Identify a major conflict in the story and explain what parts of the story reveal this conflict and how the conflict contributes to the story’s meaning.

1. Come to some conclusion about the story that is revealed via the plot structure. In other words, identify a major conflict in the story and explain what parts of the story reveal this conflict and how the conflict contributes to the story’s meaning.
2. Make sure you introduce the paper and that the introduction contains a clear thesis statement that identifies the conflict clearly.
3. Use specific detail from the story as support for your argument. Remember to explain why you chose that detail; explain how that detail relates to your assertion.
4. Please write entire essay in present tense

What practical advice does each offer to the Paralegal on the job, whether directly offered or implied?

Unit 6 Discussion: ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services, Guidelines 5, 7-10.

Discussion Overview
This discussion forum will help you get to discuss what you have read about in this Unit.
Grading
This discussion is worth 40 points (10 points for each question in Step 2, 10 points for your replies). Use the attached rubric to determine if you are meeting the objectives of the assignment for full credit.

Deliverables
A clear, specific, and detailed response to the initial question(s) below
Clear, specific, and detailed, responses to at least two other students’ posts
Discussion Directions

Step 1 Read and Review:
ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services, Preamble, Guideline 1 and Comments from last week.
ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services, Guideline 3-4.
ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services, Guidelines 5, 7-10.
Step 2 Post:
Go through each of the Guidelines (5,7, 9, and 10), and discuss them. Your discussion should include the following:

-What practical advice does each offer to the Paralegal on the job, whether directly offered or implied?

Browse the STATE OF NEW JERSEY Websites accessible through the National Center for State Courts, 2019.

-Where are your State’s rules of ethics/professional responsibility offered for lawyers?
-Through the State Supreme Court? State Bar Association? Some other regulatory bodies?
-Are there any State ethical rules that resemble ABA Guidelines 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10? If so discuss one State rule that resembles one of these Guidelines.

Identify the kind of appeal each supporting claim is meant to address.

Locate all of the supporting claims used in your selected text.

Identify what kind of supporting claim each is. As a reminder, the categories defined earlier in this section include
-exhibits (or primary sources)
-expert testimony
-interviews and surveys
-anecdotes

Identify the kind of appeal each supporting claim is meant to address. As a reminder, the categories of appeals defined earlier in this section include
-logical appeals
-authoritative appeals
-emotional appeals

Note how effective you think each type of support used is, relating back to the source’s thesis. Which do you find most convincing? Why? Which do you find least convincing? Why?

Advise the Air Cadets on whether the huts, and Portakabins are tenant’s or landlord’s fixtures?

The local Air Cadets occupy land and buildings to the south-east of the redeveloped airfield under a standard business tenancy. They use a number of huts (erected around 1990) and two Portakabins (sited around 1995) for their training activities. There is also a shed, built of stone, that was erected when the airfield was an operational wartime base and used as a resting room for pilots awaiting their ‘scramble’ call.
The Air Cadets as an organisation, in their various forms, have held a lease on this area of the airfield since 1959. Specific clauses in the lease state:
• ‘the use of premises on the land shall be as Headquarters for an ATC Wing provided that there is no nuisance or annoyance caused by such use’;
• ‘the tenants must repair and keep in repair the stone shed, any additional buildings, and all hedges, ditches, fences and gates on the demised premises’;
• ‘on termination of the tenancy, the tenants shall remove all building and other erections and works so as to restore the land to the condition in which it was when it was taken over.’
The Air Cadets have been holding over since 2018 when the contractual terms came to an end. They have continued to pay rent to the MoD and, more recently, to Airside Developers Ltd. and have now applied to Airside Developers Ltd. (as their landlords) for a new lease.
The landlord is opposing the grant of the new tenancy and is relying on Section 30(1)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, stating that they wish to demolish the existing buildings and to clear the land so need full possession. The landlord is not claiming that they will reconstruct any of the premises or that they will carry out further construction work.
The Air Cadets assert that the existing buildings on the land are tenant fixtures and so cannot be demolished by the landlords, However, the landlord asserts that the existing buildings are fixtures and as such are part of the land and can be demolished.Task
Critically assess the scenario above, and using your current knowledge of property law, write an essay to advise the Air Cadets on:

a. whether the huts, and Portakabins are tenant’s or landlord’s fixtures?
b. the extent to which Airside Developments are likely to have satisfied Section 30(1)(f) of the Act and the potential consequences for the Air Cadets as tenant.
You should present a reasoned argument, supported by appropriate authority. Whilst this task has two sections, consideration should be given as to how part b (advice on the grounds for refusal) might be affected by your argument in respect of part a (whether the buildings are landlord’s or tenant’s fixtures). Your advice should be legal, not practical (i.e do not recommend that the Air Cadets consult a solicitor) and should include reference to appropriate cases. Although you are asked to provide advice, your answer should be in an essay format.

What elements of this story qualify as magical realism? What might these elements represent in reality?

(in at least 250 words) what Marquez is asking us to accept in this short story. Consider these questions (again, you need not answer all of these. Use them, instead, to think about this story more deeply in crafting your answer). What elements of this story qualify as magical realism? What might these elements represent in reality? Why do the town’s residents accept in the way they do? What about Marquez’ life might help us understand this story?

1. Discusses the prompt fully

2. Uses properly integrated passages from the story to illustrate and support (Marquez writes…Elisenda declares….)

3. Uses paragraphs to organize ideas

4. Is carefully proofread

Explain how each consideration will assist your business, and what you will do to implement it.

