Consider a time when Cicero’s concept of Delivery was important to you. How did you feel? What did you need to consider about audience? How did you engage (if you did) ethos, pathos and logos? How would you change what you did for the better, if you could
For this paper, you need to persuade your reader that you have a potential solution to a current problem. This paper should be 1,400-1,800 words (the works cited page is in addition to these) and be supported by at least four outside sources. Sources may include interviews, pamphlets, lectures, government documents, t.v. programs, books, journals, magazines, and newspaper articles, and reliable internet sources. Dictionaries and encyclopedias do not count as adequate sources for the paper. Do not use Wikipedia. For this paper, you must use formal, MLA documentation style. Be sure that any time you use ideas or material from any source, even if you put those ideas into your own words, you credit the source; otherwise, you are plagiarizing, and that will result in a zero for the paper. And if you do use the exact words from your source, be sure to put those words in quotation marks and credit the source to avoid plagiarism. This paper is worth up to 300 points.
You should choose a topic that you feel strongly about and have thought about. Narrow your focus to a manageable topic that can be developed in depth within your word limit. You need to have a clear position put forward in a well developed thesis statement which lets readers know you will be proposing a solution to the problem. A thesis statement should be in the form of a statement, not a question. Remember, a controversial thesis statement may need more of a lead in than a less shocking position would. Think of your audience. Develop and support your thesis throughout the body of the paper. You may use your own experience as well as material from your sources to support your claims; however, you may not count your experience as one of your four sources. Do not use inflammatory language, faulty analogy, or any of the other logical fallacies.
Remember to narrow your focus. For example, do not just say that you want to discuss spousal abuse; say that you want to propose a method for rehabilitating abusers. Or, you want to argue why there should be stricter laws protecting abused spouses. If you try to cover too large a topic, your information will stay on such a general level that you will not tell your readers anything they do not know already. You do not have to solve the ENTIRE problem. Most problems are too big and complex. But, explain to your readers that your solution will help minimize the problem in some way: fewer people will suffer, costs will be lessened, etc.
Because this is an argument, you must build into your essay a response to the questions your opposition would most likely ask. (For example, who will pay for this plan? Or, who will provide this information to the public?) And explain why your solution is better than any others that might be out there. This does not mean that you split the paper into an equal discussion of the points made by both sides. Your main discussion and support is for your solution, but you must demonstrate to your readers that you understand the entire debate and do have a rebuttal to your opposition. If you have not found any other solutions proposed, do not skip the rebuttal section. Just point out that in your research no other solutions were found, so we should try your solution till a better one comes along.
What are the requirements for the paper?
The Research Essay should contain:
A clear organizational structure, with introductory and concluding paragraphs and body paragraphs that develop the argument
A clear thesis statement
A title for the paper is recommended
A minimum of 5 typed, proofread pages (approximately 1200 words)
A minimum of ONE primary source
A minimum of THREE reputable, critical secondary sources, excluding Wikipedia, CliffsNotes, Shmoop or any similar “free essay” type website
A Works Cited page, formatted in MLA style, that lists all works consulted and cited including the primary source(s)
MLA-style parenthetical citations
9. What is the role of women in three stories we have read? How are women portrayed?
Use these stories from Ann Charters book an introduction to short fiction.
use the stories below: The yellow paper, The lady with the Pet Dog (joyce Oates), Girl ( Jamaica Kincaid).
Also write annoted bibilography of the paper
The next step is to prepare your annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a document in which you analyze sources and identify how they will be used. The annotated bibliography is a tremendous help to you as a writer because it helps you get to know your sources before you write your essay and understand how they will help you create your argument. By situating yourself in a critical debate, you will develop a sense of authority and purpose in your own writing.
You must complete an annotation for each of the four secondary sources you intend to use, and the annotations must be displayed in alphabetical order.
Each annotated bibliography entry contains three components: a bibliographic citation, a brief summary/analysis of the article, and a mention of how the source will be incorporated into your essay.
The first part is the MLA citation. This show the bibliographic information about the source, such as author, title, publication, etc. The entry conforms to MLA format, and the list is prepared alphabetically.
The next section is a summary of the source and reference to specific ideas from the text. The summary briefly describes the source and its contents.
The final part of the entry is the commentary on how the article will be useful to your research. Does it set the groundwork? Provide definitions? Clarify terms? Make sure to include this section; the annotation is incomplete without it.
See the sample below:
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life. New York: Anchor Books, 1995. Print. (This is the CITATION)
Lamott’s book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott’s book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one’s own internal critic. In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun.
