Explain a current regulation regarding the existing initiative that has been identified and the context in which it was developed. Why is this regulation important? Describe the regulatory level that the existing initiative is being addressed at. Consider the potential for multiple levels of regulation.

A gap in equity related to mental health access for veterans

I. Introduction
A. Describe a specific gap in the delivery of healthcare. Include the specific population affected by the gap.
B. Briefly describe the history of this gap in access to healthcare. Has this been an issue historically, or is it a modern issue?
C. Explain the impact that the socioeconomic background of the population has on their access to healthcare.
D. Describe how the healthcare delivered to the population is affected by the gap in access.
E. Predict any potential implications if this gap in access is not addressed.

II. Existing Initiatives
A. Explain an existing healthcare initiative that was put in place to address this gap in access.
B. Explain the specific goals of the existing initiative in place to address this gap in access.
C. Describe the circumstances around the development of the existing initiative. Consider when it was developed and what factors were considered.
D. Describe the resources required to fund the existing initiative.
E. Explain why the existing initiative is not meeting its intended purpose and now requires improvement.

III. Regulation
Explain a current regulation regarding the existing initiative that has been identified and the context in which it was developed. Why is this regulation important?
Describe the regulatory level that the existing initiative is being addressed at. Consider the potential for multiple levels of regulation.

Conclusion:

Explain the effectiveness of the existing initiative and associated regulations in addressing this gap in the delivery of healthcare to the target population. Does the initiative align with initiative in place to support other gaps? Are there conflicting interests to be aware of?

What are the major differences between the cohort study design and the case-control study design? When do we use the case-control study design? What makes the case-control study design so popular?

Epidemiologic Study Designs

Address the following:

What are the major differences between the cohort study design and the case-control study design?
When do we use the case-control study design?
What makes the case-control study design so popular?

Identify a journal article related to your topic from the free access journals available from a database. Summarize the objectives and findings of the research article. Include the strengths and weaknesses of the selected article. Discuss how this study can be improved.

Appraising the Quality of Information in Research

Identify a journal article related to your topic from the free access journals available from a database.

Summarize the objectives and findings of the research article.
Include the strengths and weaknesses of the selected article.
Discuss how this study can be improved.

Identify a public health issue within your local area or state that you think needs to be addressed. Explain the history of this public health issue.

Access to Healthcare for minorities in San Antonio

The purpose of this assignment is for you to research and identify a topic for your course project, which will include several segments aimed at recommending ways to mitigate a public health concern of your choosing.

Identify a public health issue within your local area or state that you think needs to be addressed. Explain the history of this public health issue.

Include health data and background information on the issue.

Explain why you choose this public health issue. It can be personal, professional, or for other reasons. Explain how researching this concern will help you in your future career.

Your completed research paper topic should be a minimum of two pages in length. You must use a minimum of two outside sources. All sources, including the textbook, must be cited and referenced according to APA Style. APA Style formatting, however, is not necessary.

Read and compare two articles of your choice from offered in the Forum. Are there similarities in the conclusions? Are there differences? Why?

Macroeconomic Policies and Public Health

Read and compare two articles of your choice from offered in the Forum. Are there similarities in the conclusions? Are there differences? Why?

TWO ARTICLES:
1.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23322039.2018.1435443

2.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154550/

Discuss how the research was conducted. Recap essential information from the methods set forth in the manuscript. Does the design of the study clearly tie to main objectives?

The Effects of Music Therapy

For this week’s discussion, review the article found in this module’s readings: The Effects of Music Therapy on Anxiety and Depression of Cancer Patients. By Day 4 of the module week, answer the following questions.

Discuss how the research was conducted.
Recap essential information from the methods set forth in the manuscript.
Does the design of the study clearly tie to main objectives?
Your opinion on whether the statistical tests were appropriate for testing the hypothesis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072238/

What are the purposes of survey research serves?What are the essential elements of survey research? Describe the process of conducting survey research. What are the major strengthsand weaknesses of survey research?

Lesson 2

Chapter Three
Become familiar with the funding sources most likely to support the research topics of your interest. What are their requirements and restrictions? Think about your proposal assignment. What funding source might you target?

