China is a member of the Security Council and the UN can’t apply any sanction because of the Article 41 UN Charter. So this paper should talk about hypothetical effects.
What would be the effect of the UN sanctions if they would be allowed.
Compare and contrast the four main types of sentencing schemes used by various jurisdictions throughout the United States. In your opinion, which type sentencing do you believe a defendant will prefer? Which do believe the victim and society will prefer? Provide rationale for your response.
Critically evaluate the key legal features of the national energy law and policy in a the UK and another country of your choice, and state which elements of this legislation are more effective.
You are asked to write a concise piece of legal advice to the solicitor acting for Sam Floyd’s estate on the distribution of her various assets. Your written opinion should not exceed 3,000 words in length and contain a bullet-point summary of your conclusions. Do NOT use footnotes or endnotes – all case citations (and other references) should be included in the body of your opinion. Your work should be word-processed and contain a detailed bibliography with full citations. Your advice should be supported by relevant case law and statutes (where appropriate). Leave a wide margin on the left-hand side of each page for tutor’s comments. Marks will be deducted for bad grammar, syntax, spelling and punctuation.
In your answer, have you identified when the possible offence/s might have occurred? (the part of the facts you are about to discuss?
Have you provided a definition of theft?
Have you considered all the AR and MR of theft, with most emphasis on the more problematic elements? Have you analysed the question to determine and explain the relevant law, statutory provisions and cases on theft that are relevant to each element? Explanations should: (a) be comprehensive: in sufficient detail and not brief or superficial
(b) be clear, as opposed to confused or vague (c) be legally accurate as opposed to inaccurate (d) be complete and not contain omissions (e) be relevant to the question and not contain irrelevant discussion (f) be reflective of the law where appropriate. In relation
to cases, refer only to those cases that are potentially relevant to the facts of the question and show case law development and contrasting cases where appropriate (provide case facts where they illustrate the points).
Essay 1
Constitution
(350 words)
Explain the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten constitution
Essay 2
Sources of Law
(600 words)
Outline the methods used by judges when interpreting legislation. Illustrate your answer with case law.
Essay 3
Legal Professions
(550 words
Outline the roles and duties of the following Legal Personal. Evaluate how each role is appointed and/or the training required for each.
• Barrister
• Solicitor
• Magistrate
• Jury
L14 Discussion – Discussion Forum Group 1
From [20FA] CJPA 501, Sec 001: CJ INSTITUTIONS (WC, Guler)No unread replies.No replies.
To help you approach your readings for this week, you were given several reading questions. In this discussion, you’ll choose one of those questions, and address how it is answered throughout the readings for the lesson. As you answer, be sure to cite the readings and authors as you address the question.
To complete this discussion:
Address one of the following questions in a post to the discussion forum. You are encouraged to answer from an academic point of view (lecture and readings) as well as your own personal or professional experience. There is no length requirement, but the writing should be enough to fully explain your thoughts.
1. What are some common themes/lessons from the two readings by Campbell and Schoenfeld and Surrette and Kampe?
2. What national-level factors have fostered common directions in criminal justice policy, e.g., large scale increases in incarceration from 1980s–2000s?
3. In the Campbell and Schoenfeld reading, what do they identify as three periods of penal change? What are your thoughts on these? Do you agree with this conceptual scheme or disagree?
4. How much do you think media drive public opinion and criminal justice policy? How much do you think media simply cater to criminal justice attitudes that the public already has?
5. How much crime control through deterrence or incapacitation has mass incarceration produced? Have there been diminishing returns?
6. Are there more effective ways to expend criminal justice resources than imprisonment, if the goal is crime control?
Question 3:
3. How fair are the existing defences to copyright infringement in Australian law? In balancing the competing public interests of protecting private property rights on the one hand, versus freedom of expression (or at least the widespread dissemination of knowledge and ideas) on the other, how balanced are the present legislative settings in furthering these typically divergent policy objectives?
In giving your answer, discuss the full range of copyright defences under Australian law, your understanding of the comparative concepts of ‘fair use’ versus ‘fair dealing’, and what the notion of infringement of copyright encompasses.
Use Textbook: Reynolds, R, Stoianoff, N, Roy, A 2015, Intellectual Property Text and Essential Cases, 5th edn, The Federation Press, Sydney. ISBN: 9781862879867
And one other Australian Source
*** Use AGLC Referencing Please ***
Article Review (‘Methodology Review’):
Word count: 2000 words max.
Task:
In relation to the article that you review, (i) describe and discuss the main theoretical approach which it takes, and (ii) identify a different theoretical approach or approaches that might have been used to address the same issue, and discuss what insights this alternative approach might have provided. Your review should therefore, at a minimum, consider, in the context of the article, the strengths and weaknesses of (i) the approach taken and (ii) one further approach.
Please select one article from the list below.
LLM ITIP: Aisling McMahon, ‘Gene patents and the marginalisation of ethical issues’ (2019) 41 European Intellectual Property Review 10, 608.
•• Requirements ••
This is part of my application to the PhD program in law at explain briefly their motivations for postgraduate study in law: e.g. . Below you will find the instruction of the two required paragraphs.1) my relevant fragmented idea to help you in writing. Also, 2) my previous personal statement of the LLM program that I’m currently pursuing which is imperative to assist you catch the main personal and academic characteristics of mine to shape your powerful draft. Please read the attached files and the school requirements carefully.
1- Reasons for applying (1500 characters)
* Applicants should use this space to explain briefly their motivations for postgraduate study in law: e.g. aspiration for an academic career, pursuing particular research projects, desire to work with particular faculty members, acquiring skills relevant for non-academic careers.
2- Statement of interest (1500 characters)
* Applicants should use this space to describe their research interests and to explain why the Faculty at Cambridge would be a good fit for their intended projects – e.g. research interests of particular faculty members, research groups in relevant areas.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.