Critically evaluate the extent to which you agree with the statement that corporate governance helps ensure achievement and retention of shareholders’ wealth using your selected company.

Submission details:

  • The deadline for submission into registry is on the Hand in Date shown on the Feedback sheet (1st Page)
  • Students are to submit via Moodle before due date
  • Students must submit before due date. Any assessments brought after will not be accepted
  • THE UNIVERSITY’S REGULATIONS CONCERNING CHEATING, COLLUSION AND PLAGIARISM APPLY TO THIS ASSESSMENT.

Key Skills: The key skills addressed through this assessment are logical reasoning, analysis, evaluating, synthesis, learning and study, structure and consistency.

Harvard Referencing: Complete reference list which MUST conform to the Harvard System of Referencing must be included at the end of your assignment and in text citations where appropriate.

Learning Outcome

  • Calculate, as demonstrated in lectures and seminars, and interpret investment ratios and other performance measures to facilitate the valuation of shares/businesses in the context of mergers and acquisitions.
  • Evaluate competing theories relating to capital gearing and dividend policy and their impact on the development of corporate policies.

Assessment Brief:

You are required to select a public limited company from the list below, conduct research and write a 3,000-word assignment addressing the following questions:

  1. Analyse the firm’s financial performance during the last three years. Identify the financial actions taken and policies adopted during these years, as far as you can tell from the available information. Investigate and discuss to what extent you think the company has been able to increase shareholders’ wealth through the financial actions you have identified. (30%)
  2. Critically evaluate important qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a firm’s likely future financial performance. (20%)
  3. Critically evaluate the extent to which you agree with the statement that corporate governance helps ensure achievement and retention of shareholders’ wealth using your selected company. (20%)
  4. Carry out a valuation of the company following three valuation methods seen in class and compare it to the company’s market value (Stock price) (30%)

Substantiate your answer with appropriate theories or concepts, relevant supporting calculations and empirical evidence/examples.

Assignment/coursework general submission requirements:

  • The coursework is due for submission at the reception.
  • Your formulae, workings and ratios should be shown in your appendices, not in the main body of your work.
  • Your student identification number must be clearly stated at the top of each page of your work.
  • A declaration that the work is your own (apart from otherwise referenced acknowledgements) must be included after the title page of your assignment.
  • Each page must be numbered.
  • Please use a minimum font size of 14.
  • Where appropriate, a contents page, a list of tables/figures and a list of abbreviations should precede your work.
  • All referencing must follow Harvard referencing.
  • A word count must be stated at the end of your work.
  • Your course, year of study and the relevant module must be included as a “footer” on each page.
  • Appendices should be kept to the minimum and be of direct relevance to the content of your work.
  • All tables and figures must be correctly numbered and labelled.
  • Your assignment/coursework should be submitted in one A4 transparent pocket.
  • Standard assessment regulations apply. You must reference your work as required by Cardiff Metropolitan University regulations and must include a bibliography.

Assessment Marking Criteria

Identification and application of relevant theories/concepts

Use of supporting evidence/workings

Clarity of critical analysis

Structure and presentation

Marking Scheme

Marking of this coursework would be based on the extent to which the following criteria are met.

Assessment criteria

Identification and application of relevant theories/concepts

Use of literature/ evidence of reading

Coherence and clarity of analysis

Structure and presentation

Answers should provide an examination of the key aspects of financial health such as profitability, efficiency, liquidity, financial gearing, and investment, and investigate possible linkages between the firm’s financial actions and shareholders’ wealth.

A more critical discussion by incorporating relevant theories/concepts on potential caveats of financial ratio analysis such as benchmarking, inflation, meaningful set of industry norms, seasonal factors, window dressing techniques, differences in accounting practices, effective use of financial statements, etc would be expected in better answers.

Answers should recognize that sound financial analysis involves more than just calculating numbers and that good analysis requires that certain qualitative factors be considered when evaluating a company. Such factors include whether the company’s revenues are tied to one key customer, the percentage of the company’s business that is generated overseas, the extent to which the company’s revenues are tied to one key product, the likely actions of the current competition and the likelihood of new competitors in the future, the extent to which the company relies on a single supplier, and how the legal and regulatory environment affects the company.

As regards the corporate governance and shareholders’ wealth, answers would be expected to discuss by applying theories relating to capital gearing & dividend policy and their impact on the development of corporate policies and shareholders’ wealth. Answers should be substantiated with appropriate theories or concepts, supporting calculations and empirical evidence/examples wherever relevant.

Marking Scheme

90  –  100        A quite exceptional and outstanding answer, providing insights which would not be available publicly, and would, with some editing, be publishable.  In addition to the features of the next section, this range is distinguished by superior organization, economic use of language and totally comprehensive, given the conditions of the exercise.

80  –  89          An answer which demonstrates an excellent understanding of the question and of the complexity of the issues involved.  There is a sound basis of relevant factual knowledge and/or the theoretical issues involved.  Most of the important issues are dealt with in a detailed, specific and systematic way.  There is either some measure of original thinking in the answer or an accurate and comprehensive account is given in a way which demonstrates understanding, for example by structuring the material such that it could not have been based just on reproduction of lecture notes and programme material.  Evidence of creativity, critical approach, and wide reading beyond the core subject matter.

70  –  79          As above but a slightly less consistently excellent level.  Alternatively, this range of mark may be given for an answer which, while not having original insights, gives comprehensive and accurate coverage of the issues at a high level throughout the answer, without significant omissions or errors.

60  – 69            An answer which demonstrates a clear understanding of the question and grasp of the complexity of the issues involved.  There is a sound basis of relevant factual knowledge and/or of theoretical issues involved, with few significant errors.  The issues involved are dealt with in a systematic way.  Some of the issues may be limited in critical approach, but organized to display a comprehensive understanding and factual information essentially complete.

