Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the principles of property law and the underlying system of land ownership in England and Wales with consideration of Scottish Law differences.

/in /by

LO1Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the principles of property law and the underlying system of land ownership in England and Wales with consideration of Scottish Law differences. LO2Articulate the features and impact of common law and statutory provisions.

LO3Evaluate and articulate the function and effect of leasehold ownership, the legal relationship between landlord and tenant, third party rights, covenants and contracts for the sale of land.

LO4Undertake critical analysis of information, draw logical conclusions based on legal principles and communicate arguments and analysis and effectively, using relevant legal terminology

Analyse Equity’s historical and contemporary relationship with the law.

/in /by

Analyse Equity’s historical and contemporary relationship with the law. Giving three examples, justify why further fusion of law and Equity is desirable”
If you could start the essay by analysing equity’s historical development. Write about the development and the origins of the common law and the provisions of Oxford 1258.
Then, could you write about Equity’s developing role in law ( equity being developed as a remedial situation).

Then could you please write about how equity is now solving contemporary issues in law.

Then please talk about the fusion of equity and law – The Judicature Acts 1873

Then could you write about 3 different reasons why further fusion of law and equity is desirable. thank you.

Could you please use this reference where you can ( it may help in justifying 3 reasons why equity and law fusion is still desirable)

Wilde, D. (2020) ‘The Three Certainties Required To Declare A Trust–Or Is It Four?“ Distributional Certainty’ 79(2) Cambridge Law Journal 349.

PLEASE COULD YOU DO IN-TEXT CITATIONS WITH OSCOLA REFERENCES PLEASE.
MUST BE IN-TEXT CITATION’S!!!
And a bibliography at the end please
thank you :)

Critically consider public perceptions of the police as an organisation and how this may influence reporting rates (20 marks)

/in /by

Sexual violence is known to be widely under-reported in the UK. Discuss why this is the case, drawing upon the social context and normalisation of sexual violence, perceptions of the police as an organisation and the structure of the criminal justice system.

Criteria
Use the criteria below as a guide to structure your essay:

Identify and describe the current climate of sexual violence and the increase in awareness of its prevalence and under-reporting (20 marks)

Offer theoretical explanations for the prevalence and normalisation of sexual violence and the phenomena of under-reporting (20 marks)

Critically consider public perceptions of the police as an organisation and how this may influence reporting rates (20 marks)

Critically consider criminal justice responses to sexual violence and how this may influence reporting rates (20 marks)

Offer possible solutions to combat under-reporting, drawing upon existing measures/movements (10 marks)

Essays must be presented in a coherent manner, correctly referenced and contain a bibliography using the Harvard referencing system (10 marks)

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the ‘functional’ approach?

/in /by

– What is ‘security interest’ under the PPSA system?
-What are the advantages and disadvantages of the ‘functional’ approach?
At least one proposition must be included for me to present to the group (two would be better).
Please provide me with a clear presentation to be made:
– Introduction
– Logical sequence of elements, and a
– strong conclusion

Explain how, in Herbert Morris’s view, a system of punishment is like coercion, and how, in his view, is it unlike coercion.

/in /by

Herbert Morris PERSONS AND PUNISHMENT Source: The Monist, Vol. 52, No. 4

Instruction: Explain how, in Herbert Morris’s view, a system of punishment is like coercion, and how, in his view, is it unlike coercion. Then present an objection to his argument that it is unlike coercion.

What are different theories of judicial decision-making? How complementary are they? How mutually exclusive are they?

/in /by

L09 Discussion – Discussion Forum Group 1
From [20FA] CJPA 501
To help you approach your readings for this week, you were given several reading questions. In this discussion, you’ll choose one of those questions, and address how it is answered throughout the readings for the lesson. As you answer, be sure to cite the readings and authors as you address the question.
To complete this discussion:
Address one of the following questions in a post to the discussion forum. You are encouraged to answer from an academic point of view (lecture and readings) as well as your own personal or professional experience. There is no length requirement, but the writing should be enough to fully explain your thoughts.
1. What are different theories of judicial decision-making? How complementary are they? How mutually exclusive are they?
2. How have policies tried to constrain judicial sentencing discretion in the 1970s and 80s, and why did they try to do this?
3. What are unwanted consequences of too little constraint or structure of judicial sentencing discretion? What are some unwanted consequences of too tightly constraining judicial sentencing discretion?
4. What are the principles behind sentencing guidelines, in general? What are sentencing guidelines’ typical characteristics?
5. Have sentencing guidelines been a “success?” What would “success” mean, and how would you evaluate it?

Critically assess legal rules relating to the financing of international sales. in 300 words

/in /by

Critically assess legal rules relating to the financing of international sales. in 300 words

why a funeral director would need to be familiar with business law principles.

/in /by

For this discussion, discuss and respond to your classmates about why a funeral school student would need to take a business law course, and why a funeral director would need to be familiar with business law principles.

Discuss with reference to requirements of maintaining peace, order and safety, the institutional restrictions on obtaining adequate evidence, administrative fairness, the Canada Human Rights Code and CCRF.

/in /by

Part II Essay Question  –  50% of exam total  (Marked out of 25 points)

You have six essay choices. You are required to answer ONLY ONE of the following 6 questions.  You will not be given extra marks if you answer more than one question.

You may use paragraph or point form.   double-spaced pages.  You will be marked on content and style and your ability to provide sound arguments and authorities to support your views.

  1. If prison management denies prisoners in a federal penitentiary prescribed benefits and services, put them into administrative detention and/or transfer them to another less desirable prison, what administrative law, statutory and/or constitutional remedies do prisoners have?

Discuss with reference to requirements of maintaining peace, order and safety, the institutional restrictions on obtaining adequate evidence, administrative fairness, the Canada Human Rights Code and CCRF.

  1. What is the duty of administrative fairness? When, how and why did the SCC adopt this remedy to resolve administrative law disputes?  Making reference to case law, has this doctrine been expanded or limited?  Describe and discuss.
  2. The River City Fire Chief in Ontario recently terminated a female firefighter with two years’ service because she could not meet a new fitness standard. This standard of carrying a specified heavy weight down a ladder and running 300 metres in one minute. was developed by the Fire Chief.  He also fired a Sikh paramedic attached to his service because the paramedic refused to wear a facemask when treating fire victims on site due to his religious beliefs.  As legal counsel advise the terminated employees of their legal remedies.  Also include counter arguments by the Fire Chief.   Describe and discuss.
  3. Describe the difference between procedural and substantive judicial review in terms of what the courts may order and what they do. Describe how the standards of review have changed between CUPE v. N.B. Liquor Board and Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick.  Do the new standards make better sense than the old?  Did the SCC subsequently confirm its approach and require that the provincial Courts of Appeal give deference in applying the standards to lower courts and tribunals.  Is further SCC action needed? Describe and discuss.
  4. In terms of delivering a public program or service, describe the advantages and disadvantages of using a government department over using an administrative regulatory agency or tribunal. When a decision needs to be appealed from either a government department or administrative agency/tribunal, what are the advantages and disadvantages of putting such decision-making in the hands of a court of law rather than a department or administrative tribunal/regulatory board.  Describe and discuss.
  5. Administrative tribunals and regulatory boards in Canada do not presently have the degree of independence from political control that law courts have. What controls do governments presently have over such bodies to keep their decision making consistent with government policies?  Do you think they should have the same degree of independence as courts?  Making reference to case law, describe and discuss.

 

 

Which form of government would you advise Riverland to adopt?

/in /by

Which form of government would you advise Riverland to adopt? Please answer by reference to relevant material on Forms of Government and real-world examples.