In responding your peers, identify examples of telehealth currently used in our healthcare system, citing your source. Please expand on the topic of telehealth by discussing its impact on improving access and patient safety. Do you agree with its use? Why or why not. Please explain.
Please refer to order #7537680883 of initial discussion.
Investigate the Fibonacci sequence. Describe how the Fibonacci sequence is constructed. Give a brief biography of Fibonacci. Give at least three instances where the Fibonacci sequence appears in nature. Explain what the Golden Ratio is and how it is calculated. Discuss how the Golden Ratio is connected to the Fibonacci sequence.
1. “The future of this form awaits its participants who truly believe that the application of sequential art, with its interweaving of words and pictures, could provide a dimension of communication that contributes—hopefully on a level never before attained—to the body of literature that concerns itself with the examination of human experience.”—Will Eisner, Comics and Sequential Art (p. 141) Do you think that graphic novels contribute to the body of literature that concerns itself with the examination of human experience?
If so, please comment using three of the five books read in class to support your answer.
If you disagree, please use three of the books read in class to support your answer.
Provide two pieces of textual evidence per book
(200-word response)
2.Consider, for a moment, some of the reasons educators are encouraged to embrace graphic novels—and, to a lesser extent, comic books—as a teaching tool. Graphic novels are said to:
=scaffold students for whom reading and writing are difficult (Bitz, 2004; Frey & Fisher, 2004; Morrison, Bryan, & Chilcoat, 2002);
=foster visual literacy (Frey & Fisher, 2008);
=support English language learners (Ranker, 2007);
=motivate “reluctant” readers (Crawford, 2004; Dorrell,1987);
=and provide a stepping stone that leads students to transact with more traditional (and presumably more valuable) forms of literature.
Which of the claims do you agree with? Please explain why. If you disagree, you will have to explain why.
You have to respond to at least 2 of the points. Textual evidence is required.
(200-word response)
3. Respond to both statements:
Do you agree? Do you disagree? Does your answer depend on the book being read?
Please use three of the books read in class to support your answer.
Provide two pieces of textual evidence per book
(200-word response–total)
Watch a film or television show and analyze it using your sociological imagination.
This is the second of three assignments that, as a whole, will cover all aspects of the project life cycle relevant to your selected project.
Assume that your project sponsor has reviewed the project proposal and has asked that you make some changes to it. For the purposes of this assignment, consider your professor’s feedback to be your project sponsor’s review comments.
Requirements
Write a 4–6 page paper in which you:
Provide a brief summary of your project.
Update the goals and objectives based upon your project sponsor’s feedback, and add two more goals and objectives. (Use your professor’s feedback to update your goals and objectives.)
Describe at least three key milestones and/or deliverables for your project.
Describe a high-level timeline that includes key tasks and deadlines.
Estimate the project’s overall cost and any key staffing and non-staffing resources needed.
Several studies have looked into how gender and talk are related. Chapter 1 in U214 Course Book provides a sociolinguistic perspective that relates conversation styles to social factors. Explain the arguments provided by Goodwin, Lakoff and Cameron that attempt to explain communicative styles of men and women. Use examples from your own context to support your discussion and conclude with your opinion on the matter.
The Short Paper: State Ratification Assignment will allow you to research and better understand the ratification conventions for the U.S. Constitution that occurred at the state level. The purpose of the assignment is to enhance the historian’s grasp of the early American founding era by investigating and interpreting primary and secondary source evidence. Also, this assignment will expose you to the relationship that history has with the present-day.
INSTRUCTIONS
Using primary source documents located in the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution resource, which is available online through the Jerry Falwell Library, you will write a Turabian style 2-3-page short research paper about the Federalists and Anti-Federalists debates at the state ratifying conventions. The paper must use a minimum of 5 primary sources from the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution resource. Additional secondary sources are encouraged and must be appropriately cited if used.
Overall, you must:
1) Select 1 of the 13 state ratifying conventions
2) Provide a well-written narrative analyzing the following three things about that state’s convention:
a. The initial position of the Federalists in the chosen state convention
b. The fears of the Antifederalists
c. The Federalist promises made to relieve those fears.
3) Also, include brief biographical material of the people involved
Your paper body must include an identifiable introduction with a well-crafted thesis statement and summative conclusion. The title page and bibliography do not count toward the 2-3-page requirement. No headings should be used (except on the Bibliography page). Also, the paper must be written in the third person. You should utilize the template from the LU Online Writing Center – Writing Style Guide website.