50  –  59          An answer which demonstrates an understanding of the major or basic issues in the question.  There is a basis of factual knowledge and/or of relevant theoretical issues.  Although some errors may be present, the overall framework of the answer is sensible and accurate.  Most of all the issues may be dealt with at the level of obviously available programme material given to the student.  The answer shows planning in its construction, with a clear train of thought or development of argument present. Average competent performance, well presented, demonstrating understanding of most of the essential issues.

40  –  49          An answer which demonstrates a limited understanding of the major or basic issues in the question.  There is some relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of theoretical issues, but it is patchy.  A few significant errors may be present.  The answer is not well planned, with little development of argument, and often much irrelevant material is present.  Lacks clarity of expression.

The lower range (40-45) would include an answer where relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of theoretical issues is poor and confused, but not absent.  Many significant errors may be present.  The answer is poorly planned, with little clear train of thought or development of argument, and much of the answer may be irrelevant.

38  –  39          An answer which fails to demonstrate any appreciable understanding of the major issues or basic issues of the question.  Relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of theoretical issues, if present at all, is very poor and confused and very limited.  Many significant errors may be present.  Much or all of the answer may be irrelevant.  Poorly organized and very limited in scope.

30  –  37          Attempts an answer, but relevant factual knowledge and/or awareness of theoretical issues is very poor and confused, and very limited with many significant errors.

10  –  29          Not clear that an answer is properly attempted.  Only a few minor points made at all relevant to the answer and these may be superficial.  Most material is irrelevant or incorrect.

1  –  9               An answer that is so short or irrelevant that only a few marks are justified.  For example, one or two points may be made which show some peripheral awareness of certain possibly relevant issues.

Reflect on a change you have experienced or been a part of either professionally or personally within an organization.

Read PDFS

Reflect on a change you have experienced or been a part of either professionally or personally within an organization. Describe how it was introduced and led.what would you have done differently? Explain your reasons

Explain the roles and responsibilities of the key regulators within the financial services industry and their promotion of ethical, fair and compliance driven behaviour between firms, advisers and customers.

Prepare 1500-words essay requiring critical assessment of the activities and subsequent collapse of Wonga.

(Wonga.com, also known as Wonga, is a British payday loan provider of “short-term, high-cost credit” that was founded in 2006 and has operations in the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland and South Africa.)

Course work Assessment

This should include:

  1. Analysis of the role of appropriate Regulators within the scandal such as FCA, Pensions Regulator and Bank of England: should the situation have been prevented from happening?
  2. Apply the CII Ethical Dilemma Resolution model to assess the ethics of the scenario and review the Social and Ethical implications of the specific case reviewed
  3. 3. Suggest recommendations as to what could be done in the future to ensure that Corporate Managers uphold the highest standards of integrity and ethics in all business matters.
Assessment criteria State what Unit Learning Outcomes are being covered by the assessment
 

1.

Explain the roles and responsibilities of the key regulators within the financial services industry and their promotion of ethical, fair and compliance driven behaviour between firms, advisers and customers
 

2.

Analyse how the rules and principles set out in regulation, are Outcome applied in practice in order to meet the financial needs of the consumer

 

 

3.

Demonstrate an ability to apply the range of skills and competences required when advising clients in order to demonstrate the application of professional standards and behaviour

 

FSRE Coursework Marking Criteria

70%+ = 1st Class

  •  Student demonstrates a substantial range of knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined.
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied in great detail to the scenario, drawing out specific observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has accessed a broad range of research and in great depth, pulling from a huge variety of sources including academic literature, regulatory presentations and up to date press sources
  •  Student presents a strong critical analysis of the case, with a wide-ranging discussion of the issues involved, presented in a well-structured and reasoned manner
  •  A comprehensive review of possible future recommendations has been undertaken, including comment on ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is well presented, with accurate referencing and appropriate bibliography.

60-69% = 2:1

  •  Student demonstrates a good knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied in good detail to the scenario, drawing out general observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has accessed a good range of research and in some depth, pulling from a variety of sources including academic literature, regulatory presentations and press releases
  •  Student presents a good critical analysis of the case, with a varied discussion of the issues involved, presented in a logical manner
  •  A sound review of the possible future recommendations has been undertaken, including comment on ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is structured clearly, with good referencing and appropriate bibliography.

50-59% = 2:2

  •  Student demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied with some detail to the scenario, drawing out some accurate observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has shown some evidence of a range and depth of research, using a variety of sources including academic literature and press releases
  •  Student presents some evidence of critical analysis but with a limited discussion of the issues involved
  •  Some evidence demonstrated of possible future recommendations, but with limited commentary on the ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is adequately structured, with appropriate referencing and bibliography.

40-49% = 3rd

  •  Student demonstrates a limited knowledge of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been attempted but applied with limited detail to the scenario, drawing out minimal observations around the ethics of the case being reviewed
  •  Little evidence of any breadth or depth of research, with very limited sources being used
  •  Limited evidence of critical analysis, leads to a very minimal discussion of the issues involved
  •  Narrow range of knowledge evidenced with regard to future recommendations and minimal commentary on the ethical or regulatory changes required
  •  Poor structure, contributing to lack of coherent argument. Limited referencing.

<40% = Fail

  •  No real demonstration of knowledge of the UK Financial System or the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model is clearly not understood with minimal application to the scenario, leading to limited or no observations re the ethics of the case being reviewed.
  •  Limited evidence of any breadth or depth of research from relevant sources
  •  Minimal or no evidence of critical analysis of the case, leading to a limited or no real discussion around the issues involved.
  •  Narrow or zero commentary around future recommendations or the ethical,

regulatory changes required.

  •  Weak presentation and structure leading to inappropriate argument.

Minimal/inappropriate referencing.

Suggested Reading and Links: Wonga

These links are intended to help you as you research Wonga:
BBC (2014) ‘Wonga chased debt with fake lawyers.’ BBC News. Business. [Online] 25th June.

[Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-28015456

Collinson, P. and Jones, R. (2018) ‘Wonga collapses into administration.’ The Guardian. [Online] 30th August. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/30/wonga-collapses-into-administration

Dunkley, E. (2016) ‘Payday lenders still active after UK watchdog’s crackdown.’ Financial Times. [Online] 4th December. [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://www.ft.com/content/db25ea2e-b7b9-11e6-961e-a1acd97f622d

FCA (2019) High-cost credit and consumer credit. Financial Conduct Authority. [Online] [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/high-cost-credit-consumer- credit

Financial Times (2018) ‘Wonga: decline and fall.’ Financial Times. [Online] 28th August. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.ft.com/content/b1c7686a-aace-11e8-89a1- e5de165fa619

Hale, T. (2018) ‘How do you solve a problem like Wonga loans?’ Financial Times. [Online] 21st September. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/09/21/1537528728000/How-do-you-solve-a-problem-like- Wonga-loans-/

House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills (2013) Payday Loans: Seventh Report of Session 2013–14. [Online] [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmbis/789/789.pdf

Analyse how the rules and principles set out in regulation, are Outcome applied in practice in order to meet the financial needs of the consumer.

Prepare 1500-words essay requiring critical assessment of the activities and subsequent collapse of Wonga.

(Wonga.com, also known as Wonga, is a British payday loan provider of “short-term, high-cost credit” that was founded in 2006 and has operations in the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland and South Africa.)

Course work Assessment

This should include:

  1. Analysis of the role of appropriate Regulators within the scandal such as FCA, Pensions Regulator and Bank of England: should the situation have been prevented from happening?
  2. Apply the CII Ethical Dilemma Resolution model to assess the ethics of the scenario and review the Social and Ethical implications of the specific case reviewed
  3. 3. Suggest recommendations as to what could be done in the future to ensure that Corporate Managers uphold the highest standards of integrity and ethics in all business matters.
Assessment criteria State what Unit Learning Outcomes are being covered by the assessment
 

1.

Explain the roles and responsibilities of the key regulators within the financial services industry and their promotion of ethical, fair and compliance driven behaviour between firms, advisers and customers
 

2.

Analyse how the rules and principles set out in regulation, are Outcome applied in practice in order to meet the financial needs of the consumer

 

 

3.

Demonstrate an ability to apply the range of skills and competences required when advising clients in order to demonstrate the application of professional standards and behaviour

 

FSRE Coursework Marking Criteria

70%+ = 1st Class

  •  Student demonstrates a substantial range of knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined.
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied in great detail to the scenario, drawing out specific observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has accessed a broad range of research and in great depth, pulling from a huge variety of sources including academic literature, regulatory presentations and up to date press sources
  •  Student presents a strong critical analysis of the case, with a wide-ranging discussion of the issues involved, presented in a well-structured and reasoned manner
  •  A comprehensive review of possible future recommendations has been undertaken, including comment on ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is well presented, with accurate referencing and appropriate bibliography.

60-69% = 2:1

  •  Student demonstrates a good knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied in good detail to the scenario, drawing out general observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has accessed a good range of research and in some depth, pulling from a variety of sources including academic literature, regulatory presentations and press releases
  •  Student presents a good critical analysis of the case, with a varied discussion of the issues involved, presented in a logical manner
  •  A sound review of the possible future recommendations has been undertaken, including comment on ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is structured clearly, with good referencing and appropriate bibliography.

50-59% = 2:2

  •  Student demonstrates some knowledge and understanding of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been applied with some detail to the scenario, drawing out some accurate observations around the Ethics of the case reviewed
  •  Student has shown some evidence of a range and depth of research, using a variety of sources including academic literature and press releases
  •  Student presents some evidence of critical analysis but with a limited discussion of the issues involved
  •  Some evidence demonstrated of possible future recommendations, but with limited commentary on the ethical and regulatory changes required
  •  Essay is adequately structured, with appropriate referencing and bibliography.

40-49% = 3rd

  •  Student demonstrates a limited knowledge of the UK Financial System and the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model has been attempted but applied with limited detail to the scenario, drawing out minimal observations around the ethics of the case being reviewed
  •  Little evidence of any breadth or depth of research, with very limited sources being used
  •  Limited evidence of critical analysis, leads to a very minimal discussion of the issues involved
  •  Narrow range of knowledge evidenced with regard to future recommendations and minimal commentary on the ethical or regulatory changes required
  •  Poor structure, contributing to lack of coherent argument. Limited referencing.

<40% = Fail

  •  No real demonstration of knowledge of the UK Financial System or the Ethical and Regulatory implications of the case being examined
  •  CII Ethical Dilemma model is clearly not understood with minimal application to the scenario, leading to limited or no observations re the ethics of the case being reviewed.
  •  Limited evidence of any breadth or depth of research from relevant sources
  •  Minimal or no evidence of critical analysis of the case, leading to a limited or no real discussion around the issues involved.
  •  Narrow or zero commentary around future recommendations or the ethical,

regulatory changes required.

  •  Weak presentation and structure leading to inappropriate argument.

Minimal/inappropriate referencing.

Suggested Reading and Links: Wonga

These links are intended to help you as you research Wonga:
BBC (2014) ‘Wonga chased debt with fake lawyers.’ BBC News. Business. [Online] 25th June.

[Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-28015456

Collinson, P. and Jones, R. (2018) ‘Wonga collapses into administration.’ The Guardian. [Online] 30th August. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/30/wonga-collapses-into-administration

Dunkley, E. (2016) ‘Payday lenders still active after UK watchdog’s crackdown.’ Financial Times. [Online] 4th December. [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://www.ft.com/content/db25ea2e-b7b9-11e6-961e-a1acd97f622d

FCA (2019) High-cost credit and consumer credit. Financial Conduct Authority. [Online] [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/high-cost-credit-consumer- credit

Financial Times (2018) ‘Wonga: decline and fall.’ Financial Times. [Online] 28th August. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] https://www.ft.com/content/b1c7686a-aace-11e8-89a1- e5de165fa619

Hale, T. (2018) ‘How do you solve a problem like Wonga loans?’ Financial Times. [Online] 21st September. [Accessed on 19th August 2019] http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/09/21/1537528728000/How-do-you-solve-a-problem-like- Wonga-loans-/

House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills (2013) Payday Loans: Seventh Report of Session 2013–14. [Online] [Accessed on 6th January 2020] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmbis/789/789.pdf

How would you relate the information in the article to the propositions proposed by MM?

