Critically evaluate the recommendations (‘priorities’) made in the Justice Project Report for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people.
How might vulnerability be best interpreted/understood to advance the interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people?
CHOSEN FIELD AND FUTURE PROFESSION: IMMIGRATION SOLICITOR
As a result of the European (Withdrawal agreement) Act 2020, a new Australian style ‘point-based’ system will be introduced after the Brexit transition period (1 January 2021). This will mean, freedom of movement, by which EU/EEA/Swiss citizens have used to move freely to the UK to live, work, or study since 1992 will ultimately end. Under the new proposed immigration system, EU/EEA/Swiss citizens will have to meet the restrictive and ‘crude’ requirements to qualify for a visa. These include, earning a minimum salary of £25,600, have a job offer from an approved employer for a middle-skilled job or higher and speak English to a required level. Because of this, 70% of the 200,000 migrants from EU who move to the UK each year will be excluded. These include low-skilled, low-wage migrants from the EU and high-skilled applicants who did not obtain a job offer or sponsors.
Because of the new proposed immigration system, Immigration law solicitors will be negatively impacted. For instance, because of the harsh rules, immigration for industries that relies on low-skilled EU migrants (e.g. construction, businesses and social care) will significantly decline. This will consequently reduce profits and demand for Immigration solicitors. Due to the decrease in clients, Immigration law firms may be hindered to recruit aspiring Immigration solicitors and will be hesitant to offer training contracts to students or graduates.
1. “The existence of a separate insanity defence appears to be an outdated throwback to a time when our understanding and awareness of mental illness was restricted to the surface level. “
– Claire Hogg ‘The insanity defence: an argument for abolition’ (2015) Journal of Criminal Law, 79(4), 250 at p.253
Critically discuss the validity of this statement and to what extent the defence of insane automatism is in need of either reform or abolition.
To what extent can privacy laws, codes or terms of use be enacted to protect our online roles from abuse by social media platforms? Besides the system, what about the responsibility of the platform? What about the public awareness
As the manager of a community hospital’s Emergency Department, you have been tasked with developing a policy to prevent patients from receiving ED services for non-emergent conditions. Prepare a policy draft to be reviewed by the hospital’s leadership team. This team includes legal counsel, physicians and registered nurses, as well as chief operating, financial, and executive officers. Your wording should be professional, and consistent with an organization’s policy (do not include statements that indicate opinion, personal views, or observations).
In an opening paragraph, summarize EMTALA and the hospital’s obligation to comply with it.
In a second paragraph, explain the need for and reasoning behind the policy.
In approximately 1 page, draft the policy to provide guidelines for all staff, including clinical providers when triaging patients who walk into the ED.
On a separate page, include a “Question & Answer” section. Provide six questions (and answers) that the leadership team is likely to ask after reading your policy draft.
Include a reference page, in APA format, with a minimum of three scholarly sources.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets the criteria.
Submit the following the EMTALA Policy.
INTERNATIONAL LAW
Assignment Description:
Please identify and discuss one of the international law issues raised by the Chagos Case
(Mauritius vs the UK). You must demonstrate knowledge and skills to:
– Identify a topic for legal analysis from an international law perspective. The topic must be related to sources of international law, subjects of international law, title to territory and/or self-determination.
– Identify, find and review scholarly and primary sources, demonstrating effective use of databases and other written sources. You may also use relevant audio-visual materials.
– Provide arguments well-founded in international law to advance your ideas.
– Write a well-structured and well-referenced paper.
– Evaluate the authority and relevance of different sources of information,
including peer’s work. Possible topics:
CHOSE ONE TOPIC ONLY:-
• Legality of the decolonisation process. Rules applicable to assess this question.
• Relevance of customary rules and others regarding uti possidetis juris/territorial integrity in determining the status of Chagos prior and after decolonisation
• Legal status of the Agreement between the UK and Mauritian Representatives of the country.
• Possible grounds to claim the invalidity of the agreement.
• Legal basis to defend or deny the existence of the right to self-determination
of Mauritius in this scenario.
• Legality and legal nature/status of the agreement between the USA and UK
• UK Declaration to ‘revert’ Chagos to Mauritius: analysis of unilateral acts
as binding obligations in general and in this scenario
PLEASE REFERENCE USING OSCOLA
It is a criminal law coursework and you have to Explain, illustrate and critically assess the current state of the law relating to consent and non-fatal offences against the person.
It must be word processed in 11 point font Arial and double spaced. It must include a bibliography. The page limit for the answer is 6 pages (excluding the front submission form, any permitted title page, your endnotes and your bibliography). While the page limit excludes the bibliography and endnotes, please note that the use of lengthy endnotes (i.e. containing substantive information and arguments) is inappropriate. Any such substantive information or arguments in endnotes will be disregarded.
LEGAL METHOD AND RESEARCH SKILLS
Tutor to identify those skills considered particularly relevant to this task and to identify additional skills, if required:
1. ability to understand concepts central to the question
2. correct citation of authorities and other sources
3. understanding of the precedent system (especially stare decisis) and routes of appeal
4. ability to isolate the ratio(nes) of decided case(s)
5. accurate reference to judges and other actors within the system
6. ability to interpret statutory material
7. research skills
8. demonstration of analytical powers
9. capacity to question and criticise as well as summarise
10. clarity of expression and avoidance of ambiguity
11. ability to draw relevant conclusions
12. general presentational skills
Spinoza and Lessing both explore how doubt, anxiety, and unstable imagination can give rise to superstitions and conflict, but true religion can bring confidence, empowerment and peace. Drawing from readings assigned in this module, write an essay on the relationship between superstition and true religion in Spinoza and Lessing. In the context of religious war and persecution, what makes the difference between superstition and true religion, and how does one turn from one to the other? Explain.
…It is not and cannot be literally true that the donor has to do everything which he can, to transfer the property to the donee, as illustrated in T Choithram International SA v Pagarani [2001] 1WLR 1 (PC) where a gift of shares was held to be valid even though vested in the name of only one of the trustees (the donor)…’ ~ LJ Arden in Pennington and another v Waine and others [2002] EWCA Civ 227.
Required:
• Critically analyse the statement of LJ Arden in the context of the formalities required for an enforceable express trust.
To help you approach your readings for this week, you were given several reading questions. In this discussion, you’ll choose one of those questions, and address how it is answered throughout the readings for the lesson. As you answer, be sure to cite the readings and authors as you address the question.
To complete this discussion:
Address one of the following questions in a post to the discussion forum. You are encouraged to answer from an academic point of view (lecture and readings) as well as your own personal or professional experience. There is no length requirement, but the writing should be enough to fully explain your thoughts.
1. What is “net widening”? Why is net widening a concern for intermediate sanctions?
2. What kinds of intermediate sanctions or alternatives to incarceration exist?
3. Why is implementation important to the “success” of intermediate sanctions?
4. What does research tell us about intermediate sanctions and recidivism, cost, implementation, and other issues?
5. What do you think are the most promising new directions in corrections policy? What are some of the most important gaps in corrections research?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.