Do you think that illegal criminological field research and criminological Verstehen are considered important methodological strategies? How could you achieve Verstehen when conducting criminology research?

Discussion Forum 1

Discussion 1

1. Do you think that illegal criminological field research and criminological Verstehen are considered important methodological strategies?

2. How could you achieve Verstehen when conducting criminology research?

Answer both questions. At least 2 paragraphs with 5 sentences per paragraph, (points will be deducted for spelling and grammatical errors).
Make sure that your responses are comprehensive.

 

What impact did this have in terms of the department’s overall effectiveness in the short and long term? Given that there are 22 agencies in the Department of Homeland Security, how well do you think they work together given their diverse roles and responsibilities? Of the 22 agencies that comprise the Department of Homeland Security, which ones are you familiar with based on your consumption of news and current events?

Module 2 Homeland Security

1. Politics played a key role in the formation of the Department of Homeland Security. What impact did this have in terms of the department’s overall effectiveness in the short and long term?

2. Given that there are 22 agencies in the Department of Homeland Security, how well do you think they work together given their diverse roles and responsibilities?

3. Of the 22 agencies that comprise the Department of Homeland Security, which ones are you familiar with based on your consumption of news and current events?

4. What role does the Department of Defense play in homeland security?

5. Do you believe that immigration and border security are major homeland security issues? Why?

6. Since FEMA is the only agency that responds to natural disasters, do you believe it should be place in another federal department? Why?

Discuss the importance of a well-written narrative case report. How is this legal document essential to the prosecution of criminals? What are the various parts?

Narrative case report

Discuss the importance of a well-written narrative case report. How is this legal document essential to the prosecution of criminals? What are the various parts? (200 words or more, 100 points)

Discuss the guidelines to the process of note-taking, creating an outline, and then transferring that information into a professional case report.

Note-Taking

Discuss the guidelines to the process of note-taking, creating an outline, and then transferring that information into a professional case report. (200 words or more, 100 points)

Explain the processes.

The assignment:
a) Discuss the guidelines to the process of Note-Taking.
b) Discuss the guidelines to the process of creating an outline.
c) Discuss the guidelines to the process of transferring the information into a professional case report.

Research a specific incident involving police officer conduct that has been called into question. Identify and briefly describe the incident. Explain what ethical codes would guide the officer in an ethical response to this situation and how these codes relate to morality and legal responsibility in this incident. Explain whether there were any policy violations or policies that may warrant change considering the incident. Describe the handling of the situation by the criminal justice system. Were any changes made based upon the incident? If so, were those changes affected by outside influences or pressure?

Social Justice Reform Research Paper

In the past decade, operational policies of police agencies across the United States have been steadily called into question in response to incidents involving alleged racially biased policing. Social justice reform groups have been formed to demand change and accountability within the criminal justice system.

Research a specific incident involving police officer conduct that has been called into question.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you do the following:

Identify and briefly describe the incident.
Explain what ethical codes would guide the officer in an ethical response to this situation and how these codes relate to morality and legal responsibility in this incident.
Explain whether there were any policy violations or policies that may warrant change considering the incident.
Describe the handling of the situation by the criminal justice system. Were any changes made based upon the incident? If so, were those changes affected by outside influences or pressure?
Determine through your research whether the situation was handled appropriately in the criminal justice system, or if there was a better course of action. Justify your answer.

Reference at least 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

What is the Mexican Mafia? What are some of the criminal activities of the Mexican Mafia?

 Mexican Mafia

What is the Mexican Mafia? What are some of the criminal activities of the Mexican Mafia?

Post your questions pertaining to creating an annotated bibliography in proper APA format and answer their classmate’s questions pertaining to creating an annotated bibliography.

W3: Creating An Annotated Bibliography in Proper APA Format

Discussion #3
Prior to attempting this week’s discussion read the information in week 3’s lesson. Students are to post their questions pertaining to creating an annotated bibliography in proper APA format and answer their classmate’s questions pertaining to creating an annotated bibliography. Students are to share with their classmates at least 2 helpful hints they feel will assist others with creating an annotated bibliography in proper APA format. Also, students are to post an example of a couple of annotated bibliographies done in proper APA format.

