What cultural values of the Anglo-Saxons are revealed in this text? (Be careful to note the Christian influence that is most likely not original.)
What motivates Beowulf’s behavior? Grendel’s?
How does the language of the text impact the reader/listener?
Battery Operated Vehicles, Electrics cars. MUST USE Galileo! 9 SOURCES TOTOAL -4 scholarly/peer-reviewed/academic sources from Galileo -2 books from Gil or Galileo -2 “other” Galileo sources -1 CREDIBLE internet search engine source Annotations should include: Type of Source Credibility of author/source Summary of the source topic How you plan to use the source Possible Quotes (Be sure to use quotation marks and provide in-text citations including page numbers) try: ABI/INFORM – a business database (“electronic vehicle” market, or brand names like Prius, hybrid, etc.) GreenFILE – an environmental science database (“electronic vehicle” benefits. I think they will give two different perspectives. for additional keywords: infrastructure (like charging stations) perception benefits (environment) Are you thinking about personal cars or commercial vehicles (shipping, tractor trailers, etc) The infrastructure (charging stations, etc.) Perception and market share (What are the car companies developing? Tesla v. Toyota v. something else) government policies and or other market incentives
1. Identify and explain the role rhetorical appeals and the rhetorical triangle can play in non-fiction print and/or multimodal texts.
4. Locate, accurately cite (through summary, paraphrasing, and quoting) and critically evaluate primary and secondary sources.
5. Demonstrate knowledge of writing as a process, including consideration of peer and/or instructor feedback, in one or more pieces of writing from initial draft to final revision.
So far, we have discussed and analyzed rhetorical appeals in the context of both textual and visual rhetoric. This essay asks you to apply those skills to two argumentative texts of your choosing about your research topic, and to make an argument about how your selected texts communicate rhetorically to appeal to their intended audiences. Not only will this assignment help you hone your analytical and close reading skills, but it will also help you think about the importance of considering context and audience in your own writing. One of the first major steps in building on your skills as a writer is becoming conscious and aware of how arguments are made and what makes them persuasive. This will help you improve your ability to deliberately incorporate effective rhetoric into your own writing.
For this 1000-1250-word assignment, choose two argumentative pieces of rhetoric relevant to your research question. One source should be a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article and one source should be a long-form magazine article (e.g. an article published in the Atlantic or a New York Times editorial). Analyze how well their components work together to persuade or move their audiences. Rather than engaging heavily with the content of the chosen pieces, this assignment asks you to focus on how the authors are making the arguments. To successfully complete this task, please use the following questions as your guidance:
Think about the rhetorical situation of the articles: What is the rhetorical situation of each piece? Where is it published? What audiences are addressed?
Think about the argument in each piece: Are the arguments timely and exigent? What rhetorical appeals are used (ethos, logos, and pathos)?
The audience for this piece is, at the same time, similar to and different from your previous assignment. While your text will be read by your classmates and the instructor for feedback and learning purposes, you should also picture your essay as a part of an academic conversation, which means it will be of interest to other participants in that conversation. Your academic audience is interested not only in the issue addressed by your chosen texts, but also in the implications of the rhetorical strategies used by individuals who argue about that issue. As academics, they value close, insightful analysis. Additionally, while they expect a certain level of formality and structure, they are interested in reading lively, personable essays.
Playing in jazz band, refereeing soccer, both dynamic fast paced environments that allow me to be creative within approximate structures based on sport rules or music theory. Explain how the freedom makes me feel. Similarly golf, math, programming are similar in their solitary, meticulous and designed around the pursuit of perfection. Compare and contrast these experiences. How do they each inform my pursuit of the other? Do these two represent two sides of my personality? What lessons do I take about life from these different forms of expression?
I like to learn about all sorts of things and chase down more knowledge with questions. I had an experience with a teacher that made me think about the topics/people I regarded with skepticism and those that I don’t. I am skeptical about human/social things like politics, but trusting of topics and people related to technical topics like math or programming. Explain how this experience with teacher made me interact differently with human/social topics or technical topics and how that enriched my life. Than not everything can be perfectly logical.
Assignment Purpose
This assignment gives you experience in writing a set Instructions for a non-specialist audience. Instructions spell out the steps necessary to complete a task or set of tasks.
This assignment also offers you the opportunity to develop the following:
Written Communication Skills
In writing for a non-specialist audience, you will practice many of the features of good writing that we have identified as a class:
Clarity
Organization, including visual organization
Concision
Tasks
1. Decide on a task or set of tasks to write instructions for. Previous WR 320 students have written about:
Inserting an acupuncture needle into a trigger point
planning a character strategy in a computer game
soldering fine metals for jewelry
trailering a horse
parsing a string of hexadecimal characters to decimal numbers
The task should be one your are very familiar with and sufficiently complex to require detailed instructions.
