Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

  1. Identify two issues that are related to your career or degree: My career is Medical Coder. I read patients medical charts and analyze it, determining the patients diagnoses and any procedures performed. I then categorize those diagnoses and procedures according to a national classification system, assigning a specific numeric or alphanumeric code to each diagnosis or procedure. My degree I wish to achieve is BA in Health Information Management.
  2. Write a fully developed paragraph for issue one (5–8 sentences).
  3. Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue.
  4. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree, or your potential field or degree.
  5. Write a fully developed paragraph for issue two (5–8 sentences).
  6. Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue.
  7. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree, or your potential field or degree.
  8. After exploring the arguments related to your issues, take a moment to consider the bigger picture. Then, briefly reflect (in 1 to 2 paragraphs) on the importance of persuasion for the issue you are most likely to write about. Be specific in your assignment; this information will help guide you as you work on your project in the coming weeks.
  9. Identify which side you might argue if you plan to pursue this issue in your final persuasive

essay.

  1. Identify your potential audience and why your topic would be relevant to them.

Prepare a 2 page summary of the research and responses to the current philosophy of the disease concept of substance abuse and addiction.

Using the historical information provided in the reading. The Rebirth of the Disease Concept, prepare a 2 page summary of the research and responses to the current philosophy of the disease concept of substance abuse and addiction. This assignment should address both the opinions of public health, as well as other areas within the medical and public research/treatment areas. Please include an introduction as well as a conclusion paragraph.

What is racism? When did people begin to be categorized by race?

Intro to identities assignment

WHAT TO WATCH AND WHAT TO READ?

ASSIGNMENT:

After you read the assigned text and screen the assigned documentaries, write a 3-4 page, double-spaced literary and filmic analysis. Since this is not a composition course, we do not focus on teaching how to write, but you must practice becoming a proficient, academic writer. Think about the following questions that will inform your development of a strong and original thesis that you will defend in the body of your analysis: What is racism? When did people begin to be categorized by race? Have ideologies of race and racism evolved throughout history? How do the films compare and contrast with your existing or previous perceptions of equality and equity, racism, race relations, policing and politics in Canada? In your analysis, be sure to give examples of bias, discrimination, and stereotypes that were present in the films. Consider what stood out to you, that the filmmakers introduced you to or excluded. End your Literary Analysis with a considered reflection, with references to the assigned text and films, on any concrete actions that you can take to recognize and combat racism in your daily life.

 

What is the Clean Air Act?

What is the Clean Air Act? What are the National Ambient Air Quality Standards? What is the Air Quality Index?

What interests you about the subject of this paper? Why is it worth writing about?

Whenever you begin a major writing project, it is very important that you take the time to assess your writing situation. This first “Pre-Writing Exercise” asks you to do just that.

To start, re-read the “Checklist for assessing the writing situation” on pages 4 and 5 of Rules for Writers. Then, keeping the checklist in mind, carefully re-read the assignment instructions for Paper #1. I suggest that you read a printed copy of the instructions, which will make annotation easier. Read the whole set of instructions more than once if needed, and make notes about anything you find confusing, important, or otherwise significant.

When you feel you have a solid understanding of the assignment, answer the following basic questions about your writing situation for this paper. Type your answers in a new Word document.

1. Subject: What interests you about the subject of this paper? Why is it worth writing about?

2. Purpose: Why are you writing? What goal should your essay accomplish?

3. Audience: Who are your readers? How well informed are they about your subject, and what do you want them to learn?

4. Genre: What genre does the assignment require? What are the expectations and conventions of this genre?

5. Sources of information: where will you find the information you need? What kinds of evidence will be appropriate and effective?

6. Length and format: What are the length and format requirements for this assignment?

7. What are your deadlines? When will you need to start drafting your essay in order to meet your deadines?

Each of your answers should be at least two or three sentences long, but feel free to write as much as you like. The more you think and write about these issues, the better prepared you will be to write your essay.

You do not need to write your answers as an essay; numbered answers will be fine.

THIS IS A PREWRITING EXERCISE FOR A MAJOR PAPER. I’VE ATTACHED THE CHECKLIST, PAPER #1 WRITING INSTRUCTIONS, AND MY OUTLINE TO ORDER, YOU CAN RE-WORD IT IF YOU LIKE

Compare at least two of the tools, examining advantages and disadvantages of each type.

Written Assignment 5
Sometime in the course of your education or your career you will probably be asked to lead or participate in a presentation. You’ll find it valuable to know the options available for presenting information to a group in a clear and engaging manner.
Read the lesson material as well as the articles by TechRadar and also by Spencer referenced in your study materials.
https://business.tutsplus.com/articles/online-free-presentation-software–cms-30002
https://www.techradar.com/best/free-presentation-software
(Please incorporate further research with citation) Then compose a brief document of between 500 and 850 words (approximately 2 to 3 pages long). Your document should do all of the following:
• Compare at least two of the tools, examining advantages and disadvantages of each type.
• Speculate about why a particular situation or setting might call for one type of software over another.
• Think about classroom, social, or workplace experience you have had as an audience member for a presentation. Critique one aspect (either positive or negative) of the presenter’s use of presentation software.

Write a one to two-page summary on key assumptions of Leininger’s Culture Care theory and summarize the implications of this theory for Leadership in nursing Expectations

Write a one to two-page summary on key assumptions of Leininger’s Culture Care theory and summarize the implications of this theory for Leadership in nursing
Expectations
Length: 1-2 pages, excluding title page and reference page
Format: APA 6th ed. formatting and citation rules are required for all written assignments in this and all graduate courses.
Research: A minimum of one, recent (past five years) scholarly, peer-reviewed reference citation is required.

Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal.

For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.

The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)

You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.

Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:

❒ Have you provided the author’s name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s credibility?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)

Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II
Synthesizing and Writing
Due Week 5 and worth 100 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.

Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.
The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Conflicting Viewpoints part 1

The selected topic is gun control. I support gun control. I believe that access to guns among general population should be restricted. This paper will utilize Elbow’s believing game to analyze the opposing side.
The website offers three opposing arguments for gun support. The first reason is that the right to own guns is granted by the U.S. Constitution. In particular, the Second Amendment the Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. This view is interesting because it traces the issue back to the time when the nation was created. If I believed this view, I would notice that our Constitution is very important for regulating our life. This idea might be true if we accept that guns are important for having a free state.
The second opposing argument is that being able to own a gun reduces public crime. The second reason is helpful because it demonstrates that gun controls laws are more dangerous for crimes than allowing gun ownership. If I believed this reason, I would notice that it is actually safer on the streets when everyone is allowed to own a gun. This reason might be true if we accept that these studies were rigid and valid.
The third opposing argument is that gun ownership increases people’s perception of safety. The third reason is interesting because it focuses on intangible things, such as people’s feelings and mood. If I believed this reason, I would notice that being allowed to own a gun makes people feel safe for their lives. This reason might be true under the conditions that owning a gun is the major way to protect oneself.
To sum up, applying the believing game to the three con reasons on gun control has increased my understanding of the opposing view.

Describe three methods to mitigate outdoor sources of excessive noise.

Describe three methods to mitigate outdoor sources of excessive noise.