How does this literature review support the analysis or further understanding of the problem statement? How do you intend to tell the story to the reader?

/in /by

4.1 Literature review

Complete your literature review that analyzes or helps the reader understand your problem statement from back in

Weeks 1 and 2. The literature review paper should be a condensed, synthesized, narrative that integrates all of the literature you have reviewed in Week 2 as well as additional research relevant to your problem. Don’t merely list an article and describe it in one paragraph and then another in the next paragraph. Make it a narrative. Describe the studies and how they support what you want to examine in your topic. Think of this as a paper within a paper. You should provide an introduction and summary of your lit review. Include headings to organize the content.

Your literature review may be a fluid document as your focus changes and recommendations are received from your instructor. Continuously make additions, updates, and revisions to the Literature Review Matrix you created in Week 2.

Provide an updated Literature Review Matrix as an additional document uploaded along with the 4.1 Literature Review assignment this week.

Your literature review paper should include:
Title page formatted in APA.

Title heading as your introduction heading to the literature review. How does this literature review support the analysis or further understanding of the problem statement? How do you intend to tell the story to the reader?
Your clearly stated problem statement. Make any revisions following Weeks 1 and 2 if necessary.

Well-organized sections in the paper that review similar research studies used to explain or analyze the problem (review the Literature Review Tutorial). Include correctly formatted APA headings.

Conclusion

References – 10 minimum. They must be research articles. You already have 5 from Week 2.

What constitutes valid, reliable, and relevant evidence? Why is it necessary to always consider the validity, reliability, and relevance of a research study?

/in /by

Week 3 Discussion question

PArt 1
What constitutes valid, reliable, and relevant evidence? Why is it necessary to always consider the validity, reliability, and relevance of a research study? As you explain why a systematic appraisal of the evidence is necessary, consider the alternative to valid, reliable, and relevant evidence and the potential resulting outcomes. As always, provide substantive support of your views and opinions using appropriate research articles.

part 2
In 1998, Wakefield et al. reported a link between the administration of the MMR vaccine and a form of autism, igniting panic and contributing to a public health issue that continues today. Intentional or not, the research was flawed with bias. (You can read more about Wakefield’s study and fraudulent reporting here: Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent.)
Ethical issues such as confirmation bias, whether intentional or unintentional, hold a significant impact for consumers of research. How can a manager or healthcare team work to prevent confirmation bias in EBM? As always, provide substantive support of your views and opinions using appropriate research articles.

Through personal research, evaluate the needs to intubate a patient and the variables that make the process difficult, and the proper assessment tactics that would indicate failure to secure the airway.

/in /by

RES 321: Module 1–Essay

When evaluating a patient for emergency airway management, the first assessment should be of the patency and adequacy of the airway.

Four Key Signs of Upper Airway Obstruction

Muffled or “Hot Potato” voice (as though the patient is speaking with a mouthful of hot food)
Inability to swallow secretions, either because of pain or obstruction
Stridor
Dyspnea
The first two signs do not necessarily herald imminent total upper airway obstruction;
stridor, if new or progressive, usually does, and dyspnea also is a compelling symptom.

Through personal research, evaluate the needs to intubate a patient and the variables that make the process difficult, and the proper assessment tactics that would indicate failure to secure the airway.

 

Identify the organ/organ system that has the direct influence on maintaining the normal range.

/in /by

RES 330: Module 1–Essay

Hemodynamic Organ or System

For each of the selected hemodynamic parameters;

Pulmonary artery pressure,
Pulmonary wedge pressure,
Cardiac output,
Mean arterial pressure, and
Central venous pressure,

Identify the organ/organ system that has the direct influence on maintaining the normal range. You can define in your own terms, and make sure to cite any sources used.

What does the prevention of disease look like within the context of epidemiology? How does the natural history of disease (prepathogenesis and pathogenesis, active versus passive signs and symptoms) speak into prevention of disease?

/in /by

 Epidemiology

What does the prevention of disease look like within the context of epidemiology? How does the natural history of disease (prepathogenesis and pathogenesis, active versus passive signs and symptoms) speak into prevention of disease?

Differentiate between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research designs. What are the benefits of each research method? How might each be appropriate in healthcare research and evidence-based management?

/in /by

2.1 Discussion question

Differentiate between qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research designs. What are the benefits of each research method? How might each be appropriate in healthcare research and evidence-based management? As always, provide substantive support of your views and opinions using appropriate research articles.