This week’s readings in the textbook concern the capital structure decisions of firms–i.e., should a firm use debt or equity to finance its operations. The textbook describes the MM Propositions on the effect of debt on the value of the firm.

This discussion question takes a much broader view of the use of debt in our economy. Today, the use of debt is a given by all participants in our economy–governments, businesses, and consumers. Read the article “Repent at leisure” from The Economist. The article describes debt for various groups in the economy and across a variety of countries. Part of the article includes an interactive graph that visually examines debt levels around the world for various sectors of the economy.

Please read the article and ‘play’ with the interactive graph. Respond to the following questions:

  1. Describe and discuss the main points in the article–i.e., what did you learn from it?
  2. How have debt levels for various segments of society changed over time? What have been the benefits of this increased debt? What are the negative effects of it?
  3. How would you relate the information in the article to the propositions proposed by MM?

Assignments, which are data cases from the textbook, require current market data for their inputs. All market data (e.g., prices, rates, shares outstanding, etc.) must be current and the date the data is retrieved must be included in your analysis. Any solution using data that is more than one week old will receive a grade of 0.

Must use textbook as a reference

STUDYING CHAPTERS 14,15 THIS WEEK

Text book: Vitalsource.com (corporate finance)

Username sarah@lennondesign.com

Password Mazziotti1006!

Book: Corporate Finance found under the “my bookshelf” tab

 

How serious are the kinds of conflicts of interest discussed in this case? Did Sarbanes-Oxley eliminate the most serious conflicts?

4/3/2020 Analyzing Financial Statements
https://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs12096/ebook/c04/cGFycmlubzk3ODExMTkzNzEzODBjMDRfMTRfMC54Zm9ybQ.enc?course=crs12… 1/3
Print this page
Ethics CaseA Sad Tale: The Demise of Arthur Andersen
In January 2002, there were five major public accounting firms: Arthur Andersen, Deloitte Touche, KPMG, Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, and Ernst & Young. By late fall of that year, the number had been reduced to four. Arthur Andersen became the first major public accounting firm to be found guilty of a felony (a conviction later overturned), and as a result it virtually ceased to exist.
That such a fate could befall Andersen is especially sad given its early history. When Andersen and Company was established in 1918, it was led by Arthur Andersen, an acknowledged man of principle, and the company had a credo that became firmly embedded in the culture: “Think Straight and Talk Straight.” Andersen became an industry leader partly on the basis of high ethical principles and integrity. How did a one-time industry leader find itself in a position where it received a corporate death penalty over ethical issues? First, the market changed. During the 1980s, a boom in mergers and acquisitions and the emergence of information technology fueled the growth of an extremely profitable consulting practice at Andersen. The profits from consulting contracts soon exceeded the profits from auditing, Andersen’s core business. Many of the consulting clients were also audit clients, and the firm found that the audit relationship was an ideal bridge for selling consulting services. Soon the audit fees became “loss leaders” to win audits, which allowed the consultants to sell more lucrative consulting contracts.
Tension between Audit and Consulting
At Andersen, tension between audit and consulting partners broke into open and sometimes public warfare. At the heart of the problem was how to divide the earnings from the consulting practice between the two groups. The resulting conflict ended in divorce, with the consultants leaving to form their own firm. The firm, Accenture, continues to thrive today. Once the firm split in two, Andersen began to rebuild a consulting practice as part of the accounting practice. Consulting continued to be a highly profitable business, and audit partners were now asked to sell consulting services to other clients, a role that many auditors found uncomfortable. Although the accountants were firmly in charge, the role of partners as salespersons compounded an already existing ethical issue—that of conflict of interest. It is legally well established that the fiduciary responsibility of a certified public accounting (CPA) firm is to the investors and creditors of the firm being audited. CPA firms are supposed to render an opinion as to whether a firm’s financial statements are reasonably accurate and whether the firm has applied generally accepted accounting principles in a consistent manner over time so as not to
4/3/2020 Analyzing Financial Statements
https://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs12096/ebook/c04/cGFycmlubzk3ODExMTkzNzEzODBjMDRfMTRfMC54Zm9ybQ.enc?course=crs12… 2/3
distort the financial statements. To meet their fiduciary responsibilities, auditors must maintain independence from the firms they audit. What might interfere with the objective judgment of the public accounting firms? One problem arises because it is the audited companies themselves that pay the auditors’ fees. Auditors might not be completely objective when auditing a firm because they fear losing consulting business. This is an issue that regulators and auditors have not yet solved. But another problem arises in situations where accounting firms provide consulting services to the companies they audit. Although all of the major accounting firms were involved in this practice to some extent, Andersen had developed an aggressive culture for engaging partners to sell consulting services to audit clients.
Andersen’s Problems Mount
The unraveling of Andersen began in the 1990s with a series of accounting scandals at Sunbeam, Waste Management, and Colonial Realty—all firms that Andersen had audited. But scandals involving the energy giant Enron proved to be the firm’s undoing. The account was huge. In 2000 alone, Andersen received $52 million in fees from Enron, approximately 50 percent for auditing and 50 percent for other consulting services, especially tax services. The partner in charge of the account and his entire 100-person team worked out of Enron’s Houston office. Approximately 300 of Enron’s senior and middle managers had been Andersen employees. Enron went bankrupt in December 2001 after large-scale accounting irregularities came to light, prompting an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It soon became clear that Enron’s financial statements for some time had been largely the products of accounting fraud, showing the company to be in far better financial condition than was actually the case. The inevitable question was asked: Why hadn’t the auditors called attention to Enron’s questionable accounting practices? The answer was a simple one. Andersen had major conflicts of interest. Indeed, when one member of Andersen’s Professional Standards Group objected to some of Enron’s accounting practices, Andersen removed him from auditing responsibilities at Enron—in response to a request from Enron management.
Playing Hardball and Losing
The SEC was determined to make an example of Andersen. The U.S. Justice Department began a criminal investigation, but investigators were willing to explore some “settlement options” in return for Andersen’s cooperation. However, Andersen’s senior management appeared arrogant and failed to grasp the political mood in Congress and in the country after a series of business scandals that had brought more than one large company to bankruptcy. After several months of sparring with the Andersen senior management team, the Justice Department charged Andersen with a felony offense—obstruction of justice. Andersen was found guilty in 2002 of illegally instructing its employees to destroy documents relating to Enron, even as the government was conducting inquiries into Enron’s finances. During the trial, government lawyers argued that by instructing its staff to “undertake an unprecedented campaign of document destruction,” Andersen had obstructed the government’s investigation. Since a firm convicted of a felony cannot audit a publicly held company, the conviction spelled the end for Andersen. But even before the guilty verdict, there had been a massive defection of Andersen clients to other accounting firms. The evidence presented at trial showed a breakdown in Andersen’s internal controls, a lack of leadership, and an environment in Andersen’s Houston office that fostered recklessness and unethical behavior by some partners. In 2005, the United States Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Andersen conviction on the grounds that the jury was given overly broad instructions by the federal judge who presided over the case. But by then it was too late. Most of the Andersen partners had either retired or gone to work for former competitors, and the company had all but ceased to exist. Discussion Questions
1.
4/3/2020 Analyzing Financial Statements
https://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs12096/ebook/c04/cGFycmlubzk3ODExMTkzNzEzODBjMDRfMTRfMC54Zm9ybQ.enc?course=crs12… 3/3
To what extent do market pressures encourage unethical behavior? Can the demise of Andersen be blamed on the fact that the market began rewarding consulting services of the kind Andersen could provide?

