Describe, in detail, the health risks, health crisis, or health promotion issues you will address in your plan.

Course Objectives 4, 5, & 6

DNP Essentials I, II, III, IV, VII, VIII

Purpose: Through the use of scholarly formats and multimedia, the student will create a Proactive Health Communication Campaign highlighting communication methods for a specific health topic.  Health Communication Campaigns are used locally and globally to bring attention to health issues, along with a call to action.  Development and implementation of health communication campaigns are examples of DNP Essentials.

The Proactive Health Communication Campaign allows you to address a population and health issue; then summarize and highlight how you could use multimedia methods to communicate the health issue and engage the population in your solution.  While content is important, the primary focus here is how health messages can be communicated in a way that engages the audience.  This is not a paper, it is a narrated video presentation highlighting different ways of getting your message out.   The plan does not have to be implemented.

This “Health Campaign of the Week” features Safe Sleep for Babies, a CDC website with great examples of how one campaign encompasses many methods: https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/safesleep/

Instructions:

  1. Choose the tools to create your narrated video presentation i.e. Prezi, Powerpoint, You Tube, Screencast-o-matic, Google Slides etc.
  2. Create your presentation:
  3. Title Slide: name, title, course, date.
  4. Introduce your topic. Give an overview of the “agenda” of the presentation.
  5. Describe a county and a subpopulation that is considered at risk.   See http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/using-the-rankings-data/exploring-the-data#peer
  6. Describe, in detail, the health risks, health crisis, or health promotion issues you will address in your plan.  This should answer the questions “What is happening” and “Why is this campaign important?”  This is not an overview of disease processes.
  7. Apply your health theory or concept – be specific on how the theory is used in approaching the health issue. Why is this a good theoretical approach?
  8. Describe in detail your multimedia presentation/campaign that addresses the health issue or issues.  Give examples of the different multimedia approaches you would use, and describe them.  You must describe and discuss all materials and attachments in the presentation.  You may include photos, give links, or attach copies of your multimedia examples.
  9. Include a resources slide with additional information.
  10. Mechanics:  Format and APA references.  Presentation works, has audio, clear delivery.  Length: 10 minutes maximum

 

Describe the role of an organization’s values and mission in assessment of organizational performance.

CHAPTER 8

Quantifying the Quality Performance Gaps

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this chapter is to lay out a strategic planning framework driven by organizational performance considerations. This framework is based on setting of performance targets and then identification of gaps between the current status and the performance targets. In contrast to the conventional finance-centered planning process, this framework will be driven not only by financial performance targets but also by quality performance targets. Thus, any strategy adopted will have to balance the financial and quality aspirations of the organization both in the short run and in the long run.

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

After reading this chapter, the reader should be able to:

  1. Define performance measurement.
  2. Describe the process of performance measure selection.
  3. Describe the relationship between financial performance and quality performance.
  4. Describe the equilibrium between financial performance and quality performance.
  5. Describe why and how organizations should assess their performance status.
  6. Describe the role of an organization’s values and mission in assessment of organizational performance.
  7. Define the business case for quality.
  8. Explain how performance targets could be set.

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

As discussed previously in this text, it is helpful to have a good understanding of what is involved in the definition and achievement of organizational success. The next important step once success is envisioned is measurement; for without measurement, the organization will not know where it stands along the path to defined success. It may not even know how to communicate its vision of success to others. Therefore, this chapter will focus on measurement and quantification of performance expectations and performance gaps, which is necessary to communicate direction as well as distance to success.

The basic concepts of strategy and performance were previously introduced in this text, and the importance of finance and quality in organizational performance and success were reviewed. Performance measurement, not surprisingly, is often a poorly defined concept. Even if defined, the degree of variability involved in measurement of performance across a range of dimensions often makes organizational comparisons difficult. There exist models that have been used for measurement of performance in an organization with various dimensions of success, such as balanced scorecard,1 performance prism,2 and competing values framework.3

Lack of a clear definition of what constitutes a business performance measurement (BPM) system spans from features of such a system to its role and even its processes.4 The roles of a BPM can be captured in one or more of the following4:

  1. Performance measurement
  2. Strategy management
  3. Communication
  4. Behavior modification
  5. Learning and improvement

The process of creating a BPM is captured in the following categories4:

  1. Selection/design of measures
  2. Collection/manipulation of data
  3. Information management
  4. Performance evaluation
  5. System review

It is important to reemphasize that organizational performance is not synonymous with financial performance. If there ever was a time that finance was the only focus for business executives, that era has long passed, and modern business executives need to (and often do) look beyond immediate financial goals.

There is no dispute that a long-term goal of businesses is financial viability, which in turn may have somewhat different meanings depending on the for-profit versus nonprofit nature of an organization. As the business environment has grown in its complexity and sophistication, the path to long-term success may go through long periods of shifting priorities for the organization. Such priorities all aim to secure the organization’s future viability; these priorities may at times be at odds with financial objectives, but management recognizes that to win the war, it may have to lose a particular battle here and there.

By assuming such a position, management realizes that “enhanced competitiveness depends on starting from scratch and asking: ‘Given our mission, what are the most important measures of performance?’ ‘How do these measures relate to one another?’ ‘What measures truly predict long-term financial success in our businesses?’”5

Decline in product quality while management had its eyes on the financial ball has been blamed for the eventual downturn in the financial performance of some businesses.5 Today, the story of GM versus Toyota is common knowledge. Although this does not directly translate to medical care, local, regional, and national competition in health care is a fact of life today, and we are already seeing some international travel for medical care, the so-called medical tourism phenomenon.6,7 For now, the main drivers are cost and value as defined earlier; in the future this may also include specific consideration of quality. As it is widely recognized that quality of health care is an important component of performance, two questions need to be answered:

  1. How should quality be measured?
  2. How can finance and quality be balanced?

Both of these questions can be answered by iterative processes similar to the eight-step process described for balanced scorecard8 and are discussed further in the following paragraphs.

Measures, Indicators, and Metrics

As described previously in this text, a quality measure is defined as “a mechanism to assign a quantity to quality of care by comparison to a criterion.”9 This definition was expanded to define measure as a mechanism to assign a quantity to a variable of interest according to a criterion. This is to ensure consistency of definition across different aspects of organizational performance.

As described previously, an indicator is defined as a composite of measures grouped together according to a consensus. Subsequently, a quality metric was defined as a composite of quality indicators that represent a specific dimension of quality. In the context of this text, different aspects of healthcare quality are grouped under six main categories represented by the six aims (dimensions) introduced by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). Therefore, there will be six groups of quality indicators.

Finally, a performance metric is defined as a summary representation of a group of indicators that are closely related to a broad aspect of organizational performance, such as each of the six IOM aims for a group of operations (Figure 8-1).

The example of labeling medication bags with patient’s name and medical record number was used to illustrate the grouping of measures into indicators and the use of indicators to create metrics. It must, however, be emphasized that the organization’s management and board of directors will determine what indicators and metrics will best provide them with quality information they need.

Financial Performance Metrics

There exist multiple financial metrics for measurement of performance and to aid decision making during strategic planning. These metrics are strongly related to other financial indicators and to more subtle financial measures in a financial performance measurement system. As part of the discussion of interactions of finance and strategy, it is important to recognize the high-level financial metrics. Two of these, NPV and IRR methods, were discussed earlier in this text, and that discussion will not be repeated here. This context for organizational performance has evolved and has been refined over a long period of time. To a large extent, the treatment of quality performance has yet to go through a similar evolution and refinement.

FIGURE 8-1. A hierarchical view of quality measures, indicators, and metrics. A metric corresponds to one or more of the IOM aims. An organization can create an aggregate value of the metrics as “top quality metric” and define it as appropriate to represent its quality performance level. Of course, boundaries have to be defined, and the metric must have true meaning. This will allow an organization to monitor periodically its performance with respect to quality.

Quality Performance Metrics

Like most other things in life, outcomes are the bottom line with respect to measurement of success along the path of quality improvement. However, without a careful analysis of the link between access, process, and structure of care, improvements in outcomes seem unattainable.

Fortunately, this important relationship has been recognized, and such relationships are being actively studied. Various government and nongovernment organizations are investigating a number of clinical (process) and organizational (structure) variables to determine their role in improvement of outcomes. The catch is that there are too many variables, and their weights in how they affect outcomes are different. Additionally, the ultimate net effect of modifying these variables is confounded by the prevalence, acuity, and natural course of different illnesses.

As a result, the organization that plans to include quality as a major performance metric must have a deep understanding of the related indicators and measures, its patient population, and its case-mix before it can optimally allocate its resources and deploy them to specific tasks. Quality measures must clearly be linked to modifiable elements in domains of access, process, or structure so that an intervention could be introduced as needed. As discussed in the “Measures, Indicators, and Metrics” section, indicators are groups of measures that are closely related under a domain or dimension of care, and metrics are constructed from groups of indicators that address one or more domains or dimensions of care for operational categories or the entire enterprise. To build the aggregate indicators and eventually metrics, the organization’s management should develop a framework that adequately represents its patient population and the range of diagnoses and procedures that the organization covers according to their frequency and level of importance. Unfortunately, such a system is not available “off the shelf” and must be developed by the organization’s management. Successful execution of this important step will create meaningful, reliable, and valid metrics for quality that can be used and understood by the executives and the board of directors. The potential is there for complexity and excessive detail in pursuit of this important aspect of organizational performance. Consequently, each organization will have to decide what areas within its clinical services will receive the highest priority and focus in building its quality performance system. To try to cover all areas with maximum detail will overwhelm the resources of the organization and therefore will defeat the overall purpose of introducing quality alongside finance as an important basis for organizational performance.

In addition to creation of aggregate metrics for the six IOM aims, a healthcare organization may create a top metric that is an aggregate of all quality metrics. To be meaningful, such a metric must represent the weighted sum of the IOM metrics and must be evaluated over time within the organization to ensure its reliability and validity in representing the aggregate level of quality within the organization. The weighting must also be determined according to the needs of the organization. For example, because safety has life and death consequences, it may carry more weight than efficiency. Organizations, depending on the population they serve and their for-profit, nonprofit, or government status, may have different priorities, which may be reflected in the weights they give to the six IOM aims.

An important caveat is that such a top metric will not be appropriate for comparison of one organization with another. Rather, it will be a measure of the internal state of quality and will serve to guide the organization’s direction along its quality path. As such, it will be of use to board members and executives as part of the organization’s navigation system. If properly linked to real-time data, this metric can be updated frequently and serve as one of the vital signs of the organization’s own health. Should there be an unexpected change, management can trace back the source of the deviation and address it accordingly using drill down functions to get to lower level metrics, indicators, or even measures. The IOM metrics can also be treated the same way; however, at times a single metric may be more desirable than six.

Later in this text, organizational feedback and control will be discussed in more detail.

