Explain how Golding uses symbolism in the novel to convey his ideas about the imperfection of man. Fully explain three symbols and how they demonstrate different ideas about Golding’s theme (“the attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature”).
Plan, write, and revise a short story
Construct a plot outline. Be sure that your plot has a dilemma, at least one complication, a climax, and a resolution.
Write a short story using the plot outline and the character sketches you have prepared in the earlier project. Use dialogue, narration, and description in developing the four short story elements. Briefly state the theme of your story.
When a story has been completed, it should be reread carefully. Mechanical errors should be corrected and any inconsistencies or shortcomings noted. If you find that the plot does not flow smoothly, recheck your plot outline. Make sure that no steps were left out and that your story has no “loose ends.” Be sure that the style of your story suits the subject matter. Tone should not clash with atmosphere. Check your characters’ diction as carefully as you check your own to be sure that the dialogue is realistic, appropriate to the character, and easy to follow.
Revise your story. Make any needed corrections on your rough draft. When you are certain that it meets all stylistic and technical requirements, recopy it neatly and turn it in.
The purpose of this essay is explanatory; to help your audience understand a controversial issue as well as how and why people argue different points of view. You’re not trying to convince your audience of one side or the other, simply making sure they fully understand the issue and the differing perspectives.
For this essay, you will be unpacking and providing a probing analysis of an issue we’ve been exploring, that of free speech. Your essay will provide an unbiased examination of the opposing views, helping your audience understand the issue through the lenses of people who hold different viewpoints.
For this essay, you will explore and analyze the opposing perspectives on the question: Is Freedom of Speech an Individual Right or a Public Good?
Here are the requirements for the final example essay on interesting places:
A) You need a heading and a title
B) You need an introduction with a lead, some background, and a main idea. You main idea should make it clear your essay will be about interesting places you have visited.
C) You need three body paragraphs. Each paragraph should introduce one interesting place you have visited. Remember to give specific detail and explanation that makes it clear you actually visited the place. Don’t forget that you overall purpose is to state why you think the place is interesting. Each body paragraph should have a topic sentence and a closing sentence.
D) You need a conclusion that restates your overall main idea. For your final thought you can look to the future and discuss how you look forward to traveling again or you can talk about something you learned while visiting the places you noted.
Choose any love song and state whether if it’s a negative and positive outcomes of it. Address if its a healthy or unhealthy relationship.
Some information she asked us after we wrote the paper.
What is the introductory technique?
What is the thesis statement? (Write it out here.)
Is the thesis multi-part? If so, offer an alternative here.
Does the thesis adequately cover all material in the paper?
Is the historical context of King’s “Letter” adequately provided?
Explain the connection of EACH body paragraph’s topic sentence to the thesis or to the paragraph before it.
Describe the paper’s logical organizational structure.
Are the rhetorical strategies that are discussed defined/explained?
Are examples of all the rhetorical strategies that are discussed provided? Here, write out two for each paragraph.
Is the effectiveness of the each rhetorical strategy discussed and explained?
What is the concluding technique?
Assignment task
Comparative Text Analysis: 90% 3800 words Deadline in handbook
Introduction
The main assignment will be a final essay of 3800 words. There is one question but it allows for variation both in the choice of approach you take (what kind of analysis you choose to do) and the kinds of text you choose. This will also allow you to look at texts that come from pedagogic contexts or focus on an area of language use in a particular social context. There is a discussion of the range of such choices later and examples of some previous assignment choices will be available online.
There will be some sample assignments on Moodle. (Note that some of these assignments were specified at 3000 words). There will also be an in-class and online peer workshop which will be designed to enable you to work towards completing the assignment, giving you the opportunity to explore ideas and exchange information about your assignment. Further advice on how to approach the assignment will be given on the moodle site.
We will be working on some comparative text analyses during our classes and for the portfolio after class. For this, students share their responses to the tasks in Brookes Virtual. These are important as they will provide you with some first steps into text analysis. Further suggestions of possible topics for the text analysis and samples of previous assignments will be available on the Moodle site.
Orientation to the assignment
On this module, our main concern is to explore our own understanding of how language is used to do things in the world and how we can describe it ‘in use’. A crucial focus on the module is to describe and understand the link between the description of language structures and our use of language in context and to try to show that these two are not separate areas but two sides of the same coin. The key question is how we use the resources of language to make meanings in specific contexts. To understand this we need to look at language as it is used in the world around us and to understand that there is much variation but that this variation is not random – language is a purposeful and meaningful activity that both reflects the social contexts we use it in, the meanings we wish to make and which in turn helps to construct our social world.
We need as professionals in language teaching to be able to describe and explain the way we use language in our everyday lives to make meaning. The key focus of the assignment is to try to describe this predictable link between language structures and language use in social contexts. It is this predictability that is so useful to teachers.
The assignment is designed to provide as much flexibility as possible to study language in a wide range of contexts by allowing you to choose your own texts to analyse and to allow for a wide range of possible applications of such descriptions.
The Assignment Rubric:
Compare and contrast two related texts (they can be spoken or written) using relevant techniques of description and analysis that we have covered on the module. Identify the key language choices that construe the particular communicative purposes of the texts and the social meanings that they make. How do these choices relate to the context in which the texts are situated and to the broader socio-cultural context? Comment briefly on the implications of your analysis of the texts for a pedagogic related context that you have experience of.
– Chapters 3, 4, 5 of Blindspot
– “The New Jim Crow” law article by Michelle Alexander, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law
– “The Danger of a Single Story” – TedTalk by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
– “How Microaggressions Relate To Systemic Biases” by Paolo Gaudiano
Introduction Section (2 paragraphs)
Provide an overview of the problem of racial bias in the criminal justice system, with a few key data highlights, specific examples, and quote(s) from authorities on the subject.
Provide readers an overview of the different solutions being proposed for this problem and then a more detailed introduction of the solution you’re writing about.
Provide a thesis statement in which you sum up your argument about whether and how your chosen solution will reduce or eliminate racial bias in the criminal justice system.
Body Section (5-8 paragraphs)
Discuss in more detail the solution you’re examining and how it would work.
Evaluate the strengths you see in this solution — why you think it would help address the problem of bias.
Evaluate the limitations/challenges of the solution — e.g., the parts of the problem it would not address, or thing that would make it hard for the solution to work.
Conclusion Section (1-2 paragraphs)
Discuss whether the solution you’ve examined is sufficient to address the problems of racial bias in criminal justice system and any additional steps/solutions that you think would be needed
If The Great Gatsby had been written in 1950, would it have been banned? You will need to support your position with hard evidence, such as similar themes/scenes in books that were banned at the time…etc.
Select a short story that we are reading for this course and create a strong, detailed analytical thesis statement relating to the work.
Write a minimum of 100 words on which critical perspective you are using to analyze the text. For example, why would you think it is valuable to use the gender perspective (Feminist Criticism) to analyze “The Yellow Wall Paper”? You should include specific examples from the text to support your choice.
Find three peer-reviewed academic sources that you could use to support your interpretation. Possible databases to search include jStor, ProQuest, Literature Resource Center, etc.
For EACH of your three sources, you must provide:
An MLA-style Works Cited entry
A 200-word minimum evaluation and analysis of the source that answer the following questions:
Evaluation: Is the source peer-reviewed? Are there any factual errors? Is it relevant to your chosen text? What is a particularly strong quote from the source, and why would it be helpful to your research?
Analysis: How does the source relate to the critical perspective you chose in step 2? How does the source support your thesis statement on your chosen work of literature? What are some quotes from your chosen short story that link to the arguments found in your source, and in what ways do they relate to each other?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.