Describe the demographics: Who else is in the space? Families with children? Or perhaps other college students? Elderly people? You get the idea.

Prompt
For essay 2, you will write an essay of at least 500 words and no more than 600 words in which you describe a place where you regularly purchase and consume food. Examples of locations include HEB, a convenience store, a restaurant (fast food or otherwise), an ACC campus, a farmers market, and so on. Your essay should be unified with a thesis statement, which should appear near the end of the introduction paragraph. In this case, the thesis does not need to convey an argument but should present a unifying theme about the space and its purpose.

Rubric

In order to do well on this essay, you should:
Incorporate imagery and descriptive details to place the reader in the space.
Discuss the interplay between form/design and function/purpose of the space (example: the maze of the Whole Foods flagship or IKEA).
Describe the product(s) that you purchase and consume in that space.
Describe your observations of the space: Is it clean? Messy? Does it seem to be understaffed? Is it “user-friendly” (meaning signage and messaging are clear)? Is it warm and inviting or cold–or something else altogether?
Describe the demographics: Who else is in the space? Families with children? Or perhaps other college students? Elderly people? You get the idea.
Discuss other functions of the space. Does this space serve any other purpose, aside from being a restaurant/shop/cafe/coffee shop/bar? Is it a space to study, for instance?
Proofread carefully, eliminating all distracting errors.
Organize your ideas into coherent paragraphs and sentences.
Stay within the prescribed word count
Adhere to MLA Document Design guidelines
And finally, you may use first person pronouns here!

Select one of the three mixed methods research articles (#1-3) in [Reading]. You can select other mixed methods research articles. 

Mixed Methods Research.

This module introduces the basic concepts of research approaches and research design. We will review different philosophical views, the types of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs, and the relationships among philosophy, designs, and methods. We will also discuss how to select a research approach for your future research.

Upon completion of this module, you will be able to:

  1. State the definition and the characteristics of mixed methods research
  2. Explain the 3 core mixed methods designs and compare them.
  3. Select the appropriate design, based on outcomes, data, timing, and researcher.

To achieve these objectives: read [Chapter 10 of the textbook]review/watch [Module 7 Resources]; and complete the [Final Project][Discussion Forum].

Reading_Mixed Methods

  1. Sparr, J. L., Knipfer, K., & Willems, F. (2016). How leaders can get the most out of formal training: The significance of feedback‐seeking and reflection as informal learning behaviors. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 29-542.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrdq.21263
  2. Yawson, R. M., & Greiman, B. (2016). A systems approach to identify skill needs for agrifood nanotechnology: A multiphase mixed methods study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27,517-545. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrdq.21266
  3. Jara, I., Claro, M., Hinostroza, E. J., Martin, E. S., Rodriguez, P., Cabello, R., et al. (2015). Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed methods analysis. Computers & Education, 88,387-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.016
  4. Reio, T. G., Jr. & Werner, J. M. (2017). Publishing Mixed Methods Research: Thoughts and Recommendations Concerning Rigor. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28, 439-449. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrdq.21291

Discussion Question

Provide your responses.

  1. Select one of the three mixed methods research articles (#1-3) in [Reading]. You can select other mixed methods research articles.
  2. Analyze the article by using the attached sheet and the guideline from Reio and Werner (2017) (#4 in Readings).

Discuss the ways in which literature belonging to one time and place are received by new audiences across geographical frontiers as well as across historical eras.

Discuss the representation of women, historical representation, challenging social custom in Euripides’ play The Medea.

Discuss the ways in which literature belonging to one time and place are received by new audiences across geographical frontiers as well as across historical eras.

How are literary texts and theatrical performances altered as they enter the translingual spaces between cultures?

How and for what purposes have the cultural artefacts of the past been preserved for later generations, and what new significance have they acquired for contemporary audiences across the globe?

Identify your target audience and what values, priorities, and emotions you must take into consideration to make a convincing argument.

Module 2 Competency Assessment Worksheet

In this Competency Assessment, you will create a persuasive, problem-solving thesis statement and evaluate the effectiveness of that thesis using the rhetorical situation and the rhetorical triangle.

