RESEARCH THE EVOLUTION OF HIPAA AND REPORT ON THE CHANGES SINCE INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION IN A 2 PG PAPER WITH APA FORMAT/REFERENCES.
Do a writeup to summarize the key features of the four (4) suites. A table comparing features is acceptable. Also need to make a recommendation on which of the four (4) suites you would pick, and why you would pick it. Ensure you justify your pick and use references in APA 6th edition format.
Pick three (3) Configuration Management Suites/Tools and compare them with each other and SCCM.
One (1) will be SCCM
At least one (1) should be from this list
Puppet
Chef
SaltStack (aka Salt)
Ansible
Microsoft Intune
Other should be from:
Ivanti’s LANDesk
Quest’s KACE
Symantec’s Altiris
HCL’s BigFix
PDQ
Jamf
Expected Criteria are:
Quality of Comparison
Features picked for comparison help show the feature sets, and the comparison helps the tools stand apart. The comparison also contains accurate data!
Presentation
Format is appealing and easy to follow, includes citations and references.
Reasoning for Recommendation
For the tool being recommended, the reasoning provided makes sense and fits the comparison.
In the first part, discuss the theme of Kierkegaard that we studied in the course (The Individual, Inwardness, Subjectivity, or the Leap of Faith) that you are most interested in learning more about. Research this theme through scholarly literature and find at least 3 academic sources on your topic. Present a summary of your theme including at least two quotes from different academic sources. In addition, reflect about what this theme has meant to you personally, and discuss ways in which you have changed as a person, a thinker, or a student because it. If you don’t feel it has changed you at all, write about that. Another part of what I will be looking for in this section of your paper is the quality and accuracy of the sources you choose to include.
Watch the movie, “The Chamber”. Focus on Sam Cayhall and what personality theorist you think he fits best! (Do not use Freud)
No particular length requirement, just as long as you get your points across! APA format with cover letter, abstract and sources!
The Thin Blue Line
Paper #2
Length: 5-7 double-spaced , typewritten pages
Value: 200 points
The purpose of this paper is to analyze and explain how visual rhetoric works in a documentary film, especially to shape viewers’ responses to the film and the filmmaker’s argument. A secondary purpose is to understand the role of film criticism to involve viewers in a process of reflection and reconsideration of their cinematic experience.
WRITING TASK
After careful consideration of Errol Morris’s film documentary The Thin Blue Line, and a thorough reading of Richard Sherwin’s “The Postmodern Challenge: A Case Study,” write a paper that 1.) analyzes and explains how Morris rhetorically constructs his film in an attempt to persuade his audience and 2.) defines Sherwin’s postmodern challenge and explains how it complicates Morris’s argument.
Part 1: In order to write this paper, you will first need to isolate particular rhetorical strategies that Morris employs and explain how he attempts to shape the audience’s thinking and attitudes. Specifically, identify what Morris does to encourage the audience’s distrust of the criminal justice system, David Harris, and the eyewitnesses, and to elicit their sympathies for Randall Adams. Identify at least three of Morris’s strategies, explain how they work in particular instances in the film, and explain the desired effects on his viewers.
Part 2: After the rhetorical analysis of Morris’s cinematic strategies, you should then transition to Richard Sherwin’s The Postmodern Challenge, explaining how it complicates viewers’ understanding of the film. What non-linear, acausal narratives does Sherwin identify that complicate the case supporting Adams’s innocence, and why are they abandoned by the end of the film? Why, according to Sherwin, do viewers disregard the non-linear, acausal narratives? In other words, what expectations do viewers bring to criminal and courtroom narratives, and how do their expectations limit their ability to perceive and judge reality?
Evaluative Criteria:
1. Do you thoroughly and thoughtfully analyze and explain how Morris uses his film to construct an argument? Do you isolate particular rhetorical strategies and explain Morris’s attempts to influence the audience’s thinking about the Randall Adams case?
2. Do you smoothly transition to Richard Sherwin’s “The Postmodern Challenge,” accurately define the postmodern challenge, and thoroughly explain how it complicates Morris’s narrative?
