Watch the video and make note of all the ways this teacher is supporting the language development of these preschoolers.
Sort your list by each of the five aspects of language knowledge:
Examine the student roster to identify the diversity of your students. You will create two seating charts: one for whole group instruction activity and the other on slide two for a differentiated activity. Click inside each white box labeled “Student Name” on the classroom layout and type in the full name of one student from the class roster. Examine your classroom layout to guarantee your first slide is for whole group instruction activity and the second slide is for a differentiated instructional activity.
Class Roster
Joe Doe- multilingual/ visually impaired
Mary Jones- learning disability/language impaired
John Smith- speech Impaired/emotional disability
Natasha Simmons- intellectual disability/hearing impaired
Juan Torres- limited English/ learning disability
Nadia Romanov- Multilingual/gifted and talented
Lamont Evans- gifted and talented/orthopedic impairment
Boris Smirnoff- limited English/ learning disability
Buzz Valenti- Traumatic-brain injury/intellectual disability
Nancy Beauville- Multilingual/sickle-cell anemia
Patricia Lutz- Multiple disabilities/bilingual
Maria Ramirez- Limited English/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Mario Wong- multilingual/gifted and talented
Evelyn Ramirez- autism spectrum disorder/speech disorder
Frank Williams- developmental delay/language impaired
Barbara Brooks- homeless/emotional disturbance
During your field experience, you will use the hyperlinked checklist to assess your schools. Talk to teachers, administrators, and staff to assist you. Once you have completed the checklist you are to write an analysis that includes:
Try to come up with some guiding questions for your project to direct the focus. Remember that you are not attempting to answer the guiding questions, but rather to demonstrate how one might approach doing an interdisciplinary research project on the topic.
Requirements: The final paper should be about 5-pages (double-spaced) and must include:
1) A clear statement of the problem and guiding question(s).
2) Justification for using an interdisciplinary approach to study the issue.
3) Identification of the relevant disciplines.
4) Consideration of the disciplinary perspectives that compose the relevant disciplines and how those perspectives connect to the problem.
As an example of some of the types of detail you might include in your final paper:
* Definitions of any technical or ambiguous terms
*An explanation of how you decided on the focus/scope of the topic.
*What have disciplinary research projects on the topic missed?
*What are the relevant disciplines for your project and how did you choose them?
*What are the relevant elements of the disciplinary perspectives that will be important to your project?
*Reflect on how elements of multiple disciplinary perspectives can be used in a holistic approach to your topic.
***Recall the elements of disciplinary perspective: Phenomena, methodology, theories, data, assumptions, epistemology, and concepts.
1.Compare Emily’s teacher with Marissa’s experience (Download Marissa’s experience), using all the texts you have read (especially Popham chapter 12 Download Popham chapter 12, and Chappuis and Stiggins’ chapter 2) to support your opinion. Be sure to use Emily’s before and after writing Download before and after writing.
2.What makes the formative assessment process such a powerful learning strategy (Popham, 2017; Chappuis & Stiggins, 2020)?
3.Explain which one or more of Popham’s (2017) five applications of formative assessment (pp. 19-20) you would use in your classroom and why?
Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Research and examine the Redistribution of Income and Wealth Theory. Discuss the following questions:
Is the theory clear and unambiguous? What clarity would you include to increase understanding?
Does the research on the theory support or fail to support the expectations? Explain your opinion.
How can others use the theory to explain events and test hypotheses derived from it?
How can you deduce predictions from it that can be tested in different circumstances?
How can you derive explicit expectations about real-world events from it? Is it related to the world in systematic ways?
For this assignment, you will create a rough draft of the literature review that follows the basic structure of the Dissertation Handbook template (quantitative or qualitative) for Chapter Two. The rough draft must be at least five pages long, excluding the title and reference pages, and it must include at least 10 scholarly sources published within the last five years.
1.Compare Emily’s teacher with Marissa’s experience (Download Marissa’s experience), using all the texts you have read (especially Popham chapter 12 Download Popham chapter 12, and Chappuis and Stiggins’ chapter 2) to support your opinion. Be sure to use Emily’s before and after writing Download before and after writing.
2.What makes the formative assessment process such a powerful learning strategy (Popham, 2017; Chappuis & Stiggins, 2020)?
3.Explain which one or more of Popham’s (2017) five applications of formative assessment (pp. 19-20) you would use in your classroom and why?
In the second equity assignment, you will be demonstrating your deep dive into data you have collected. The resources you collected should be varied and address the specific areas you proposed during the first assignment. During your proposal stage, you indicated one topic (access, equity, success rates, safety, etc.) and various resources you plan to use to explore the topic (state/national reports, scholarly articles, etc.).
This assignment is a summary of that research. This work should be about approx. 3-5 pages in length (not including your title and reference page).
Your written submission must exhibit the following elements:
Introduction
Brief overview of the issue you are examining
State your research question
Themes
Background or history behind the issue (you are trying to develop a foundational understanding of the topic)
Identify themes and present different points of view. Describe how the data compares/compliments themes.
Critique: Equity Gaps
Challenge posed by the issue (you are to frame the issue for the reader. i.e what is the problem?)
Describe two areas where you observe gaps or inequities and propose one solution for each gap.
Conclusion
Summarize your relevant findings and major conclusions
Synthesize how the issue impact the teacher, the student, and/or the learning community
References
List your sources using APA format
You must cite 3 articles (at the minimum)
1.What are the characteristics of students with math mathematical difficulties?
2. What instructional adaptations and attributes of effective instruction that can be implemented to help students access the mathematics curriculum?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.