Part I: First of all, you will revise the provisional thesis statement that you worked on in the Module’s discussion. Make sure the thesis is concise (1–2 sentences) and includes two parts: a proposal for solving a problem and a reason that solution is needed.   For more on creating effective persuasive thesis statements, review the following PGWC resources:

Write your revised two-part thesis statement here, and be sure to include a claim + reason (the “because” or “since” clause):

State the underlying assumption of your argument:

Part II: Use the rhetorical situation (author, text, purpose, audience, setting) to brainstorm about the main elements of your argument. This argument analysis will help you prepare for the persuasive essay written for the Module 4 Competency Assessment. You will be the author and the text will be a scholarly essay, so there is no need to answer those two parts of the rhetorical situation. Identify the other three elements of the rhetorical situation below using complete sentences:

Purpose – What do you hope to accomplish by making this argument?

Target audience – Who in the community can make the change and what other stakeholders will be affected by this issue and your recommended change?

Setting – Name and describe the community you will write about.

You can use “The Rhetorical Situation” and “The Rhetorical Situation in College Composition II” for help with this exercise.

Part III: Describe how you will use the appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos to make your argument more compelling to your audience. You can review the PGWC resource on the appeals here: “The Three Appeals of Argument.

Pathos – Identify your target audience and what values, priorities, and emotions you must take into consideration to make a convincing argument.

Ethos – Describe what points of disagreement, assumptions, misconceptions, and valid concerns you will need to address to show a complex understanding of the issue. What are some common ground opportunities that you can use to show that you understand their position and agree with parts of it?

Logos – Describe what logic, examples, and evidence you can use to support your explanation of the problem and your proposed solution? What logical fallacies will you need to avoid?

Explore processes, activities, and events in case study, grounded theory.

Characteristics and Designs
The Characteristics of Qualitative Research
It is important to:
Review the needs of potential audiences for the proposal
If there is some question about their knowledge, present the basic characteristics of qualitative research in the proposal and possibly discuss a recent qualitative research Journal article to use as an example.
If you present the basic characteristics you should mention:
Natural setting
Research is key instrument
Multiple sources of data
Inductive and deductive data analysis
Participants’ meaning
Emerging design
Reflexivity
Holistic account
Qualitative Designs
Identify the specific design that you will be using and provide references to the literature.
Designs include procedures for data collection, analysis, and writing.
Designs – narrative, phenomenology, ethnography, case study, grounded theory.
Based on the design, researchers:
Study individuals in narrative, phenomenology
Explore processes, activities, and events in case study, grounded theory.
Learn about broad culture-sharing behavior of individuals or groups in ethnography.
2/16/2020 Module 6 Resources
https://lsuonline.moodle3.lsu.edu/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=159249 4/13
The Researcher’s Role and
Re

Has reading The Circle made you think differently about technology? If so, how?

The next journal entry presumes you’ve read through the entire book. Ponder all of the following:
1. Why do you think you had to read and reflect on this book for this class?
2. Has reading The Circle made you think differently about technology? If so, how?
3. Would you recommend that others should read The Circle? If so, who? Why?

This journal is private and only viewable by you and the professor.
Feel free to have a little fun with your journal. It’s okay to be creative, experiment, and try new things here with your writing style and content. You can try freestyle writing if you like, where you let your thoughts run without worrying about style, grammar and spelling.
Please do write in this regularly – we want you to reflect as the class is going on, not wait until the end.
The entire journal counts for 10% of your overall grade (100 points total, 20 points for each entry). You are evaluated on quality and quantity of journal entries. Graded as Complete/Incomplete, where a B or higher is Complete.
Note: The Circle is 500 pages. There are at most 2 pages of content that contain adult situations (expressed in PG-13 terms) that are relevant to the plot. If these small segments are a problem for you, please contact your professor to discuss alternate options.
Submission Requirements:
• Format: Microsoft Word APA STYLE
• Font: Times New Roman, 12-point, Double-spaced
• Citation Style: APA
• Length: 1 page (275 words)

Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.