2. Plan your draft by reviewing the criteria for success and one or two sets of instructions that you have personally found helpful in the past.
3. Draft your instructions. About 800 words.
Divide the task into two or three major sections and title them. The more specific your title is, the more helpful it will be to the reader.
Working from the titled sections, draft out as many steps as necessary for each. You may want to bullet or number the steps in each section. Anticipate as best you can what a non-specialist might need to know in order to follow your instructions. Consider whether visual aids are necessary and what hazards might need to be avoided along the way.
Write an introduction. This is the place to provide background information and also an
explanation as to why someone might want to perform the task in the first place. For instance, why in the world might someone want to transform his or her bicycle from a multi-geared bike, to a bike with a single gear and without the capacity to coast? What are the benefits to completing your set of instructions?
Some considerations:
Audience
You will be testing your instructions with your base group. As you write your instructions, be sure to notice terms or words your audience wouldn’t know and define them. You will also need to describe an equipment necessary to follow your instructions.
Layout
As single-spaced instructions are easier to follow, you may single space for this assignment. In fact, you may experiment more broadly with page designs that you think organize and present your instructions in the most usable fashion. You might also use images that you create to guide your audience through the task.
Criteria for Evaluation
This assignment is considered complete when you have submitted document to this assignment that is about 800 words and attempts all of the following elements:
Clear and limiting title that accurately defines the task at hand
Introduction: Provide background and explain the benefits of performing the task
Logically ordered steps: usually chronological order
Division of complex tasks into sections with sub-steps
Appropriate level of detail
Hazard notes and warnings
Language of instruction: imperative mood, direct address, and active verbs
Page design and text layout that lends itself to rapid comprehension
Includes 2-3 major sections with enough
Includes an introduction that provides a logical and compelling reason someone might need your instructions
Is ready for audience testing in class
Freedman book
What did the Freedman book teach you about writing?
What impressed you and why?
What lessons or examples were new and prompted you to think how you could use those tactics in your own writing?
What are the three specific and most important takeaways for you and why?
Make this essay thoughtful; be analytical of your own work.
Cite specific pages in your essay.
What do you most want to remember and apply in your own writing?
Remember: Freedman is particularly good at writing about the use of people, keeping things simple, the suitcase theory, and the rule of threes. Those can be prompts for your essay, but be sure to add others of your own selection.
Do not simply praise or criticize the book—this is not a book report.
Do not waste a single word writing the title or Freedman’s name.
Be thoughtful and insightful about your own writing, and tell us what you think you learned.
Freedman book
What did the Freedman book teach you about writing?
What impressed you and why?
What lessons or examples were new and prompted you to think how you could use those tactics in your own writing?
What are the three specific and most important takeaways for you and why?
Make this essay thoughtful; be analytical of your own work.
Cite specific pages in your essay.
What do you most want to remember and apply in your own writing?
Remember: Freedman is particularly good at writing about the use of people, keeping things simple, the suitcase theory, and the rule of threes. Those can be prompts for your essay, but be sure to add others of your own selection.
Do not simply praise or criticize the book—this is not a book report.
Do not waste a single word writing the title or Freedman’s name.
Be thoughtful and insightful about your own writing, and tell us what you think you learned.
Descriptive narrative on sibling bond
As you begin working on this project, consider the basic elements. What draws you to the subject? What is your role in it? Who else is involved, if anyone? What structure works best as a framework for the piece – a list, a chronology, a definition, a structured argument, a narrative, the interview form, something else? Does the use of narrative involve several narratives or focus on different aspects of one narrative? What meaning does the story have? Meaning points to the idea you are trying to explain. What is the essential notion you wish to impart to the reader? What emotion? Respond to these questions in your journal or notebook as you develop your idea.
It Takes More Than Good Looks to succeed at Television News Reporting
What you think about his tips, tricks and ideas.
What has caught your eye?
What does he do that you might want to consider doing for your own work?
What impressed you about the pages you’ve read.
What has struck a chord in you thus far?
You should use the text and cite page numbers or chapters; you might include brief quotes from the book, and since all the stories are also available on Youtube, you can make references to those too in your essay.
Why – why this assignment?
Freedman is a terrific storyteller who expresses himself well in both print and on video. You too are burgeoning storytellers. His tips and tricks are less about a dusty old text and more from real life-lessons on the streets.
His stories are profiles, always featuring people. He uses characters wisely and well to engage his audience, to give them someone they can relate to, or have empathy for.
Are you doing (thinking) the same way. Maybe, you should?
For goodness sake, be sure to proofread your work and use spellcheck and grammarly.com.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.