How has the writer structured the text to interest you as a reader?

Q3: You now need to think about the WHOLE of the source. If you require the source again, please read it below. If you have done this already, please scroll down to the bottom of this resource where you can begin writing your response.

The social worker says she is here to help us. Her name is Lucy Fisher and she seems        impressed that I can speak English so well. I tell her about my job in Syria, about the bees and the colonies, but she doesn’t really hear me, I can tell. She is preoccupied with the papers in front of her.

Afra won’t even turn her face towards her. If you didn’t know she was blind you would think that she was looking out of the window. There’s a bit of sun today and it’s reflecting off her irises, which makes them look like water. Her hands are clasped together on the kitchen table and her lips are sealed tight. She knows some English, enough to get by, but she won’t talk to anyone except me.

“How is the accommodation Mr and Mrs Ibrahim?” Lucy Fisher with the big blue eyes and silver-rimmed glasses consults her papers as if the answer to her question is in them. She looks up at me now and her face is a burst of warmth. “I find it very clean and safe,” I say, “compared with other places.” I don’t tell her about these other places, and I definitely don’t tell her about the mice and cockroaches in our room. I fear it would appear ungrateful.

She doesn’t ask many questions, but explains that we will soon be interviewed by an immigration officer. She pushes her glasses up the ridge of her nose and reassures me in a soft and precise voice that once we receive the papers to prove we are seeking asylum, Afra will be able to see a doctor about the pain in her eyes. She glances at Afra and I notice that Lucy Fisher’s are clasped in front of her in exactly the same way. There is something about this that I find odd. Then she hands me a bunch of papers. A packet from the Home Office: information about claiming asylum, eligibility, notes about screening, notes about the interview process. I skim through and she waits patiently, watching me.

To stay in the UK as a refugee you must be unable to live safely in any part of your own country because  you fear persecution there.

“Any part?” I say. “Will you send us back to a different part?”

She frowns, pulling at a strand of her hair, and her lips tighten as if she has eaten something horrible. “What you need to do now,” she says, “is to get your story straight. Think about what you’re going to say to the immigration officer. Make sure it’s all clear and coherent and as straight forward as possible.”

 “But will you send us back to Turkey or Greece? What does persecution mean to you?” I say this louder than I meant to, and my arm begins to throb. I rub the thick line of tight flesh and red tissue, remembering the edge of the knife, and Lucy Fisher’s face is blurred, my hands are shaking. I undo the top button of my shirt. I try to keep my hands still.

 “Is it hot in here?” I say.

She says something I cannot hear; I only see that her lips are moving. She is standing up now, and I feel Afra shifting in her seat behind me. There is the sound of running water. A rushing river. But I see a sparkle, like the edge of a very sharp knife. Lucy Fisher’s hand turning the handle of the tap, walking towards me, placing the glass in my hands and lifting it up to my face as if I am a child. I can see her clearly now and she looks frightened. Afra places her hand on my leg.

The sky cracks. It is raining. Torrential rain. I realise that she’s spoken, I hear her voice through the rain, I hear the word enemy and she stares at me, frowning, and her white face looks flushed.

“Excuse me?” I say.

“I said we’re hear to help you as much as we can.”

“I heard the word enemy.” I say.

She thrusts her shoulders back and purses her lips, she glances again at Afra and there’s a spark of anger that fires up in her face and eyes. But it’s not me she’s angry with; she can’t really see me.

“All I said was that I’m not your enemy.” Her voice is apologetic now, she shouldn’t have said that, it slipped out, there is pressure on her, I can see it in the way she tugs at that strand of hair. But the words ring out still in the room, even as she speaks to Afra, who now nods her head very slightly at her, if only to acknowledge her presence.

Q3: You now need to think about the WHOLE of the source.

This text is from the beginning of Chapter 2.

How has the writer structured the text to interest you as a reader?

You could write about:

·        what the writer focuses your attention on at the beginning of the source

·        how and why the writer changes this focus as the source develops

·        any other structural features that interest you

(8 marks)

Write your answer below:

 

What are the relationships between people and/or groups?

Choose a public place such as a shopping mall, a library, a restaurant, or any other place where you are not participating in the activities you are observing. Record your observations in field notes. Pay attention to and describe the following in detail:

The setting (layout of the space, arrangement of furniture, decor, “feel,” and so forth),
The people (describe individuals and groups, detail behaviors)
The action (what are the relationships between people and/or groups?).
Then expand the description of one particular person at some point in the observation.
By Day 7, turn in:

A 3 page summary of what you observed.
A few paragraphs of what you learned about yourself as a researcher.
Any electronic field notes you took, as an Appendix to the paper (or a brief description of your handwritten notes).