Determination of Measures of Performance

What to measure and how to measure are the key questions when it comes to measurement of performance. There exist multistep processes that add more detail on how this can be done, the most popular one being the balanced scorecard.8,10

Researchers suggest that the best approach would be to start with five generic measures: technical quality, customer satisfaction, speed, product cost reduction, and cash flow from operations, ensuring they are11 (1) integrated, hierarchically and across business functions, and (2) based on a thorough understanding of the organization’s cost drivers.

Upon closer examination of these five generic measures, one may conclude that these five actually belong to two broader categories of measures: financial measures (speed, product cost reduction, and cash flow from operations) and quality measures (technical quality, customer satisfaction). Of the two performance categories of finance and quality, the former has been the center of attention of executives and investors for a very long time. Therefore, the measures for financial performance have become well developed and accepted. In contrast, especially in health care, quality performance measures are still evolving. Fortunately, in recent years research in this area has picked up some momentum and has grown in sophistication.

From a practical point of view, quality measures must meet the general requirements of a business performance measure. Although this is a necessary condition, in the case of health care it is not sufficient; more is expected of a healthcare quality performance measure. To that end, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has established a clearinghouse that evaluates proposed healthcare quality measures based on a set of requirements. This entity is called the National Quality Measure Clearinghouse, or NQMC.9

Content removed due to copyright restrictions

FIGURE 8-2. Measure design process.
Source: Adapted from Neely et al.12

To develop a properly and fully operationalized performance measure, a process must be in place. There are many such processes described in the literature, and one that has the most relevant features is presented here12 (Figure 8-2).

Selected measures must be clearly defined and owned. The link between the measure, related outcomes, and consequences of success and failure with respect to the measure must be firmly understood. Finally, intervention with respect to the measure must be possible.12

Linking Financial and Quality Performances

When quality measures are selected and incorporated into the performance model for an organization’s quality, an estimate of the impact of the measures on other performance indicators for the organization is useful in the evaluation of the remedial actions necessary for overall performance. Although this will establish a link between quality and finance, it does not necessarily mean that the financial bottom line will dictate the course of action. Rather, it means that management will be able to foresee the consequences of the alternative actions and determine the most cost-effective alternative given the conditions in the business environment. In other words, a value can be quantified for quality that can help with decision making; there is supporting evidence in the literature for the usefulness of such efforts.13

This is not dissimilar to the conflicts between marketing and finance14 and should be resolved in a similar fashion.

Equilibrium of Finance and Quality in the Strategic Plan

With the recognition of the bidirectional link between quality and finance in a healthcare organization, it follows that any changes to one can have an echo in the other. To determine the net result of a change in overall performance status of the organization, one must determine the point where the results of echoes will reach equilibrium. This state of equilibrium will give a much more accurate picture of the organization’s performance status as a result of a strategy, and alternatives could be evaluated more rigorously.

To implement such a model, the consequences of strategic adjustments to affect quality performance on the organization’s financial performance must be determined along with any potential feedback that might affect quality performance. The opposite is also true in the case of changes made that affect financial performance that in turn may have consequences on quality and subsequent feedback to financial performance.

The following example will illustrate this effect. Suppose that due to a difficult economic environment, an organization decides to reduce its nursing staff to save cost and improve the bottom line. If such an action results in deterioration of quality (increased medication errors or increased rate of preventable mishaps), quality may decline, and the organization will likely lose more in nonpayment from the payers than it will save. This in turn will further jeopardize the financial bottom line resulting in further decline in quality. Overall, this will have been a bad decision. However, if a decrease in nursing staff is judicious or is coupled with other measures that ensure maintenance of the quality level (through technology or other less expensive alternatives), the effect on quality may be negligible, making the move strategically sound.

Although the implications of this example may appear obvious, similar dynamics in more complex situations may well be overlooked during the planning process. Hence, the point of this text is that in very much the same way that the financial impact of any strategic decision is measured, the quality impact of any such decision must also be considered.

ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT QUALITY PERFORMANCE STATUS

Assessment of quality involves assessment of access, process, structure, outcomes, and patient experience.15,16 For practical purposes, the IOM’s definition of quality and the six related aims are appropriate areas that deserve primary focus.17 It is incumbent upon management to systematically examine the quality of care delivered within the organization with respect to those six dimensions using instruments that are valid and reliable. Other characteristics of such an instrument are listed in Figure 8-2.

Other elements in quality will come to light when one looks at the processes in terms of overuse, underuse, and misuse.18 Evaluation of error and defect rates in the organization by auditing processes will also reveal valuable information about quality of care delivered. These are different vantage points that provide invaluable information that could be used to address the underlying causes of the observed effects.

Useful indicators that reflect performance in each of those areas must be identified and validated by the management and then processed into relevant and clear quality indicators on the dashboard or quality report card. This is an incremental process and should always be considered as a work in progress given that the flow of new discoveries and treatments is a fact of life in health care. A measurement framework that consists of measures, indicators, and metrics with respect to organizations operations, as well as domains and dimensions of quality, was discussed elsewhere in the text. This framework must be implemented in conjunction with a performance presentation and reporting framework to enable the organization access to performance data as shown in Figure 8-3.

Insight into an Organization’s Standing on the Quality Scale

A well-designed quality performance measurement system is not only able to identify and report variances but also is useful in identifying contributing causes. Management must prioritize the variances and problems in terms of their impact on mortality, morbidity, financial bottom line, and other factors that affect the overall effectiveness of the organization in provision of quality care and then initiate corrective action to address the problems.

Focusing of efforts on quality and quality improvement in a healthcare organization requires the broad participation of the rank and file of the organization. The only way to ensure that the organization as a whole is appreciative of and sensitive to the quality of care it provides would be to engage all parties involved.

FIGURE 8-3. The quality measurement framework must have a matching framework for presentation and reporting of the performance data. Only then can the collected data be used to calculate composite metrics for each of the six IOM aims and even a single metric of quality if the organization so chooses. There is evidence in the literature that active participation of nurses may play a significant role in improvement of outcome, potentially at no additional cost.19

Lower levels will be concerned with what happens in their own domains, but executives and boards must be involved in all aspects of quality in the same way they are concerned with the overall financial performance of the organization.

Reconciling Values, Mission, and Vision with Quality Status of the Organization

Values and mission are the foundation of an organization’s identity. They are the fundamental motivation and clarity of purpose that constantly guide all employees and members of the organization toward the same goals. The organization’s vision, which management wants all to participate in achieving, is constructed on a foundation of values and mission. These foundational principles should provide a clear message as to what the organization’s attitude and purpose is with respect to the quality of care it delivers. It would not be surprising to find that the employees of many healthcare organizations are not aware of the values, mission, or vision of their respective organizations.20

For an organization effectively to improve the quality of care it delivers, not only is it necessary to reconcile the values, mission, and vision statements with the organization’s quality status and goals, but also it is imperative that all employees be familiar with these statements, as the statements will provide a valuable sense of direction to employees in the daily performance of their duties.

Beyond Regulatory Requirements: The Business Case for Quality

It is possible that an organization may satisfy the regulatory requirements for quality. It may even be possible that the organization may not perceive any real quality threats vis-à-vis its competitors. Should the organization continue with its quality improvement initiatives? Should it set goals beyond what is required ? How can the investment be justified?

If a healthcare organization seeks to improve its quality of care beyond the minimum requirements, both regulatory and competitive, then expecting a return on the investment in that improvement would seem logical. This expectation and associated results have been studied, and consequently, a “business case” for quality has emerged.

A business case for a healthcare quality improvement intervention exists if the organization realizes a financial return on the investment required for the intervention in a reasonable time frame using a reasonable rate of discounting. This return may be in the form of profits, reduction in losses, or avoided costs. A business case may also exist if the organization believes that a positive indirect effect on its function and sustainability will accrue within a reasonable time frame.21

One of the most influential forces in the healthcare quality movement is, no doubt, the payment system. In order for healthcare organizations to provide higher-quality care, they must make specified investments and commitments. Where chronic diseases and third-party payers are involved, the benefits of these investments might not accrue directly to the healthcare organization making those commitments. A deliberate study of the current environment and the mechanisms by which quality improvement efforts can potentially be rewarded or punished is a topic that involves all parties in the U.S. healthcare system, but more importantly, it involves the payers and policy makers.

Pay-for-performance is an attempt at aligning the incentives between payers and providers, including healthcare organizations, to adopt quality-enhancing interventions. This applies especially where there may exist a negative business case for quality from the perspective of the provider; however, the payer may benefit from the intervention. In these circumstances, a business case can be made if the sum of these two effects is positive. Consequently, a pay-for-performance agreement can be made between the payer and the provider, and therefore the intervention can be adopted.22 It is imperative to understand that for such arguments to be made, the costs of quality-enhancing interventions, including investment and operating costs of implementation as well as the changes in revenue and costs that result from the interventions, must be carefully tracked and projected.23,24

ESTABLISHING QUALITY PERFORMANCE TARGETS

The first priority after identifying the measures and developing the indicators and performance metrics that will be used to declare success or failure is to review the organization’s standing for each and every one of the quality indicators selected. This will establish the point of origin from which the organization hopes to advance.

The next step is to establish targets. The usual exercises of selection of targets as part of any strategic planning process apply here as well. Targets must be derived from an organization’s mission and be relevant to its vision. The targets must take into account a realistic application of an organization’s capabilities and must also recognize (and exploit) the opportunities that the organization faces. Finally, they must also realistically acknowledge the internal weaknesses and external threats facing the organization.

Overreaching targets that are incompatible with an organization’s capabilities will only serve to disappoint or frustrate, and setting of too modest a target will result in an organization falling far short of its potential. Therefore, a thorough exercise in analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis) is essential. In addition, the quality targets must be reviewed in light of their impact on overall outcomes indicators such as mortality. This is one way that management can prioritize where it wants to allocate resources. Synergistic interactions among targets must also be examined.

The organization will have to be cognizant of at least three distinct levels for quality performance, or any other performance metric for that matter. The first level (A) is the minimum requirement as set by regulations or otherwise below which there is no point in remaining in the business. The second important level (B) is where an organization’s competitors in that market stand and their relative distance to where the organization is. The third level (C) is where the organization’s ideals picture it to be. Thinking in these terms will allow the organization’s board and management to find a sense of direction by surpassing the minimum requirements, setting their posture relative to competition, and moving toward the ideal. This process, often referred to as positioning, is central to the long-term viability of the organization.

When the current state is determined and targets are set, the gaps will determine the time frame and resources needed to undertake the tasks that will result in achieving the targets. Once the organization has identified its current position and determines its existing (and desired) relative position to the competition, it can position itself in the community or marketplace. In many industries, quality (a subtype of differentiation) is one of the three generic recipes for success, the other two being cost leadership and focus.25 This may be different in health care, as it is not clear whether the informed consumer will choose lower quality over cost. A safer strategy would be to match or surpass the competition while containing cost by way of improved productivity. At times, circumstances may necessitate matching or surpassing the competition even at greater cost in the short term, although unless this is coupled with increased productivity or other cost recovery measures over the long term, this strategy will not be sustainable. Figure 8-4 depicts these dynamics.