You’re looking at the examples that show Level 4 and Level 5 work. The way that exemplars work is that you read the example student essay, and then the examiner commentaries. The examiner commentaries tell you the strengths and weaknesses of that essay and the mark that it was awarded. So detailed analysis is something to keep working really hard on.
Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
AO2 Analyze ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts.
AO3 Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.
AO4 Explore connections across literary texts 14.
AO5 Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations.
It needs to be critical something that would get top marks for an A level piece and to be a knock out for uni.

be a creative and inventive as you want but please just make it good, and refer to the A level marking scheme constantly.

What do you consider as the key points when designing and conducting experimental  research?

Quantitative Research.

This module introduces the general process of participants and sample selection, instrumentation, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and results reporting in quantitative research. We will review the specific procedures for designing quantitative research (including both survey and experimental methods) by using the given checklists.

Upon completion of this module, you will be able to:

  1. Define survey research and experiment research
    2. Design survey research and experiment research plans by using the checklist
    3. Explain the research process and requirements in quantitative research
    4. Identify the threats to internal validity and external validity.

To achieve these objectives: read [Chapter 8 of the textbook]review/watch [Module 5 Resources]; and complete the [Discussion Forum].

  1. Johnson, K. R., Park, S., & Bartlett, K. (2018). Perceptions of customer service orientation, training, and employee engagement in Jamaica’s hospitality sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(3/4), 191-209. https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/EJTD-11-2017-0094
  2. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26458506.pdf
  3. Park, S., Kang, H., & Kim, E. (2018). The role of supervisor support on employees’ training and job performance: An empirical study. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(1/2), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2017-0054
  4. Park, S., & Kim, E. (2018). Fostering organizational learning through leadership and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1408-1423. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0467

 

Provide your responses per each question.

  1. Select one quantitative research in [Readings] and provide your comments on population and sample, instruments, variables, and descriptive analysis. You can select other articles if you do not want to use [Readings].
  2. What do you consider as the key points when designing and conducting experimental  research?

 

 

Explain about the literary approach and specify what criteria you plan to use to analyze, evaluate, and interpret the text.

English 126: Research Paper

For this assignment you must research and write an original paper on a topic which relates to some area within the broad category of “The Humanities.”  Specific disciplines can include aspects of music, art, religion, language, philosophy, dance, photography, etc. in addition to the aspects of literature which make up the bulk of our classroom study and discussion.  You must receive a passing grade on this assignment to pass the class.

Essentially, your approach should be that of a critic.  Your paper should have the underlying purpose of providing some analysis, interpretation, and/or evaluation of the particular area you choose to research.  In other words, you should not merely report trends, standards, principles, perspectives, etc. which are or have been at the cutting edge of your topic.  Your discussion should add to the current discussion.

In your paper you need to base your criticism from the perspective of one or more of the schools of literary theories discussed in class handouts or our text, Literature: A Portable Anthology, edited by Janet E. Gardner, et al.  In your paper you need to provide some background or explanation of the particular criteria used by the theoretical school.  Then the bulk of your paper should be a discussion of how you see those criteria applied to the text to produce meaning, value, insight, etc.  (You may wish to explain how the criteria reveal the lack of these as well.)  For example, you could use principles of historical criticism to analyze how Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll can be understood as an allegory of the historical political situation in England at that time, or you could use formalist (New) criticism or Mythological Criticism to examine the character of Luke Skywalker in The Last Jedi as a classic messianic hero who struggles with his own humanity.

Many texts offer commentary on social issues which may be contemporary and current both to the time of the text creation as well as our contemporary social situations.  However, the focus of your discussion should be on the text itself rather than the social, political, and/or cultural issues addressed in the text.  In other words, if the text deals with such issues as PTSD, rape culture, economic inequality, psychopathic disorders, family values, etc., the focus of your analysis should be on the actual text and its expression of such social concerns (positive or negative) rather than an investigation into the actual issue.  Thus, reliance on media reports and social behavior studies should be include at most to provide background information.  For example, a literary analysis on the TV series Breaking Bad should not stray into social issues related to the social ramifications of drug use in the USA.  Instead, it should focus on the actual content of the TV series as the “text” being analyzed.  Contemporary issues of illegal drug use should be limited to historical context only.

A paper which merely reports information gathered from a combination of different sources will receive a grade no higher than a “C.”  To receive a grade higher than a “C,” you must provide evidence of original thought and critical thinking.  This means you must explain some application, source, motivation, relative strengths or weaknesses, etc. of the material you are presenting.  Help your audience understand why the content is valuable to them.