2. How serious are the kinds of conflicts of interest discussed in this case? Did Sarbanes-Oxley eliminate the most serious conflicts?

3. Was it fair for the government to destroy an entire company because of the misdeeds of some of its members, or had Andersen become such a serious offender that such an action on the part of the government was justified? Copyright © 2018, 2015, 2012, 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.

Choose a minimum of two financial ratios (below) and include in your analysis. Prepare the next quarter’s budget based on your interpretation of past data.

Prior to beginning this Interactive Assignment, review the sections of Chapters 5, 8, and 9 in the Abraham’s textbook on Assessing the Company and Operational and Budget Planning. Also read the online articles Analyze Investments Quickly With Ratios (Links to an external site.)(Elmerraji, 2017) and What Is an Annualized Budget? (Links to an external site.) (Ashe-Edmunds, n.d.).

Using the same publicly traded company you used in the Environmental Scanning Interactive Assignment, and the downloadable Operating Budget Template, research the company online by accessing the Mergent Ashford University Library online database which offers company financials, descriptions, history, property, subsidiaries, officers and directors. Also, access the Business Insights: Global Ashford University Library online database which offers information on global companies, and industries. It includes SWOT reports, market share data, financial reports, case studies, business news, and company comparison charts. (View the Getting Started With Mergent and Business Insights: Global documents for suggested methods of searching Ashford University Library databases generally as well as specific advice for searching these two databases). You can always conduct research using credible online sources of corporate financial information, just be sure that wherever you obtain financial information that you cite your source.

For this Interactive Assignment, you are going to look at the financial statements for the company you selected and, using the previous quarter’s financial data, interpret the data and propose a budget for the next Quarter based on your current and previous analysis of company performance. Complete the budget template using this Operating Budget Template:

  • List your current sales, discounts and allowances, net sales, margins, operating costs, and earning before and after taxes.
  • Choose a minimum of two financial ratios (below) and include in your analysis.
  • Prepare the next quarter’s budget based on your interpretation of past data.

Include at least two of the following types of relevant financial ratios in your analysis. Review the online article Analyze Investments Quickly With Ratios (Links to an external site.) (Elmerraji, 2017) and Chapter 5 in the Abraham’s textbook to help with this portion of the budget:

  • Profitability Ratio
  • Liquidity Ratio
  • Solvency Ratio
  • Valuation Ratio
  • Leverage Ratio

 

Determine the capital structure of the firm: Determine the market value of the firm’s debt and equity. Explain the approach and procedure you used and use these values to determine the weights for the WACC.

This is a copy of the full assignment. At this time I am only requesting parts I,II,III

Will request the rest in the future

The firm it Marriott

Must use textbook as a reference

Text book: Vitalsource.com (corporate finance)

Ask support for logins

Book: Corporate Finance found under the “my bookshelf” tab

 

Part I: Firm History and Overview (due Week 4)

Develop an overview/history of the firm that you have chosen, as well as the industry your firm operates in. You should include information that describes the market structure and competition in the industry, along with the position of your firm within this industry – i.e., is the firm one of the leaders or is it a niche player? Is the firm one of the medium-size firms in the industry? Part I will be worth 30 points.

Part II: End-Point Financial Analysis (due Week 4)

Using historical financial statements (income statements and balance sheets) for the firm, analyze the financial performance and changes to the firm over a ten-year time period using an end-point analysis framework similar to that used in the analysis of Coca-Cola (Week 1 dropbox assignment). You should calculate the same ratios and financial measures as were provided for the Coca-Cola case.

Next, you will identify the major changes in the firm’s financial performance over this time period. Include an analysis of: 1) overall changes/growth in the firm’s revenues, assets, and liabilities; 2) common-size statements; 3) ratio analysis; and 4) analysis using the DuPont model.