Chapter Eight
What are the purposes of survey research serves?What are the essential elements of survey research? Describe the process of conducting survey research. What are the major strengthsand weaknesses of survey research? Find a study that was conducted using a survey instrument either in the references section at the end of chapter eight or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website: https://www.cdc.gov/

Share what you found with your peers by providing the citation and brief summary. What was the population? What was the time frame? How was the survey conducted? Did the study list any limitations of the survey?

If the government is spending similar per capita, why are Americans spending more private money and yet still achieving poorer results? Is the United States actually spending “too much”, or is it possible that the high outcomes Switzerland achieves really do come with a higher price tag? 

United States Healthcare Spending and Outcomes

The United States is spending more money and achieving fewer quality health outcomes than many of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) peer higher-income nations.  The United States has a lower life expectancy, highest rate of suicide, highest burden of chronic disease, double the average rate of obesity, and among the highest rates of hospitalization for preventable illness (Tikkanen & Abrams, 2020). Government spending rates of OECD nations are similar, but U.S. individual out of pocket expenses are greater than most, and U.S. private spending is more than five times the rate of Canada, the second highest private spender. This then begs the question: if the government is spending similar per capita, why are Americans spending more private money and yet still achieving poorer results?

The first consideration is a comparison of cost for goods and/or services. In their economic analysis report, Papanicolas et al. (2018) considered drivers of U.S. healthcare spending compared with other developed nations. Despite broad generalizations among policy makers to the contrary, this report found that the United States is not spending too much on healthcare and too little on social services comparative to peer nations. There was no notable difference in services targeting improvement of social determinants of health across nations in this data analysis review. The United States did demonstrate high levels of administrative spending costs, as well as higher rates of some common surgical procedures (coronary revascularization and joint replacement), and more expensive pharmaceuticals, fees for physician/hospital services, and diagnostic tests.  (Papanicolas et al., 2018). Targeted action to decrease cost of these goods and services could help to rein spending.

The recent enactment of the No Surprises Act, which protects patients from onerous out-of-network billing practices, was a bipartisan effort by legislators to curb health costs (Hall, 2021). While this bill will certainly be a welcome protection for patients, it has the potential to simply shift out-of-pocket costs from the consumer to insurance payers while doing little for the overall balance of spending. Costs will continue to be high until the United States decides if it wants to spearhead a true national health plan, or if it will continue to provide the either/or option of government sponsored plans versus private insurance.

In light of similar rates of government spending, we must also consider the efficiency with which the government money is spent. Government money is defined here as public funding generated via taxation. The United Kingdom (UK), which spends only half as much on healthcare as the United States, funds 79% of of its National Health Service (NHS) through taxation. By comparison, Switzerland funds only 30.5% of healthcare expenditure with tax funds; the bulk is largely via compulsory private insurance (Cooper, 2019). Switzerland spends a combined (government and private funds) 12% of its adjusted GDP, compared to the United States 16.0% and UK 9.8%, and achieves among the highest overall outcomes (Tikkanen and Abrams, 2020). One takeaway one might consider is that private dollars achieve better outcomes than government, and that cost is relative to outcomes. Is the United States actually spending “too much”, or is it possible that the high outcomes Switzerland achieves really do come with a higher price tag?

Prepare a 500- to 750-word paper that addresses the ethical responsibilities associated with mandated reporting of domestic violence according to Ohio state reporting laws.

Ethical responsibilities

Prepare a 500- to 750-word paper that addresses the ethical responsibilities associated with mandated reporting of domestic violence according to Ohio state reporting laws. Be sure to reflect on the implications of these laws to the professional counseling practice.

How does this position contribute to the organization’s overall success? What unique contributions will the successful candidate make to the team? What subtle challenges confront a person in this role? What unique capabilities does the candidate need to succeed?

Realistic Job Previews

By Jesse Sostrin March 28, 2014

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

As organizations struggle to fill vital roles with qualified candidates, some of the greatest frustrations experienced by managers come from failed recruitments. Whether your organization has 10 or 10,000 members, the ability to select the right candidate is a game changer in the war for talent and the quest to reduce personnel costs.

