Using the required resources for this module and through research on the subject, develop an essay that:
Describe the organizational theories applicable to law enforcement.
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each theory as it relates to law enforcement.
Read the textbook “Criminology: Theories, Patterns and Typologies 13th Edition” (Chapter 11) by Larry J. Seigel and answer this question: What constitutes treason? Include a discussion of traditional espionage and industrial espionage.
Make sure to use evidence from the chapter & must be 3 paragraphs in length
Review Chapter 10, “Race and Ethnicity,” in your textbook, Experience Sociology, Fourth Edition. Also review Chapter 17, “Social Change: Globalization, Population, and Social Movements.”
Develop an essay arguing how conflict can develop within social movements as a result of the involvement of the dominant majority in movements for marginalized minority groups. Include in your essay your own opinion about whether minority social movements should include members of the dominant majority.
Week Eight Assignment: For this assignment, write a 1000 Word APA 7th edition formatted paper using our weekly readings, America Burning, America Burning Revisited, America at Risk, the internet as well as professional journals, articles and other academically recognized sources on the following topic:
Address the historical progression of the fire problem in the United States. Identify and delineate on several factors that help explain the disparity between the high aggregate costs of fire for the nation, states, and communities, and lower perceptions of fire risks and costs. What are the ramifications of ignoring fire prevention and education?
Make sure to read Fire Death Rate Trends in order to help formulate your opinion.
General Instructions:
Respond to the questions below. Single space your answers with 12 point font. Write at least one page per question – you may write more. Use headings and keep the paper well organized. If you copy and paste the question into your response, please ensure that you write one page at least. You may collaborate and you may use any sources you wish including our text, videos, slides, and outside sources. You may use your PCAs but do not simply cut and past them (particularly for the short answers in Q#1).
Question #1: Use the DIRE structure (Define, In other words, Relevance, Example) to explain five out of the eight concepts below. Your choice.
A Exclusionary Rule
B Fourth Amendment
C Nationalization of US Constitution
D Searches not requiring a warrant
E Stop and Frisk
F Probable Cause
G Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
H Reasonable Suspicion
Question #2: For the past two months we have been considering the tension between liberty and security. Write a one-page response to the questions below:
A. Does the tension result in a balancing of important rights, or an erosion of important rights?
B. What is the US Supreme Court’s role in resolving this tension over time?
C. What role do the police play in balancing the interests of liberty and security?
D. What recommendations would you make to improve the ability of police and the courts to balance the sometimes conflicting interests of liberty and security?
Question #3: Several weeks ago, we watched a short documentary regarding the tensions that spilled over on January 6, 2021 (the “Capitol Riot”) concerning the 2020 US Presidential Election. Considering the video and news objectively and not politically, what issues regarding policing, the Constitution, crimes, arrests, public and private property, were revealed, as relevant to our study?
Question #4: Review the US Supreme Court case summary below regarding Torres v Madrid (Sup Ct., slip opinion, March 25, 2021)
Part A: Apply the IRAC structure to the Torres case in order to provide a summary of the case (case brief).
• Issue(s)
• Rule(s)
• Application to the facts
• Conclusion(s)
Part B
• Consider the Torres v. Madrid et al. case and apply it to any issues we have discussed including US Constitutional application to states, the 4th Amendment, seizures, use of force, police conduct, role of the US Supreme Court, and any other you think are important.
Discuss the employee performance evaluation rater and rating errors. Which errors do you feel are most common? Have you ever experienced an evaluation where the rater made any or all of these errors?
As a police supervisor, do you feel you are more of a category I or category II time manager?> why do you feel that way? Please provide in detail the steps you would follow in becoming a category II supervisor.
General Instructions:
Respond to the questions below. Single space your answers with 12 point font. Write at least one page per question – you may write more. Use headings and keep the paper well organized. If you copy and paste the question into your response, ensure that you write one page at least. You may collaborate and you may use any sources you wish including our text, videos, slides, and outside sources. You may use your PCAs but do not simply cut and past them (particularly for the short answers in Q#1).
Question #1:
Use the DIRE structure (Define, In other words, Relevance, Example) to explain five out of the eight concepts below. Your choice.
