Qualify your discussion and explain the limits of it. For example, even after health service organization is defined, which ones or one you are meaning may need to be limited or described.

/in /by

Economic benefit for a particular health services organization

Select one topic. Develop the question you want to address from the list or get one approved. Plan the approach and analysis you will take to address the question. Define your terms. Do not assume concepts like universal healthcare are commonly understood. If that were the term, one would need to describe who will provide what and how it will be achieved. There is no universal way that is done. You will also need to describe the context for some terms, like market. If you only mention market, the reader will not know if you mean the theoretical non-existent perfectly competitive model economists use as a beginning basis to discuss and explain how changes might be explained, or do you mean real market that is some combination of a planned and market system.
Qualify your discussion and explain the limits of it. For example, even after health service organization is defined, which ones or one you are meaning may need to be limited or described. Avoid making unfounded generalizations. Be precise and support your statements as needed.
Research your issue sufficiently. Include a minimum of three references from peer-reviewed journals Qualify your discussion and explain the limits of it. For example, even after health service organization is defined, which ones or one you are meaning may need to be limited or described. . Use the text, the resources in contents, like KFF. Analyze and summarize your sources in an organized way as you develop your analysis. Recognize the limits of your review of the literature, some sources being particularly relevant, and others not so much. If your conclusion varies from those sources that do not support it, explain how and why. Regardless how limited your analysis is, reach a conclusion, but reach one that can be supported given your ideas and the literature you discover.

What constitutes this case as a crisis? How is this debt crisis classed, racialized, gendered, and otherwise prejudicial and/or predatory in its structure and consequences? Who profits from the crisis and who are most adversely impacted in terms of exposure to risk, access to assistance, and adverse health impacts?

/in /by

Consumer Debt Crisis

This essay assignment asks that you research a significant debt crisis (past, current, or impending) and make an analytical argument as to its political significance beyond the events of its specific history. You may consider a particular market of consumer debt or a certain case of sovereign debt within a specific geography and historical period (e.g., medical debt crisis in the US post 9/11). Include details of the crisis’ history, causes, and effects that are relevant to your overall argument. This is not a book report—be selective about the descriptive information you include and provide citations for all such information. The bulk of the essay should rather be composed of your analysis of the economic, political, historical, and geographic factors that structure this specific debt crisis, and your argument as to the overall political lesson we can glean from engaging with this specific case.

In the course of your analysis, you may want to consider the following: What constitutes this case as a crisis? How is this debt crisis classed, racialized, gendered, and otherwise prejudicial and/or predatory in its structure and consequences? Who profits from the crisis and who are most adversely impacted in terms of exposure to risk, access to assistance, and adverse health impacts? What type of discourse (explanatory genres, narrative representations) surround this debt crisis and what capitalist myths and notions of morality, human nature, the state and society does this discourse naturalize? What is the role (potential or actual) of austerity, stimulus, relief, (corporate) welfare in structuring the crisis and its resolution? Engaging with these questions should function in service to your overall argument, in which you derive a generalizable political lesson from this particular case of debt-related crisis.

Explain how different schools of thought would conclude the data. I.e. how would Neoclassical and Classical schools view this data. Is one wrong and is the other right? Why?

/in /by

Impact of Financialization on Public Health

You must produce a Report on the above topic in a format like this:

In addition, you will also need to upload the excel file with the data used in the report.

Tips for the Report:

– Explain how different schools of thought would conclude the data. I.e. how would Neoclassical and Classical schools view this data. Is one wrong and is the other right? Why?

– Is the data an example of a Simpsons Paradox?

– Is the data an example of how correlation is used to provide a sort of backing to a point and not denote the causation?

– Present data well

– Don’t say more that needs to be said. Say “this could be part of this reason or something else” not say, “This proves my point”.

To what extent has the “National Women Policy” been effective in increasing the female labour participation rate in the STEM field, in Klang Valley?

/in /by

National Women Policy

To what extent has the “National Women Policy” been effective in increasing the female labor participation rate in the STEM field, in Klang Valley?

Is China’s involvement in East Africa’s economy a front to take over the region for strategic purposes?

/in /by

Economic Development vs Debt Trap:

Is China’s involvement in East Africa’s economy a front to take over the region for strategic purposes? A case study of Tanzania.

Focus on the effects the merger had on the market and competition; did the merger lead to monopoly practices such as price discrimination? Was there any retaliation or accusations of a monopoly? If so so how was it resolved?

/in /by

AT&T/Time Warner Merger

Write a substantive research paper on the merger between companies AT&T and Time Warner.
This paper should include the details of the merger; what changed within the company in regards to pricing, processes and other policies.
Also focus on the effects the merger had on the market and competition; did the merger lead to monopoly practices such as price discrimination? Was there any retaliation or accusations of a monopoly? If so so how was it resolved?

what’s the intent? What are the major historical and conceptual issues stressed? What are the major points made? What would you like to know more about-or what did the economists not talk about that you thought might have been talked about.

/in /by

Knut Wicksell and Irving Fisher.

Write an analysis paper on the economists Knut Wicksell and Irving Fisher. Focus on marginal productivity theory, especially of factor prices, capital theory, and the macro-dynamics of money, interest and prices.
Please make sure to include the following points: A short introduction to the thinkers. This might include a brief summary of the context in which the economist is writing, and-thus-what motivated his thinking. It might also include why the issues were thought to be important.
Try to identify the question they are trying to answer; what’s the intent? What are the major historical and conceptual issues stressed? What are the major points made? What would you like to know more about-or what (if anything) did the economists not talk about that you thought might have been talked about.