A proven way to avoid costly turnover from failed hires is to offer qualified candidates a realistic job preview.

Such a preview can reveal pivotal aspects of a job and test whether prospective candidates are likely to succeed. Gaining this accurate perspective on the job’s true demands provides the best chance for both sides to determine fit before a commitment is made. While there will always be the risk of a mismatch in hiring, a preview offers some safeguard against the guesswork that often pervades this critical decision. Here are three strategies for implementing previews to reduce the incidence of bad hiring decisions.

Go beyond the job description. Once the recruitment and selection phase has ended and the employment relationship is solidified, only then do most people discover the true demands of a new job through a process of trial and error. Coming to terms with these brutal facts can derail a new employee’s success if the reality severely contradicts their expectations.

This occurs in part because of the double reality of work: All the tasks and activities listed in a standard job description tell only part of the story about what it takes to succeed. On the other hand, there is always the “job within the job.” That’s made up of those hidden components like effectively collaborating with difficult people, navigating confusing workplace politics and getting great work done amid shrinking resources and increasing demands.

While it may be true that this double reality of work is unavoidable at some level, a realistic job preview can reduce the surprise factor and help avoid the painful blind-side effect of a severe mismatch. Start by going beyond the job description and analyze a position with core questions to reveal deeper details, such as these:

  1. How does this position contribute to the organization’s overall success?
  2. What unique contributions will the successful candidate make to the team?
  3. What subtle challenges confront a person in this role?
  4. What unique capabilities does the candidate need to succeed?

The goal of questions like these is to spark a different kind of conversation, one that exposes the known complexities of the position and limits the remaining pockets of ambiguity to those unavoidable circumstances that can only be tested on the job.

Design the interview accordingly. The interview experience is the next focused arena for providing a realistic job preview. This can be accomplished, however, only if the interview is structured in a way to increase transparency, reveal concrete expectations and provide insight into the cultural factors the new employee will encounter within the organization. Each position is different, so the following options can be combined so provide an environment for painting a clear and compelling picture of the job:

  1. Biographical interview: Focus on a chronological assessment of a candidate’s past experiences.
  2. Behavioral interview: Seek specific examples of how he or she has performed certain tasks.
  3. Unstructured interview: Stage an improvisational discussion that includes unscripted questions.
  4. Stress interview: Do scenario testing that creates anxiety so you can how see how candidate responds.

In addition to using formal interview processes, other vehicles can help both sides arrive at a realistic preview. Employers can request work samples or offer trial experiences to assess performance. Organizations can produce interactive videos that illustrate basic expectations and day-in-the-life scenarios. And candidates can spend time on-site shadowing workers or attending question-and-answer sessions with current employees.

Provide an “out” to confirm commitment. Job previews can provide an “out” for both the candidate and employer; they weed out the ill-equipped and disinterested and focus qualified candidates on the true criteria for success. While it may seem counterintuitive, this escape mechanism can intensify legitimate commitments from those truly fit for the opportunity.

Although a comprehensive evaluation of the employment relationship is better for both parties, pressures faced by employers and potential employees may deter them from taking advantage of realistic job previews. For job seekers, the desire to be employed is often strong enough to force lingering doubts aside. If so, candidates might roll the dice and accept an offer — even if it’s based on limited information, a superficial job description and filtered details about the organization’s culture — and lack the patience to test for a careful match.

A company may feel compelled to produce glossy materials portraying the organization in the most positive light. Yet ultimately it would be more effective for managers to move past the veneer and present a fuller picture of the firm’s past success, as well as its goals for future growth and improvement. This candor ideally would lead them to providing useful details about the chemistry of the team, managers’ decision-making habits and the relative pressures and the challenges and opportunities that could affect the position.

While it may take time and energy to shift to a “warts-and-all” approach to recruitment and candidate selection, prospective employees will gain a deeper sense of commitment as a result. This will lead to solid hiring choices that improve retention and reduce costly failed hires.