File Links:

Using the following keywords for your PubMed search “emergency medicine cost emergency department utilization” perform a search of scholarly articles and provide a bibliography of your five articles.

/in /by

Bibliography of Pubmed

Instructions
Using the following keywords for your PubMed search—“emergency medicine cost emergency department utilization”— perform a search of scholarly articles and provide a bibliography of your five articles. Your bibliography must be presented in an APA (7th edition) format.

Present the key findings in a matrix (format provided). Provide 3–5 bullet points to summarize the key findings of all five articles.

Identify one article published since 2020 on the topic of “emergency medicine cost” or “emergency department utilization.” Provide a link to the article so your peers can read it. Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the article and explain your reasoning.

/in /by

Google scholar article analysis

Using Google Scholar as your search engine, identify one article published since 2020 on the topic of “emergency medicine cost” or “emergency department utilization.”

Initial Post
Provide a link to the article so your peers can read it. Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the article and explain your reasoning. Use the following example as inspiration for your posts.

Example of strengths:

Relevant topic
Large and representative sample size
Results are generalizable
Examples of weaknesses:

Data is dated
Findings are not robust and consistent across the different models
Small sample size

Discuss the issue or gap identified during your investigation and explain what business need is not being met. Create a problem statement that can be used to provide a snapshot of the issue or gap and the proposed solution.

/in /by

Business Need and Development of Problem Statement

Discuss the issue or gap identified during your investigation and explain what business need is not being met.
Create a problem statement that can be used to provide a snapshot of the issue or gap and the proposed solution.
Describe the departments directly affected and discuss the impact the issue or gap has on them.
Discuss any additional consequences of the issue or gap for organizational performance, other stakeholders, budget, etc.
Propose a clinical, technological, or process-related solution that can be implemented to address the identified issue or gap. Explain how the proposed solution addresses the issue or gap for the departments and how it fulfills the specified business need.
Evaluate the advantages and limitations of using information science and technology to solve the problem.
Describe how the proposed informatics solution supports the organization’s objectives and overall strategy and operations.

You are required to cite a minimum of three scholarly resources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and health care and health informatics content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
Please include an introduction paragraph and a conclusion.

Provide some general information about the business or organization the project is meant for, a description of the problem or opportunity that will be addressed solved with your innovative idea, and an overview of the technology that will be integrated in your solution.

/in /by

Innovations through Technology

The Course Project provides an opportunity for students to conceive a project that adds value to a business or an organization through an innovative technology solution..

Project Title
General description of the kind of business or organization that the project is intended for
Description of problem/opportunity that your innovative idea will address
Overview of the technology integration components
Product or solution scenario as exemplified by customer or end-user population it will serve
The proposal should give a high-level overview of the project. It should provide some general information about the business or organization the project is meant for, a description of the problem or opportunity that will be addressed solved with your innovative idea, and an overview of the technology that will be integrated in your solution. It should also provide a scenario that exemplifies the solution and customer or end-user population it will serve. You can do that by developing a scenario that illustrating your vision in a brief narrative. The goal is to help the reader envision your innovative solution.

The proposal should not exceed three double spaced, pages, using no larger than the Times New Roman, 12-point font.
Title Page of the Proposed Project
Introduction
Background
Innovation Opportunity
Technology Integration
Operational Environment
Why it should be embraced and/or funded

Summary
The detailed description of your innovation project should provide enough information to propose the project to a client or a source of funding entity. The technology, operational environment and competitive value of the solutions should be addressed. All of the areas covered in Part 1 should be re-visited in more detail. The idea here is to compel the reader to embrace the solution. The detailed description should not exceed ten double spaced, pages, using no larger than the Times New Roman, 12-point font.
A bullet form summary of Part 2 with illustrations and annotations or voice over explanations as appropriate.
The presentation should summarize the detailed description of the project. Assume that your audience has already read the detailed description document from Part 2. Cover each of the required sections from Part 2 in a new chart. Each chart should summarize of those sections using bullet points. Each chart should contain talking points annotations and/or narrations.

The presentation should contain a title page chart, only enough charts to cover the required sections from Part 2 , and a conclusion chart. The idea is to convey a vision of your innovation project that would need to be followed at some point in time with a project plan if you are successful in getting approval for the project.