• Begin by researching how to protect a wedding business, using both your textbook material and other sources that you find.
• Read the article, 5 Ways to Protect Yourself Against Unexpected Wedding Catastrophe
• In your submission to this assignment, provide at least five ways in which you will protect your wedding consultant business. These may be legal or ethical considerations. You must provide at least one consideration that is not included in the article.
• Explain how each consideration will assist your business, and what you will do to implement it.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/fashion/weddings/5-ways-to-protect-yourself-against-unexpected-wedding-catastrophe.html

How and why the writer changes this focus as the source develops

Q3: You now need to think about the WHOLE of the source. If you require the source again, please read it below. If you have done this already, please scroll down to the bottom of this resource where you can begin writing your response.

The social worker says she is here to help us. Her name is Lucy Fisher and she seems        impressed that I can speak English so well. I tell her about my job in Syria, about the bees and the colonies, but she doesn’t really hear me, I can tell. She is preoccupied with the papers in front of her.

Afra won’t even turn her face towards her. If you didn’t know she was blind you would think that she was looking out of the window. There’s a bit of sun today and it’s reflecting off her irises, which makes them look like water. Her hands are clasped together on the kitchen table and her lips are sealed tight. She knows some English, enough to get by, but she won’t talk to anyone except me.

“How is the accommodation Mr and Mrs Ibrahim?” Lucy Fisher with the big blue eyes and silver-rimmed glasses consults her papers as if the answer to her question is in them. She looks up at me now and her face is a burst of warmth. “I find it very clean and safe,” I say, “compared with other places.” I don’t tell her about these other places, and I definitely don’t tell her about the mice and cockroaches in our room. I fear it would appear ungrateful.

She doesn’t ask many questions, but explains that we will soon be interviewed by an immigration officer. She pushes her glasses up the ridge of her nose and reassures me in a soft and precise voice that once we receive the papers to prove we are seeking asylum, Afra will be able to see a doctor about the pain in her eyes. She glances at Afra and I notice that Lucy Fisher’s are clasped in front of her in exactly the same way. There is something about this that I find odd. Then she hands me a bunch of papers. A packet from the Home Office: information about claiming asylum, eligibility, notes about screening, notes about the interview process. I skim through and she waits patiently, watching me.

To stay in the UK as a refugee you must be unable to live safely in any part of your own country because  you fear persecution there.

“Any part?” I say. “Will you send us back to a different part?”

She frowns, pulling at a strand of her hair, and her lips tighten as if she has eaten something horrible. “What you need to do now,” she says, “is to get your story straight. Think about what you’re going to say to the immigration officer. Make sure it’s all clear and coherent and as straight forward as possible.”

 “But will you send us back to Turkey or Greece? What does persecution mean to you?” I say this louder than I meant to, and my arm begins to throb. I rub the thick line of tight flesh and red tissue, remembering the edge of the knife, and Lucy Fisher’s face is blurred, my hands are shaking. I undo the top button of my shirt. I try to keep my hands still.

 “Is it hot in here?” I say.

She says something I cannot hear; I only see that her lips are moving. She is standing up now, and I feel Afra shifting in her seat behind me. There is the sound of running water. A rushing river. But I see a sparkle, like the edge of a very sharp knife. Lucy Fisher’s hand turning the handle of the tap, walking towards me, placing the glass in my hands and lifting it up to my face as if I am a child. I can see her clearly now and she looks frightened. Afra places her hand on my leg.

The sky cracks. It is raining. Torrential rain. I realise that she’s spoken, I hear her voice through the rain, I hear the word enemy and she stares at me, frowning, and her white face looks flushed.

“Excuse me?” I say.

“I said we’re hear to help you as much as we can.”

“I heard the word enemy.” I say.

She thrusts her shoulders back and purses her lips, she glances again at Afra and there’s a spark of anger that fires up in her face and eyes. But it’s not me she’s angry with; she can’t really see me.

“All I said was that I’m not your enemy.” Her voice is apologetic now, she shouldn’t have said that, it slipped out, there is pressure on her, I can see it in the way she tugs at that strand of hair. But the words ring out still in the room, even as she speaks to Afra, who now nods her head very slightly at her, if only to acknowledge her presence.

Q3: You now need to think about the WHOLE of the source.

This text is from the beginning of Chapter 2.

How has the writer structured the text to interest you as a reader?

You could write about:

·        what the writer focuses your attention on at the beginning of the source

·        how and why the writer changes this focus as the source develops     any other structural features that interest you

(8 marks)

Write your answer below:

 

Compare and contrast old and new testament

Compare and contrast old and new testament

What are your thoughts about how people interact in a digital community?

What are your thoughts about how people interact in a digital community? Use Facebook as an example to show how social media can create a discourse community. Can Facebook create a successful discourse community?

What are the effects of this oppression on both on the individual and on society?

Some questions to stimulate your thinking as you respond to the prompt (you do NOT have to directly address these if you don’t want to):

In what ways can we self-fashion our own unique identity? In what ways do external forces attempt to mold our identities to conform with an ideal or norm?
What complications arise from trying to deny the identity that you feel you truly have?
How can we reconcile who we are with who others want us to be? How can we insist on “being ourselves”?
When we identify with a role model, style, etc., are we making moves to cultivate or express our own identity, or are we conforming? How do we know?
What techniques or strategies are used to construct and enforce identity categories?
When is the enforcement of an identity category intentional versus a bi-product of one’s cultural/social environment? How do the techniques of enforcement vary between these two situations?
Why might conforming to these categories or stereotypes be appealing or even necessary?
What are the different forms that complicity can take? How do you know when you’re part of the problem?

An original argument, made by you—what are you adding to the conversation?
The use of evidence from the text to support your claims
Connective thinking—pieces of evidence from the text should be in conversation with one another to show how they “speak to” your own point
Analysis and interpretation of the parts of the text you are using as evidence: what does this evidence do, and why is it important enough for you to have chosen it as evidence?