This paper is about the excavation of the Gobekli Tepe. The paper must address how it was discovered, and the processes and techniques used to find and excavate the site during its first excavation in 1995 by Klaus Schmidt.
EAS 140, Fall 2020 Final Exam
Strong Suggestion from the Instructor: When formulating and composing your essays, do not describe the contents of the films (Example: “Better Luck Tomorrow is a film about an over-achieving, Asian-American student named Ben and his three classmates and how they live double lives as honor students during the day and petty criminals at night ….” ). Instead, focus your essays on answering the specific exam assignment (as in essay #1) or specific exam question (as in essay #2).
Essay question #1: Write a letter (in letter format) to Mr. Doug McMillon, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Walmart. Tell Mr. McMillon that you recently became aware of the deplorable conditions of sweatshops in China that produce clothing for Walmart. Using the Lifeng factory in China as an example, briefly outline the terrible work conditions and abuses of workers in this factory, which represents the typical sweatshop in China (be brief here; just a list of the most serious workplace conditions and abuses of employees will suffice). In the remainder of your letter, develop an argument aimed at convincing Mr. McMillon (and Walmart) to initiate changes in its clothing supplier factories in China that would improve working conditions for employees in those factories. Tell Mr. McMillon what specific changes need to be made (again, be brief here; just a short list will suffice). The challenge here, of course, is this: how are you going to craft an argument that will convince Mr. McMillon to change conditions at the factory? Who absorbs the costs of making these changes? Mr. McMillon and Walmart? Mr. Lam? How can you convince them to make these needed changes, which will surely reduce their profit margin?
Essay #2: Better Luck Tomorrow is a film that has been commercially successful, and yet at the same time presents a chilling, hidden side of suburban affluence. Ben and his three pals are portrayed as overachieving Asian-American students in a wealthy California suburb. They conform to the so-called model Asian student stereotype. They all have ambition (especially Ben and Daric) and on the surface they seem conform to the popular image of “smart, well-behaved Asian kids.” But they lack values (道德价值观); in other words, they have no strong sense of what is right and what is wrong. The result, as we discussed in class, is that they move more deeper into crime. In your essay you should focus on answering one specific question: How could four, bright, overachieving high school students, with a seemingly bright future before them, devolve into criminals and murderers? What happened to them and why? Simply saying “they were bored with their lives” is an insufficient answer. Is there something wrong in society that causes Ben and his friends to “lose their way” and thereby lose sight of what is right and wrong? Does the film suggest that there is something wrong with growing up in America now? If so, specifically … what is it that is “wrong”? Explain!
Consider your classmates’ responses. How does this violence exemplify “mob thinking” in the late 19th-century South? Response should be at least 1 paragraph per post. At least one citation per response. You may use different citations in each post if needed.
Which hero has the greatest arete – Akhilleus or Odysseus?
Take ANY ONE of the episodes from The Odyssey and construct a comparatist analysis using any other mythological tales known to you. 500 Words
Your opinion needs to be validated by using course material as EVIDENCE.( attached below!!!)
Be specific in your posts; don’t generalize; you MUST explain your assertions using course materials as EVIDENCE.
Cite examples from the associated chapter in American Yawp, or other sources to support your analysis.
Provide a brief work cited (MLA format) at the end of your post.
Questions:
1. In light of what you’ve learned about the Gilded Age, do you think the state government should have intervened and regulated conditions in NYC tenement homes? Why or why not?
2. Do you think the federal government should have regulated the growth of wealth among the captains of industry, e.g., Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Henry Flagler, and J.P. Morgan? Why or why not?
3. In light of what you’ve learned about the historical conflicts between American Indian nations and the U.S. government, what is your opinion of the creation of the Mount Rushmore National Memorial?
4. Do you think breaking the Treaty of Fort Laramie of 1868, among hundreds of other treaties between the U.S. government and sovereign Indian nations, was legal? Why or why not?
