by Emerson, Whitman and Emily Dickenson

Guaranteed

Listen carefully (headphones recommended) to the above song.

With reference to phrases and lines from this song, compose an extended or long form essay within the range of 750-1000 words.

Watch this trailer (2.35minutes)

Your essay must incorporate dominant ideas of Self, Solitude , Isolation and Society from the pieces of American Literature by Emerson, Whitman and Emily Dickenson

Explain your position including any of the given perspectives that support your position Give an example that supports your position and explain how the example supports your position

Has Technology changed.your everyday lifestyle

Essay Outline
Introduction (Paragraph 1)
Hook – Question, Stat, Hypothetical Situation, etc
Topic summary – Paraphrase the prompt
Introduce your perspective
Include how the other two contrast your perspective.
Body (Paragraphs 2) – Assertion
Start with a transition/topic sentence that discusses YOUR POSITION on the central issue
Explain your position including any of the given perspectives that support your position
Give an example that supports your position and explain how the example supports your position
End the paragraph by summarizing the paragraph
Refutation (Paragraphs 3)

Concession:

Start with a transition/topic sentence that discusses the OPPOSING SIDE of your argument
Discuss the given perspective(s) that would support the opposing argument

Counter:

Explain why you disagree with the opposing perspective
Discuss flaws in reasoning
Give a specific example that could be used to support the opposing perspective
Be sure to discuss how the opposing logic doesn’t work when compared to your position.

Conclusion (Paragraph 4)
Recap your discussion
Restate your perspective and arguments
Provide a final overarching thought on the topic

Drawing on at least one additional assigned text from Weeks 1-5, discuss what Beloved tells us about the experiences and afterlives of chattel slavery in the United States.

Beloved

– Drawing on at least one additional assigned text from Weeks 1-5, discuss what Beloved tells us about the experiences and afterlives of chattel slavery in the United States.
– Response papers should be between 2-3 pages double-spaced in length, and 12-point, standard font.

Part of the American identity involves intervening in the face of injustice. Do you agree with this point? What boundaries should exist to those interventions?

Henry David Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil Government.”

Post 1: Look at Henry David Thoreau’s “Resistance to Civil Government.” He claims that it is not just our right as Americans, but it is also our duty to defy unjust laws. This is a very American idea. Part of the American identity involves intervening in the face of injustice. Do you agree with this point? What boundaries should exist to those interventions? Support your claims using “Resistance to Civil Government” AND one of the other assigned readings from this week.
Criteria:
300 words minimum (excluding quotations and citations)
Include two properly and integrated quotations (one from each work) to support your claims. You may use either direct or paraphrased quotes. See the Literary Analysis Tools Modules in Weeks 1 and 2 for information about integrating and citation quotes.

Explain the ways in which Santiago’s heroism relates to his belief that “a man can be destroyed but not defeated.”

Answer the following question in the form of a short essay.

Your essay should consist of at least five paragraphs (1200 words)
Examine Hemingway’s notion of heroism as it pertains to the character of Santiago in The Old Man and the Sea

How is Santiago a conventionally heroic figure? How is Santiago’s heroism unique or unusual?

Explain the ways in which Santiago’s heroism relates to his belief that “a man can be destroyed but not defeated.”
Cite specific examples from the text in your response.