How important is it for someone to pursue their passion?
How important is it for someone to pursue their passion?
How important is it for someone to pursue their passion?
Article Link: https://medium.com/lucky-peach/dick-soup-b3c7f5651b7a
1) Identify three claims that you consider to be central to Dunlop’s argument.
2) For each claim, provide any supporting evidence offered in the article. This evidence should be in the form of direct quotes from the text itself.
3) Once you have identified three claims and their supporting evidence, evaluate the effectiveness of each claim. Were the claims convincing? Did the evidence effectively support the claims? Was the evidence “strong” or “weak” and why?
At the beginning of your paper clearly explain how you critically analyzed your proposition and how your analysis helped to refine your proposition.
Clearly state your proposition as refined.
Clearly identify the decision maker- to whom the proposition is meant to be presented, and what it is you want the decision maker to do to adhere to your argument. (What is your goal in making the argument.)
Build an argument supporting your proposition
Clearly state the claims and issues that are most important to your argument.
Do some research!!!
Present and give citations referencing the materials and sources that support your argument and claims when you give the information. You should have at least four (4) credible sources. If the source is not credible or familiar on its face (for example; The New York Times –Harvard Medical Journal etc.) then explain to your decision maker why the source can be relied upon.
Examine both sides of the issue.
State why your side is preferable.
State a clear conclusion of what action you desire your decision maker to take.
Paper should be at least 4-5 pages- (double spaced 11 or 12 size font) of argument. This does not include any list of references.
What might be some challenges to the process of publishing a research proposal
For this assignment you will need to produce an MLA-formatted citation for Steven Harvey, “The Other Steve Harvey”
Contemporary relationship:
In your essay include a paragraph or more on that reflects on a contemporary design of a church by architect Santiago Calatrava for the City of New York that incorporates formal characteristics of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. How do you understand the translation of formal principles in the Hagia Sophia to this contemporary church? You may find information using the article cited below; however, you may also do your own research.
Anderson, Nicole. “Calatrava Offers First Glimpse of Liberty Park at World Trade Center When Unveiling Church Design,” The Architect’s Newspaper, December 3, 2013, accessed 1:29PM EST, February 10, 2018, https://archpaper.com/2013/12/santiago-calatrava-offers-first-glimpse-of-liberty-park-at-world-trade-center-when-unveiling-church-design/
1. Remember to use 12 point font in CALIBRI and write from the ESSAY TEMPLATE located in the Content Section of D2L. Essays not written with the template may not be graded.
2. Essay should be between 750 and 1000 words. Double spaced paragraphs with proper footnoting when using sourced material.
3. Document margins should be 1” at top, bottom, left and right. If you choose to include a direct quote that is longer than two sentences, please adhere to the following formatting:
“Indent the quote using one tab, decrease the font size to 10 point, decrease line spacing to 1.5. Indent the quote using one tab, decrease the font size to 10 point, decrease line spacing to 1.5. Indent the quote using one tab, decrease the font size to 10 point, decrease line spacing to 1.5.”
4. Please use Chicago Style Manuals posted in the RESOURCE section of D2L <> to ensure you are following correct formatting styles. For this course, I prefer everyone to use footnotes rather than citing sources within the paragraph and / or including a List of Works Cited. Also, please remember to include page numbers at the bottom right of each page (including the first page). Websites such as Wikipedia are not, generally, acceptable sources. Websites of cultural organizations, architects, newspapers journals, etc. are acceptable and should be cited per the Chicago Style Manual.
5. Save your document as: LAST NAME-FIRST NAMEessay01 [02,03, etc.]
Writing a research paper gives you an opportunity to explore a topic of special interest, research that topic, and organize your research findings in writing for an academic audience.
Through your preparation work, you have established an argumentative thesis statement and have planned a clear organization of your main points. Your research is complete, and the details are integrated into your writing plan. You have pulled it all together in a draft and have revised the paper’s organization, ideas, and words.
In this task, you will write the final draft of your argumentative research paper. You may use the sources and thesis from Task 1, but it is not required. Aim for a polished, error-free submission. The writing tone for your research paper should be formal and appropriate for academic writing. The information in the paper should be based on credible source material. If needed, the “Topic Ideas” web link below can be used for selecting your paper topic.