A Exclusionary Rule
B Fourth Amendment
C Nationalization of US Constitution
D Searches not requiring a warrant
E Stop and Frisk
F Probable Cause
G Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
H Reasonable Suspicion
Question #2:
For the past two months we have been considering the tension between liberty and security. Write a one-page response to the questions below:
A. Does the tension result in a balancing of important rights, or an erosion of important rights?
B. What is the US Supreme Court’s role in resolving this tension over time?
C. What role do the police play in balancing the interests of liberty and security?
D. What recommendations would you make to improve the ability of police and the courts to balance the sometimes conflicting interests of liberty and security?
Question #3:
Several weeks ago, we watched a short documentary regarding the tensions that spilled over on January 6, 2021 (the “Capitol Riot”) concerning the 2020 US Presidential Election. Considering the video and news objectively and not politically, what issues regarding policing, the Constitution, crimes, arrests, public and private property, were revealed, as relevant to our study?
Question #4:
Review the US Supreme Court case summary below regarding Torres v Madrid (Sup Ct., slip opinion, March 25, 2021)
Part A: Apply the IRAC structure to the Torres case in order to provide a summary of the case (case brief).
• Issue(s)
• Rule(s)
• Application to the facts
• Conclusion(s)
Part B
• Consider the Torres v. Madrid et al. case and apply it to any issues we have discussed including US Constitutional application to states, the 4th Amendment, seizures, use of force, police conduct, role of the US Supreme Court, and any other you think are important.
Assume you are a detective assigned to the Sam Sheppard case. Develop and submit at least 12 interrogation questions based on the case. Use your assigned readings to gather information on the case.
Target one suspect (the person they believe committed the murder of Marilyn Sheppard) with the 12 pertinent questions.
The list of questions will be graded on how well they fit the nondirective interview style, their pertinence to the available evidence, and their focus on the interviewee’s actions and motives.
The first two questions may be general information-gathering (rapport) questions, but they must progressively move toward the development of specific facts based on your theory of the crime and fit the profile of the questions described in Lecture 5.
Explain the importance of completeness and accuracy in the incident report and officers witness statements written by the initial responding officers. How will the contents of these reports be used as the basis of a request for a search warrant?
You will write an 8–10 page APA–style paper on the topic of your choice. The paper will need to explain the
historical context, describe the applicable legislation, describe and analyze the main features of the topic, and
discuss any controversies surrounding the topic. Provide an argument towards the end of your paper discussing
what you think and what influenced opinions/decisions on this topic—whether it be from the judiciary, the
public, or some other relevant institution or group. The paper must be in APA format, double spaced, 12–point
Times New Roman font, and with normal 2.54 cm margins all around. It should be a maximum of 8–10 pages
not including the reference list pages. Refer to ‘Grading Rubric B’ (Appendix B) in the syllabus. If you
would like to write on a topic that is not listed email me for approval through MyLS.
You may write about one of the topics generally, or focus on a specific case (e.g., a specific sexual offender,
first responder, a case before the Ontario Review Board, etc.).
Suggested Topics:
• The Mental Health of First Responders
• Prisons and Mental Health
• Mental Health Courts
• Ontario Review Board
• Psychiatry and the Criminal Justice System
• Sexual Offenders
• The Relationship between Mental Health and Criminality
• Patient Rights
• Unconditional Discharges
• Treatment (historical or current)
• Institutionalization
• Criminalization of the Mentally Ill
The paper will need to:
• Explain the historical context.
• Describe the applicable legislation.
• Describe and analyze the main features of the topic.
• Discuss any controversies with an argument in the end of what you think and what influenced that opinion.
Remember:
• Work independently
• Include a clear and concise thesis statement/research question in the introduction of your paper
• Use sub–headings to organize your paper
• Consult the Purdue OWL website for help with APA formatting
• Proofread your paper before submitting for clarity, grammar, punctuation, etc.;
contact me through MyLS if you have any questions or concerns.
You are tasked with identifying and discussing at least three (3) factors/issues that were covered in class, presented in the textbook, or discussed by a Guest Speaker that figured predominately in Ronald Cotton’s arrest, conviction, and incarceration for the sexual assault of Jennifer Thompson. Lastly, you will discuss whether or not you believe the criminal justice system (the police, the courts, and the correctional system) did anything wrong, improper, or unethical in their pursuit of justice for Jennifer Thompson and in the arrest of Ronald Cotton.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.