How can language be used to resolve your self discipline issues in preschool?

/in /by

How can language be used to resolve your self discipline issues in preschool?

What role (if any) can eating insects play in ensuring future global food security?

/in /by

What role (if any) can eating insects play in ensuring future global food security? Main stakeholder/scholarly discipline: from the perspective of a place that already consumes bugs Second scholarly discipline perspective: policymakers perspective Summarize the key concerns and evidence used by your assigned stakeholder or disciplinary perspective and contrast it with at least one other perspective researched by your group. You will synthesize the different sides of the debate in a well-researched paper in which you: -Integrate discussion of how 2 different scholarly disciplines or stakeholder groups view the issue; -Consider the implications of different solutions for society and/or the environment; and – Conclude with your own informed perspective and policy recommendations of how the issue should be addressed in the future based on what you learned in your research. In 1300-1600 words, the paper should be structured to include the following: Introduction – Start with a hook to grab the readers’ attention. In 1-2 paragraphs, introduce the debate topic and provide an overview of what you will accomplish in the paper. Clearly state which two stakeholder or disciplinary perspectives you will discuss. Background of the debate topic – In 2-3 paragraphs, provide the reader with any relevant background information about your topic. You might discuss historical, political, social, or geographical factors or define key concepts. 2 stakeholder or disciplinary perspectives – The main body of your paper should be dedicated to describing and contrasting at least two stakeholder or disciplinary perspectives of your topic (your assigned perspective as well as at least one other from your peers in your group). Clearly describe which two perspectives you are addressing. Content will vary, but you should attempt to address the following: -How is the topic understood by a particular scholarly discipline or stakeholder group? -What evidence exists to support (or reject) each position? -How does the topic affect different people or places? Can you provide concrete examples from a particular place or people? -What are the considerations, impacts, or benefits of different approaches to addressing the topic based on each stakeholder perspective? Discussion – In 2-3 paragraphs, discuss your findings. What are the implications of different solutions or future pathways for particular people or places impacted by the issue? Conclusion – Summarize your key findings and conclude with your own informed perspective and policy recommendations of how the issue should be addressed in the future. Citations – You must cite at least 6 sources (more is fine) in your paper. At least 3 sources must be from peer-reviewed, scholarly sources. Sources cited must be valid and relevant to the debate topic and stakeholder perspectives. Bibliography – Bibliography must be alphabetized by author last name and use consistent formatting (APA style recommended)

Discuss the relationship between language and each social variable.

/in /by

Review literature on the relationship between language and one or more social factors such as gender, class, ethnicity or some other social variable.
First step: review studies that relate language toe each of those variables.
Second step: review studies that relate to more than on variable.
Third step: summarise your arguments and write a conclusion.
Font – Times New Roman, 12pt, Arial 11pt, Calibri 11pt.
Margin – 2.54cm left and right (minimum); 3cm L/R (max)
Page numbers, anonymise (only the title and the word count to be included).
Marks are deducted for poor referencing.
Marks are deducted for poor spelling, punctuation, grammar and layout.
Terminology must be defined the first time it is used.
Quoted definitions should be from an appropriate, referenced academic source and briefly recapped in your own words.

Structure:
Introduction (approx 400w), Main body (approx 3200w), conclusion approx 400w).

Introduction:
sets the expectations for the reader. It is NOT a place to present your arguments, save that for the main body.
Outline the aim of your assignment.
Briefly mention the key theories and authors you rely on to make that
case.
Inform the reader of your main conclusion (say what are you arguing for, but do not present your arguments).

Main body:
– Discuss the relationship between language and each social variable.
– Discuss the interaction between language and multiple social
variables.
– Discuss how different approaches result in different theories/findings.

Conclusion:
– Focus on providing the arguments (describing the reasons) rather than conclusions.
For example, “Lakoff says women’s language is a sign of dominance” is a conclusion, not an argument.
In contrast, “Lakoff says the use of hedges indicates a lack of power” presents the reasons/arguments for that conclusion.
– Make the links between the theoretical arguments and their examples.
– The conclusion sums up how you argued for your thesis. As such, it MUST NOT contain new information (neither literature nor examples)!

Does text messaging affect student’s writing?

/in /by

Does text messaging affect student’s writing?

How has the Magistrate been infected? What kind of knowledge has he been infected with?

/in /by

The paper is about the novel ″waiting for the Barbarians by Coetzee″. Its goal is to answer the question ″At one point in the narrative, the Magistrate refers to the “infection of knowledge.” How has the Magistrate been infected? What kind of knowledge has he been infected with? How does this infection work its way through his body and mind? You may also want to consider the knowledge that the Magistrate is infected with through his confinement, dehumanization, and torture, and whether it is the same as the knowledge with which he was infected as a (reluctant) witness of torture.″

My goal is to have two body paragraphs, first one talking about the magistrate′s infection of knowledge within the empire, and the second one being about his infection of knowledge through his experience of torture and confinement.
There has to be at least 1 citation per body paragraph.

The essay could vary from 800-1000 words, and i′ve already written the introduction, which was 130 words.
The paper is in MLA format, double spaced, font size 12, Times New Roman

The source is the pdf version found online of “Waiting for the Barbarians” by Coetzee

How is gender identity determined.

/in /by

How is gender identity determined. Is it a cause of your surroundings or is it predetermined,

What kind of influence or power do they wield?

/in /by

Write an essay analyzing the role of women in The Great Gatsby, as represented by Daisy, Jordan, and Myrtle. What kind of influence or power do they wield? Consider their social positions and interactions

which diet is the best for mental and physical health?

/in /by

the topic is which diet is the best for mental and physical health? It will focus on the mediteranean diet and keto diet, and any other diets can be included in the criticism paragraph (before the conclusion) ymy thesis is that the Mediterranean diet is the best for mental and physical health because it is adaptable and protects against the leading causes of death and it protects against mental health disorders.

Analyze how integrity functions in at least one of the other writers’ essays

/in /by

In Steven L. Carter’s essay, “The Rules About the Rules,” he suggests that Americans are having an “integrity dilemma” and outlines a new “simple and specific” definition of integrity. Using Carter’s definition as a foundation, analyze how integrity functions in at least one of the other writers’ essays. In addition, choose a lens to focus your argument. Some possible lenses: integrity as it relates to morality, the law, religion, government, self-image, or scientific research. You may also use a specific part of Carter’s definition as a lens if you would like to focus on action or speech as a key measure of integrity. Make sure to ground your argument in a textual analysis that examines HOW the writers’ arguments work, not just a summary.

What examples can you give from your work that support your claim that your understanding has improved?

/in /by

This assignment requires the student to evaluate the work that has been done throughout the course (discussions, position paper, research paper and oral presentation) and assign a grade based upon your progress in the class. Has your writing improved? Can you show examples from your work where your writing has become more convincing, or clearer, or more coherent? Have you grown in your understanding of the role of ethics/theories of knowledge/myth or origin stories influence on our contemporary culture and specifically on the relationship with technology to your major/life/future? What examples can you give from your work that support your claim that your understanding has improved? Finally, give your self a grade for your final grade using your own self reflection and evaluation to guide you. So be honest, but not too hard on yourself or conversely not too easy on yourself either-a fine balance is what your’re shooting for!