You will be required to provide the conclusions regarding which way the major ratio categories are trending. An acceptable conclusion might be, for example: “profitability has increased over the last five years as evidenced by increasing net margin and gross margin ratios. This is the result of a decrease in cost of goods sold, higher margins because of increased market share, etc.” You should also research the notes to your company’s 10K to determine the probable causes of these changes (“Leverage increased because the company issued $50M in bonds to pay for a plant expansion.”). Part II will be worth 70 points.

Part III: Working Capital Analysis (due Week 4)

Using the same financial statements from your Financial Analysis (Part II), provide an analysis of the firm’s working capital policy and changes to this policy over a ten-year period. Your working capital analysis should include the following: 1) overall level and change in WC over the time period and the factors that caused these changes; 2) calculation of the Cash Conversion Cycle for the beginning and ending period and a discussion of causal factors and implication of these changes; 3) overall assessment of the firm’s working capital policy (i.e., is it conservative, moderate, or aggressive?). Compare your results to the firm’s industry averages. Part III will be worth 40 points.

Part IV: Determination of WACC (due Week 7)

Using the principles and tools outlined in the textbook, form an estimate of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for the firm. In order to complete this task, you will need to do the following:

  • Determine the cost of debt: Using information from the firm’s website, annual report, the website Investing in Bonds (link available in the Content area), and the library database sources, determine the ‘average’ rating of your firm’s bonds and the current YTM on a composite of these bonds. Based on this information, estimate the current cost of debt for the firm. Explain the approach and procedure you used to make your determination and what this number means.
  • Determine the cost of equity: Determine the required rate of return for your firm using the CAPM. Explain the approach and procedure you used (and justification for the sources of inputs used for your model) to make your determination and the meaning of this required rate of return.
  • Determine the capital structure of the firm: Determine the market value of the firm’s debt and equity. Explain the approach and procedure you used and use these values to determine the weights for the WACC.

Finally, provide an overall explanation for your results and how the firm will use this WACC. There are resources available in the Content area that will help guide your determination of WACC. Part IV will be worth 80 points.

Part V: Stock Valuation (due Week 7)

In chapter 9, we learned how the dividend-discount model can be used to determine the value of a firm’s equity, or the current price of a share of stock. Use this model to estimate the value of a share of your firm’s stock and compare this estimate to the current market value. To do this, you will need to do the following:

  1. Estimate the firm’s stock price using the dividend-discount model: Use an investment source (some have been provided in the Content area) and find: 1) the current dividend; 2) analyst’s estimate growth rate for the next five to ten years; 3) an alternative growth estimate using the firm’s historical growth rate or the formula “g=ROE x b”.
  2. Use your estimate of the cost of equity in the WACC for the rE part of your formula: Combine the above information into the dividend-discount model (DDM).
  3. Compare your result to the current market price of your firm’s stock. Provide analysis and an explanation of how they compare and explain any differences you observe.

Part V will be worth 50 points.

Part VI: Capital Budgeting Analysis, Capital Structure Analysis and Funding Growth Strategies, and Bibliography and Data (due Week 8)

Capital Budgeting Analysis (30 points): You have been asked to evaluate a potential acquisition of a smaller privately owned competitor. The acquisition candidate produces an EBITDA of 10% of your current EBITDA and is offered to your firm at a price of multiple of 8 times EBITDA. Assume the following:

  • Current debt costs you 8% and you can raise additional debt at this rate today. The loan is to be amortized over 7 years.
  • Current return on equity is 15%
  • Current WACC is 10%
  • Tax rate is 30% (constant)
  • 80% of the purchase price is considered depreciable assets – to be depreciated over ten years on a straight-line basis with no residual values.
  • Residual value for this operation is to be 2x current EBITDA in year ten.

Create an after-tax cash flow analysis to answer the following:

  • Economic analysis: is this a fundamentally sound investment?
  • Using the tax cash flows and no debt (pure equity), is the prospect a positive NPV using ROE as the hurdle rate?
  • Using the after tax cash flows and the firm’s WACC, is this project desirable? Explain how you came to this conclusion.

Capital Structure Analysis and Funding Growth Strategies (80 points): Imagine your firm has some attractive investment opportunities that it is considering. The capital budgeting process has been completed and found that these projects have a positive NPV and are desirable. The firm must raise financing for the projects in the amount equal to 5% of the current level of its total assets. As you know, these funds can come from a number of sources: operations, short-term debt, long-term debt (new bond issues), or equity (new stock issues).

Your task is to decide where funds for these projects should come from based on your knowledge of the firm and your knowledge of the current state of the economy (i.e., level of interest rates, state of the stock market, future prospects for the economy/firm). This section is worth 80 points. Your analysis should answer the following questions:

  1. How much must your firm raise for the investments to be undertaken?
  2. How will you determine where the funds should come from? Provide analysis for the following areas:
    • Current capital structure of the firm, specifically, you must cite how some of the ratios you calculated in Part II will influence your decision.
    • Federal Reserve policy and interest rates, meaning what are current borrowing interest rates and what direction do you believe these will trend in the near future?
    • Stock price and state of the stock market, meaning are current stock prices high? Low? How could a firm’s financing choice(s) be impacted?
    • Working capital policy
    • Profit/loss situation and operating cash flows
Sources and Formatting: (20 points) – Due Week 8, along with your Completed Project
  1. Remember to include a properly formatted APA bibliography page. All direct and paraphrased quotations within your paper are to be properly notated. All sources of information are to be properly identified.  (5 points)
  2. As an appendix to your paper, copy and paste the financial statements from which you derived all your ratios, percentages, and any other quantitative data. Do not just provide a link. (5 points)
  3. The paper will be prepared in APA format and is to be double-spaced. Composition is an important part of your paper. Multiple grammar, spelling and/or punctuation errors will decrease your ability to communicate clearly your ideas to your audience. (10 points)
  4. Your final project should be formatted as a MS Word (.doc/.docx) file that has been edited carefully for grammar and style, and include a cover page and a complete bibliography and index of data.