3. Have you chosen a structure for your ideas that will convince an audience of your argument most effectively? Do you lead the reader carefully from one idea to the next? Are your paragraphs fully developed and cohesive?
4. Sources: Do you incorporate examples from the film and quotations/paraphrasing from Sherwin successfully into the essay? Do you strike an effective balance between their ideas and your own, moving smoothly between the two?
5. Mechanics? Is your writing free of mechanical and grammatical errors that might interfere with a reader’s understanding? Do you cite sources according to proper MLA conventions?
One key aim of this course is to understand how humans develop. With the
increased use of social media, technology, and the presence of media in society, students
will be asked how media affects child or adolescent development. Specifically, students will assess how the
concepts of the course connect to an aspect of child or adolescent development (e.g. cognitive, physical, emotional).
The paper is meant to be an exercise in analyzing concepts of development and create connections to various
aspects of child or adolescent development. This can include evaluating programs/policy and its effectiveness,
identifying limitations of current research, and describing their own ideas/perspective regarding media influence on
child or adolescent development. Therefore, papers (Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, double-spaced, and 1-inch
margins) are required to be a minimum of 5 pages in length (however, more content is highly encouraged).
Inclusion of research citations to support prepositions are also required.
Module 4 – Case
ACTION RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION AND DATA COLLECTION
Case Assignment
The case in Module 4 builds upon your work in Module 3. Referring back to Module 3:
In a 4- to 6-page paper, address the following task:
State a hypothetical or actual business problem that might lend itself to action research. Provide a description of the problem and identify what questions need to be answered. Then, briefly outline a plan that includes the action that is proposed to be taken. Briefly identify what type of data would likely result from the proposed action. Describe how you might evaluate and reflect on the data and what action you may consider taking in the next iteration.
In Module 4, select three different methods of data collection that you intend to use in your action research. Briefly discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Explain your rationale for the method selection, including a discussion of why the data collection method is suitable for addressing the problem or issue under consideration. Further, explain how you would organize and carry out the data collection. Finally, describe specifics regarding how you might reflect upon the data and use it to prepare for taking action with resulting solutions. (4-6 pages added to your case paper in Module 3.
Assignment Expectations
Your 4- to 6-page paper must follow APA formatting and demonstrate clarity, depth, and critical thinking. As you answer the questions posed in this case, include supporting rationale and cited sources.
Module 4 – SLP
ACTION RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION AND DATA COLLECTION
Module 1 described in detail how the SLP for this course will produce a document that will begin a working draft of a proposal for your Doctoral Study. Once again, it is important that you not be concerned that the work you do at this early date will obligate you to that topic later on. Your thinking should and will evolve as you take additional courses. However, you should take this assignment and the feedback you receive seriously because it will serve as the template you will follow as you develop your ideas more fully.
In Module 1 we provided the big picture of what you will put together throughout the course. It would be a very good idea to review it again. Note that the “deliverables” are listed for each module.
As a review, the deliverable for Module 3 was as follows:
Module 3: How would I classify the appropriate study design (explanatory, descriptive, etc.)? Describe how you would classify your design and explain the rationale for your design choice. Briefly discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the approach. (2-3 pages).
SLP Assignment Expectations
Although the SLP is a less formal document than a case study, it is expected that you follow APA convention at the doctoral level. Also, although you are asked for your opinion, remember that it is good practice to avoid writing in the first person. Instead, focus on stating the facts as you perceive them to be while writing in the third person—and cite supporting sources.
Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: “the birth of mass incarcerations'” pages 40-58
Barry Latzer “Michelle Alexander is wrong about mass incarcerations
and any third source that argues against systemic inequities
In 1-2 paragraphs, answer the following: Natural Science topic
What question related to the topic in the news story you chose would you, assuming the role of a natural scientist, like to study?
What prior knowledge and assumptions about the science topic in your article did you have before viewing this news story? In other words, describe what you already knew about the topic.
When responding to this question, consider the list of questions you posed in your Project 1 graphic organizer. Select one question that interests you and that you would like to focus on as you continue your project work in the course.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.