The paper must follow APA documentation guidelines and must include an APA-formatted reference list, not your annotated bibliography from Task 1. Any sources that you cite in the paper must be included in the reference list, and any source in the reference list must also be cited within your paper.
A. Write an original and cohesive argumentative research paper (suggested length of 8–10 pages).
1. Provide an effective introduction.
2. Provide an appropriate thesis statement that previews two to four main points.
3. Develop each of the previewed main points in effective paragraphs with support from a variety of sources.
4. Provide an effective conclusion.
B. Incorporate seven academically credible sources in your paper.
Note: More than seven sources may be used but are not required.
C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
!!!! I already have the thesis and the sources if you could just write the paper and include the thesis and the sources I have provided.!!!!
You should complete an Informative Review of this article by providing your knowledge, research on the Importance/Rewards of providing Service Learning in higher Education and Servicing (giving back) to your community. (There is no right or wrong answer) This is your thoughts after research and applying your current knowledge.
CLASSICAL ARGUMENT ESSAY
The purpose of this handout is to help you draft the final essay in the course: A Classical Argument. You may fill in the blanks. Remember the following:
Audience
Peers with an opposite or indifferent viewpoint than yours
Purpose
To convince and persuade with ethical/logical means
Subject
Issue that is debatable and arguable .
INTRODUCTION
• What is the issue/problem? Open with a quote, stat, or an interesting fact to catch reader’s attention and establish context of persuasion (this can wait until later on in the drafting process).
• What is your claim on this issue? What is your position?
• Why is this important? Why is your position important?
• Why should the audience care? How does this issue impact this audience?
BODY SECTIONS
a) Narration or Background
• What is the history of your topic/issue/claim? Give the audience some background information. Provide research sources.
• Begin maybe 5-10 years ago with your topic. What are some key events, topics, ideas (or people) that have happened to make your issue debatable and something to argue?
b) Definition of Position
How can you define your claim so the audience will understand? What is . . . ? This is a type of . . .? Define key words in your position statement that will help convince your audience to believe the way you do. Think about defining at least two words in your claim/position statement.
1. What does a dictionary source state?
2. How can you redefine using your terms?
EVIDENCE OR CONFIRMATION OF ARGUMENT
• The discussion of warrants (principles/laws of society), assumptions (shared values/beliefs), should be in this portion.
• What are the assumptions associated with your claim? You need to explain these because the audience needs to understand the kinds of values that make your claim creditable. This is where you should have sources to build your authority (ethos). You could create a story or testimony about the creditability of your claim.
• What is the “goodness” of your position or the positives? What kinds of belief statements are associated with your claim? Are there some moral lessons? You should include sources.
REFUTATION OR COUNTEREVIDENCE
What are some major objections to my claim? What questions do you need to address for your audience to understand? Explain why your audience could be wrong, and how you are right?
Objection 1:
Explain why the objection is wrong
Objection 2:
Explain why the objection is wrong
Objection 3:
Explain why the objection is wrong.
CONCLUSION
What are your reasons for wanting this claim or reasons for your position (logos)? Are there some benefits or improvements to society if your claim is accepted? Possible call to action?
1. Benefit/advantage/solution?
2. Benefit/advantage/solution?
3. Benefit/advantage/solution?
Initial Post Instructions
Main Post Paragraph 1: Share Your Thoughts on Annotated Bibliographies
Please take the time to reflect and to honestly respond to all of the following (in a single, well-developed paragraph):
When you started this class, did you fully understand the definition of an “annotated bibliography”?
Based on your textbook and lesson readings for this week, what do you now understand an annotated bibliography to be? Have you been guilty of “cherry picking” from the sources you write about? Explain.
In what ways do you anticipate your annotated bibliography being helpful to you in writing a strong, compelling argument research essay?
Also, after reviewing the lesson and the textbook, what remaining questions do you have about the annotated bibliography in general and/or about our assignment this week?
Main Post Paragraph 2: Perform an Initial Source Evaluation
Part of this week’s assignment will ask you to richly evaluate your potential sources for your argument research essay. This post will get you started by allowing you to practice with one of those sources. In a single, rich paragraph:
Introduce the source by author, title, and year, and summarize it briefly.
Explain why you chose this source over others.
Briefly run through all five elements of the CRAAP test.
How thoroughly have you read this source and how many times?
How have you benefited from more thorough readings of the source?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.