Write a comprehensive paper evaluating the contemporary state of punishment in the United States of America

/in /by

Please write a comprehensive paper evaluating the contemporary state of punishment in the United States of America by taking into consideration the following statement:
Punishment ought in no case to be more than what is necessary to
Bring it into conformity with the rules here given…
–This rule marks out the limits on the maximum side, while the previous three concern the minimum side. Bentham argues that while the danger of erring on the minimum side is greater, tendency to err of most men in on the maximum side, tendency to over-punish. Thus more precautions should be taken with regard to maximum punishments. This is because punishment is, in and of itself, an evil. And we ought to be careful to admit that evil only when it prevents a greater evil. So there are times when we should not punish.
Specifically, your paper should address the following questions:
1. When the United States of America is groundless: where there’s no evil for it to prevent.
2. When it can’t prevent further evil.
3. When the evil it would produce is greater than what it prevented.
4. When it is needless: where the mischief may be prevented, or cease itself, without it: that is at a cheaper rate.
Also should include your own well-reasoned conclusions about the state of the appointment process.
I would like please 11 page of paper context ( this don’t include reference page and source should be journal article)
I need and Outline of the research.
Select a case decided by the United States Supreme Court during the modern era (post-1937) and apply the Holding Rule or Dicta to your argument/statement.
I would like that the research deals with capital punishment (death penalty) and solitary confinement among things. also we can use some court cases as example of punishment or over punished and to answer those 4 questions.

Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you discuss the historic and pragmatic relationships between constitutional law and contract law.

/in /by

Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you discuss the historic and pragmatic relationships between constitutional law and contract law. Include the following in your paper:
A brief discussion of the nature of constitutional law in the U.S. Where did it originate? By what right are laws made? Who interprets laws?
A discussion of seminal constitutional and contractual case law and the influence of these on modern business.
A discussion of the importance of contracts in American business. Why do contracts exist? How might contracts influence the sustainability of a business?
A discussion of when to engage legal counsel in the administration or defense of a contract.

Describe the difference between aiding and abetting. Provide examples.

/in /by

You must answer the questions in essay style, full sentences with proper spelling and punctuation. for spelling and grammar errors. Full referencing in APA Format is required including in text citations. A cover page and reference list is also required.
1. Describe the difference between aiding and abetting. Provide examples.
2. Using examples explain the differences among recklessness, carelessness, and negligence.

Discuss examples of how Chanel Miller’s experience impacted her identity.

/in /by

Chapters 5-8 in Chanel Miller’s Book (Know My Name).
Please respond to the following questions:

Discuss examples of how Chanel Miller’s experience impacted her identity.

How that crime affected her and others (emotionally, physically, and financially, day to day life, etc.)?

What was the response of the criminal justice system, and other related institutions/systems, to Chanel Miller’s experience?

/in /by

Please respond to Chanel’s Millers Book (Ch 9-end) and answer the following questions:

-What was the response of the criminal justice system, and other related institutions/systems, to Chanel Miller’s experience?
-How could the criminal justice system and other related systems have responded differently?
-What type of legal response would you like to have seen?
-What resources/responses were helpful to Chanel?

Draft a performance action plan for a company to follow when providing discipline in response to complaints of sexual harassment.

/in /by

Draft a performance action plan for a company to follow when providing discipline in response to complaints of sexual harassment. Use the Library or other Web resources if needed.

Explain how changing economic pressures may impact the policing profession.

/in /by

– Explain how changing economic pressures may impact the policing profession.
Please include at least 2 article references.

What’s the mission of the Homeland Security Act?

/in /by

What’s the mission of the Homeland Security Act?

What are the elements of the crime the prosecution must prove?

/in /by

Option #1: Fact Pattern/Essay/Expert Witness

Part II: Burdens of Proof, Criminal Procedure Violations, and the Role of the Expert Witness (250 points)

Section A: Burdens of Proof and Violations of Criminal Procedure: 
Write 2 pages addressing the following questions separately for each of the four Fact Patterns that you completed in Part 1 during Module 7:

  • What are the elements of the crime the prosecution must prove?
  • What violations of criminal procedure by law enforcement, if any, occurred?
  • Be specific in your discussion of the applicable law.
  • Discuss arguments that could be made on both sides of any issue raised.