In looking at Figure 8-4, the reader is cautioned against simply considering productivity as a function of outputs given the inputs of the organization. An instance of this definition that is most widely used by healthcare organizations uses the number of encounters, discharges, or patients served as the output. This interpretation of output in this definition is a narrow one at best and can be misleading. To measure productivity properly, quality must be factored in when output is measured.

FIGURE 8-4. Relationship between quality, cost, and productivity. A, B, and C are iso-quality curves plotting organizations that deliver the same quality of care at different average costs. The higher the cost, the lower the productivity. The dashed line denotes a path to improvement of quality that is coupled with an increase in productivity.

To demonstrate the flaw in the above definition, consider a hospital that serves n patients per year, with a cumulative mortality and morbidity rate of m. This hospital finds out that by cutting certain costs, it can serve the same n patients per year at a 5% reduction in its use of resources (i.e., at 95% input). The drawback is an increase in cumulative mortality and morbidity rate. Using the common instance of the definition (i.e., number of patients n served per year over input), one can show an increase in productivity (Equation 8-1).

Equation 8-1. Increased productivity P as a result of a reduction in input.

However, this comes at a cost: decreased quality. It must be emphasized that oftentimes, such changes are not linked to changes in quality. It is, therefore, appropriate and even necessary to consider the role of quality in measurement of productivity.

By looking at Figure 8-4, one can see that different organizations that share a similar quality performance level will fall on a curve plotted against average cost and productivity. Achieving a higher level of quality for one organization would mean moving from one curve to the next one. Depending on an organization’s strategy, this could result in increased average cost (the y axis will represent incremental average cost) at the same level of productivity or a smaller increase in cost if combined with increased productivity. In rare instances, it may even be possible to have no increase in cost by simply improving productivity and at the same time achieving a higher level of quality.

Other factors that influence these curves and movement from one to another include cost recovery strategies, competition, and time frame envisioned for the change.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.   Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review.1992;70(1):71–79.
  2. 2.   Neely A, Adams C. The performance prism perspective. Journal of Cost Management.2001;15(1):7.
  3. 3.   Wicks AM, St. Clair L. Competing values in healthcare: balancing the (un)balanced scorecard. J Healthc Manag.2007;52(5):309–324.
  4. 4.   Franco-Santos M, Kennerley M, Micheli P, et al. Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.2007;27(8):784–801.
  5. 5.   Eccles RG. The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review.1991;69(1):131–137.
  6. 6.   Brown SB. Datapage. Medical tourism: nations vie for health dollars. Hosp Health Netw.2008;82(12):49.
  7. 7.   Horowitz MD, Rosensweig JA, Jones CA. Medical tourism: globalization of the healthcare marketplace. 2007;9(4):33.
  8. 8.   Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review.1993;71(5):134–147.
  9. 9.   Child health care quality toolbox: understanding quality measurement. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. http://www.ahrq.gov/chtoolbx/understn.htm#whata. Published 2004. Accessed November 4, 2011.
  10. 10.   Wisner JD, Fawcett SE. Linking firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurement. Production & Inventory Management Journal.1991;32(3):5–11.
  11. 11.   Keegan DP, Eiler RG, Jones CR. Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting.1989;70(12 June):45–50.
  12. 12.   Adapted from Neely A, Bourne M, Kennerley M. Dysfunctional performance through dysfunctional measures. Journal of Cost Management.2003;17(5):41–45.
  13. 13.   Taylor R, Manzo J, Sinnett M. Quantifying value for physician order-entry systems: a balance of cost and quality. Healthcare Financial Management.2002;56(7):44.
  14. 14.   Barwise P, Marsh PR, Wensley R. Must finance and strategy clash? Harvard Business Review.1989;67(5):85–90.
  15. 15.   Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q.1966; 44(3, Suppl):166–206.
  16. 16.   Domain framework and inclusion criteria. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/about/domain-definitions.aspx. Accessed November 5, 2011.
  17. 17.   Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2001.
  18. 18.   Chassin MR. Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q.1998;76(4): 565–591, 510.
  19. 19.   Khatri N, Baveja A, Boren SA, Mammo A. Medical errors and quality of care: from control to commitment. California Management Review.2006;48(3):115–141.
  20. 20.   Desmidt S, Heene A. Mission statement perception: are we all on the same wavelength? A case study in a Flemish hospital. Health Care Manag Rev.2007;32(1):77–87.
  21. 21.   Leatherman S, Berwick D, Iles D, et al. The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. Health Aff (Millwood).2003;22(2):17–30.
  22. 22.   Wheeler JRC, White B, Rauscher S, et al. Pay-for-performance as a method to establish the business case for quality. Journal of Health Care Finance.2007;33(4):17–30.
  23. 23.   Kilpatrick KE, Lohr KN, Leatherman S, et al. The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality. Int J Qual Health Care.2005;17(4):347–355.
  24. 24.   Fetterolf D, West R. The business case for quality: combining medical literature research with health plan data to establish value for nonclinical managers. Am J Med Qual.2004;19(2):48–55.
  25. 25.   Porter ME. Generic competitive strategies. In: Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors.New York, NY: The Free Press; 1980:34–46.

 

Develop a spiritual improvement plan using theoretical framework.Explain how each step in the plan’s process can improve spiritual development.

Assignment

Instructions

Create a transpersonal plan which integrates theory and action for spiritual development. Choose one of the theories listed in the Reading this week, and then provide 10 steps that could be followed in a spiritual development plan (like a recipe). Explain the importance that each step has toward spiritual health. You can create your step-by-step plan for a specific population or for the general public. Be sure to include at least one outside source along with a references section per APA guidelines at the end of your paper to support your sentiments.

Requirements

  • Develop a spiritual improvement plan using theoretical framework.
  • Explain how each step in the plan’s process can improve spiritual development.
  • The plan can be developed for a specific population or for the general public.

Demonstrate an ability to make recommendations for change in paramedic practice based upon existing literature.

4000 words, Research question: Nebulised adrenaline used in asthma; research process and how it impacts upon paramedic practice – COMPARE TO SALBULTAMOL NEBULISED in asthma
Aim: to effectively critique literature and discuss how practice can be developed with an enhanced evidence base
Both quantitative and qualitative methods used to examine how practice is based upon and can be improved with evidence. The theme of unscheduled, emergency out of hospital contact will be used to offer perspective from a range of different research theories. Discuss the potential impact on paramedic practice Present recommendations for further research.
1. Formulate systematic search strategies to identify relevant literature.
2. Critically appraise research evidence.
3. Discuss the relationship between research and paramedic practice.
4. Critically discuss the need for further research in paramedic practice.
5. Synthesize a research question based upon existing literature.
6. Demonstrate an ability to make recommendations for change in paramedic practice based upon existing literature.

Locate and select a research article that addresses current best practices for assessing and managing the disorder you selected.

Application – Best Practices
Paper details:
For over 20 years, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study has conducted research trials to examine factors that impact risks and development of conditions that impact women such as heart disease, breast and colorectal cancer, and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Health care providers use results from these trials to develop guidelines for delivering care to patients. In your role in clinical settings, you must be familiar with these guidelines, and you must be aware that through clinical practice, guidelines frequently evolve and change. Often, what is considered a best practice today might not be a best practice in the future. For this Assignment, you compare guidelines outlined in the WHI study to current best practices for assessing and managing conditions.
Review the Women’s Health Initiative article in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one disorder presented in this study.
Locate and select a research article that addresses current best practices for assessing and managing the disorder you selected. Be sure that the research article you select is from a reputable source.
Consider the similarities and differences between the best practices presented in the WHI study and the article you selected. Think about the potential impact of differences in best practices on women’s health.
Consider whether the best practices in the article you selected should be used in clinical practice.
To Complete:
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Describe the disorder you selected from the Women’s Health Initiative study.
Explain the current best practices for assessing and managing this disorder as suggested in the research article you selected.
Compare the best practices presented in the WHI study to the current best practices presented in the article. Explain how the differences in best practices might impact women’s health.
Explain whether you think the current best practices in the article you selected should be used in clinical practice. Support your position with evidence-based research.

How would you address the myths and concerns regarding vaccine safety? Provide support for your opinion.

Addressing vaccine hesitancy and refusal among families is a significant challenge for healthcare providers. As a nurse you may be asked by friends and family for your opinion. How would you address the myths and concerns regarding vaccine safety? Provide support for your opinion.
pleas use only nursing/ medical journals.

Why it is important to look at what paramedics think about the evolving role?

MSc Delivering Quality Health Care (Paramedic Practitioner Programme)

Dissertation NURM112

Abstract

 

Title

Exploring paramedics views on training to provide wound care in the community.

The study’s aims are to;

Understand paramedics opinions and views towards providing this service and whether paramedics think providing this service is part of their role.

The study’s objectives are to explore;

The barriers and facilitators to paramedics providing wound care.

Paramedics perception of their knowledge of wound assessment and treatment choice.

Paramedics attitudes towards carrying out this role.

Method

A qualitative Grounded Theory approach using focus groups was used. From a review of the literature it appears that there has been little investigation into Paramedic’s developing scope and a theory regarding their perceptions of ability to carry out this role has not been formulated. This lack of earlier investigation suggests that the use of Grounded Theory is appropriate. Ingham-Broomfield (2015) supports this when describing how this method allows for the researcher to use inductive reasoning to attempt to develop a social theory for a phenomenon that has none. Grove (2017) goes on to state that, while data is collected and examined repeatedly, the researcher identifies concepts and relationships between them allowing for a greater understanding to emerge.

Results

Conclusion

Chapter 1

Introduction

  • Introduction

The NHS continues to be put under ever increasing pressure and that with finite resources, more efficient and new systems of working need to be implemented. Seeking to address this shortfall in capacity the Urgent and Emergency Care review NHS England (2013) advocates the treatment of patients as close to their home as possible. NHS England (2016) supports this when stating that the number of patients transported to hospital should be reduced by developing the role of the paramedic.

In order to achieve this NHS England (2013) encouraged the development of the paramedic’s scope of practice which is supported by the College of Paramedics Post Registration Career Pathway (2015). Brooks et al (2015) agrees when identifying the requirement for developing paramedics wound care education, to avoid unnecessary wound care referrals. Not being able to treat minor wounds themselves has the effect of delaying care and putting nursing and specialist paramedic services under unnecessary pressure. With the correct training and education non specialist paramedics can address this issue Urgent and Emergency Care review (2013).