Evaluate the nature and significance of external economic relations for China and India immediately before the emergence of European sea-borne trading links from c.1500.

/in /by

EC120 The World Economy in Historical Perspective

Evaluate the nature and significance of external economic relations for China and India immediately before the emergence of European sea-borne trading links from c.1500. Discuss how the economies of these regions were affected by the expanding influence of European traders during the three centuries before 1800.

What evidence does the author present in support of their argument? How convincing is the author’s argument? Are there any issues or potential problems that you can see? What are the article’s strengths? What are the articles weaknesses? How has the article advanced our understanding of a specific scholarly debate?

/in /by

The critique of “The Economics of Guilds” by Ogilvie

Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “The Economics of Guilds.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28, no. 4 (2014): 169–92.

Sources:

1) Use the main article – The economics of guilds (the essay critique is based on the this article that we need to critically analyse)

2) Use other articles (5-6 sources of the below-given ones) attached for the formation of evidence or general arguments (for weakness or strength of article support) – you can choose the ones you find useful:

– Epstein, S. R., and Maarten Prak, eds. Guilds, Innovation and the European Economy, 1400–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511496738.

– De Moor, Tine. “The Silent Revolution: A New Perspective on the Emergence of Commons, Guilds, and Other Forms of Corporate Collective Action in Western Europe.” International Review of Social History 53, no. S16 (2008): 179-212. doi:10.1017/S0020859008003660.

– Berezin, P. (2003). Did Medieval Craft Guilds Do More Harm than Good? Journal of European Economic History 32, 171-197.

– Gustafson, B. (1991). The Rise and Economic Behaviour of Medieval Craft Guilds. In Power and Economic Institutions: Reinterpretations in Economic History (Ed. Gustafson, B.). Aldershot: Elgar, pp. 69-106.

-Epstein, S. R. “Craft Guilds, Apprenticeship, and Technological Change in Preindustrial Europe.” The Journal of Economic History 58, no. 3 (1998): 684–713.

– Charles R Hickson, Earl A Thompson,

A new theory of guilds and european economic development,

Explorations in Economic History,

Volume 28, Issue 2,

1991,

Pages 127-168,

ISSN 0014-4983,

(

– Kieser, Alfred. “Organizational, Institutional, and Societal Evolution: Medieval Craft Guilds and the Genesis of Formal Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 34, no. 4 (1989): 540–64.

– Guilds, laws, and markets for manufactured merchandise in late-medieval England in Explorations in Economic History

Article by Gary Richardson 2004-1

– Rosser, Gervase. “Crafts, Guilds and the Negotiation of Work in the Medieval Town.” Past & Present, no. 154 (1997): 3–31.

– Soly, Hugo. “The Political Economy of European Craft Guilds: Power Relations and Economic Strategies of Merchants and Master Artisans in the Medieval and Early Modern Textile Indistries.” International Review of Social History 53 (2008): 45–71.

{Related question to start with: Were craft guilds good or bad for economic development?}

Consider following in the essay:

• What is the author’s main argument?

• What larger debate is the author contributing to?

o You may want to read some other related papers to get an idea of this (cite them properly!). This is what historians refer to as a historiography section. Economists and social scientists might call this a literature review.

• What evidence does the author present in support of their argument?

• How convincing is the author’s argument?

o Are there any issues or potential problems that you can see?

• What are the article’s strengths?

• What are the articles weaknesses?

• How has the article advanced our understanding of a specific scholarly debate?

Essays should be formatted in proper Chicago Style (footnotes included with page numbers, bibliography included in the end in Chicago style 17th)

– pages needed

– use only 4 extra sources for the evidence or argument

– do not copy past the work , use the ideas and write your own argument

– keep it simple

– get to the point in the conclusion (do not add new information, conclude what you said throughout the paper)

Use the document ‘ogilvie’ for the readings ( i highlighted the main good and bad stuff for the question given in the red i.e. Were craft guilds good or bad for economic development?

(+) = good for economic development

(-) = bad for economic development)

17:17

OVERALL:

– No need to explain Ogilvie’s essay = NEED to show what STRENGTHAND WEAKNESS and SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS or UNSUPPORTING ARGUMENTs

– The structure should be :

Introduction

a. Context

b. Literature review (3 sentences, important author’s argument)

c. Road map of approach (how you would structure your body paragraph) (with main explanation of what craft guilds are, Ogilvie’s argument about them and the contribution to larger debate)

Body Paragraphs (3-4 paragraphs)

a. Introduce first strength ( Use historical evidence, it can be both numbers and descriptive events. )  use supporting evidence (other authors)

b. Introduce second strength ( Use historical evidence, it can be both numbers and descriptive events. )  use supporting evidence(other authors)

c. Introduce first weakness ( Use historical evidence, it can be both numbers and descriptive events. )  use supporting evidence(other authors)

d. Introduce second weakness ( Use historical evidence, it can be both numbers and descriptive events. )  use supporting evidence(other authors)

All footnotes need a page number

Conclusion

a. Show that your evidence in the body paragraph proved the argument of author (summarize)

b. How this relates to the larger debate.

What do you consider to be the most important aspect of the UN framework that would assist in overcoming the major problems faced by the Indigenous Australians?

/in /by

UN Indigenous Peoples’ rights framework

Using the UN Indigenous Peoples’ rights framework, evaluate the Australian Government’s approach to the Indigenous Australians. What do you consider to be the most important aspect of the UN framework that would assist in overcoming the major problems faced by the Indigenous Australians?