Discussion Guidelines

Start a New Thread
Filter by. All Threads %,
MARK- WEEK 3
Sort by:
Least Recent Activity

Indicate if the wrongful conviction was based upon unethical practices by the police, court, probationary personnel, or witnesses. Describe how the conviction was appealed and whether the defendant received any reparations. Indicate if the justice system targeted those responsible for the wrongful conviction and whether they were prosecuted for their conduct. Describe what could be done to avoid such behaviors in the future.

Wrongfully convicted

Research a case in which an inmate was wrongfully convicted and eventually released based upon new evidence.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you do the following:

Indicate if the wrongful conviction was based upon unethical practices by the police, court, probationary personnel, or witnesses.
Describe how the conviction was appealed and whether the defendant received any reparations.
Indicate if the justice system targeted those responsible for the wrongful conviction and whether they were prosecuted for their conduct.
Describe what could be done to avoid such behaviors in the future.

Reference at least 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

Indicate if the wrongful conviction was based upon unethical practices by the police, court, probationary personnel, or witnesses. Describe how the conviction was appealed and whether the defendant received any reparations. Indicate if the justice system targeted those responsible for the wrongful conviction and whether they were prosecuted for their conduct. Describe what could be done to avoid such behaviors in the future.

Research a case in which an inmate was wrongfully convicted and eventually released based upon new evidence.

 

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you do the following:

Indicate if the wrongful conviction was based upon unethical practices by the police, court, probationary personnel, or witnesses.
Describe how the conviction was appealed and whether the defendant received any reparations.
Indicate if the justice system targeted those responsible for the wrongful conviction and whether they were prosecuted for their conduct.
Describe what could be done to avoid such behaviors in the future.

 

Identify the facts, including all parties involved. Indicate the rights and responsibilities of each party. Identify relevant values, concepts, social constraints, and any additional information necessary for an accurate understanding of the case. Identify all possible ethical dilemmas for each party involved. Decide what is the most immediate ethical issue facing the decision-making individual.

Week 1: The Mad Bomber

A madman who has threatened to explode several bombs in crowded areas has been apprehended. Unfortunately, he has already planted the bombs and they are scheduled to go off in a short time. It is possible that hundreds of people may die. The authorities cannot make him divulge the location of the bombs by conventional methods. He refuses to say anything and requests a lawyer to protect his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. In exasperation, some high level official suggests torture. This would be illegal, but the official is sure that it will make him tell the truth in time for you to find and defuse the bombs. What should you do? What if you know that the bomber can withstand torture himself, but would talk if you were to torture his innocent wife instead?

Discuss this case, using a different ethical system than you used in a previous discussion question.

1.Identify the facts, including all parties involved. Indicate the rights and responsibilities of each party.

2. Identify relevant values, concepts, social constraints, and any additional information necessary for an accurate understanding of the case.

3. Identify all possible ethical dilemmas for each party involved.

4. Decide what is the most immediate ethical issue facing the decision-making individual.

5. Describe one ethical system.

6. Apply that ethical system to this case. Do not use your default ethical system. Think about the ethical system you selected. How would that ethical system decide what is right and wrong in this case?

7. Describe one concept of justice.

8. Apply that concept of justice to this case. That is, do not default to what you think should be done to correct this situation. What would the concept of justice you selected say about how to achieve justice in this situation?

9. Sum it up – Resolve the ethical or moral dilemma by using the ethical system and concept of justice you described. Since you’ve describe an ethical system defining right and wrong and a concept of justice defining how to remediate this situation, what should you do?

10. Use evidence from the text, lecture, or outside sources to support your claims.

The steps above will give you practice in selecting and applying an ethical system and a concept of justice. Starting next week, your case study responses will become much more robust. Look at the upcoming assignments to make sure you are prepared.