Describe at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the two outcomes you chose.

/in /by

Reflect: Please take some time to reflect on how the concept of global citizenship has shaped your identity and think about how being a global citizen has made you a better person in your community.

Describe and explain a clear distinction between “globalism” and “globalization” after viewing the video and reading the article.

Describe how being a global citizen in the world of advanced technology can be beneficial to your success in meeting your personal, academic, and professional goals.

Explain why there has been disagreement between theorists about the definition of global citizenship and develop your own definition of global citizenship after reading the article by Reysen and Katzarska-Miller.

Choose two of the six outcomes of global citizenship from the article (i.e., intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, environmental sustainability, intergroup helping, and the level of responsibility to act for the betterment of this world).

Explain why those two outcomes are the most important in becoming a global citizen compared to the others.

Describe at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the two outcomes you chose.
Identify two specific general education courses.

Explain how each course influenced you to become a global citizen.
The Importance of Becoming a Global Citizen

Must be 750 to 1,000 words in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style.
document APA style any information used from sources.
Also, did not find a subject close to class, since the class is General education Capstone

Identify Structural racism issues for African Americans and other people in the neighborhoods within NYC.

/in /by

1) Identify Structural racism issues for African Americans and other people in the neighborhoods within NYC. The neighborhoods are: FLATBUSH and BOROUGH PARK. Focus the essay more on the structural racism toward African-Americans

2) Answer all the questions from at least one or more section of the Structural racism Framework Doc, particularly, SECTION FOUR. You can use outside sources. You don’t have to worry about the comparison of the neighborhood. Just Identify structural racism issue fro African- American in Flatbush and Borough park.

Structural Racism Framework doc:

Copy and paste the link in the search bar to get access to the link. Thank you:)

Below is the direction for the essay.

What does the Ephesus coin hoard tell us about numismatics in the archaeological record?

/in /by

Based on below 4000 essay is required. Also take on board that coins could be used in a more contextual way to address archaeological problems. Also With ephesus coins narrow the focus to allow a very clear argument on a very specific case study. They’ve been excavating at ephesus for more than a century so there may be different structures, deposits, assemblages to talk about

What does the Ephesus coin hoard tell us about numismatics in the archaeological record?

Research Question

Case study: The coins of Ephesus

The following research question will form this essay: Does the archaeology of coins rethink numismatics?
There is evidence of discrepancies in dating coins. For instance, frequent inconsistencies between the manufacture of coins and the date associated with their physical archaeological context.
This paper will explain the numismatic approach that considers the objects’ life biography, cognitive patterns, social relationships, and the various routines of societies that played a central role in the production, use, reuse, and deposition of these coins.

Abstract

In setting out to examine coins in the archaeological discourse, this essay will arghujhb7ue that coins are a critical aspect of material culture, which should be investigated and understood within historical archaeology, their primary, secondary, and tertiary contexts. By integrating case studies into its analysis, the essay will demonstrate how coins incorporate text, existence, and an image to offer much-needed insights into humans’ cultural values, economic matters, the history of state organisations, and their issuers and the agency of objects. Moreover, the paper will reflect on the 19th century, which marks the formative or early archaeology period and the emergence of new archaeological and numismatic concepts and methods. The benefits of understanding coins from archaeological and numismatics perspectives will be discussed, and recommendations regarding the need for an explicit research approach and agenda on the procurement or origin, use and maintenance, and deposition of coins.
Bibliography

Hodder, I. 1989, “Writing Archaeology: Site Reports in Context.” Antiquity 63: 268–74.

Lockyear, K. 2012. “Dating Coins, Dating with Coins.” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 31 2:
191–211.

Schiffer, M.B. 1972, “Archaeological Context and Systemic Context.” American Antiquity 47 2:

156–165.

Further references: Metcalf, William E, ed 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage and also:

Howgego, Christopher et al: Coinage and Identify in the Roman Provinces, 2007, Oxford University Press.

Is mental illness socially constructed?

/in /by

1 McCann, J. (2016) Is mental illness socially constructed? Journal of Applied Psychology and Social Science, 2(1), 1-11 Is Mental Illness Socially Constructed?

Do you think we need religion or faith to be moral?

/in /by

After you’ve had a chance to read the Guest chapter on Religion and Review the PPT, please respond to the following:

There is strong evidence to show that spirituality has existed long before humans existed (Neanderthal rites and burial practices).

We, humans, have developed over the course of our own history many ways to seek spirituality and connect to the divine – all through many religions and theologies, faith practices, rituals, and religious and secular philosophies, etc.

In addition, humans over the thousands of years have always questioned the existence of or the human need for the divine.

In essence – the divine – regardless if it is its acceptance and rejection, has been a huge part of our human history and human thought.

So do you think we need religion or faith to be moral? Can we be “Good without God” Is the need for religion a social good?

Certainly many, many people and many ideas and actions have been done in the name of “God” which have tried to heal our divisions and bring peace. However, there’s a flip side to this as well.

There are no easy answers to these questions. Try your best and remember to THINK LIKE AN ANTHROPOLOGIST!!!!