We can use the field of literature as a model for any topic you choose.  In the field of literature, potential topics are in our textbook in the introduction and at the beginning of each genre selection.  Within the realm of literature, you may choose a literary style, particular schools of thought, a specific writer, writers of a common era, particular aspects which are treated similarly or differently, common themes, etc.  If you wish to focus on a single writer, you may use any writer whose work you feel has been recognized as making a significant contribution in the humanities field.  If you wish to focus on a single writer, make sure your paper is an analysis of the writer’s work and not just of his or her life.  A biographical research report would be done in a history class.

In your paper you must cite at least four credible sources other than our course texts (you are not required to use any course materials).  One of these outside sources must be related to one or more of the schools of literary theory (even if it is only a portion of a particular text).  Please be wise and responsible in your choice of sources.  You must include a primary source as the central focus of your paper.  For example, if you wish to provide a critical analysis of the symbols used in Grant Woods’ painting American Gothic, you would need use a copy of the painting itself as one of the sources (and insert a copy into the paper) rather than just researching what other people have said about it (secondary sources). If you thought this was an image of a farmer and his wife, but your research revealed it to be a farmer and his daughter, you would need to cite the source of the information about the woman being the daughter;  then you could provide your own understanding and analysis to expand upon that.   Likewise, if you wish to do a feminist critique of the TV show Brats, you would need to do your own analysis of specific episodes rather than providing a general commentary based only on what other critics have noted.  Again, you could use content from other sources, but the analysis should come from what you personally observe from the episodes.  Dictionaries and encyclopedias provide general understanding of details or meaning, but they should not serve as your major sources.  Also, the Internet is a convenient source of information, but many Internet sources lack credibility.  Sites like the Wikipedia, IMDb (Internet Movie Database), or such information sites may serve for general information or to seek more credible sources (follow up on their sources!).  Typically, such information or content would not need to be cited.  In other words, don’t go to some site listing a series of quotes by famous people.  You should go to the original source to use the “quote” in its context.  Newspapers and magazines like The New York Times, Time, and People also tend to publish “news” which has not been thoroughly researched.  Academic research on contemporary writers or productions of their works should not depend solely on such “news” sources.  However, they can be valuable for gaining an awareness of social comment or general background.   Some such article content is based on in-depth research and analysis, which would be acceptable.  You need to evaluate the validity of your sources.

You can assume your audience is intelligent and familiar with academic standards; thus, your paper should conform to accepted conventions of writing.  The paper should be approximately five to nine pages in length and it should be typed double-spaced.  Please follow the guidelines for academic writing as discussed in class.  Make sure that you use the MLA method to document your research.  Consult The Little Seagull or Gator handbook or a similar textbook for the proper documentation techniques and format.  Be cautious in using online tools to formulate your works cited page, as the format does not always correctly “paste” into the finished paper.

As mentioned previously, quotes or summaries of source material should be limited to essential points you use to support your views.  In your paper, you should focus your discussion on your analysis and understanding.  Your sources should provide evidence to support or stimulate your ideas, but the analysis and evaluation should come from you.  Do not let the sources or quotes do all the talking.  You need to contribute to the discussion.

 

English 126, Research Paper.

 

  1. Introduction: The paper should begin with an introduction that does the following:
  • Provide background about the topic to be discussed.
  • Set the stage for a discussion of some text or group of texts using a particular literary approach (such as feminist criticism, formalist criticism, mythological criticism, etc.)
  • Indicate that a particular theme or message emerges from the text or group of texts when the approach is used.
  • Present a thesis to indicate that you have some “my point” to make about that theme or message expressed in this way.