 

Coca-Cola case assignment as referred to in Section II

 Coca-Cola Analysis

Below you will find financial data for Coca-Cola for the years 2006 and 2016. This data includes the following:

  1. Raw numbers for the balance sheet and income statements
  2. Common-size balance sheets (all entries expressed as a percent of Total Assets)
  3. Common-size income statement (all entries expressed as a percent of Total Sales)
  4. Ratios—including liquidity, profitability, leverage, asset management, and market ratios
  5. DuPont equations
  6. Working Capital
  7. Cash Conversion Cycle

Your assignment is to analyze this data. Your analysis should include the following:

  1. An ‘eye-ball’ assessment of  the changes in Coke’s financial statements between 2006 and  2016—e.g., overall growth in assets, revenues, equity, debt, etc.
  2. Analysis of the Common-size statements—i.e., what changed and why. That is, describe the  changes in these statements and analyze the cause of the changes. Include: a) mix of assets, b) split between current assets and  fixed assets, c) mix of debt, d) split between current liabilities  and LT liabilities, capital structure (i.e., debt and equity), e) profitability at all levels, f) changes in expenses, etc. This section must include evidence of research indicating what events had substantive effects on Coke’s financial profile during the 10 year In other words, profitability may have increased due to  introduction of new product lines, leverage may have increased due to the issuance of bonds, and assets may have increased due to acquisitions. These are offered as examples, and your research should indicate what occurred and how it affected Coke from a           financial perspective.
  3. Analysis of the ratios by category—include in this an explanation of the cause of the   change—e.g., liquidity increased due to the increase in CAs and decrease in CLs. In addition to discussing each of the individual  ratios, this section must include an overall conclusion regarding the direction of the four major categories of ratios. In other      words, you must draw conclusions regarding the overall trends in 1)liquidity, 2) efficiency, profitability, and 4) leverage over the 10 year period. You must also provide industry averages where available  so that you can compare Coke’s ratios to those of its industry
  4. Analysis of the DuPont equation and discussion of the underlying reasons for the changes in ROI             (ROA) and ROE.
  5. Analysis of working capital and discussion of the implication of a positive or negative WC level. Is             Coke’s WC policy conservative, moderate, aggressive? Why?
  6. Analysis of the Cash Conversion Cycle and discussion of its implications.
  7. Summary and conclusion concerning the major changes in Coke’s financial situation.

Coca-Cola Common-Size Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for December 2006 and 2016

All Amounts in Millions

  2006 % 2016  
Revenue 24,088         100% $ 41,863        100%
Cost and Expenses        
      Cost of Sales $8,164 34% $16,465 39%
Gross Profit $15,924 66% $ 25,398 61%
 

S, G, and A

$9,616 40% $16,772 40%
      Interest Charges $220 1% $ 733 2%
      Other Income/Expenses (net) ($490) -2% ($243) -.5%
           Total Cost and Expenses $17,510 73% $ 33,727 81%
Income before Income Taxes $6,578 27% $ 8,136 19.4%
 

Provision of Income Taxes

$1,498 6% $ 1,586 4%
Other Income     ($23) -0.4%
Net Income 5,080 21% $ 6,527 15.6%
Dividends (% of NI)               57%              83.6%
Adjustments to Retained Earnings $0   $0  
Retained Earnings, Beginning Balance $28,388   $ 65,018
Retained Earnings, Ending Balance $33,468   $ 65,502

 

Coca-Cola Common Size Balance Sheets for December 2006 and 2016

All amounts in Millions

  2006 % 2016 %
Assets        
Current Assets        
     Cash and Equivalents $2,440 8% $22,201 25.4%
     Receivables $2,704 9% $3,856 4.4%
     Inventory $1,641      5.5% $2,675 3.1%
     Other $1,656       5.5% $5,278 6.1%
Total Current Assets $8,441 28% $34,010 39.0%
Productive Assets        
     Property, Plant, and Equipment (net) $6,903   $10,635  
         
Net Productive Assets $6,903 23% $10,635 12.2%
Other Assets $14,619 49% $42,625 48.8%
Total non-current assets $21,522     71.8% $53,260      61.0%
Total Assets $29,963    100% $87,270      100%
Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity        
Liabilities        
     Current Liabilities        
          Accounts Payable $5,622 19% $2,682 3.1%
          Current Debt Due $3,268 11% $16,025 18.4%
          Other $0 0% $7,825 9.0%
Total Current Liabilities $8,890 30% $26,532 30.5%
Long-Term Liabilities        
     LT Debt $1,314 4% $29,684 34.0%
     Other LT Liabilities $2,231 7% $3,753    4.3%
     Deferred Income Taxes $ 608 2% $4,239    4.9%
          Total LT Liabilities $4,153 13% $37,676    43.2%
Total Liabilities $13,043 43% $64,208 73.6 %
Shareholders’ Equity        
     Common Stock $878 3% $1,760 2.0%
     Treasury Stock ($22,118) -74% ($47,988)    -55.0%
     Retained Earnings $33,468 112% $65,502  75.1%
     Equity Adjustments ($1,291) -5% ($11,205) -12.8%
Capital Surplus   $  5,983         20% $14,993 17.2%
Total Shareholders’ Equity $16,920 57% $23,062 26.5%

Total Equity + Liabilities           $29,963                   100%     $87,270         100%

