Critically analyse the truth of the statement provided in the brief and identify what measures could have been taken to prevent the Hillsborough Disaster from happening.

/in /by

This is a 750 word Max assignment. The Assignment Bried is attached and that will tell you what to do for this assignment in detail. Please ask me if you don’t understand it completely. There are two parts to this assignment. The first part is Issue Spotting, which asks you to Identify as many torts and crimes as you can in the following scenario. Your answer must be completed on the template provided and supply the following information for each potential claim. This is all in the brief in detail under the Assignment Task heading. This part of the assignment should be a Maximum of 250 words. Please read the brief carefully and ask me any questions. The second part of this assignment will ask you to complete an annotated bibliography. So you will need to Critically analyse the truth of the statement provided in the brief and identify what measures could have been taken to prevent the Hillsborough Disaster from happening. This means you should Provide an annotated bibliography including a minimum of four resources that would enable you to answer this question. DO NOT answer the question itself, simply provide an annotated bibliography based on your research. This has a Maximum word count of 500 words. PLEASE READ THE BRIEF & USE THE TEMPLATE GIVEN. The template is where I want you to do the assignment on. if you read the brief you should see an example of how both assignments need to look. AGAIN, PLEASE ASK ME IF YOU DONT UNDERSTAND.

Explain the similarities and differences between the two trials you selected.

/in /by

Please use in text citation and provide references
Assignment Content

The criminal trial process has many components. In this assignment, you explore real-life examples of the criminal trial process in two different types of trials.

Search the Internet for trials using parameters such as but not limited to “watch criminal trials online,” or visit the Wild About Trial website.

here’s the link you need for my paper

Compare two trials. If possible, compare a murder trial with one involving another major felony. Include the parties represented in each trial (i.e., plaintiff and defendant).

Write 350- to 700-word comparison in which you:

Summarize what each trial was about.
Identify the type of court the trials were held in (refer to Ch. 1 for types of courts in the United States).
Describe as many of the steps of each trial as you can (refer to Ch. 13 for the steps/process).
Explain the similarities and differences between the two trials you selected.
Identify as many of the actors of each trial as you can who played a role in the steps of the trial process. What were their roles?

Cite a minimum of 2 sources (one source for each trial).

Format your paper as a Word document according to APA guidelines.

Each case that you discuss needs to have been a criminal trial in the United States. For this assignment it is unacceptable to discuss a case outside the United States, a civil case, a case that was resolved by a plea bargain, or a case that has not yet gone to trial.

Quoted language does not count toward the minimum word count.

Submit your assignment.

Resources

Ch. 1 and 13 of America’s Courts and the Criminal Justice System
Center for Writing Excellence
Reference and Citation Generator
Grammar and Writing Guides

Copyright 2020 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Use this space to build your submission.
You can add text, images, and files.
Add Content

Evaluate whether the Court of Appeal has achieved the right balance in its interpretation of the requirement with regard to the legal principle of double jeopardy.

/in /by

S 78 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 requires ‘new and compelling evidence’ as one of the conditions to be satisfied for the Court of Appeal to order a re-trial of a defendant who has been acquitted.
Evaluate whether the Court of Appeal has achieved the right balance in its interpretation of the requirement with regard to the legal principle of double jeopardy. Choose two cases to illustrate your answer.
You may consult and use the following sources, among others:
Ian Dennis, ‘Quashing Acquittals: Applying the “New and Compelling Evidence” Exception to Double Jeopardy’ (2014) 4 Criminal Law Review 247
R v Dobson [2011] EWCA Crim 1255

( You must include an accurate word count on the cover and feedback sheet, please number your pages, Referencing
• Provide a bibliography.
• Accurate use of references and footnotes with OSCOLA. Schedule time to do it.)

Write a paper on how the international community is addressing cybercrime.

/in /by

Search for “United Nations international cooperation to fight cybercrime” and write a paper on how the international community is addressing cybercrime.

Advise Tim on whether he is bound by any of these claims.

/in /by

Question 3Six months ago, Tim bought a freehold factory building, together with adjoining land, fromFred. The property was correctly registered at HM Land Registry with absolute title. Since thepurchase was completed, the following matters have come to light:(a)Quick Money Ltd claims that it has a legal mortgage over the land, granted by Fred threeyears ago. It says that, as instalments are now considerably in arrears, it wishes to enforceits security.(b)Eileen has produced a letter, signed by both her and Fred, in which Fred agreed to allowher to graze her goats over the land.(c)Albert, who owns adjoining land, has produced an old deed that prevents any industrialactivities taking place on Tim’s land.(d)Aidan, another adjoining landowner, says that he and his predecessors in title have used apath across Tim’s land for at least the last 100 years and that he has evidence to provethis.(e)Teresa claims that Fred allowed her to sit on the land to paint, and she hopes that Tim willcontinue to do so.Advise Tim on whether he is bound by any of these claims.

