(1) What are the gendered beliefs and attitudes around cervical cancer, HPV and HPV vaccination among Mexican and Mexican-American men and women living along the Texas-Mexico Border?
(2) What are similarities/differences between mothers and fathers beliefs who have HPV vaccine-eligible daughters?
Provide a two-page position paper on a current social or health issue. The paper should be in APA format and include references as appropriate.
Step 1:
Identification of poor practice in health, social, and community care setting – a) describe a poor practice, and involved partners if applicable; b) describe the specific workplace or organisation that the poor practice is taking place in. This can include the type of setting (e.g., health, social, and community care setting), the specific care/service; its location; the specific population/patients it looks after; and the number of beds. You may use examples from your own work/educational experience or examples from the literature. Approx 200 words
Step 2:
Impact of the poor practice – discuss the impact of poor practice at different levels/among one or more partners such as patients/consumers, professionals, healthcare providers/healthcare organisations. Approx 500 words
Refer to the Case Study: Healthcare Reform: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in your textbook.
What events, according to you, may have caused the Clinton plan for healthcare reform to fail?
What do you think are the factors that might explain why President Obama’s success in having his health care reform (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) enacted?
Instructions– *FOCUS ON ETHICAL DILEMMAS*
Supportive Submission #1 requires you to research, choose, and identify the topic of your ethical issue/dilemma presentation (Abortion Rights), then provide a rationale for choosing it as your topic of interest.
The rationale should include the following-
1. A brief summary of the issue(s). Remember to give fair balance by including some discussion representing opposing sides of the issue.
2. A brief discussion about any relevant ethical and/or legal considerations.
3. A short discussion on any current events, controversies or “hot buttons” that make discussion of the issue timely.
Of note- You should focus your submission toward a specific ethical dilemma, whereas you will eventually (within the critical assignment presentation submitted in Week 8) critically examine and discuss the opposing sides of this ethical issue/dilemma in fair balance, and develop and argue your own position as the preferred–based upon ethical frameworks.
All written submissions should be academically sound and free of typos or grammatical errors. Submissions must follow current APA requirements, with 1-inch margins, typed in 12-point Times New Roman font, double spaced, and include an appropriate title page, running heads, page numbers, correctly formatted in-text citations and references where appropriate, and be uploaded as .doc or .docx documents.
Analyze the concepts of leadership strategies in a health care organization. Argue whether leaders are born or made.
Give three examples of a great leader whom you admire in the health care field, elaborating on the primary reasons why you admire this selected leader.
Discuss two challenges this selected leader faces and how you would successfully tackle these challenges. Provide specific examples to support your rationale from readings throughout your program or from peer-reviewed journal articles.
Describe health promotion activities for people with disabilities in KSA.
600 WORDS – 1000
The critical assignment in this course is a finance and reimbursement presentation. You will choose and research a system of care (e.g., Covered California, Expansion of Medicaid or Medi-Cal, ACA, or Single Payor Models) and their related finance and reimbursement functions and challenges.
Supportive Submission #1: Topic Selection and Rationale requires you to research, choose, and identify the topic of your finance and reimbursement presentation, and then provide a rationale for choosing it as your topic of interest. The rationale should include identification of the system you will be focusing on, a brief summary of the issue(s), and a short discussion on any current events or “hot buttons” that make discussion of the issue(s) timely.
Background-
The field of public health is interested in securing the greatest benefits for the most people and often uses public health laws and statutes to do so. Public health laws are any laws that have important consequences for the health of defined populations. They derive from federal and state constitutions; statutes, and other legislative enactments; agency rules and regulations; judicial rulings and case law; and policies of public bodies. The overwhelming majority of public health interventions are intended to benefit the whole population, without knowingly harming individuals or groups. That said, public health authorities often recommend paternalistic interventions such as mandatory seat belt or motorcycle helmet laws. Public Health reasons the sacrifice asked of individuals is relatively minimal and the communal benefits substantial. In the public health model, individual interests in autonomy, privacy, and liberty are taken seriously, but they do not invariably trump community health benefits.
Instructions-
Review the web links below.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2014/10/30/360120406/awful-moments-in-quarantine-history-remember-typhoid-mary
http://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/aboutlawsregulationsquarantineisolation.html
1. Discuss the delicate balance of public health protection versus individual liberty (i.e., personal rights and free will).
2. Suppose a public health policy, such as quarantine, violates an individual’s liberty. Do you believe it must satisfy all of the justificatory conditions (i.e., effectiveness, necessity, least infringement, proportionality, impartiality, public justification) in order to be considered ethically acceptable?
3. Why or why not? Defend your position.
Select one of the three practice guidelines provided and address the following in a typed double spaced document of no more than two pages, using APA format.
Evaluate the methods used to develop the guideline.
Evaluate the quality of the research evidence upon which the recommendations are based.
Discuss what practice change(s) if any, should be initiated as a result of the guideline.
Conduct an independent search of the research literature and identify if any new primary research evidence exists that adds to or detracts from the guideline. Describe the search terms used, search results, and the impact if any, on the existing guidelines (increased evidence, contrary evidence, no further evidence).
Choose a guideline from the following:
1. Clinical Guideline for the Management of patients with prosthetic joints
2. Nonfluoride Caries Preventive Agents
3. Nonsurgical Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.