Ratio Analysis for Coco-Cola:  2006 and 2016

Ratio Definition 2006

2016

Liquidity      
1. Current ratio current assets

current liabilities

.9 1.28
     
2. Quick ratio (acid test) current assets – inventories

current liabilities

        .76 1.18
     
Asset Management      
3. Average collection period accounts receivables

credits sales/ 365

41 33.6
Total Rev. = Cr. Sales    
 

4. Inventory turnover

cost of sales

average inventory

5 5.64
INO = AVE INV    
 

5. Fixed asset turnover

sales

fixed assets

3.5 3.94
FIXED ASSETS = NET    
6. Total asset turnover sales

total assets

.8 0.48
     
Financial Leverage Management    
7. Debt Ratio total debt

total assets

       .44 0.735
ST+LT= Total Debt    
8, Debt-to-equity total debt

total equity

.77 2.78
ST+LT    
Profitability      
9. Gross profit margin sales – cost of sales

sales

66.1 60.7
     
10. Net profit margin earnings after taxes (EAT)

sales

21.1 15.6
     
11. Return on investment earnings after taxes (EAT)

total assets

      17.0 7.5
     
12. Return on Stockholders’ equity earnings after taxes (EAT)

stockholders’ equity

30.0 28.3
     

 

Dividend Payout                                                                                                         57%               83.6%

 

 

Du Pont Model

ROI or ROA:

ROI = Profit Margin x Asset Turnover = Net Profit x Net Sales
Net Sales Total Assets
                     
ROI (2006) = $5,080 x $24,088 = 21.1% x ,80 = 17%
$24,088 $29,963
ROI (2016) = $6,527 x $41,863 = 15.6% x 0.48 = 7.5%
$41,863 $87,270
                     
ROE:

 

                   
ROE = Profit Margin x Asset Turnover x Leverage        
 

Where Leverage = Total Assets/Equity

 

 

           

ROE (2006)  =  21.1% X  .8      X       1.77      =        29.9%

ROE (2016)  =  15.6% X  0.48     X    3.78      =        28.3%

Working Capital

Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities

2006 Working Capital:          8441 –     8890 =    -449

2016 Working Capital:                      34,010 – 26,532 = +7478

 

 Cash Conversion Cycle

                                                                       2006                                       2016 

Accounts Receivable Days:                          41                                           33.6

Inventory Days:                                            73                                           59.4

Accounts Payable Days:                             251                                           59.5

CCC                                                             -137                                         33.6

Explain why additional funding for SCDC security initiatives is a wise investment for South Carolina.

Assignment: Essay 9010SWA200329 Why Allocating Additional Funding to the South Carolina Department of Corrections is STILL a Smart Investment for South Carolina Length: 6 pages (NOT including Title and Reference Pages) Spacing: Double-spaced Style:

Sources Needed:
APA Use page numbers in citations. Must include required sources; can include additional as desired, but must include all provided DO NOT FALSIFY CITATIONS; use page numbers within the in-text citations.

Required Sources:
 Waldron Article  Price of Prisons  Ch 5 Mikesell, Fiscal Administration 10ed  SC Budget Information (4 files)  SCDC News Information.

Additional Optional Sources Provided:
 Ch 6 Mikesell , Fiscal Administration 10ed  Ch 7 Mikesell, Fiscal Administration 10ed  Additional Articles.

1. Read Waldron Article as a basis/guide for the paper.

2. Review SC budget information provided and Price of Prisons comparison with other states.

3. Review the additional articles and information provided since the publishing of Waldron’s article.

4. Header: Introduction (1 page) Summarize Waldron’s relevant points in order to build upon them.

5. Header: SCDC Budget Analysis (2 pages) Analyze the funding for the Department of Corrections. Be sure to reference Chapter 5 of Mikesell at least.

6. Header: Justification for Allocation (3 pages) Explain why additional funding for SCDC security initiatives is a wise investment for South Carolina.

7. References

Research and prepare an individual report on the contemporary topic above and how it has impacted on the way that we arrange our personal finances.

PERSONAL FINANCE

Assessment Requirements

Developments in smartphone and data sharing technology are changing how we save, spend, share and invest our money.

REQUIRED

Research and prepare an individual report on the contemporary topic above and how it has impacted on the way that we arrange our personal finances.

Critically discuss the evolutionary and revolutionary changes across FIVE different personal finance products or services owing to technological and environmental factors over the last 20 years.

GUIDELINES VERY IMPORTANT

Contemporary is how technology or general environmental factors has changed the way we deal with our money. So how has it impacted in general way we handle our finance paragraph critically discuss many means looking at pros and cons of the evolutionary ever-changing cycle ie things that we did that has come to an end i.e chequebooks across 5 different personal finance products:

Loans or lease or Debt

Savings

Insurance

Investment

wills and Estates

YOU can add any more you feel comfortable first 4 highlighted is a must last one you can choose

use of PESTEL will help

Investments okay look at how has it was about 20 years ago how easy was it to access that type of investment how it was set back then and how easy it is to do now was sort of law legislation or technology that has come in or social effects of demographics and see how that has changed .

for example, look at the age we are in a microwave generation we want things done fast how has most of the products being developed to the way we perceive things which is instant e.g. use of apps.

we can now check her balances make loans overdraft online banking etc. We couldn’t do that before we had to go all the way to the banks to physically carry out that transaction, we then look at why it was set up that way using theories or reasons that support the technology technological move.

when concluding we look at what is going forward such as 5 gene network or drones and say how that is going to shape or reshape or advance personal finance

Layout

Introduction 200 words -250

Main body very important

Conclusion is very important 15 marks here so 400 words here kindly give it your best shot

 

MARK ALLOCATION BELOW THANKS A MILLION

CRITERIA MARKS AVAILABLE MARKS AWARDED COMMENTS
REPORT WRITING SKILLS

  • –  Format (5 marks)
  • –  Spelling (5 marks)
  • –  Grammar (5 marks)
15 Format- Spelling- Grammar-
RELEVANCE OF RESEARCH 20
RELEVANCE OF CONTENT:

  • –  ORIGINALITY OF

APPROACH (20 marks)

  • –  ARGUMENTS PUT FORWARD (20 marks)
  • –  CONCLUSION(S) REACHED (15

marks)

55 Originality –

Arguments –

Conclusions –

BIBLIOGRAPHY / REFERENCING LINKED TO TURNITIN REPORT 10
TOTAL 100