Lamott offers sane advice for those struggling with the anxieties of writing, but her main project seems to be offering the reader a reality check regarding writing, publishing, and struggling with one’s own imperfect humanity in the process. Rather than a practical handbook to producing and/or publishing, this text is indispensable because of its honest perspective, its down-to-earth humor, and its encouraging approach. (These 2 paragraphs are the SUMMARY and ANALYSIS of the source.)
Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1 address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students’ own drafting and revising processes. Some of the writing exercises would also be appropriate for generating classroom writing exercises. Students should find Lamott’s style both engaging and enjoyable. (This is the discussion of the USEFULNESS of the source.)
Note: Choose only one of the following topics for your essay.
• Narrate an experience you had with a writing or reading task that you found (or still find) difficult or challenging. Explain the significance of this experience.
• Describe an important moment or event in your literacy development. Explain the significance of this event.
• Narrate a time when your literacy skills have helped you achieve a personal goal or accomplishment. Explain the significance of this accomplishment.
• Describe a time when you have used reading or writing to learn in an environment other than the classroom. Explain the significance of this event.
Instructions from Professor:
Topic: How does BNW portray a dystopia? Specifically, address the following 5 issues:
Introduction: Introduce the topic of your paper (a quick summary is that BNW illustrates how a utopia scheme creates a dystopia) and give a brief overview of your paper.
1) Utopian ideas are expressed in slogans like “A world with war,” “A world without poverty,” etc. Think of 3 slogans of this type that the creators of the World State might have used to present their vision of utopia, + which help to explain why the World State is organized and operates the way it does. These slogans should be expressed positively, so claiming “A world without families” or “A world without individual thought” would not work-these slogans would not be attractive to most people.
Identify 3 slogans that might have been used and use them to organize your discussion of the World State’s utopian vision. Provide examples from the novel of how each slogan would explain how/why the World State operates the way that it does.
2) Show how the novel demonstrates these consequences of attempts to create a utopian society, using examples & evidence from the book: 1) regimentation of society; 2) dehumanization; 3) misuse of technology; 4) state terror; 5) tragedy of the individual; 6) a new class of rulers; 7) use of propaganda to manipulate population; & 8) dystopia is necessarily totalitarian. For more explanation, see Barilleaux, “The Map of Dystopia”. You should have a separate paragraph for each of the 8 features.
3) WIs the dystopia of Brave New World a hard or soft one? (See Barilleaux, “The Map of Dystopia,”) PICK ONE (hard or soft) and use examples/evidence from the book to support your position.
5) Which aspect of Huxley’s dystopia is the worst? Why? Explain.
NOTE: If you do not use “What is the Worst Thing” as your conclusion, be sure to have a separate concluding paragraph.
Additional research is not required for this essay, but all sources used must be cited properly
You do not need to summarize the novel (I have already read it more than once) and unnecessary filler (like a background on Huxley or his times) are not relevant to the analysis of this paper.
How will you know if the society is happy and contented with what they have?
You will write 5 paragraph explanatory essay responding to the following prompt:
What three factors lead people to criticize their society rather than simply accept it? Use the three texts read in this unit along with independent research using a real-world example of an artist, reporter, revolutionary figure, or politician to exemplify your position.
Instructions:
⦁ 5 total paragraphs
⦁ 1 Intro paragraph
⦁ Thesis statement must have 3 parts – Essentially, include your three main claims (Factors) in your overall thesis statement.
⦁ 3 body paragraphs
⦁ Each body paragraph must be a 6C paragraph explaining one of the three factors.
⦁ Body paragraphs 1 and 2 must use the texts as the sources of information.
⦁ Texts used:
⦁ Standing Up to Absolute Power
⦁ The Worms of the Earth Against the Lions
⦁ Shakespeare’s Sister
⦁ Body paragraph 3 must use independent research on a real-world example of the third factor.
⦁ All body paragraphs (including your independent research paragraph) must have 2 pieces of evidence EACH. This means you’ll have a grand total of 6 citations in the essay.
⦁ In the independent research paragraph, make sure you use VALID sources. Use the Tennessee Electronic Library and other certified resources
⦁ 1 concluding paragraph that ties everything together.
⦁ Works cited page
⦁ MUST BE IN MLA Format (must follow it in all forms including)…
⦁ 12-point Times New Roman font
⦁ Double-spaced
⦁ In-text citations
⦁ Works cited page
⦁ USE THE RESOURCES WE GAVE YOU TO GET THIS STUFF RIGHT.