NOTE: The citation guide provided at the bottom of each webpage on the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution website is not accurate! Therefore, each speech by a delegate should be cited as a separate source in footnote form as follows:
1 George Mason, “Speech at the Virginia Ratifying Convention,” 19 June 1788, in Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution, Volume X: Virginia, ed. John P. Kaminski, et al. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2009), 1391.
Gathering information for this citation is easy. Simply locate the author of the speech by name in the proceedings of the debates. Each speech will have the same title as listed above: “Speech at the Ratifying Convention.” Identify the date of the speech, then use the “Original source” citation information at the bottom of the webpage to locate the volume number and state for the source. Then add the page number found within the body of the recording debate in brackets [xxxx] at the end of the citation. The page number will always come after the material you quote, paraphrase, or otherwise use as your source.
Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of Module 5.
Link to resource page:
This reflection activity is an opportunity for you to reflect on all you’ve accomplished this term. It is through reflection — contemplating what we have experienced — that we understand the importance of our experiences and make use of them in the future, i.e., reflection is a very important part of learning.
Instructions
Context
To better understand the context of English 102, you will reflect on your learning this semester. Using your own writing as evidence, you will evaluate your learning outcome achievement.
Purpose
The purpose of the Final Reflection Essay is to evaluate your learning outcome achievement and reflect on your learning this semester.
Process
1. Read your writing (major and minor assignments) from this semester.
2. Read instructor feedback on you writing this semester.
3. Review learning outcomes from our syllabus (see p. 2).
4. Choose three learning outcomes you have achieved.
5. Write draft of Final Reflection Essay
6. Post draft of Final Reflection Essay on Blackboard.
7. Respond to two classmates’ Final Reflection Essays on Blackboard.
8. Submit Final Reflection Essay by deadline.
Requirements
For this assignment, in 750-1000 words, you will evaluate and reflect upon your learning in our course, choose three learning outcomes (below), provide relevant evidence and development for each of the three learning outcomes, contextualize your overall thesis in an engaging introduction, close your essay in a relevant conclusion, and generally apply characteristics of thoughtful, engaged, and correct writing for your Final Reflection Journal.
Choose from the learning outcomes listed below in order to write your essay.
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this course, you will be able to
Rhetorical Knowledge
Research
Analyze how audience/purpose dictate information included, the order of information, voice, language, and style
Develop an effective research question to guide a sustained research project
Apply conventions of format and structure appropriate to various rhetorical situations
Apply systematic research methodology using library databases to locate and utilize a variety of credible sources (e.g., scholarly journals as well as interviews, case studies, lectures, surveys)
Distinguish between credible sources and non-credible sources, both in traditional print media and outline
Integrate source materials using summaries, paraphrases, and quotations to support a defendable thesis
Processes/Conventions
Critical Thinking, Reading, and Writing
Create texts, with multiple drafts, that adhere to the conventions of Standard Academic English
Demonstrate close reading of a text through various strategies (e.g. annotating, outlining, summarizing, note taking)
Utilize invention and re-thinking to revise their work
Utilize a dictionary to help facilitate understanding of various texts
Collaborate and utilize effectively the social aspects of writing processes (writer-peer & writer-instructor review)
Locate, evaluate, analyze, and synthesize appropriate primary and secondary sources
Summarize and paraphrase arguments and/or other texts * Use quotations and citations appropriately (including sources that cite other sources)
Use interpretation to recognize the author’s meaning and strategies (e.g., induction, deduction) to develop ideas
Use MLA documentation system and/or the APA documentation system
Critique complex arguments of sustained length (longer than the average op-ed piece or newspaper article)
Identify and avoid different types of plagiarism (i.e., intentional and unintentional
Identify logical fallacies and authorial bias, and analyze their effects on an argument
Recognize and acknowledge diverse perspectives of an issue
Formulate constructive questions that facilitate meaningful inquiry
For this assessment you must submit two response paragraphs to the following topics:
Response Paragraph 1
Three to five sentences long
Explain how the resolution of the plot indicates the author’s purpose.
Show what human rights issues took place in the conflict and how the author used the resolution to generate a reaction in the reader.
Use proper spelling and grammar.
Response Paragraph 2
Three to five sentences long
Explain how the diction and characterization indicate the author’s purpose for writing about a human rights issue.
Provide specific examples from the novel.
Use proper spelling and grammar.
Check the Grading Rubric for this assessment.
the novel Is enders game
– Write a Personal Analytical Response essay for “Women who are difficult to love” by Warsan Shire in response to the topic given.
– Use evidence from the source provided in the pdf document.
– Follow the essay format under “Personal Analytical”
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.