Discuss how genre fictions can represent modern society in ways that are unavailable to mainstream realist fiction. What advantages/disadvantages are there?

With reference to ‘The Fifth Season’ by N.K.Jemisin and ‘The City and The City’ by China Mieville, discuss how genre fictions can represent modern society in ways that are unavailable to mainstream realist fiction. What advantages/disadvantages are there?

Explain your reasons for supporting the position that you do. You should also consider the opposing arguments as well and why those arguments are not convincing.

Length: This paper should be at least four typed pages in length (double-spaced) (not including the Works Cited page) and include at least four documented sources, properly cited and incorporated into your text.

This assignment requires you to write an argument (assisted by some outside sources), not simply describe or narrate.

Avoid choosing a large, controversial issue, such as captial punishment or abortion. These issues are too large for the scope of this essay and would require extensive research to handle effectively.

6) Narrow the subject, considering audience, purpose, context, ethos, pathos, and logos. You are looking for a topic that is debatable, one that you can reasonably argue at least two competing viewpoints. Something specific and personal is the best choice, such as To work, one job could not be far superior to the other; there would need to be a convincing, reasonable case to be made for both sides. Your topic should be an issue that is personal to you, that you have plenty of specific details and arguments to offer on both sides of the issue, that you are truly undecided about, and that you can find a few sources to fill in information on.

7) Your goal is first to present each side of the issue as fairly and as accurately as possible. Next, you should explain your reasons for supporting the position that you do. You should also consider the opposing arguments as well and why those arguments are not convincing.

8) You should have a clear position by the end of your essay and include a correctly punctuated Works Cited page

Write an argumentative essay in which you state and defend a claim about whether Dr. Jekyll is responsible for the crimes committed by Mr. Hyde.

Prompt: Write an argumentative essay in which you state and defend a claim about whether Dr. Jekyll is responsible for the crimes committed by Mr. Hyde.Grading Checklist/Rubric

Introduction

___/5 Engaging hook to catch the reader’s attention
___/5 Background information that states the text and author
___/5 Thesis is clearly stated

Body Paragraphs

___/5 Topic sentences that are clearly derived from the thesis statement
___/5 Evidence from the text that is quoted/paraphrased; Supports topic sentence
___/5 Analysis of evidence shows depth of knowledge

Argumentative Technique

___/5 Counter claim is stated clearly
___/5 Rebuttal of counterclaim is clearly stated
___/5 Evidence from the text is used to support argument

Conclusion

___/5 Conclusion restates the thesis without using the exact same words
___/5 Conclusion does NOT include new ideas or information
___/5 Conclusion ties the ideas of the essay to the larger world

Word Choice

___/5 Essay is written solely in objective third person
___/5 Words and phrases are natural, effective, and appropriate; memorable or powerful
___/5 Transitional words and phrases are used skillfully to connect ideas
___/5 Varied sentence lengths

Conventions/Grammar

___/10 Spelling, capitalization, punctuation is correct

MLA Format

___/4 Double spaced throughout the essay
___/3 One inch margins and 12 point normal looking font (Times, Arial etc)
___/3 Title/Heading are included

score____/100

Does Trump Face Legal Jeopardy for His Incendiary Speech Before the Riot?

Your final exam will consist of a 2 page essay/op-ed on the Capital Riots that occurred on Wednesday, January 6, 2021 as the electoral votes were being tallied in Congress. Essay must be typed, double spaced, 1” margins, 12 pt font. Please be sure to cite any information copied, borrowed, or paraphrased using parenthetical citation form with a works cited page.

Your essay should accomplish 2 main objectives:

Describe the events of that day leading up to and including the riots also including the results of riots and the most current information concerning the fallout from the siege of the Capital.

Your opinion of what happened on that fateful day. Below are some questions to consider as you are formulating how you will express your opinion?
Why were the rioters protesting? Who were they? What was their objective? Do you agree with their reasoning/perspective?
Who is responsible for the violence and death? Is President Trump responsible? Should he be punished? Should Republicans who supported overturning the election during the electoral votes be punished? Are they responsible? How should these participants be punished? Should they?
How do you assess the threat to American Democracy? Do you think that democracy is in trouble?
Compare the police presence in D.C. during the social justice protests of the spring and summer to the police presence on January 6th. Why do you think there was a difference? Was there a difference? Why?

Main focal point should be American Democracy and the Election of 2020

Final Exam Essay – Additional Information to Consider

Insurrection
18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Sedition
18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Domestic Terrorism (FBI.gov)

18 U.S. Code § 2331(5)

Activities that involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; appearing to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; influence the policy of government by intimitdation or coercion; or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnaoping; and occurring primarily within the territorial jurisciction of the United States.