 

  1. Body Paragraphs. In order to confirm that the text or group of texts does express a particular theme, do the following in the body paragraphs:
  • Explain about the literary approach and specify what criteria you plan to use to analyze, evaluate, and interpret the text. This can include aspects such as
    • Explain the kinds of questions such a critic might ask and what kinds of answers would be praised or condemned by such a critic;
    • Explain the kinds of assumptions such a critic will have in approaching the text;
    • Explain how aspects of truth, beauty, and fairness are presented, balanced; etc.
  • Use examples from the text or texts and view them from the perspective of the criteria identified previously. Explanation should include answers to both questions:
    • What does the example mean?
    • What is significant about that meaning?
  • Cite each example to identify the source it came from, using both in-text citations and a works cited page.
    • Use at least four credible sources not among course materials
    • At least one “primary” source should be included (the actual “text” itself)
    • Reference to course materials is optional in addition to the four outside sources
    • At least one outside source must be used to explain the type of criticism itself.

 

III. Conclusion.  Provide closure to the document.

  • Sum up the content by reviewing the content, repeating the key ideas, and/or restating the thesis point (optional). (R’s “Я” Us)
  • Identify the value of the content as it applies to the lives of contemporary readers; in other words, explain why they should be aware of the information you have discussed.
  1. Analyze, Evaluate, and/or Interpret to offer a conclusion, and/or
  2. Discuss consequences by forecasting, predicting, and/or warning, and/or,
  3. Issue a call to action through advice, suggestion, and/or solution.

 

  1. Source List
  • Provide an MLA style “Works Cited” list of all the sources referenced.
  1. The list should be alphabetized.
  2. The indentation should follow the “reverse” format for the MLA.
  3. The entire page should be double-spaced (no extra space between entries).
  • At least one “primary” source should be included. (In other words, if the topic is a particular film, book, CD, etc, then direct references to the text details should be included.)

Explore the aims, methods and/or impacts of Stephen Brunt’s video essay about the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.

English 100: University Writing
Essay 3
Essay 3 (with an annotated Works Cited list and a first draft) is worth 20 percent of your final grade. It should serve as a vehicle for exploring/responding to/arguing about a text (or as of a text) from the in-class material or course reading pack. The essay, which should approximately 1,500 WORDS in length, will require you to demonstrate your ability 1) to ask compelling questions in order to explore/respond to/argue about a topic, not only at the what- level, but also at the how- and why-levels; 2) to express your findings using clear, concise,grammatically accurate writing; 3) to conduct research and summarise, analyse, synthesize, and evaluate (SASE) ideas from at least THREE sources (primary and secondary); 4) to cite the sources both in-text and in a Works Cited list as outlined by the MLA Documentation guidelines; and 4) to implement the various elements and formatting rules of the research-supported,
academic essay. Note that Wikipedia and other unverifiable online sources won’t be accepted as
a reliable source of information.
Topics;
1 Explore the aims, methods and/or impacts of Stephen Brunt’s video essay about the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.
2 Argue for or against the narrator’s assertion that “what mattered was the excuse to wave the flag and sing the anthem and shout it out loud” in Stephen Brunt’s video essay about the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.
3 Explore the relationship(s) between the iconic photographs Tank Man and Falling Man.
4 Explore the function(s) of identity/anonymity in Tank Man and/or Falling Man.
5 Argue for or against Wikileaks’ mission statement and/or methodology.
6 Argue for or against TIME magazine’s naming of Wildleaks founder Julian Assange as runner-up for Person of the Year in 2010.
Explore the role of violence in Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell.
8 Respond critically (SASE) to the narrator’s assertion that imperialism is an “evil thing” in Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell.
9 Respond critically (SASE) to the central message in Unchopping a Tree by W.S. Merwin.
10 Explore the aims, methods and/or impacts of tone in Unchopping a Tree by W.S. Merwin.
11 Explore the evolution/devolution of the protagonist in Bullet in the Brain by Tobias Wolff.
12 Respond critically (SASE) to the central message in Bullet in the Brain by Tobias Wolff.
13 Argue for or against the narrator’s argument in Why Study/Teach English? by Brian Bauld.
14 Argue for or against the narrator’s assertion that “[l]iterature gives us the chance to awaken the humanity in us” in Why Study/Teach English? by Brian Bauld.
15 Respond critically (SASE) to the narrator’s argument in A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift.
16 Present your own “modest proposal” outlining a solution to a current societal problem using
A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift as an argumentative model. Note that due to the nature
of this topic, you may choose not to refer directly to A Modest Proposal in your essay (in
which case the connection will be implied in the structure).