How do you respond? Do you have any ethical issues with lying to the suspect about the existence of his fingerprints on the body?

You are a homicide investigator and are interrogating someone you believe picked up a nine year old girl in a shopping mall, molested her and murdered her. He is a registered sex offender. He was in the area when the crimes occurred. Although he does not have any significant prior convictions for violent crime, you believe there are no other possible suspects who had the means, opportunity and motive. You have some circumstantial evidence because he was seen on video following the child at the mall, but you have no solid physical evidence. (Remember to take my criminal law and evidence classes for a better understanding of the differences between these two types of evidence.) You’re going to need him to admit the crimes to prove up your case.

After several hours of getting nowhere, you have an idea. You ask one of your colleagues to come into the interrogation room and with a file folder and a false story. Your fellow detective quickly agrees. She barges into the room, tosses the folder on the table and tells the suspect that the medical examiner lifted his prints from the victim’s body. You immediately tell him that he lost his chance to confess because now he is facing the death penalty. He quickly responds that he will say anything you want him to if the death penalty is taken off the table.

How do you respond? Do you have any ethical issues with lying to the suspect about the existence of his fingerprints on the body? Does it matter if you had already Mirandized him? Would you tell the prosecutor assigned to the case what you did to obtain his admissions?

provide detail as to how you would implement an evaluation study to answer questions that haven’t been answered in the existing literature.

This is a PEP (Program Evaluation Project) The same guidelines as Order#7544603

Remember that the purpose of this assignment is to provide detail as to how you would implement an evaluation study to answer questions that haven’t been answered in the existing literature.

Please use the subheadings below for your outline so that you are sure to address all of the required components of your plan:

Key Features of the Program Being Evaluated
Evaluation Questions and Performance Measures (What questions do you want to answer?)
Data Collection Plan and Evaluation Methodology (What data will you use to answer these questions?)
Analytical Strategy
This outline should be 4-5 pages (double-spaced, 12 pt font, normal margins). This assignment is worth 10% of your grade.

Identify the independent and dependent variable(s) for each hypothesis.

Assignment: Experimental DesignRead the ​Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: A Summary Report​. Include a referencepage in APA format.

1.State the five hypotheses examined in the study (p. 2 of report).

2.Identify the independent and dependent variable(s) for each hypothesis. (Hint: Theindependent variable is the same for all the hypotheses.)

3.State how these variables are operationalized, i.e., how were the dependent variables measured? What was the conceptual definition of the independent variable and how wasit operationalized?

4.Define and discuss the validity (i.e., face, criterion-related) of the dependent measures.

5.Describe the setting for the experiment including the demographics of the population, thestudy area, and the police officers.

6.Outline the procedures used by the researchers to conduct the study, i.e., how were thebeats divided up? What steps were taken to collect the data for each measure?

7.State the research design used (it differs for each of the dependent variable measures).

8.What are the major findings (briefly – a few sentences)?

9.Define and discuss the validity of the study (internal, external, construct, statisticalconclusion).

10.Discuss any ethical concerns in the study

what are the fundamental ways these bias are created and what kinds of impact do they have on us?

Please listen to how Islamophobia is designed and spread — what are the fundamental ways these bias are created and what kinds of impact do they have on us? Please examine your own perspectives and share your thoughts as you listen to her presentation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiEQmcZi8cM

Explain the rationale for your study; convince the reader that your research questions are important

• It identifies the important concepts of the paper and specifies the major findings or perspective
• Make the title informative and meaningful on its own
• Be specific
• Be concise (avoid “empty” words and phrases)
• Write the title with your audience in mind (don’t discourage or confuse potential readers)
• Avoid highly technical or specialized terminology
• Avoid abbreviations (except those widely recognized like DNA, RNA, etc.)
• The title is often one of the last things written
Introduction
• Sets the stage for your scientific argument and should grab the reader’s interest
• Orient the reader to the research topic by summarizing pertinent literature written and published by other scientists who are doing related research
• Go from general to specific
• Explain the rationale for your study; convince the reader that your research questions are important
• Place your study in the context of previous research
• State your objectives or your hypothesis
• Much of this section will be in the present tense. (The convention for verb tense is as follows: use the past tense when reporting your own immediate findings, and the present tense when discussing the published works of others.)
• The last sentences of the Introduction Section should include (1) a statement of the purpose of the study (the “why”) and (2) the “how” with respect to addressing the purpose. For example: The purpose of the present study was to …. In order to …, we….
• An important aspect of both the Introduction and Discussion sections is that by their nature they include a review of the published literature or a “Literature Review”

Which “Verb Tense” Do I Write In?
CONSISTENCY OF VERB TENSE helps ensure smooth expression in your writing.
USE PAST TENSE. . .
• To describe your methodology and report your results.
• When you write it, its already done.
• When referring to the work of previous researchers.
• To describe a fact, law or finding that is no longer considered valid and relevant.

USE PRESENT TENSE. . .
• To express findings that continue to be true.
• Use present tense to express general truths or facts or conclusions supported by research results that are unlikely to change – in other words, something that is believed to be always true:
• Genetic information is encoded in the sequence of nucleotides on DNA.
• Use the present tense in reference to the thesis or dissertation itself and what it contains, shows, etc.
• To discuss your findings and present your conclusions. Also use present tense to discuss results and their implications.

How does deviant behavior differ from criminal behavior?

Explain the concept of deviance. How does deviant behavior differ from criminal behavior? Due Thursday, October 15 at midnight.

Are there any other factors that might affect your decision in this matter.

You are a rookie officer on patrol. You observe a young African American male drive past you in a new silver Porsche. You estimate the car’s value at approximately $50,000.00, but the neighborhood you are patrolling consists of low-income housing, cheap apartments and small neglected houses. You decide to follow him. While doing so, you see him fail to use his turn signal while changing lanes. What do you do and why? Are there any other factors that might affect your decision in this matter.

Explain in detail the risk-factor approach to intervention/prevention efforts.

Explain in detail the risk-factor approach to intervention/prevention efforts. What are the pros to using the risk factor approach? What are the cons to using the risk factor approach?

Describe major issues related to border patrol and drug trafficking.

Create a 2 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation on global issues related to drugs. Include the following:

Describe major issues related to border patrol and drug trafficking.

Include detailed speaker notes.

Include a minimum of one sources.

Format any citations in your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.