5. According to the U.S. National Park Service, “Over the decades, Mount Rushmore has grown in fame as a symbol of America―a symbol of freedom and hope for people from all cultures and backgrounds.” Do you think this statement is ironic? Why or why not?
After reading the articles by Allison and Waldron, please answer the following question:
These two articles provide opposing perspectives on the likelihood of a potential future conflict between the United States and China. Which one, do you believe, provides the most useful perspective?
Below is the rubric for this assignment. In this paper you must have:
Thesis- Identifies a defendable thesis statement that is related to the assignment.
Addresses Issue – Make connections between things in the readings and ideas expressed.
Provides Support Arguments- Position, objection and response presented with acceptable argumentation, some defense of your position and a good summary in a concluding paragraph.
Fair Opposing View- Fair presentation of significant objection. The paper fairly addresses a solution outside the author’s thesis and presents an argument on why it might not be more valid.
Graduate Level Writing – One or two mistakes that did not substantially distract from the reader’s comprehension. Style and format are consistent and contribute to the comprehensibility of the paper.
The 1937 Haitian Massacre (also known as 'The Parsley Massacre') was a mass killing that occurred from October 2nd – 5th, 1937 against Haitians living in Dominican Republic's Cibao region located in the northwestern border. Under the orders of the dictator, Rafael Leonidas Trujillo, Dominican troops came from different areas of the country and carried out the massacre.
In this podcast, you will examine the devastating physical and psychological impact it left on both Haitians and Dominicans in its aftermath. As a follow-up assignment, submit a 3 page double-spaced reflection paper on the Haitian Massacre. Be sure to include examples from both media sources: Ugly History: The 1937 Massacre (youtube video) & 80 Years On, Dominicans and Haitians Revisit Painful Memories of Parsley Massacre (podcast).
o Where are you from? Sparta
o Gender: Female
o Social status: Wife of a Spartiate
o Chosen city-state: Sparta
o General reason for choice: Women’s Rights, Education
Body
o Argument #1: Women’s Rights
o Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
Women have more freedom/rights, less housework to do other than nursing/providing care for children.
Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
Women were still head of the household even when their husband is home, they were also able to own property in Sparta.
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
In Athens women were certainly treated with more disrespect. Women in Athens were made to everything around the house.
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
They weren’t treated right humanely they didn’t have as many rights as they do in Sparta, they were not able to own land in Athens.
o Argument #2: Education
o Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
Women actually had access to education and were able to marry later in life.
o Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
The women in Sparta were also encouraged to be strong.
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
Women who lived in Athens could not really go out in public unless it was to funerals or public festivals.
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
Women in Athens did not have access to any education at all while managing finances without knowledge.
o Argument #3: The army was fierce and protective/strongest fighting force in Greece
o Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
Women living in Sparta feel safer with a more supported army. Sparta’s army have a formidable land army of disciplined professional soldiers.
o Supporting detail for chosen city-state:
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
Athens need a city wall for protection which shows that they are weaker than us.
o Supporting detail against other city-state:
Athens valued order above individual rights, they were pretty big on order as well.
Conclusion
o General summary of your choice: _
o Good –bye and signature (make your name sound Greek):
o Introduction: Create a back story describing why you are moving, what your social status will be (citizen, foreigner, or slave) and your gender (male or female). Your introduction must also include which city-state you have chosen as your new home and a general reason for your choice.
o Body: The next three paragraphs will compare Athens and Sparta on three criteria. Each paragraph will highlight the positives for your chosen city-state and the negatives for the other city-state. Specific examples are very important to justifying your choice.
o Conclusion: End your letter with a good-bye and a quick summary of your chosen city-state.
If you had inhabited the world of Homeric mythology, what moral values would you have subscribed to and why?
PROMPT: How were the combat experiences of Americans in Vietnam, based on those interviewed by Santoli, different from those of previous American conflicts? How were they the same? In both cases, different and the same, support your analysis with examples from the literature.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.