⦁ YOU NEED TO BRING A PRINTED COPY OF INTRO PARAGRAPH AND FIRST BODY PARAGRAPH TO CLASS FOR PEER REVIEW ON WEDNESDAY NOV. 17TH.
⦁ Wednesday and Thursday (Nov. 17-18) will be for peer review and editing. Friday (Nov. 19) will be for writing and revising.
1. What did you enjoy most about the video? Be specific and use examples from life experience, experiential learning, and the video themselves (MLA format).
2. Paraphrase each video in four or less sentences.
3.What elements of the genre are being used in one specific piece (pick one of the videos). Use specific examples from that video and cite them in MLA format.
Think of three goods or services that you buy frequently. Fill in the following details for each goods or service in the tabular template provided:
1. The current price and the quantity that you normally buy.
2. A higher price than the current price and the quantity that you will buy at that price.
3. A lower price than the current price and the quantity that you will buy at that price.
Questions
Now, consider the price, and the quantity that you are willing to purchase at that price and answer the following questions.
1. How does price influence the quantity of an item you are willing or able to purchase?
2. Does it make a difference if the item is an essential item, like food vs. a luxury item like a sports car whether you are likely to continue to purchase the item even if the price goes up?
3. Consider what you can infer from your own purchasing habits about price and demand? Explain your answer.
● How are such events interpreted and presented?
● How are events’ interpretation and presentation a product of the culture of the author?
● Does the work’s presentation support or condemn the event?
● Can it be seen to do both?
● How does this portrayal criticize the leading political figures or movements of the day?
● How does the literary text function as part of a continuum with other historical/cultural texts from the same period?
● How can we use a literary work to “map” the interplay of both traditional and subversive discourses circulating in the culture in which that work emerged and/or the cultures in which the work has been interpreted?
● How does the work consider traditionally marginalized populations?
Postcolonial Criticism/Race Theory: Typical questions:
● How does the literary text, explicitly or allegorically, represent various aspects of colonial oppression?
● What does the text reveal about the problematics of post-colonial identity, including the relationship between personal and cultural identity and such issues as double consciousness and hybridity?
● What person(s) or groups does the work identify as “other” or stranger? How are such persons/groups described and treated?
● What does the text reveal about the politics and/or psychology of anti-colonialist resistance?
● What does the text reveal about the operations of cultural difference – the ways in which race, religion, class, gender, sexual orientation, cultural beliefs, and customs combine to form individual identity – in shaping our perceptions of ourselves, others, and the world in which we live?
● How does the text respond to or comment upon the characters, themes, or assumptions of a canonized (colonialist) work?
● How does a literary text in the Western canon reinforce or undermine colonialist ideology through its representation of colonialization and/or its inappropriate silence about colonized peoples?
Feminist Criticism: Typical questions:
● How is the relationship between men and women portrayed?
● What are the power relationships between men and women (or characters assuming male/female roles)?
● How are male and female roles defined?
● What constitutes masculinity and femininity?
● How do characters embody these traits?
● Do characters take on traits from opposite genders? How so? How does this change others’ reactions to them?
● What does the work reveal about the operations (economically, politically, socially, or psychologically) of patriarchy?
● What does the work imply about the possibilities of sisterhood as a mode of resisting patriarchy?
● What does the work say about women’s creativity?
● What does the history of the work’s reception by the public and by the critics tell us about the operation of patriarchy?
Queer Theory/Gender Studies: Typical questions:
● What elements of the text can be perceived as being “masculine” (active, powerful) and “feminine” (passive, marginalized) and how do the characters support these traditional roles?
● What sort of support (if any) is given to elements or characters who question the masculine/feminine binary? What happens to those elements/characters?
● What elements in the text exist in the middle, between the perceived masculine/feminine binary? In other words, what elements exhibit traits of both (bisexual)?
● What are the politics (ideological positions) of specific gay, lesbian, or queer works, and how are those politics revealed in…the work’s thematic content or portrayals of its characters?
● What are the poetics (literary devices and strategies) of a specific lesbian, gay, or queer work?
● What does the work contribute to our knowledge of queer, gay, or lesbian experience and history, including literary history?
● What does the work reveal about the operations (socially, politically, psychologically) of homophobia?
● How does the literary text illustrate the problematics of sexuality and sexual “identity,” that is the ways in which human sexuality does not fall neatly into the separate categories defined by the words homosexual and heterosexual?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.