 

1-2 Background

Current Health policy in the UK, set out in the NHS papers Urgent and Emergency Care review (2013) and Five Year Forward View (2014), describe how care should be provided as close to the home as possible. These papers go on to state that Urgent and Emergency care services are to be redesigned to ensure an integrated service between Ambulance, GP, NHS 111 and other urgent care providers with the aim of an improved patient care and efficiency. The NHS Confederation (2008) suggest that due to the myriad of avenues to obtain advice and treatment, individuals are often resorting to the Ambulance Service to provide this advice and care. For these two reasons urgent care, which is defined as care provided to patients urgently when they require, or they feel they require an urgent intervention, be that advice or treatment, has become an increasing aspect of paramedic practice. NHS 111 are also triaging calls to the Ambulance Service that may have otherwise been seen in primary care and that between 2009 and 2016 calls to the Ambulance Service from the public and NHS 111 rose from 7.9 million to 10.7 million, a 30% increase, without a comparable rise in funding, The National Audit Office (2017)

Concerns that Emergency Departments and Ambulance Trusts are under intense pressure to address this rise in demand has driven the requirement to develop the role of Ambulance staff, especially in the areas of clinical history taking, physical examination and treatment skills of paramedics.

In response to this, the role of the paramedic has evolved and extended which has been recognised by the College of Paramedics (2015) who state that the potential contribution that a well-educated and highly trained paramedic workforce can make to healthcare, through its unique field of practice, that intersects healthcare, public health, social care and public safety, has yet to be fully appreciated and understood. Paramedics are very well regarded by the general population and closer engagement of this workforce with pre-hospital urgent care and prevention of hospital admission, should be of benefit to the wider community, College of Paramedics (2013). This is supported by Spence (2017) who describes how paramedics make a valuable contribution to hospital avoidance and appropriate care in the community. Paramedics are now developing into highly trained, professionals, experienced at seeing the same types of patient that a GP sees, and are being supported, both educationally and organisationally to keep patients at home, linking in with the multi-disciplinary health care team, Spence (2017).

The emerging consensus is that paramedics are autonomous professionals at the point of registration and are well placed to effectively deliver a patient focused, out of hospital urgent care service, which was previously the remit of specialist nurses and specialist paramedics, College of Paramedics (2013).

To enable this situation to be realised, a more robust education and training system needs to be in place. The College of Paramedics (2013) state that the current education and training model, in England, is very locally determined, resulting in varied student experiences and different levels of learning outcomes achieved at the point of registration. They are addressing this with the Paramedic Evidence Based Education Project, which is attempting to strategically direct the provision of a more standardised robust education and training curriculum to enable the profession to realise its potential.

The background section is improving but you still seem to be diverting to new/side issues e.g. why paramedics may be leaving the profession. At this stage, it is enough to highlight that there is high turnover rather than going into detail. There should be a clear distinction between entry level and advanced level practice. There should be a clearly stated interest in the impact and acceptance of changing and extending paramedic roles. There should be more information about the wound care role and why you have selected this to study.

Keep to your bullet points for your argument, e.g.

  • increasing pressure and demand on emergency services
  • policy drive to keep care close to home
  • in response to this, the role of the paramedic has evolved and extended
  • you are focusing on the regular, entry level paramedic role – summarise some of the changes occurring here (examples of role expansion), e.g. paramedics acknowledged as making a valuable potential contribution in a range of areas of care – this has been acknowledged by recent review of education and banding?
  • however there are also changes occurring in the move towards specialist areas of practice and advanced practice roles, including prescribing (this is the bigger picture? why is it important?)
  • Why it is important to look at what paramedics think about the evolving role? (you haven’t really made this point clear yet). Is job satisfaction and high turnover part of this answer? If so, link it to your rationale, e.g. given that the role is evolving at a rapid pace and there is evidence for high staff turnover, it is important to examine this topic in more detail.
  • Explain wound care, context and why chosen

Chapter 2

Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

The aim of the review is to identify and examine evidence regarding the factors that affect the development of the paramedic role and practical skills development. Research investigating the changing role of the paramedic and whether the profession feels ready to take on extended roles shall be examined.

This review shall provide an insight in the level of investigation and scrutiny the developing paramedic role has been subjected to. Polit and Hungler (1995) discuss the variance in quality of evidence available and advocate the necessity of acquiring evidence from reputable sources and critiquing this information in a robust and equitable manner. Blaxter (1997) supports this view when stating that a robust literature review is essential to put work in context and draw from recognised bodies of knowledge. Although discussing nurses, Ousey (2001) describes how they should be critical when reading research and not assume it has a sound research base. nurse education has developed to meet this challenge with new registration academic levels at Degree level, and more recently paramedic education has changed to facilitate this with the introduction of Degree level pre registration courses. This level necessitates the critical evaluation of evidence facilitating an enquiring nature, allowing both paramedics and nurses to use these skills to accept or reject information affecting their practice.

2.2 Search Strategy

Wichor et al (2018) describes how the creation of search strategies for systematic reviews can be a difficult balance between being too specific and to broad. This results in either no results, too many results or lack of confidence in the robust and accurate nature of the search. They found that there appeared not to be a consistent approach for carrying out a fully replicable search. Therefore, they developed a simple search strategy that shall be used to find papers for the Literature review.                         Their method uses a step wise approach using single line search phrases and adding these to a thesaurus to ensure completeness (Table 1). This method helps individuals develop systematic reviews to search for evidence to inform their research.

Table 1

1 Determine a clear and focused question
2 Describe the articles that can answer the question
3 Decide which key concepts address the different elements of the question
4 Decide which elements should be used for the best results
5 Choose an appropriate database and interface to start with
6 Document the search process in a text document
7 Identify appropriate index terms in the thesaurus of the first database
8 Identify synonyms in the thesaurus
9 Add variations in search terms
10 Use database-appropriate syntax, with parentheses, Boolean operators, and field codes
11 Optimize the search
12 Evaluate the initial results
13 Check for errors
14 Translate to other databases
15 Test and reiterate

Wichor et al (2018)

Using the frame work described, searches were made using CINAHL and MEDLINE databases and Google scholar. These were used as they are advocated by both the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2017) and the US National Library of Health (2017) describing them as the premier databases pertaining to life sciences. Reading University (2018) describe Google scholar as an acceptable search engine for accessing a wide rage of literature but state researchers should guard against using it as a sole reference as it is unclear which publishers are included and which excluded.

Key words for the search were Paramedic/s AND/OR Developing AND/OR Extending AND/OR Primary, AND/OR Community, AND/OR Urgent, AND/OR Wound.

 

2.2.1 Inclusion and Exclusion criteria

 

A date range of consisted of 2008 to 2018 was used as it covers the period of rapid paramedic practice development driven by increasing demand of an aging population which is reflected in the Urgent and Emergency Care review (2013), and the NHS Confederation (2008) A Vision for Emergency and Urgent Care.

Only English language texts were included due to lack of funding for translation, which is acknowledged as a weakness in the literature review. Full text and research only articles were included, non research articles were excluded from the literature review due to lack of rigor although they are used in the discussion. Following this a hand search was also completed, which is described by Wichor (2018) as an acceptable method for searching the literature.

 

2.2.2 Search results

 

As demonstrated by the search results in table 2 there were 906 papers identified with paramedic in the title or text these were further filtered using the keywords in table 2 and duplicates discarded. These were then further filtered assessing their relevance to the aims of the study and 10 papers were found that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. table 3.

 

Table 2

CINHAL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Hand Search (English Language, full text, Jan 2008 to Sept 2018, filtering duplications)

Search Term And Results Relevant Available
Paramedic (Tile/Text)   906    
Paramedic (Title)   202    
Paramedic (Title) developing (Text) 16 3 3
Paramedic (Title) Extending (Text) 1 0  
Paramedic (Title) Primary (Text) 25 2 2
Paramedic (Title) Community (Text) 45 5 5
Paramedic (Title) Urgent (Text) 3 0  
Paramedic (Title) Wound (Text) 8 0  

 

Table 3

 

Authors Date Title Publication
Reeve, C. Pashen, D. Mumme, H De La Rue, S, Cheffins, T. 2008 Expanding the role of paramedics in northern Queensland: An evaluation of population health training BMC Geriatrics. 2018; 18:104.

www.10.1186/s12877-0180792-5

 

Roberts, L. Henderson, J. 2009 Paramedic perceptions of their role, education, training and working relationships when attending cases of mental illness British Journal of Midwifery Vol 24 No 6
Bourdon, E 2914 A Qualitative Study on Quevec Paramedics’ Role Perception and Attitudes of Cynicism and Disengagement within the Context of Non Urgent Interventions.

Accessed on: 10/11/2018

Conference: NAEMSP 2014 Annual Meeting at Tcson.

Available at: www.reseach.net (Requested from author)

(Hand Search)

 

Pauley, T. Dale, A 2016 Train together to work together: Reviewing feedback of community-based skills drills training for midwives and paramedics PLoS One 13 (12)

www.10.137/journal.pone.0208391

 

Tavares, W. Bowles, R. Donelon, B. 2016 Informing a Canadian paramedic profile, roles, and crosscutting themes. Health Services Research Apr 21 Vol 17
Rees, N. Porter, A. Rapport, F. Hughes, S. John A.

 

2017 Paramedics’ perceptions of the care they provide to people who self harm: A qualitative study using evolved grounded theory methodology Public Library of Science Vol 13 (10)
Simpson, P. Thomas, R. Bendall, J. Lord, B. Close J. 2017 Popping nana back to bed – a qualitative exploration of paramedic decision making when caring for older people who have fallen Australian Journal of Rural Health Vol 16.
Streeps, R. Wilfong,D. Hubble, M. Bercher, D. 2017 Emergency Medical Services Professionals’ Attitudes About Community Paramedic Programs. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care  Vol 7(2)
Mi, R. Hollander, M. Jones, C. DuGoff, E. Caprio, T. Cushman, J. Kind, A. Lohmeier, M. Shah, M 2018 A randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a paramedic-delivered care transitions intervention to reduce emergency department revisits BMC emergency Medicine 13:13

www.10.1186/1471-227X-13-13

 

 

McCann TV, Savic M, Ferguson N, Bosley E, Smith K, Roberts L.

 

2018 Paramedics’ perceptions of their scope of practice in caring for patients with non-medical emergency-related mental health and/or alcohol and other drug problems: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0208391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0208391

 

There were no papers that explored paramedics views on developing their wound care role. Therefore, papers looking at paramedic’s perceptions to their developing role in other areas, such as mental health and low acuity presentations, were included. Notable amongst these is the qualitative exploration by Simpson et al (2017) describing the perception of the paramedic’s role when caring for what was described as low acuity calls. Roberts and Henderson’s (2009) mixed method study regarding paramedic’s feelings towards caring for patients with mental illness was included as it looked into similar perceptions of the developing paramedic scope as was Rees et al (2018) Grounded Theory study exploring attitudes towards self harm. This was also the case with Reeve et al (2009) exploring the development of paramedics practice in primary care.

