Write a persuasive essay of 600 – 750 words (2.5 – 3 pages) about Distracted Driving – Should the government ban texting while driving?

/in /by

Write a persuasive essay of 600 – 750 words (2.5 – 3 pages) about Distracted Driving – Should the government ban texting while driving?
The essay must do the following:
o Provide background information (events, important persons, controversies etc.) so that an uninformed reader may understand the context of the issue/topic and your approach to it.
o Indicate clearly the purpose of the paper to persuade a reader that you have taken a sensible position on an issue.
o Include a clearly stated thesis sentence.
o Support the thesis with clearly relevant content in the paper’s paragraphs so that each includes more than one supporting idea and several specific examples and illustrations.
o Integrate relevant reference materials as summary, paraphrase, or quotations and include your interpretations of these references to demonstrate their relevance to the topic.
o Attribute and document accurately all information from sources.
o Draw an informed conclusion based on the reading, your sources, and, if
appropriate, your own experience.
o Include correct internal and ending reference information following MLA format requirements.
• Proofread your essay to identify and correct major grammar problems like sentence fragments, run-on sentences, comma splices, etc.
• Please use these sources and

What are the roles of analyst and potential conflicts of interests in their role in investment banking?

/in /by

Please answer the following 2 question using the case as primary citation (with examples), and any other references/sources from online if needed.

2003 Global Research Settlement.

a) What are the roles of analyst and potential conflicts of interests in their role in investment banking?
b) What were the issues at the SEC investigation?

What should big cities do with the homeless?

/in /by

What should big cities do with the homeless? What is our responsibility as social beings to our fellow humans?

Describe a traumatized population and the historical, social, economic, race or religious aspects of the trauma they are facing as relevant

/in /by

1. Describe a traumatized population and the historical, social, economic, race or religious aspects of the trauma they are facing as relevant
2. Discuss their traumatic symptoms (sensory, behavior, cognition, affect), impact on the sense of self, and the impact on the interpersonal functioning of this population
3. Based on the research literature available, discuss one or two treatment models utilized with this population and their outcome
4. Discuss pros and cons for this treatment model(s)
5. Discuss which treatment you would choose for this population and provide a rationale

What are your impressions of faith development in relation to an individual’s other developmental processes?

/in /by

Thread: James Fowler was an American theologian who was the professor of Theology and Human Development at Emory University. He has produced several pieces of literature illustrating his theory of faith development.

This week, you will review an article that introduces his stages of faith in relation to the developmental concepts you have learned about in this course. Faith theorists recognize the complex interplay of factors that impact ones faith development.

Development of faith, like other aspects of human development, involves movement from one stage to another and is not always systematic or predictable. Individuals can reach chronologic and biolawhile reflecting structural stages of faith that are more indicative of early or middle childhood or adolescence. Spiritual nurturing and practice, combined with a person’s spiritual aptitude and discipline, impacts the pace and depth of faith development.

After reading and reflecting on the article, develop your thread addressing these questions: Use the questions as headings in your post. Remember to include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion.

What are your impressions of faith development in relation to an individual’s other developmental processes? Do you feel that there is interconnection, or do you oppose the idea that successful faith development requires successful development in other areas? Explain your answer using examples and support from the article and/or other sources of information.

Using your personal experiences, briefly describe some of the most meaningful characteristics of your faith development process. If there were pivotal moments or notable influences, good and bad, mention the significance of those people or events. Only include the most relevant details. Make sure to relate your thread to elements of Fowler’s faith development theory and your specific experiences.

Describe the steps in the decision-making process, and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making.

/in /by

In a four- to five-page paper (excluding the title and references pages), discuss the strategic planning process. In your paper:

Explain the basic steps in the planning process.
Describe the steps in the decision-making process, and predict how the personal attributes of the manager influence decision making.
Predict how the steps of the strategic planning process and the environmental factors that influence decision making impact the quality-productivity-profitability link.
Your paper must include in-text citations and references from at least three scholarly sources, in addition to the text, and be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

Should college athletes be paid?

/in /by

Should college athletes be paid?

How would more conservation education impact the rest of my map?

/in /by

You need to fill in two maps and then answer questions below on a separate page. (link attached for maps)

Practice divergent thinking on your own. You will make two (2) mind maps (consult text for the definition of mind map). For the first map, put you in the center and map out, or brainstorm, the issues, topics, and behaviors you are passionate about. On the map, show the connections between the passions. Think about if your passions have connections, or how they may influence one another.

For the second map, pick one of these passions. This passion will now be in the middle. Map out the things that this passion affects. For example, my passions are nature, education, dancing, psychology, reading, and my dog. If I pick nature to map, perhaps nature encompasses environmental issues, flora and fauna, and environmental philosophies like conservation. It also affects the government, my family, and the larger community. From these points, continue to map out other connections. For example, I can further map out conservation to include air pollution, water pollution, landfills, etc. Notice how far your connections go. Can you connect one part of your map to another passion from the first map? I can connect land conservation back to education. How would more education impact conservation? How would more conservation education impact the rest of my map?

Once you have completed both maps, make them into images and imbed them in a discussion post. Explain your maps to your colleagues and discuss the connections you observed while making the maps. Did you observe anything you did not expect?

Did you find a particular hypothesis/argument/result convincing –and why or why not?

/in /by

Here is the instruction below:

Students should prepare a 2-3 paragraph response (~250 words) with the following subheadings:

1)Summary: What are the most important things that you learned from the reading?

2)One or both of the following:

•Analysis (preferred): Did you find a particular hypothesis/argument/result convincing –and why or why not?
•Reaction: Your thoughts about the reading. For example…
-Did anything surprise you?
-Can you relate this work to your own experiences or other things you’ve learned?
-Is it important that the public know about this line of research –and, if so, why?Etc.

Does national security justify the transformation into a surveillance society?

/in /by

Topic: Does national security justify the transformation into a surveillance society? (In the United States)

You’ll want to connect (synthesize) what others have already said about this problem so that your readers will have an in-depth understanding of the different perspectives of this topic. With this background understanding, you can move to define a new term, refute someone’s point, further support a perspective, etc. This is not a summary assignment. You should not summarize each source individually, and each paragraph should not be dedicated to only one source. During the research portion of this assignment, you may wind up summarizing your articles – this will help you identify patterns and connections among your sources. Because you want to provide an in-depth background, you must do deep and careful research using reputable sources – a simple Google search will not be enough. Include in-text citations where you paraphrase or quote directly from the article. Include a Works Cited or Reference page at the end of the paper.