Section B: The Role of the Expert Witness 
Write 4 pages addressing the following items with separate sections for each of the Fact Patterns that you completed in Part 1:

  • If you are called as an expert witness in this case in your capacity as a fraud examiner, what would you focus on to support the prosecution?
  • What would you say if you were called to support the defense?
  • Indicate what additional investigation and research you might need to do.
  • Indicate what qualifications you would need to have to qualify as an expert witness.

 

 

Evaluate how the film fits into current public dialogue on the subject as well as how it fits with our assessment of the topic in the current course.

/in /by

Documentary Film Review: Assignment Guide (Documentary Film Recommendations List Below).

Your paper should include these components:

Introduction: Identification of the film under view. Be sure to provide a citation that includes the film’s producer, director, release date, title, and place of production. What is the subject matter? What is the writer or director’s goal for the film? Who are the people in key roles: writer, executive producer, and director? Who funded the project? When was it first aired?

Brief Summary: Begin the main body of your review with a brief summary describing the content and structure of the film. What is the argument the author is making, what is the main thesis? How is this thesis developed? What evidence is provided? Be specific and provide details. Avoid being abstract or vague. You may wish to add relevant quotations or facts and findings.

Critical assessment: Here you will present your assessment of the work. What is the central argument or thesis? Be sure to address the specific assertion of the film. What is the writer or director’s particular perspective, point of view, or purpose? Do those in key roles have an obvious agenda? What is their background or their place in the mental health or criminal justice fields? What evidence is provided? What is the scholarly or scientific quality of that evidence? Evaluate how the film fits into current public dialogue on the subject as well as how it fits with our assessment of the topic in the current course. What does this film contribute? Is the argument logical, valuable? Does it support or dispel common misconceptions? If research was presented, was the research well conducted? Rigorous?

Like book reviews, scholarly film reviews should be objective and should consider the following:

  • The intended audience for the film and who would find it useful
  • The main ideas and major objectives of the film and how effectively these are accomplished
  • The soundness of methods and information sources used
  • The context or impetus for the film—review, research, or policy, etc.
  • Constructive comments about the strength and weaknesses of the film
  • Conclusion: Assess your interpretation of the work and your perception of its overall value.

Make sure to write your review in an objective manner with an academic or scholarly perspective. You may not agree with the filmmakers’ assertions, and it is okay to provide a critical examination. However, do so in a professional tone. Additionally, film reviews should be fair to the authors or artists, particularly to the writer and the director. Rather than simply pointing out flaws, you should provide your interpretation and analysis (critical or otherwise) using specific examples and expertise gathered from the materials in this course.

Assignment Summary

Citation Style: All citations should be in APA format.

Digital Format: Microsoft Word Document. Double-spaced and approximately 5 pages in length.

Top of Form

Documentary Films Recommendations:

The Invisible War (PBS)

Athlete A (Netflix)

Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich (Netflix)

Unbelievable (Netflix)

Roll Red Roll (Netflix)

Bikram: Yogi, Guru, Predator (Netflix)

The Hunting Ground (Netflix)

Audrie & Daisy (Netflix)

On The Record (HBO)

I Am Evidence (HBO)

Anita: Speaking Truth To Power (Amazon)

Twist of Faith (HBO)

I’ll Be Gone in the Dark (HBO)

At the Heart of Gold (HBO)

Surviving R Kelly (Netflix)

Holy Hell (Netflix)

The Keepers (Netflix)

Leaving Neverland (HBO)

Mea Maxima Culpa (Netflix)

Brave Miss World (Netflix)

On the Record (HBO Max)

Untouchable (Hulu)

Rewind (Amazon Prime)

Capturing the Friedmans (HBO)

Operation Toussaint (Amazon Prime)

Frontline episode on Weinstein: https://www.pbs.org/video/weinstein-ee9i3i/