A strength of the search is that it used a replicable structure, however a weakness was that it had to rely on key words being in the title, due to the fact that when key words were included in the text the search was too broad. Hand searching found a number of related papers of which Bourdon’s (2014) qualitative study on Quebec paramedic’s role perception was included which found that there was a degree of cynicism and disinterest regarding low acuity presentations. Although, this paper was in French and for that reason not initially included this was revised once a translation was obtained and it relevance revealed. Sanderson et al (2007) described a number of useful tools for assessing literature, the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) CASP UK (2019) being one of them. It is also the tool recommended by the University of Surrey. On this basis it was chosen as the tool for critiquing the evidence selected by the literature search. However, Sanderson (2007) cautions that there must be a robust process in place for these types of tools development. The CASP checklist was used for all the literature selected to provide equity of assessment.

 

2.2.3 Critical review of research on paramedics developing role within the health care system

Three themes emerged from the literature review which were: Are new expanding roles the paramedic’s responsibility? Are developing roles affecting perceived core roles? Do paramedics feel prepared for new roles?

2.2.4 Are new expanding roles the paramedic’s responsibility?

Roberts and Henderson (2009) mixed method study explored paramedics perceptions of their role regarding mental health attendances. This study consisted of a survey, interrogation of the South Australia Ambulance Service Data base and three focus groups conducted within the same Ambulance service. Their findings, to be reflected by Simpson et al (2017) a decade later, were that paramedic’s perception of their place within health care was different than the reality of their expanding role. Simpson et al (2017) described a qualitative exploration of paramedic decision making when caring for older people who have fallen. Simpson used a constructivist grounded theory methodology. Which Glaser (2012) describes as an appropriate methodology when little is known regarding the subject, and when starting without pre conceived assumptions regarding a hypothesis. Although Strauss (1998) cautioned against becoming constrained and described how the focus of the research may develop and change during the research process. This was the case with this study which started with the aim of exploring paramedic’s decision making with regards elderly falls, but developed into the perceived role of the paramedic, once thematic analysis was applied to the semi structure interviews and further explored in focus groups.  Simpson et al (2017) concluded that paramedic decision making regarding elderly falls is affected by their personal, organisational and societies perceived role of a paramedic. And that clarification of their role and decision making, and education and training for low acuity presentations is required to ensure paramedics give this cohort of patient’s evidence based equitable care. The paper acknowledged the limitations, in that the researcher was an experienced paramedic and may have inadvertently become a participant in the study and affected the results. The study was set in an Australian Ambulance service which operates a similar model to the UK, thus adding a level of external validity. Interestingly although carried out in Australia, Roberts and Henderson (2009) earlier study was not referenced in Simpson’s (2017) paper? This may highlight a limitation with Grounded Theory where the focus of a study may change and previous work not referenced as it was not initially seen as relevant. Rees et al (2018) Grounded Theory study exploring paramedic’s perceptions of care provided to patients who self harm also highlighted the perception that a paramedic’s primary role is that of acute life saving interventions rather than caring for those that self harm. This is further supported by McCann et al (2018) who’s mixed method study revealed disagreement between paramedics regarding whether this was routine paramedic work or an extended role.

2.2.5 Are developing roles affecting perceived core roles?

As described above both Rees et al (2018) and McCann et al (2018) studies suggest that mental health care is perceived as taking paramedics away from their core role of acute life saving interventions. Tavares (2016) explores this further when studying the Canadian paramedic profile using a mixed method approach finding that there is a shift in the traditional paramedic role that is putting a tension on traditional roles and expectations of both the workforce, management and society. He concluded that more work needs to be done to address these potential tensions between actual and perceived practice to fully embrace the development of the service. Roberts and Henderson’s (2009) study went on to describe how the implications for paramedic practice in rural areas are that there is the potential for the profession to undertake a greater role in the provision of health care within their communities. It was also suggested that the development of the paramedic role into a more Primary care focused service may improve retention of staff, which is at odds with Simpson et al (2017) and Henderson ‘s (2009) findings that paramedics did not perceive low acuity care to be their remit. However, countering these findings are Streeps (2017) cross sectional survey aimed at gauging the attitude of Emergency Medical Service personnel in the southern US. This study sought paramedic’s opinions on developing a Community Paramedic program, finding that the majority of those questioned were willing to participate in additional study to deliver an extended scope of practice, for the benefit of the population they served. However as this was a quantitative survey using a likert scale, the depth of information regarding attitudes and opinions was limited, which Blaxter (1997) describes as a recognised limitation of quantitative methods. Bourdon’s (2014) study wasn’t found during the initial search as it was not in English. However, following a hand search and correspondence with Emmanuelle Bourdon an English copy of her power point presentation given at the National Association for Emergency Medical Professionals conference (2014) (NAEMSP) was kindly provided. It is acknowledged that this is a less than ideal method of reviewing the literature, however this paper is one of the few available that is directly related to this dissertation’s aims and objectives. Bourdon used a qualitative Grounded Theory approach to investigate paramedic’s perception in relation to the changing role of the paramedic. Using snowball and purposeful sampling and individual interviews, results indicated that paramedics perceived their role to be orientated towards emergency care. Attitudes of cynicism and disengagement were described when caring for low acuity presentations and it was felt that these were not core functions. She goes on to theorise that this conflict between perceived and actual role may affect quality of care and the level of engagement paramedics have with these patients. This assertion supports Simpson et al (2017) and Henderson ‘s (2009) findings regarding role perceptions in mental health and community care.

2.2.6 Do paramedics feel prepared for new roles?

Roberts and Henderson (2009) found that paramedics felt educationally ill prepared for caring for mental health patients and that communication between agencies was limited and not configured to give the best support to paramedics and the patients being cared for. Countering this Reeve et al’s (2008) quantitative study explored the expanding role of the paramedic in rural Australia found that paramedics are an underused resource in remote and rural areas of Australia, and that working with the local healthcare multidisciplinary team would benefit patients, especially in the areas of health promotion and care planning. This study explored expanded roles for paramedics and undertook a survey of paramedics working in different locations. A cohort of paramedics attending the rural and remote Paramedic Practice course were asked to express their opinions on their developing role and their experience of the course, by questionnaire pre and then post course. This study used a qualitative survey method using open ended questions encouraging a more in depth response to explore how the expanding role of the paramedic was perceived by the paramedics them selves. All of the paramedics that attended the course felt that they had benefited and were in a better position to make decisions and act in an autonomous manner.

2.3 Conclusion

A key finding of the literature review revealed that there is a general agreement that the paramedic’s role is developing to support societies needs. However, there appears no consensus regarding the three themes identified. This further identifies the need for further research in this area. Due to the contradictory results found during the literature review the formulation of a theory regarding paramedics opinions on providing wound care cannot be made. This is further support towards using a Grounded Theory approach for this study. Following on from this assertion, is that the review of the literature suggests that the paramedics perception of their role is key in facilitating the change from an emergency focused model to the more wide ranging scope, that many developed nations health care systems and aging populations require. In the reviewed literature there is a consistent assertion that paramedics are ideally positioned to deliver a range of care from chronic to acute in nature. However, the literature suggests that there is still a perception, from themselves, society and employing organisations that their role is providing high acuity acute emergency care rather than primary, chronic and mental health orientated. Which is contrary to numerous government papers and the literature reviewed suggesting that it is in caring for long term chronic illness and looking after patients with low acuity conditions where they are likely to have the greatest effect. However, reviewing the literature has demonstrated the lack of research into whether paramedics feel prepared for this change. The literature that has been reviewed is international in nature, therefore caution should be taken in assuming that the results are directly transferable to UK paramedics.

Taking into account the limitations expressed above, the literature appears to suggest that paramedics, society and employing organisations perception of the role of the paramedic is at odds with the reality. Therefore the aim of this study to explore paramedics opinions regarding developing their role regarding wound care will add to the body of knowledge investigating the paramedics role in the 21st century.

 

Chapter 3

Research Design, Methodology and Method

 

3.1 Introduction

 

The earlier chapters have set out the background to this study in the context of the rapidly developing role of the non specialist paramedic. This was further explored during the literature review that demonstrated that there has been no specific published research assessing paramedics views on providing a wound care service. However, studies regarding other areas of development have been reviewed and have informed this research. As the researcher’s Trust is implementing training to facilitate wound care, and this is the first extended scope of practice area to be developed, it is important to find out paramedic’s views on this subject, to inform an effective change management strategy as advocated by Lewin (1947). This chapter shall therefore set out the study design and method used, discussing their strengths and weaknesses to explore paramedics opinions and views on providing wound care in the community.

 

Study Aim

 

To understand paramedic’s opinions and views towards providing a wound care service and whether paramedics think providing this service is part of their role.

 

Methodology and approach

 

Gray (2014) describes the importance of understanding the theoretical stance of research and goes on to state that theory guides the methodology used in a piece of research. He also describes how an initial theory may be challenged during the research process and replaced with a new one. As this study is looking into what paramedics feel, rather what can be proved, an interpretivist approach will be used.  This approach is appropriate for exploring social sciences especially within this study when a greater depth of understanding is required regarding paramedics opinions and views, this approach does not take the data at face value and strives to find underlying meaning, comparing words with other data such as emotion, body language and expression Kruger (1994).

 

Mcleod (2018) states, that when studying people, their beliefs and attitudes the traditional scientific, quantitative approach to research is less appropriate as it has a reduced ability to address the human aspects of the study, such as the participants experiences, thoughts and feelings. A qualitative approach, is more able to explore the phenomenon Mcleod (2018). As q

 

In contrast quantitative research aims to support or reject a theory using numerical data. This data is then turned into useful information by employing statistics that can then be used to suggest relationships between cause and effect.  Denscombe (2010) states that quantitative experiments do not usually take place in a natural setting,  or allow participants to explain choices and add meaning to their responses, although there are exceptions. This can lead to inferences being drawn from incomplete information. Another disadvantage is that of poor statistical analysis of the data and subsequent interpretation. There is also the issue of bias where the researcher misses’ phenomena as they are focussed on a theory and inadvertently make the data fit the theory. Studies also have to be of a suitable scale to be statistically significant which has resource issues attached to it.

However, a strength of quantitative data, is being able to be be swiftly interpreted with mathematical statistical analysis, which is viewed highly in scientific circles and is viewed as rational and scientifically objective Denscombe (2010). This makes it very useful for testing and validating formed opinions and theories and is highly replicable and un ambiguous in its nature.

To explore paramedics opinions and views towards providing wound care in the community, whether they think providing this service is part of their role and to understand the perceived barriers and facilitators to providing this service, requires an approach that allows for a depth of understanding to be investigated. As the literature review was ambiguous regarding the identified themes, the use of Grounded Theory was selected as it is an appropriate methodology for generating theory from a relatively unexplored area such as this.

When studying people, their beliefs and attitudes the traditional scientific, quantitative approach to research is not appropriate as it fails to address the human aspects of the study. Such as the participants experiences, thoughts and feelings. A qualitative approach is more able to explore the phenomenon. Mcleod (2018) goes on to discuss how qualitative research aims to understand the social reality of individuals, groups and cultures as nearly as possible as its participants feel it or are living it. So groups and individuals are studied in environments as close to their norm as possible.