1st Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article II, Section IV U.S. Constitution
The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-may-be-shielded-from-riot-charges-by-klan-speech-ruling

A 1969 Supreme Court ruling that tossed the conviction of a Ku Klux Klan leader may also shield President Donald Trump from prosecution for inciting last week’s Capitol riot, leaving few alternatives to hold him accountable if impeachment efforts fail.
At the rally preceding the riot, Trump gave an inflammatory speech, urging the crowd to go to the Capitol and demand legislators gathered to formally confirm President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory address his baseless claims of voter fraud. Trump asked his supporters to “show strength” and “fight much harder.” Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump Jr. and U.S. Representative Mo Brooks also spoke ahead of the riot, which led to five deaths.
Several Democrats and some Republicans have raised the possibility that Trump might be prosecuted for inciting the riot, and Michael Sherwin, the acting U.S. attorney in Washington, fed such speculation when he suggested on Thursday that his office would probe the president’s role. But many legal experts are skeptical charges will be filed against Trump. “A prosecution is possible but unlikely,” said John Banzhaf, a law professor at George Washington University. “A conviction would be even less likely.”

‘Imminent Lawless Action’
That’s because the Supreme Court said in its landmark decision in Brandenburg v. Ohio that the constitutional right to free speech protects inflammatory rhetoric unless it’s intended to incite “imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” The ruling overturned the conviction of Clarence Brandenburg, an Ohio Klan leader who had been prosecuted under a state law for making a speech in which he advocated violence against African Americans and Jews.
The case, in which the American Civil Liberties Union represented Brandenburg, set a high bar for criminal prosecutions of inflammatory speech. To make the case that Trump incited the riot, prosecutors would have to show that he intended to provoke violence, but his words are vague enough that it’s possible to argue that he was simply urging his supporters to peacefully protest outside the Capitol.

Does Trump Face Legal Jeopardy for His Incendiary Speech Before the Riot?

Write an essay arguing whether the use of ultrasonic devices should be banned.

Your state legislature is considering the issue of the use of ultrasonic devices. An ultrasonic device emits a high-frequency sound that adults cannot hear. Some people believe the use of ultrasonic devices should be banned. Write an essay arguing whether the use of ultrasonic devices should be banned. Your essay must be based on ideas and information that can be found in the “Ultrasonic Devices” passage set.

What makes a good job interview

What makes a good job interview

Compose an essay that highlights various aspects of the 1920s in America (The Jazz Age).

Project Description:

Students will work to compose an essay that highlights various aspects of the 1920s in America (The Jazz Age).

This is an individual assignment with the same criteria as the essay (two sources/research/CEC format/parenthetical citations/Works Cited page).

Students will use MLA research methods to insert two factual elements into their essays. The essays will conclude with a Works Cited page which lists all resources used.

Project Goal:

Because most people in school today were not living during the 1920s, much of the information for this project will come from research.

Individual Responsibilities:
choose one of the following topics:

  • prohibition
  • trends of the 1920s (dance, fashion, entertainment, movie industry, sports)
  • the automobile
  • famous people
  • jazz music
  • organized crime
  • The Lost Generation

The essays must include factual information that is obtained through research. This information must use parenthetical documentation. Further, the individual must submit a correctly formatted Works Cited page

Essays submitted without all of the requirements–essay, works cited page, three sources–will not receive full credit in grading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analyze the ending of the novel. What are the “circles of sorrow” that Nel experiences?

Your literary analysis essay will be on the novel Sula by Toni Morrison. You can choose from any of the topics listed below (recommended) or explore further topics in the chapter on Sula, pp. X to Y in the book How to Write about Toni Morrison (linked here for your convenience).

Your literary analysis should be 5 pages, not including the Works Cited page, and should be double spaced in Times New Roman 12- point font and must include:

• A clearly articulated thesis that states, somewhere in your introduction, the assertion (position, interpretation) that your paper will prove
• An introduction, a minimum of 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion
• At least two quotes from the novel itself that are integrated into your discussion
• At least two citations of outside sources (such as literary criticism on the novel, preferably from articles from the MDC databases)
• Topic sentences that focus the discussion in the body paragraphs • Examples, details, explanations in the body paragraphs that clearly support your thesis
• Clear connections between ideas from paragraph to paragraph and within paragraphs
• Proper MLA style format in the heading, in the in-text citations, and in the Works Cited page (see the template for the heading and margins in this lesson). Please remember that MLA formatting guidelines apply to the entire document, not just how you interact with sources.
• Works Cited page includes articles from two sources and from the novel for a minimum of three total listed sources
• Standard usage, grammar, and mechanics
TOPIC: Analyze the ending of the novel. What are the “circles of sorrow” that Nel experiences? Is the ending pessimistic, optimistic, or something else altogether?