Explore an archaeological controversy.

/in /by

ANTH 107 Paper Assignment : Controversiesin ArchaeologyThe AssignmentYour final assignment, as introduced in the syllabus, is to explore an archaeological controversy. Your choices are the meaning of Paleolithic art, the extinction of Pleistocene megafauna in the Americas, or the origins of agriculture. For this assignmentyou will tackle ONE of threearchaeologicalcontroversiesby critically analyzing and comparing different interpretations that archaeologists have offered about these topics. You will select your topic from the list below, which makes your life easier since the references are already compiled. This is not a research paper–you do not need to look up everything that has ever been written aboutthese controversies.However, you will need to use allof the readings provided in the list below for your chosen topics. You may consult your notes or textbook where appropriate for additional background information. However, the goal is for you to see what archaeologists themselvesare saying rather than reading about them through secondary sources, such as textbooks or newspapers.The PaperThe paper should be between 1250 and 2000 words (not counting the bibliographyor any direct quotes), and it must be typewritten, double-spaced, and proofreadfor errors. Your paper should begin by introducing the controversy –give background on why it is a controversy, why people care, and what is at stake. Keep this brief, perhaps confining it to the first paragraph. Assumethat your reader is moderately informed about archaeology and human history (like a fellow student in the class), but that he or she does not know this specific problem or why it is important. Next, introduce the two or more interpretive models or explanations that you plan to contrast. Then, systematically compare and evaluate them. You might to do this by presenting one side first and then the other, or you do a point-by-point comparison. You should conclude by briefly stating whichperspective you find the most convincing.Be sure to cite your sources appropriatelyin the body of your paper and with a reference page.You will be graded on (1) how well you present various sides to the controversy, (2) how thoroughly you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the perspectives –which might include logic,use of data, etc., and (3) how thoughtfully you organize the paper. Please remember that this paper is eligible for the Writing Proficiency Requirement(see http://www.umb.edu/academics/wpr/).

Outline the commodity chain for a product (tea leaves) as specifically as possible.

/in /by

The commodity chain analysis paper considers the impact of the commodity in various ways. The paper should outline the commodity chain for a product (tea leaves) as specifically as possible. The paper should also consider, analytically, the consequences of production or consumption on cultural, economic or political globalization. The paper should be organized in sections, with a one to two page section for each of the categories below:

(a) detailed presentation of the commodity chain;

(b) labor conditions under which the commodity is produced;

(c) environmental consequences of the production process;

(d) effects of the production process on people (health, status, etc) in relevant regions;

(e) health effects associated with the consumption of the product;

Your paper should be at least 8 – 10 pages, typed and double-spaced. It should be written in APA style; including a Cover Page, Abstract, 8-10 pages of text, and a works cited page.

 

What are the main aspects of Darwin’s theory of Evolution

/in /by

What are the main aspects of Darwin’s theory of Evolution

Show how the famous social scientist Sigmund Freud contributed to his study in his field in the social sciences.

/in /by

– Add visuals to the docs to match up the information you are presenting in your writing. You will show how the famous social scientist Sigmund Freud contributed to his study in his field in the social sciences.

– You will also explain your findings in your own word. Please thoroughly and explore and answer in detail in your own words and describe the significance/impact of your Social Scientist’s findings on society.

– Explained exactly what the social scientist achieved and provided accurate details. Be sure to clearly explain in your own words. Make sure to used 4 websites and cite them all correctly and properly.

– Be a creative genius and add unique visuals to fit everything your saying. Be sure to well summarized in your own word, and be sure to include relevant images,

– Be sure to talk about how Sigmund Freud’s impacts on society are detailed and clear and are specific.

– Avoid the biography of the person and thoroughly focus on their work and contributions more.

****BE SURE EVERYTHING IS WRITTEN IN YOUR OWN WORDS AND PROVIDE ALOT OF VISUALS IN THE DOC.****

Which of the following classifications of Neanderthals are you most comfortable with, and why? Explain your reasoning, and provide evidence to support your argument.

/in /by

Physical anthropologists must take several factors into account when defining paleospecies, such as morphological variations of skeletal remains, behavioral characteristics, geographical distribution, ecological niches, technological innovations, and timelines. Your textbook classifies Neanderthals as Homo sapiens. However, due to the complex nature of this process, the proper scientific classification of Neanderthals is still being debated. After reading this chapter and viewing the Decoding Neanderthals documentary on the pervious page, provide your informed opinion on this debate…

Which of the following classifications of Neanderthals are you most comfortable with, and why? Explain your reasoning, and provide evidence to support your argument. Consider the definitions and classification processes of a living biological species vs. an extinct paleospecies, and place it within the context of what you think it means to be “fully” human.

+ Homo neanderthalensis (classifies them as a separate species from modern humans)
+ Homo sapiens neanderthalensis (classifies them as a sub-species of modern humans, indicating that they were undergoing the speciation process but had not yet completed it)
+ Homo sapiens (classifies them as the same species as modern humans)