Denscombe, (2010) describes that although qualitative research can play an important role in suggesting possible relationships, causes and effects, as noted earlier it lacks the level of validity that can be found in a quantitative method. However this does allow for contradictions in the results that are reflective of society.

 

Grounded Theory 3.2.3

Grounded Theory shall be used and is supported by Engward (2013) who describes Engward (2013) goes on to describe how the process uncovers patterns which are analysed during the research and may lead to direction changes and the discovery of a theory that the researcher may only become aware of during the study. Glasier ((2005) cited in Engward 2013) supports this when describing how Grounded Theory is interested in exploring how people experience phenomena and relate and react to it. This is especially appropriate when investigating the non specialist paramedic population whose role is rapidly developing with little consultation with them, as the service providers. Ke (2010) describes Grounded Theory is a good approach for obtaining and analysing qualitative data. Although a literature review is often carried out the research is not reliant on formulating a theory from the data found in a literature review. In traditional research this theory is formulated and then tested in the real world. The difference with Grounded Theory is that there is not pre conceived theory and that data is gathered from the real world, rather than being bound in theory and then tested once that theory has been formulated. Glaser and Strauss (1967) suggest that the theory develops as the the research progresses. It is therefore an ideal method for exploring paramedics views regarding developing their practice.

As with all approaches, Grounded Theory has its strengths and weaknesses. Positive aspects of this approach are that the study is flexible and can adapt as the findings and themes start to emerge from the data, that the findings can be refined and further developed and the resulting theory can be used to inform future studies. Weaknesses, however are that its is time consuming, develops a large amount of data and it can be difficult to sift the data for relevant information. Understanding when data saturation has taken place and then developing a theory from that information can also be challenging. However being aware of these strengths and weaknesses allows for mitigation in the form or robust processes to be put into place, which are discussed in section 3.2.7.

3.2.4 Sampling and recruitment

Participant sampling is carried out to ensure maximum variation in the sample and continues until there is sampling saturation. This is described by Cooper et al (2009) as when no new themes or data are emerging. Analysis of the data is then carried out after coding and theory developed from the themes that emerge. In qualitative research there tends to be three main types of data that are collected. These are interviews, observation of practice and document review. To explore how paramedics feel regarding their developing role a number of focus groups shall be undertaken allowing for observation and analysis of interaction between participants in the group. It will not be possible to include the whole population of Trust paramedics due to time and resource constraints. As the goal of qualitative research is to develop an understanding of a populations experiences, thoughts and feelings a criteria based sampling technique shall be used. The three main types of sampling for qualitative research are, quota, purposeful and snowballing sampling Bell (2010).  This study shall use purposeful sampling, where the sample is chosen as they fulfil certain criteria. In this case that is being a member of the paramedic population and as a member of that population they are a sub set who have just received wound care training. On considering the sample size the Trust had stated that the course numbers should not be greater that 12 participant’s. Therefore, a sample of more than 12 was not an option and multiple focus groups were assessed as being required. Bloor (2001) states that the best groups size is between six to eight participants, noting that below that number can risk limited discussion and above risks that no all participants will have their views heard.

 

 

3.2.5 Data collection and analysis

Focus groups shall be used which allow the researcher to gain an insight to non specialist paramedic’s views regarding wound care.  Kitzinger, are versatile and can quickly gather data that can be analysed as the research progresses after the first focus group. Data also emerges from participants responding to other participants comments and how the discussion evolves. This has the effect of drawing out data that may not have been identified during an isolated interview and may become a catalyst for change itself. Seal et al (1998) found that where interviews were good for identifying an individual’s views they could not necessarily be placed together to suggest a group view. Where as focus groups are well suited to gathering shared attitudes and beliefs and drawing out previous unshared data, which is relevant to this study’s aims. Disadvantages to be addressed equate to potential breach of confidentiality and conflicts within the group, which have to be managed sensitively but firmly by the facilitator. This suggests that the success of focus groups is very dependent on how skilled the facilitator is in addressing issues as they arise. This is partially mitigated by ensuring the group interview is robust, a pilot is carried out and that ground rules are laid out and understood prior to commencing the group. Another issue is that of recording both the verbal and non verbal data, which is complex and requires skill to interpret. Recording of the groups shall be carried out using two recorders that have been tested in the setting during a pilot to ensure quality of sound as problems with transcription occur with poor sound quality and where individuals are difficult to differentiate between. Non verbal information shall be gathered by the facilitator using field notes taking into account the format suggested by Krueger and Casey (2009). It is acknowledge that this is a difficult process that will focus on the following areas; emotion, strength of feeling, where attitudes change during the discussion and withdrawal from the discussion Bell (2010).

Due to the practicalities of arranging focus groups following wound care study days two focus groups were facilitated. Bloor (2001) describes how analysis of focus group data is subtly different than from other methods due to the interactive nature of the groups and how this may influence responses and discussion. This interaction and how it affects the data must be taken into account when analysing an individual contribution to the focus group. To mitigate this the analysis of data from a focus group data must acknowledge the group dynamics and the situation that the data was gathered in.

Data collection was obtained via recordings and field notes taken during the focus groups, which was then transcribed and analysised before the next focus group. These identified themes were further explored in the subsequent focus group. The data its self, unlike numerical quantitative data, is closely associated with thoughts, feelings, expression and the words that are chosen to describe these. These were analysed by using a three step process consisting of developing codes that are initially open and organise the data, following this is Axial coding that aims to determine links between the categories of identified coded data and then selective coding that aims to frame a story from the interconnecting coded categories. The second step identifies relationships and patterns within the data, such as words and phrases frequently used, comparing this with qualitative data found in the literature review. And step three is the summarising of the data to support a hypothesis, or in the case of Grounded Theory form a hypothesis.

3.2.6 Ethics

 

Ethical considerations are an important aspect of any research and were addressed in accordance with the Department of Health (2005) framework for research governance, participants who were invited to take part were kept fully informed of the purpose of the study and written informed consent gained. Participants were also made aware that information pertaining to their participation will be kept in accordance with the Data Protection Act (2018) and managed by Surrey University as the sponsor. The only information that will be kept is the information they submit on the consent form, that each participant will be requested to sign which will not be linked to the data in any way.

The study proposal was submitted to both the University of Surrey and South East Coast Ambulance Service Trust Ethics committees, receiving a favourable response Annex ??

When involved in research there are a number of ethical principles that need to be addressed. These are beneficence, do good, non-malfeasance, do no harm, protect confidentiality, give participants the right to withdraw and avoid deception.  The RCN (2004) summarises this by stating that research ethics are concerned with confidentiality, informed consent, data protection and addressing potential benefits and harms. Central to addressing these issues is the importance of informed consent, this aims to ensure that participants are aware of the aims and objectives of the project, the methods that will be used and any risks or benefits inherent in the research. Informed consent for this study was obtained by ensuring potential participants were given a copy of the participant information sheet, Annex ?? and given the opportunity to discuss the project with the researcher or supervisor, should they wish. Another aspect of informed consent is to ensure that participants are volunteers and that there has been no coercion or deception to manipulate them to take part, which is also explained in the participant information sheet Annex ??. Gray (2014) supports this stating that it is of great importance to ensure that participants are fully informed when agreeing to take part in research. As noted earlier this was addressed using a participant information sheet which detailed the purpose and nature of the study, risks and benefits, the projects funding, how data will be handled and stored and described how confidentiality will be ensured. It also detailed the route for candidates to take should they have concerns or further questions and described how the focus group will be conducted and that it is voluntary following a wound care study day. The researcher ensured that he carried out the research in an area away from where he worked and did not know any of the participants with the aim of avoiding coercion bias.

 

3.2.7 Rigour and Validity

According to Burns (1993), the validity of a study provides a ‘measure’ of the truth or accuracy of a claim. This reflects the confidence that can be placed on the results of a study. Beck (1993) describes how Grounded Theory can be criticised for a perceived lack of validity and rigour. Beck (1993) went on to identify credibility, auditability and fittingness as the main concepts of qualitative rigour. However Cooney (2009) states that to demonstrate these in a Grounded Theory study is not as straight forward a question as it seems. Cooney (2009) identifies different stages regarding the answering of this question, which are consistent with Glaser and Strause’s (1967) two main criteria for assessing emerging theories. These are that the theory fits the situation and that it helps people involved in the situation make sense of it. However, Elliott (2005) argued that this level of rigour is inadequate and suggest that it is more important to consider that appropriate research methods were used and carried out correctly and consistently. Cooney (2009) literature review found three broad concepts of proving rigour in Grounded Theory. These were; methodological rigour, concerned with ensuring the methods were used correctly and consistently;  interpretative rigour emphasizing the trustworthiness or the data interpretation and combined focus which as it suggests is a combination of both concepts. Davis (2002) and Cooney (2009) both advocate how a combined focus method allows the greatest demonstration of rigour within Grounded Theory. This is the concept that was used for this study, ensuring that both the method and theory generation were peer reviewed to expose, any methodology or interpretative inconsistencies’.

 

 

Chapter 4

Presentation of Findings

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Discussion

4.3 Conclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Beck CT (1993) Qualitative research: the evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 15, 2, 263-266.

Available at: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=ce2bd4a2-eca7-4a8a-b4a5-63fb715c60ff%40sdc-v-sessmgr04                                                 Accessed on: 17/02/2019

Blaxter, L. Grove, S. (1997) How to Research, Buckingham, Open University Press.

Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K. Focus groups in social research. London: Sage Publications, 2001.

 

Bourdon, E. (2014) A Qualitative Study on Quevec Paramedics’ Role Perception and Attitudes of Cynicism and Disengagement within the Context of Non Urgent Interventions. Conference: NAEMSP 2014 Annual Meeting at Tcson.

Available at: www.reseach.net (Requested from author)

Accessed on: 10/11/2018

 

Brooks I, Cooke M, Spencer C, Archer F. (2015) A review of key national reports to describe the development of Paramedic education in England (1966 – 2014) Emergency Medical journal.

Assessable at: www.emj.bmj.com

Accessed on: 22/11/2018

 

Bryman, A (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6: 97 pp 97-113

 

Burns, N., Grove, S. (1993) The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilisation, Philadelphia, W B Saunders.

 

CASP(UK) 2019. Critical Appraisals Skills Programme

Available at:https://casp-uk.net/

Accessed on:16/02/2019

 

College of Paramedics (2013) Paramedic Evidence Based Education Project

Available at: https://www.collegeofparamedics.co.uk/publications

Accessed on: 04/01/2019

 

College of Paramedics (2015) Curriculum Guidance.

Available at: https://www.collegeofparamedics.co.uk/publications/professional-standards

Accessed on: 05/01/2019

 

College of Paramedics (2016) College of Paramedics welcomes announcement on paramedic salary levels

Available at:www.collegepofparamedics.co.uk

Accessed on:13/12/2018

 

College of Paramedics (2018) Paramedic salary Levels, College of Paramedics website.

