Write an essay explaining why using animals for pharmaceutical testing should be legal.
Pharmaceutical testing
Write an essay explaining why using animals for pharmaceutical testing should be legal.
Write an essay explaining why using animals for pharmaceutical testing should be legal.
Choose a current controversy related to diversity and persuade your reader on the topic. You will accomplish this by using fact and logic, as befits your academic audience. Steer clear of arguments based on emotion or morality. Your job is not to be the cheerleader for people who already agree with you or share your morality, and only logic will sway your opponent.
You want to illustrate that you have considered both sides of the issue; an effective way to persuade your reader is to show that you have thought through the controversy yet maintain your point of view. Dedicate a paragraph to your opponent’s strongest argument; by offering a rebuttal or ceding the point (and then proving that your cumulative points are stronger), you will win credibility.
Prophecy features in Oedipus the King by Sophocles. Focus on the play and discuss: how do prophetic acts operate within the play? How is prophecy relevant to one or more major theme(s) in the play?
Write a detailed essay about what you would do if you were a commanding officer and what to do to better make the JROTC. program.
Write a coherent, well-organized, and persuasive essay that takes a position on an issue primarily using the Psychologist’s View (Rogerian Argument). Should stem cell research be funded by the government? Should it be outlawed? Why or why not?
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Franz_Kafka
After reading the article, write your answers to the following questions in your reader response journal. Be sure to copy each question into your reader response journal and record your response underneath. You will submit your reader response journal at the end of the lesson.
For this assignment, you will choose one “text” that employs rhetoric in order to make an argument. What is a “text”? For our purposes, let’s consider both traditional texts (i.e., articles, editorials, essays, speeches, manifestos, biblical passages, etc.) and non-traditional texts (i.e., podcasts, Ted Talks, sermons, infographics, webpages, memes, etc.). My reasoning behind broadening the field for potential analyses is simple: I want you to write about a rhetorical situation that feels relevant, interesting, and timely–on a personal level.
The overall goal for this essay is to analyze how an author is using rhetoric to support his/her argument and to persuade his/her audience. You’ll notice that the essay begins with summarizing and ends with evaluating, which means the “heart” of this assignment is clear, perceptive, and well-supported analysis.
Proposed Outline:
● Introduction Paragraph – Identify the basic argument of the text and highlight any relevant context (5 W’s).
● Body Paragraphs – Analyze an effective rhetorical strategy being used to persuade the audience. Either quote or paraphrase from the text. Remember to start with observation. Tell me what the rhetorical technique in view is, then transition into analysis by telling me how the technique functions in the larger argument and/or affects the audience.
● Body Paragraphs – Criticize any rhetorical weaknesses in the argument. This includes omissions, misrepresentations, a failure to address counterarguments, significant blows to ethos, imbalances (overall or on specific issues), structural defects, and, of course, logical fallacies. Explain how these weaknesses undermine their specific position in the text and the author’s larger argument.
● Conclusion Paragraph – Evaluate the text’s overall rhetorical effectiveness in light of Aristotle’s ideal. In what ways was it effective? In what ways did it fail? Is it particularly persuasive for certain demographics? Avoid simplistic “good vs. bad” assessments. Attempt to offer a fair, nuanced review of the text’s various strengths and weaknesses.
Good proficiency in English language is the most important factor for international students if they want to be successful in British higher education’. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Write a 3-4 page essay, about 750-1000 words, double-spaced. Your essay will demonstrate your reading and understanding of the memoir Born a Crime. You will use Beverly Daniel Tatum’s “The Complexity of Identity Links to an external site.” as a secondary source, along with one more source of your choice. This source can be a video, a newspaper article, or an interview. Your essay will have a works cited page (not counted as a page of the essay length requirement) and will follow MLA formatting. Below are the topics–please choose one.
1-Criminality is a theme that runs through Noah’s memoir Born a Crime. Indeed, crime is so central that the author takes the idea in his title. In your essay, you will examine the role of criminality in Apartheid-era South Africa. How was crime perceived by Trevor and his community? How does crime affect them during apartheid? Do you feel that the laws passed during this time are just or unjust? Consider how Trevor’s identity centers him as a crime, but also at times, how his identity helps him to evade prosecution or suspicion?
2-In what ways does Noah’s racial or linguistic identity affect his experiences with his own family, friends, school, community, or the law? In what ways does his unique identity contribute to experiences and spaces that are both “dominant and subordinate” as described by Beverly Daniel Tatum.
3-How does racial segregation affect Trevor and his family members? Consider the limitations on the jobs, school completion, neighborhood, and relationships that they experienced due to segregation. What similarities exist between what Trevor and his family experiences to those living here in the U.S.?
Launch Audio in a New Window
FERRARA
That’s my last Duchess painted on the wall,
Looking as if she were alive. I call
That piece a wonder, now; Fra Pandolf’s hands
Worked busily a day, and there she stands.
Will’t please you sit and look at her? I said
“Fra Pandolf” by design, for never read
Strangers like you that pictured countenance,
The depth and passion of its earnest glance,
But to myself they turned (since none puts by
The curtain I have drawn for you, but I)
And seemed as they would ask me, if they durst,
How such a glance came there; so, not the first
Are you to turn and ask thus. Sir, ’twas not
Her husband’s presence only, called that spot
Of joy into the Duchess’ cheek; perhaps
Fra Pandolf chanced to say, “Her mantle laps
Over my lady’s wrist too much,” or “Paint
Must never hope to reproduce the faint
Half-flush that dies along her throat.” Such stuff
Was courtesy, she thought, and cause enough
For calling up that spot of joy. She had
A heart—how shall I say?— too soon made glad,
Too easily impressed; she liked whate’er
She looked on, and her looks went everywhere.
Sir, ’twas all one! My favour at her breast,
The dropping of the daylight in the West,
The bough of cherries some officious fool
Broke in the orchard for her, the white mule
She rode with round the terrace—all and each
Would draw from her alike the approving speech,
Or blush, at least. She thanked men—good! but thanked
Somehow—I know not how—as if she ranked
My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name
With anybody’s gift. Who’d stoop to blame
This sort of trifling? Even had you skill
In speech—which I have not—to make your will
Quite clear to such an one, and say, “Just this
Or that in you disgusts me; here you miss,
Or there exceed the mark”—and if she let
Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly set
Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made excuse—
E’en then would be some stooping; and I choose
Never to stoop. Oh, sir, she smiled, no doubt,
Whene’er I passed her; but who passed without
Much the same smile? This grew; I gave commands;
Then all smiles stopped together. There she stands
As if alive. Will’t please you rise? We’ll meet
The company below, then. I repeat,
The Count your master’s known munificence
Is ample warrant that no just pretense
Of mine for dowry will be disallowed;
Though his fair daughter’s self, as I avowed
At starting, is my object. Nay, we’ll go
Together down, sir. Notice Neptune, though,
Taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity,
Which Claus of Innsbruck cast in bronze for me!
How would you describe the duke? Is he a reliable narrator? How does the title of the poem affect your understanding of the duke?
Note: An unreliable narrator refers to a narrator that the reader shouldn’t or can’t trust entirely. The narrator’s description of events might be incorrect or tinged by their experience. They add to the overall story through their biased, compromised, or simply incorrect understanding of the story.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.