What happened to the moral integrity of physicians during the Nazi period

The moral atrocities against Jews by the Nazi’s prior to and during WWII are well documented. But the policies of Hitler and other leaders of the Nazi party were carried out by those who, in other circumstances, would be considered “normal” people. Physicians who had thriving practices where they cared for patients prior to the war, for example, were part of horrific medical experimentation conducted at prison and death camps. How can something like this happen, where individuals – even “good” people – don’t stand up for what is morally unethical? Was this some type of brain washing? An overnight switch in cultural thinking? A slow slide down a dark pit? Something else? What might you have done to uphold moral integrity as a physician or a hospital administrator during that time? Is there anything happening today, albeit maybe not as drastic, that concerns you (nationally or globally)?

Identify ethical issues that the company has been facing internally and externally.

Choose a company to research and analyze. Identify ethical issues that the company has been facing internally and/or externally. Thoroughly analyze the company’s ethical issues utilizing concepts and terms that you have learned from the readings. Use 10 concepts from the readings and embolden them throughout the paper. The key is to demonstrate substantial ethical awareness and a keen understanding of ethical concepts and their applications.

This paper should include a clear statistical and informational background of the company and should be a minimum of 5-7 (full, 12pt font, double-spaced) pages in length. Students are to use MLA or APA or Chicago Style (Turabian) and should have the appropriate citation and citation pages (respectively). Be sure to examine the grading rubric at the end of the syllabus (Appendix A) to be clear on how this assignment will be graded.

Are there instances in which private medical information should be revealed to others in order to protect individuals or the public from harm?

Choose ONE of the following to answer on this Discussion Board:

A: Are there instances in which private medical information should be revealed to others in order to protect individuals or the public from harm?  Explain your position using ethical reasoning and theories.

Or

B: Compare the original Hippocratic Oath and the modern version created by Dr. Louis Lasagna in 1948. What difference do you find to be most drastic? Which version do you believe better reflects your own view of ethics? Why?

How can parents raise children to be productive and resourceful?

How can parents raise children to be productive and resourceful?

Do women want equality or special treatment?

Do women want equality or special treatment?

Write a position paper.

You are to write a position paper. The topics for the papers need to come from chapter readings (9-10) (thus, you must read before you start to write). For a position paper, you are to take up an argument for or against a particular topic. The topic is to be chosen from that week’s readings and is at your discretion. However, I urge you to choose something that interests you.

You may think that position papers are opinion papers, they are not! Position papers are about writing well-articulated thoughts on a topic that is backed up with facts, statistics, and in some cases, peer-reviewed scientific journal articles. When those items are not relevant, such as in a presidential race, you need to support your views with an example that helps others understand your point of view. In many ways, you are not only trying to show the reading of your position on a topic but help them understand why you have a particular position. Here are a few great resources to help you understand what you are writing:

http://www.unausa.org/global-classrooms-model-un/how-to-participate/model-un-preparation/position-papers (Links to an external site.) (of course, you need to write these with ethics in mind, not government)

http://www.studygs.net/wrtstr9.htm (Links to an external site.)

Using John Corvino and Robert George as your primary sources, investigate the main arguments in favor of and against allowing same sex partners to engage in sexual relationships and allowing same sex marriage.

Using John Corvino and Robert George as your primary sources,
investigate the main arguments in favor of and against allowing same
sex partners to engage in sexual relationships and allowing same sex
marriage. What arguments do you find most convincing, and what ones
are least persuasive? If same sex relationships should be accepted by a society, does that imply that all discrimination against same-sex couples
should be outlawed (e.g. tax laws, immigration, adoption, inheritance,
etc.)? Why or why not? Ensure that you support your position with
evidence.

How might Friedman object? Would you say that the business is acting rightly or wrongly in this case? Why?

Search online for an example of some kind of stakeholder relationship or activity. I’m looking specifically for some activity that Milton Friedman would object to, where the business doesn’t act to maximize profit but acts in the interest of the stakeholder and costs the business some profit. How would Freeman defend the action by the business? How might Friedman object? Would you say that the business is acting rightly or wrongly in this case? Why?

Based on your knowledge of U.S. Government which of the philosophies are most closely embedded in the psyche of today’s American political thought?

Based on your knowledge of U.S. Government which of the philosophies (Hobbs, Locke or Rousseu) are most closely embedded in the psyche of today’s American political thought? Explain your answer

Review the presented scenario and then using the ethical standards of the National Organization for Human Services [NOHS] to address the required areas in the instructions.

In a minimum of 4-5 pages. Students will demonstrate knowledge of ethical decision making through the analysis of the hypo thetical town of “LionsVille.” For this assignment, students will review the presented scenario and then using the ethical standards of the National Organization for Human Services [NOHS] to address the required areas in the instructions.