Available at: www.collegeofparamedics.co.uk

Accessed on: 15/11/2018

 

Cooper, S. Endacott, R. Chapman, Y. (2009) Qualitative research: specific designs for qualitative research in emergency care? Emergency Medicine Journal 26. pp 773-776.

Cooney, A. (2009) Rigour and Grounded Theory Nurse Researcher. 18, 4, 17-22.

Available at: https://my.openathens.net/my/resources

Accessed on: 17/02/2019

 

Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?. Journal of advanced nursing26(3), 623-630.

 

 

Department of Health  (2005) Research Governance Framework for Health and

Social Care 2nd Ed

Available at: www.gov.uk/government

Accessed on 16/03/2017

 

 

Department of Health (2016) New pay deal for Paramedics

Available at: www.GOV.UK

Accessed on: 09/12/2018

 

Denscombe, M (2010) The Good Research Guide for Small Scale Research Projects. 4th Ed Buckingham Open University Press.

 

Dudovskiy, J. (2018) The Ultimite Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: A Step by Step Assistance. Johnathan, Piitsburgh.

Engward, H. (2013) Understanding Grounded Theory Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 2013 Oct 16-22, Vol.28(7), pp.37-41

 

Elliott N, Lazenbatt A (2005) How to recognise a ‘quality’ grounded theory research study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 22,
3, 48-52.

Krueger, R. Casey,M (2009) Focus Groups: A practical Guide for Applied Research 4th Ed CA, Sage.

Finlay, L. (2009). Debating phenomenological research. Phenomenology & Practice,3(1), 6–25

 

Gallagher, S. (2012) Taking Stock of Phenomenology Futures

Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00108.x                                       Accessed on: 03/01/2019

 

Gill, P. Stewart, K. Treasure, E. Chadwick, B. (2008) Mthods of data collection in qualitative research:interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal 204, 291-295.

Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/bdj.2008.192

Accessed on 15/02/2019

Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne NY.

Glasier, B (2005) The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical coding. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

 

Gray, D (2014) Doing Research in the Real World, Sage, London

Grove, S. (2017). Evolution of research in building evidence-based nursing practice, In J.R. Gray, S.K. Grove, & S. Sutherland (Eds.), Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Analysis, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed., pp. 18-36). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2015). A nurses’ guide to qualitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(3), 34-40.

Jackson, D. (2009) Paramedic Education: Developing depth through networks and evidence-based research: where from and where to? Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care 7(2)

Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn 1994; 16: 103–121.

Lewin, K (1947) The Kurt Lewin Management Model                                      Available at: https://www.change-management-coach.com/kurt_lewin.html                        Accessed on: 16/02/2019

May, C. and Finch, T. 2009 ‘Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory’Sociology 43 (3): 535-554

 

McCann TV, Savic M, Ferguson N, Bosley E, Smith K, Roberts L. (2018) Paramedics’ perceptions of their scope of practice in caring for patients with non-medical emergency-related mental health and/or alcohol and other drug problems: A qualitative study.                                                                                              Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208391           Accessed on: 02/12/2019

McLeod, S (2017) Qualitative vs Quantitative Research. Simply Psychology  Available at:  https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.htmAccessed on: 03/01/2019

Mi, R. Hollander, M. Jones, C. DuGoff, E. Caprio, T. Cushman, J. Kind, A. Lohmeier, M. Shah, M (2018) A randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a paramedic-delivered care transitions intervention to reduce emergency department revisits. BMC emergency Medicine 13:13

Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5934842/

Accessed on:02/01/2019

 

 

Monitor (2014) NHS paper Five Year Forward View. Monitor, London

Available at: www.gov.uk

Accessed on: 13/12/2018

 

National Audit Office (2017) NHS Ambulance Services

Available at: www.nao.org.uk

Accessed on:10/12.2018

 

NHS Confederation (2008) A Vision for Emergency and Urgent Care.

Available at: https://www.nhsconfed.org/resources/2008/12/a-vision-for-emergency-and-urgent-care

Accessed on: 04/01/2019

 

National Health Executive (2015) Health Care News

Available at: http://www.nationalhealthexecutive.com/

Accessed on:04/01/2019

 

NHS Employers (2018) contract refresh.

Available at: https://www.nhsemployers.org/2018contract

Accessed on: 05/01/2019

 

NHS England (2013) Urgent and Emergency Care review

Available at: www.england.nhs.uk

Accessed on: 03/01/2018

 

O’Meara, P. Walker, J. Stirling, C. et al. (2007) Engaging rural communities in health care through a paramedic expanded scope of practice. Rural and Remote Health.

Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5785033_Engaging_rural_communities_in_health_care_through_a_paramedic_expanded_scope_of_practice

Accessed on: 15/11/2018

 

Ousey, K. (2001|) Promoting evidence-based education in tissue viability, Nursing Standard, 15 (30) pp 62-66.

 

Pauley, T. Dale, A (2016) Train together to work together: Reviewing feedback of community-based skills drills training for midwives and paramedics. PLoS One 13 (12)

Available at: https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjom.2016.24.6.428

Accessed on:02/01/2019

 

Polit, D. Hungler, B. (1995) Nursing Research; Principles and Methods 5th Ed, Philadelphia, Lippioncott.

 

Reading university (2018) Library e resources. Google scholar.

Available at: www.reading.ac

Accessed on: 13/12/2018

 

Royal College of Nursing (2009) Research Ethics RCN guidance for nurses. London: Royal College of Nursing

Rees, N. Porter, A. Rapport, F. Hughes, S. John A (2017) Paramedics’ perceptions of the care they provide to people who self harm: A qualitative study using evolved grounded theory methodology Public Library of Science Vol 13 (10)               Available at:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205813    Accessed on: 02/12/2019

Reeve, C. Pashen, D. Mumme, H De La Rue, S, Cheffins, T. (2008) Expanding the role of paramedics in northern Queensland: An evaluation of population health training.                                                                                                             Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032210                          Accessed on:02/12/2019

Roberts, L. Henderson, J. (2009) Paramedic perceptions of their role, education, training and working relationships when attending cases of mental illness British Journal of Midwifery Vol 24 No 6 Available at: https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/view/175                                Accessed on: 02/12/2019

 

Sanderson, S. Tatt, I. Higgins, J. (2007) Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. International journal of Epidemiology, Vol 36,(3) pp 666-676.     Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/36/3/666/653571                Accessed on: 03/01/2019.

Sanjari, M. Bahrammezhad, F. Fomani, F. Shoghi, M. Ali Cheraghi, M. (2014) Ethical Challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: the necessity to develop a specific guideline. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 7: 14

Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263394/

Accessed on: 15/02/2019

Simpson, P. Thomas, R. Bendall, J. Lord, B. Close J. (2017) Popping nana back to bed – a qualitative exploration of paramedic decision making when caring for older people who have fallen Health Services Research Apr 21 Vol 17 (1)

Spence, D. (2017) Bad Medicine: Good medicine- the GP paramedic. British Journal of General Practice.

Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X691445

Accessed on: 03/01/2019

 

Strauss A and Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd Ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage.

 

Streeps, R. Wilfong,D. Hubble, M. Bercher, D. (2017) Emergency Medical Services Professionals’ Attitudes About Community Paramedic Programs. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care  Vol 7(2)

Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468069/

Accessed on:02/01/2019

 

Tavares, W. Bowles, R. Donelon, B. (2016) Informing a Canadian paramedic profile, roles, and crosscutting themes.

Health Services Research Apr 21 Vol 17

Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605119

Accessed on: 02/01/2019

 

UNISON (2014) Two thirds of staff have considered leaving the NHS

Available: Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

Accessed on 09/01/2019

 

Waite, M. (2009) Oxford Thesaurus of English 3rd Ed Oxford, Oxford university press.

 

 

Watts, A. Branagh, W. Jolly, P. (2018) A paramedic’s move to General Practice.

Available at: www.gpview.co.uk

Accessed on:12/12/2018

 

Wichor, M. Bramer, G. de Jonge, M. Rethlefsen, F. (2018) A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 106 (4) October

Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

Accessed on: 03/01/2019

 

Wood, P. (2017) Overcoming the problem of embedding change in educational organizations: A perspective from Normalization Process Theory. Management in Education.

Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0892020616685286

Accessed on: 10/10/2018

 

Robinson, N. (1999). “The use of focus group methodology – with selected examples from sexual health research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing.  29 (4), 905-913.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 1

 

Research Summery for FHMS Ethics approval

 

MSc Delivering Quality Health Care (Paramedic Practitioner Programme)

Dissertation research proposal NURM112

 

Question

Are front line Paramedics ready to undertake wound care in the community?

 

The study’s aims are to;

Understand paramedics opinions and views towards providing this service.

Understand whether paramedics think providing this service is part of their role.

 

The study’s objectives are to explore;

The barriers and facilitators to paramedics providing wound care.

Paramedics perception of their knowledge of wound assessment and treatment choice.

Paramedics attitudes towards carrying out this role.

 

Background

Current Health policy in the UK, set out in the NHS papers Urgent and Emergency Care review (2013) and Five Year Forward View (2014), describe how care should be provided as close to the home as possible. To facilitate this paramedics are increasingly developing their role. This study aims to explore the attitudes and experiences of a group of paramedics after attending a wound care study day.

 

Method

A qualitative Grounded Theory approach using a focus group shall be used. From a review of the literature it appears that there has been little investigation into paramedic’s developing scope and a theory regarding their perceptions of ability to carry out this role has not been formulated. This lack of earlier investigation suggests that the use of Grounded Theory is appropriate. Ingham-Broomfield (2015) supports this when describing how this method allows for the researcher to use inductive reasoning to attempt to develop a social theory for a phenomenon that has none. Grove (2017) goes on to state that, while data is collected and examined repeatedly, the researcher identifies concepts and relationships between them allowing for a greater understanding to emerge.

Trust Paramedic Practitioners have been given the task of facilitating wound care study days. The Trust Learning and development team have been asked and have agreed to contact Paramedic Practitioners facilitating the training to ask if paramedics attending the study would consent to attending a focus group after the session, but still within the programmed working day. This shall be the opportunity to explore whether paramedics feel ready to carry out wound care and if they see it as their role. The Paramedic Practitioner who has facilitated the training will not be present at the focus group, as this could affect participants responses. I shall not observe the training day so as not to form any pre conceived ideas regarding the participants and shall only join to guide the focus group.

I shall facilitate the focus group ensuring that they are in areas within the Trust where I am not known. Identifying data of name and profession shall be collected, due to the requirement to obtain written consent, this data will be stored by Surrey University, as the sponsor, in accordance with the data protection act.

Results shall be promulgated via the Trust Learning and Development, who will not know who the participants are, with the aim that hey will be able to use the results to tailor further wound care development.