Examine the impact of face-to-face restorative justice conference (RJC)meetings led by police officers between crime victims and their offenders on victims’post-traumatic stress symptoms.

/in /by

Short-term effects of restorative justice conferenceson post-traumatic stress symptoms among robberyand burglary victims: a randomized controlled trialCaroline M. Angel&Lawrence W. Sherman&Heather Strang&Barak Ariel&Sarah Bennett&Nova Inkpen&Anne Keane&Therese S. RichmondPublished online: 19 March 2014#Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014AbstractObjectivesTo examine the impact of face-to-face restorative justice conference (RJC)meetings led by police officers between crime victims and their offenders on victims’post-traumatic stress symptoms.MethodsTwo trials conducted in London randomly assigned burglary or robbery caseswith consenting victims and offenders to either a face-to-face restorative justiceconference (RJC) in addition to conventional justice treatment or conventional treat-ment without a RJC. Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were measured with theImpact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) within 1 month of treatment for 192 victims.

What kind of evidence is used in the book to support the main points?

/in /by

BOOK NAME IS – Stephenson, S. (2015). Gangs of Russia: From the Streets to the Corridors of Power. Cornell University Press.

A Book Review

Assignment #1

A book review usually is not just a summary of the book. It is based on your reflections and critical analysis of it.

It is important to keep notes while reading the book:

– What is the author’s main goal in this book?
– What are the main points about illegal/informal economic practices? What kind of illegal economic practices are being discussed in the book?
– What kind of evidence is used in the book to support the main points?
– What do you think about the style of the book? Easy to read or difficult to follow.

A book review should be structured and have following sections:

1. Introduction (150 words)
It is the opening section, where you provide brief information about the author, title of the book, when it has been published and the publisher.
You should provide the brief overview of the theme (trying to focus on illegal economic practices discussed in the book) and your evaluation of the book here.

2. Summary of the main points/arguments (850 words)
You should write a free-flowing summary for all the chapters. Focus on highlighting the illegal economic practices discussed in the book (their definitions, how they are conducted, by whom and under what circumstances). You should also provide a summary of the main arguments concerning the illegal economic practices and their place within the formal economy in here.

3. Conclusion and evaluation (500 words)
Tell the reader what you think about the book. Was it interesting to read, useful for understanding illegal/informal economies? What are the book’s greatest strengths and weaknesses from a criminological point of view? Discuss the contribution of the book to the field of illegal economies?

First Class (70% and above)

All main areas discussed in depth.
Thorough logical argument. Ideas clearly stated. Good analysis & evaluation. Imaginative & original approach.
Correct length. Very good written style, organisation & presentation.
Very good range of current research to augment wide general reading. Correct referencing.
Correct grammatical structure and spelling.

Explain the impact of corruption in the World at all levels during the pandemic

/in /by

Anticorruption Laws and the impact of corruption in the World at all levels during the pandemic

How do our rights and responsibilities as citizens of the United States reflect what it means to be an American?

/in /by

How do our rights and responsibilities as citizens of the United States reflect what it means to be an American?  Write a paragraph that explains how our rights and responsibilities reflect our national identity.

Do you consider that these cases support the view that the UK’s constitution should be codified, or do you consider that they show that the current state of affairs is working well?

/in /by

The overall word limit for the assignment is 2,500 words. There is no 10% leeway on the maximum word count. You must declare your word count at the end of your essay.

Please list in a bibliography at the end of the essay the main sources (books and other materials) consulted in writing your essay. Any quotations should be accompanied by a full reference with page numbers. In all Law modules, footnotes for referencing purposes will not count towards the word limit.

Assignment topic

Since the year 2000, there have been a number of high-profile cases which have dealt with fundamental questions about the constitution of the UK, for example Jackson, Miller I and Miller/Cherry (or Miller II) (see citations below). Do you consider that these cases support the view that the UK’s constitution should be codified, or do you consider that they show that the current state of affairs is working well?
R (Jackson) v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56
R (on the application of Miller and another) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Appellant) [2017] UKSC 5
R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41