Respond and give suggestions and feedback to each of your group members regarding their Justification of Need section for the Change Proposal. Provide a peer critique for each of your group members’ proposals. Then, identify other ideas or concepts that they may want to include in order to develop a robust Change Proposal. Refer to writer’s message.
Chapter 3 looked at psychosocial and biosocial theories for criminal behavior. Several biological issues such as a low resting heart rate and low serotonin levels have been associated with deviant behavior. Should lawmakers implement laws to force individuals with these types of conditions into programs to address potential issues? Why or why not? Should something be done before deviant behavior occurs? What about after? Would your attitude change if the person was yourself?
2 or 3 sources are fine thank you
What are the challenges that obi faces and who does he address them? What lessons have you learnt from obi life
1. Important group type content (relevant group concepts for the group type or group model, etc., (3)
points)
2. What is psychoeducation and what are the ways it is used.. example ( anxiety, depression, substance abuse, phobia, grief)
Using the seven-step process of selecting our topic and narrowing our research focus from pages 85–86 of the textbook, complete the table using the Unit II Template.
In the worksheet, you will complete the following tasks.
Identify the main subject area that you are interested in.
Break down that main subject into at least four subareas.
Select two subareas that interest you the most.
Identify at least three research questions.
Identify specific objectives for your research questions.
Articulate how you would assess your chosen objectives, or from a high-level overview, explain how you would go about gathering data for your proposed study.
Describe your continued interest in your topic. Explain why your topic is important to you, the fire service, or even the world. Explain what would happen if this research was not conducted.
Remember that your research topic should be specific to you and your interests, location, jurisdiction, and station.
After completing the chart, write your problem and purpose statements, and identify your research questions. Then, write a brief background and significance section to justify the research that you are proposing. You should strive to paint a vivid picture of the issue to the readers so they can see the importance of it and why your topic needs to be studied. This section of your submission must be at least one page in length.
Your completed submission, including both sections, must be at least two pages in length, not including the required title and reference pages. It must also contain at least two sources in addition to your textbook. Remember to review the rubric before you begin your essay.
Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.
U.S. CENSUS QUICKFACTS (2017)Exercise Questions: Are there differences or variations in life chances (access and opportunity) that are measurable by zip code or race/intersectionality (i.e. race, class, gender, or ethnicity)? Assignment #4Using the attached U.S. Census QuickFacts (2017), identify three indices (i.e. housing; median household income ….) that illustrates that zip code matters (3); and that race/intersectionality (3) matters in terms of one’s life chances.
Assignment Instructions: Academic Integrity reading and memo
The new and improved Academic Integrity Handbook is at:
https://journalism.arizona.edu/sites/journalism.arizona.edu/files/Academic%20Integrity%20Handbook_2020_final.pdf
Think: What resonates with you from integrity in previous classes? What do you think will be particularly applicable in a reporting public affairs class? What jumps out at you and makes you think?
Write: Write a 2- to 3-page essay, double-spaced, including three of the most important take-away points from the handbook that you should remember in 313. Discuss each point, articulating your thinking. (A full, double-spaced page is about 250 words.)
Note: The handbook is a publication of the School of Journalism, not for the overall UA campus, so be sure to be clear on that in your essay, instead of referring it to simply as the University of Arizona’s policy. The handbook adheres to UA policies, but then the School of Journalism takes them farther in the journalism setting.
Possible angles: What was the culture for cheating or academic honesty in your earlier education? What do you know about integrity issues for journalism? What do you think are the most important areas of professional integrity and academic integrity? Are they different for journalism? How do the integrity rules in the School of Journalism relate to what you are seeing in the news media today? Did anything surprise you in the handbook?
You don’t have to answer all of those questions. But think. And write from your thinking instead of just regurgitating. One way to tackle the assignment is to write about one point or a couple of points in depth. Or choose five take-sway points and develop those for a couple of paragraphs each. No lists and fragments. You can write this as a memo or an essay
EVALUATION ESSAYObjectives
Write a persuasive evaluation
Use and cite a source in the essay
Essay length–minimum 500 wordsAssignmentApply evaluation elements to a subject you like or dislike. Subjects may include something related to your major, a form of entertainment (a movie, book, magazine, sports team, vacation destination, etc.), a practical topic (a computer, car, newspaper, etc.), or a creative topic that meets the definition of an evaluation and uses evaluation techniques properly.Evaluation topics need to be objects/things, such as movies or others listed above. Avoid evaluating controversial issues such as gun control, etc., because those topics turn out to be proposal, not evaluation. An evaluation includes the following four elements:
1. Description of the subject (physical description or plot)
2. Judgment (your opinion of the subject)
3. Criteria (also called “standards”–that is, what you look for in the subject–what makes a good or bad movie, for example)
4. Evidence (examples or explanation to support your judgment)These elements often blend together. An example from a movie’s plot could provide evidence that the film is entertaining and engaging, as well as support the judgment.If you choose to evaluate a movie, don’t simply summarize the plot and mention criteria in the conclusion. In fact, just one short paragraph of plot summary is necessary. The essay should instead focus on criteria such as character development, theme, music, special effects, etc. and give evidence/examples from the plot. The best way to organize a movie evaluation is through criteria, not plot summary. For example, start with an intro paragraph that states your judgment, then a paragraph that briefly summarizes the plot without giving away the ending. Write a paragraph for each criteria, providing evidence for how the movie meets the criteria. End with a conclusion paragraph that summarizes judgment and criteria.SourceUse one source to back up your judgment or serve as a counterargument. If you evaluate a movie, you could use a movie review written by a professional movie critic, for example. Avoid websites that allow anyone to post a review, because those are not professional, credible sources.
A Works Cited page is optional, but be sure that you clearly and thoroughly credit the source in your essay. Ask if you are not sure how to do that.Reading Audience and Purpose Write as though the reading audience includes readers who are familiar with the subject, as well as those who want to know more about it (in other words, explain information thoroughly). Consider the relationship between writer, audience/reader, and purpose. Who are you as a writer? A fan of the topic? Someone involved in the topic? Who would be interested in reading this topic, or in knowing about it? What is your evaluation’s purpose? Do you want readers to see this movie? If readers are in the market for a used car, do you recommend the car you are evaluating? Rough and final draftsPost your ROUGH DRAFT in the rough draft forum.After receiving feedback in the rough draft forum and revising the essay, post your FINAL DRAFT into turnitin.com
My topic for this project is: Community race relations/police violence – #BlackLivesMatter.
Answers the following questions:
What specific conversation are you planning on following for the “Researching Rhetorically” project? (My topic is #BlackLivesMatter)
What social movement or influential organization is responding to that issue? How are they responding (i.e. briefly state their objectives and strategies)? Be specific (for example, there’s a difference between “the ocean” and “this organization is combatting overfishing in a specific zone and its impacts on wildlife”).
Why did you select this conversation? What connection does this have to your personal, academic, and/or professional interests?
What preconceptions do you have about this conversation? What preconceptions do you have about this organization or social movement? What questions do you have about either?
Analyze 1 theme in 2 of the works of literature, “Hills like white elephants” and “the story of an hour “. How does the theme help to reveal the plot, characters, setting, etc. in the two pieces of literature?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.