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Grove, S. (2017). Evolution of research in building evidence-based nursing practice, In J.R. Gray, S.K. Grove, & S. Sutherland (Eds.), Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Analysis, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed., pp. 18-36). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2015). A nurses’ guide to qualitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(3), 34-40.

Monitor (2014) NHS paper Five Year Forward View. Monitor, London

Available at: www.gov.uk

Accessed on: 13/12/2018

 

NHS England (2013) Urgent and Emergency Care review

Available at: www.england.nhs.uk

Accessed on: 03/01/2019

Velmurugan, R (2017) Nursing issues in leading and managing change. International Journal of Nursing Education. Oct-Dec 2017; 9(4): 148-151

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 2

FHMS Ethics Approval

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is the exposure in this study? How was it measured? Do you think this is a precise and reasonable way to measure this exposure?

EPI 630: Principles of Epidemiology

Our final project in this course will provide you with the opportunity to explore how well epidemiologic study results are conveyed to the public.  The steps to follow for this project are outlined below.

Step 1: Find a printed article on an epidemiologic study in the popular press such as the New York Times, CNN, etc.  For the purposes of this project, the study must be an observational in nature (e.g., cohort, case-control, etc.), not a randomized controlled trial or animal study.

  • Step 2: Locate the epidemiologic research article that supports the information in the popular press article. Sometimes, the original research article is included as a hyperlink within the news article.  Otherwise, use PubMed or another library database to locate the exact research article that supports the popular press article. Be certain that you locate the correct journal article to match your popular press article, as this is an important step in the project.
  • Step 4: Once you have received my approval on your articles, carefully review your popular press article and the corresponding journal article before responding to any of the questions below. Please type your responses to the following questions; use between 1-2 paragraphs to respond to each question.

Students will be graded on their ability to carefully review and critique the popular press and journal article and provide correct, thorough, and insightful answers to the project questions.

Citation for research article:

  1. As you read the popular press article, what were your impressions? Were the study

methods and results clearly defined?  Were any critical strengths or limitations of the study mentioned?

  1. As you reviewed the research article, did you come away from the study with the same impression as was conveyed in the popular press article? Explain.
  2. What is the exposure in this study? How was it measured? Do you think this is a precise and reasonable way to measure this exposure?
  3. What is the outcome in this study? How was it measured? If you were running this study, how would you choose to measure this outcome for this study?
  4. What study design was used? Explain how participants were selected and how they were followed. Do you feel this is the most effective study design for studying this exposure and outcome or would you propose an alternate design?  Explain.
  5. How might confounding or bias have impacted the study results?
  6. Summarize the major similarities and differences between the popular press article and the journal article. Do you feel the popular press article clearly and correctly conveyed these results? Why or why not?

Interpret and evaluate clinical information in order to formulate patient assessment plans using relevant theoretical and research evidence.

Summative Assessment

The summative assessment for this module will be in two parts:

Part 1 Written reflection linked to professional portfolio. 1000 notional words; This must meet Learning Outcomes 4 & 5; 25% of the overall module mark. In order to pass the module, both parts of the assessment must be passed (70% or above). It is essential that you follow the word c

Part 2 Discuss an issue affecting patient care; identifying and analysing decision making in relation to the chosen topic 3000 notional words; This must meet Learning Outcomes 1,2, 3 & 5; 75% of the overall module mark.

Use the reflection as the chosen topic in part 2. For example, part one I used a reflection based on someone having an Myocardial infraction. An example of this would be LO1 – Theoretical approaches example: who says we should take to PPCI. LO2 – Patient had chest pain and ST elevation, so we have GTN and aspirin, back up with evidence why we give it. LO3 – This one is similar to the last one but looking at both sides of an argument on why we do certain things for the patient

 

LEARNING OUTCOMES:

On successful completion of the module students will be able to:

  1. Examine theoretical approaches to clinical decision making and their effects within clinical practice.
  2. Interpret and evaluate clinical information in order to formulate patient assessment plans using relevant theoretical and research evidence.
  3. Critically discuss the application of clinical practice and management within the context of individual patient needs.
  4. Gather, interpret and reflect upon information gained from service users in relation to their care and experience.
  5. Demonstrate the ability to adhere concisely to the requirements contained within the assessment brief.

First part of the assignment is the reflection using the I.F.E.A.R model, this must be 1000 words and below is how the reflection needs to be done

Incident: 150 words

  1. Describe the incident; the emergency call
  2. Describe your part in it
  3. You might want to focus on a description of an experience that seems significant in some way

 

Feelings: 150 words

  1. What were your feelings during the incident/call?
  2. What were your feelings immediately afterwards?
  3. What made you feel this way?
  4. How do you now feel about this experience?

 

Evaluation: 300 words

  1. What went well?
  2. What didn’t go so well?
  3. What were the consequences of your actions on the patient and others?
  4. Did the patient have any unmet needs (PUNs)?
  5. To what extent did you act for the best and in tune with your values (ethics)?
  6. Does this situation connect with any other similar experiences?

 

Analysis: 300 words

  1. What did you earn from the incident or event?
  2. What could you have done better?
  3. Can you identify any practitioner (paramedic) educational needs (PENs)?
  4. Was there anything you did not know? Reaction:
  5. How will you meet the PENs?
  6. Do you need to chat to a colleague or mentor?
  7. Do you need to research something in books/journals?
  8. Do you need to ask questions?
  9. Do you need to read an article/book?
  10. Do you need to attend a seminar/session/course?
  11. How might you respond more effectively given this situation again?

 

Response: 100 words

  1. What did you find out in response to your reaction (educational needs?
  2. Describe your new learning
  3. What can you take forward and apply if faced with the same or similar incidents?

 

 

Reflection;

I have done a brief reflection, but it needs more work. This is the first part of the assignment. Use this reflection to complete part two.

A cat 2 job came through of a patient experiencing chest pains and was very clammy and pale in colour. I was two crew members one was the paramedic and the other was a EMT and I was the third crew member (student) A member of the public had made the call to the emergency service as he was concerned about the patient. The patient had been traveling to work when these chest pain came on, so he was in a public place.

We arrived at the patient and could clearly see he looked unwell. The member of the public was a taxi driver who stayed with the patient until we arrived. When looking at the patient he was alert and talking in full sentences he looked very clammy and pallor in colour, he was also holding his chest describing of a crushing heavy feeling. We assisted the patient onto the ambulance and conducted an assessment, we done a number of observations which included BP, HR, ECG, Respiratory rate, temp and BM we also got a full medical history at the same time. Although the patient had ST elevation and was very tachycardia, he had no previous medical history to suggest or make him a high risk of a heart attack, in fact the patient was a very fit person who cycled every day and has never really been the doctors

The patient observations were all normal apart from his HR which he was tachycardia and is ECG showed ST elevation, with reciprocal changes. This meant the patient was having a myocardial infraction. We had to act fairly quickly and get the patient to nearest PPCI hospital as he met the criteria and the local guidelines for this type of treatment. In the process of getting the patient to the local ppci hospital we had given the patient GTN and aspirin which again is protocol and also morphine was given for the chest pain.

As a student I mainly only assisted with the observations and reported them back to the paramedic, my paramedic what ask what my thoughts were and what I would do. The paramedic made all the clinical decisions based on what was presented in front of us. The other crew member also assisted with the observations and also transported the patient to the nearest ppci centre whilst me and the paramedic stayed in the back with the patient ensuring he was ok.

When the job came through from the call centre, I remember feeling apprehensive as you are never quite sure what you are going to walk into and not all jobs that come through are as what they seem. When we arrived at the job, I became very focused on the patient and ensuring I could do everything I could within my scope of practice. I felt an element of frustration as there were some aspects I couldn’t do yet, for example read the ECG or be able to cannulate. I made every effort to focus however on what I could do, for example taking the patients observations and communicating with the patient and help keeping him calm. Considering the patient was having a heart attack his whole damiana was very calm and not what I expected to see when someone is having a heart attack. This threw me a little and took me a little by surprise.

 

The whole experience itself was a good as the patient got the treatment he needed, and I was able to take a lot of learning away from it. I felt good that I was able to contribute to the patients care plan but at the same time I felt I needed to know a lot more and my knowledge held me back slightly.

 

The patient got the correct treatment plan which was in line with local policy and JRCALC.

Patient received high level of care.

The crew worked well together to achieve fast and efficient care for the patient and meet all the needs.

Because we were able to identify that the patient was having an MI we were able to give the patient the correct treatment which resulted in the patient making a full recovery.

I felt I was out of my depth in terms of knowledge and was unable to fully understand the ECG reading, this left me feeling frustrated.

Discuss the impact of Hypertension on the human body systems, including cells, body chemistry and microbiology.

Assessment Task 2
Task Description
You will be provided with a condition, disease or disorder. Using the disease or disorder you will need to develop an essay that highlights the impact the disease or disorder has on human body systems, including cells and body chemistry and microbiology. Use the topics covered in the lectures from weeks 5 – 12 to develop your essay.
Chemistry in the body – homeostasis and body planes; Cell Biology/cell membrane – diffusion, osmosis and intracellular organelles; Body systems – cardiovascular system, tissues and nervous, renal and integumentary system; Body systems – skeletal, digestive, lymphatic and reproductive, bone tissue and muscles; Microbiology and infection; Systems working together
Condition – Hypertension
A.B. is a 57-year-old man who visits his GP clinic to see the Nurse to get his flu vaccination. He complains of headaches and general tiredness. The Nurse takes some measurements and calculates that A.B. has a BMI of 32. On further discussion A.B. tells the Nurse he smokes 30 cigarettes a day. He does very little exercise and eats mostly takeaway food. His father died of a heart attack. The Nurse takes A.B’s blood pressure which is 150/110 mm Hg.
You will need to undertake research on the specific disease or disorder and consider
• Which body systems are impacted by the disease or disorder
• How the normal functioning of each body system is changed or disrupted by the disease or disorder (there will be more than one body system impacted by the disease or disorder provided)
• Demonstrate the relationship between the systems impacted.
• Explain the changes in terms of the underlying mechanisms, such as homeostasis, that have been disrupted.

Intended learning outcomes assessed in this assignment
1. Identify and explain introductory human anatomy and physiology
2. Identify and explain introductory biochemistry relevant to the health profession
3. Communicate using bio-science and health profession terminology and information

Target audience
Fellow students, tutors, potential patients.
Your essay should be 1600 words on your topic plus your reference list.
As a suggestion you should
• Introduce your disease or disorder
• Describes the impact of the disease or disorder on the normal function of each of the body systems that your research indicates what is impacted by the disease or disorder
• Highlight how homeostasis is disrupted and the impact of this on the body
• Identify the relationships between the systems that are disrupted

Make sure that you use terminology appropriate for your audience (see above) and that you understand all the concepts and terminology used. You may find that some of your sources use specific terminology outside the scope of this unit and you must ensure that you explain any unfamiliar terms for your audience.
Additionally, you will need to ensure that you provide your references.