ASSIGNMENT BRIEF The assignment consists of Twoquestions. You are expected to answer all three questions in this assignment. The suggested total word count for the assignment is 6000 words. Remember, all the words you use to answer the questions, including quotations and citations, count. You should use the mark allocation for each question as a guide to the number of words required as follows: QuestionPercentage of markSuggested word count125%1500275%4500You must provide a reference list and a word count at the end of your work. The reference list is not included in the word count. Assignment BriefConduct an independent research project investigating an area of interest to you within the business context. You could select any subject related to business (e.g. Finance, HR, Project Management, CSR, etc.) Task 1–Research Project Proposal specifications In this task, you will need to produce a Research ProjectProposalspecification in which you: 1.Identify the aim and objectives of your research 2.Identify factors that contribute to the process of research project selection 3.Review key literature around the subject area 4.Explain and justify your research methods 5.Provide a Gantt Chart providing a timeframe for completion of your research proposal Your completed research proposal document with a Research Project plan document should consist of around 1500 words

/in /by

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF The assignment consists of Twoquestions. You are expected to answer all three questions in this assignment. The suggested total word count for the assignment is 6000 words. Remember, all the words you use to answer the questions, including quotations and citations, count. You should use the mark allocation for each question as a guide to the number of words required as follows: QuestionPercentage of markSuggested word count125%1500275%4500You must provide a reference list and a word count at the end of your work. The reference list is not included in the word count. Assignment BriefConduct an independent research project investigating an area of interest to you within the business context. You could select any subject related to business (e.g. Finance, HR, Project Management, CSR, etc.) Task 1–Research Project Proposal specifications In this task, you will need to produce a Research ProjectProposalspecification in which you:

1.Identify the aim and objectives of your research

2.Identify factors that contribute to the process of research project selection

3.Review key literature around the subject area 4.Explain and justify your research methods

5.Provide a Gantt Chart providing a timeframe for completion of your research proposal Your completed research proposal document with a Research Project plan document should consist of around 1500 words

Discuss Austin’s words by referencing to 2 seminar readings and it also needs to talk about Austin’s critique’s views such as Hart.

/in /by

Law Coursework (UK)

Part A should be 3 pages of case analysis and Part B should be 7 pages of Legal Research. In the second Part, 2 of the references needed to be from Seminars which is uploaded as a file.

PART A: Case Analysis (worth 30% of the overall mark) Page limit: 3 pages, including footnotes but excluding bibliography

PART A – Case Analysis 3 pages (including footnotes in Oscola style excluding bibliography)
Read Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14, and answer the following questions.

1. How did the Court reach its decision in the case? (45%) 1.b. What is the ratio decidendi of the case? (5%)

2. Do you find the Court’s decision to be convincing? Which decision do you prefer (Lady Hale or Lord Carnwarth Give reasons for your answer. (50%)

Notes • You are reminded that this is an assessment of Understanding Law (Legal Method). The answers to the questions can be found by reading and reflecting upon the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] itself. • It is not necessary for you to follow up any of the legislation referred to in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] nor is it necessary for you to read any previous case mentioned in the decision. • You are permitted to make use of any secondary literature you might find which analyses Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020]. You will, of course, need to cite any such material in the proper manner.

PART B -Legal Research (including footnotes in Oscola style excluding bibliography)

PART B: Research Essay (worth 70% of the overall mark) Page limit: Seven (7) pages, including footnotes but excluding bibliography

Discuss by reference to TWO seminar readings:

“A law, which actually exists, is a law, though we happen to dislike it, or though it vary from the text, by which we regulate our approbation and disapprobation.” (John Austin)

Page limit: Seven (7) pages, including footnotes but excluding bibliography. The structure of the paper is crucial (Introduction covers the aim (purpose) of the paper, what Austin aimed to say with his words, what does the paper support? What is it going to explain, discuss? The main body needs sub-titles and it should be related to those 2 seminar readings which will be decided by the writer), the conclusion should be 8-9 sentences, including what the paper has covered in 7 pages.

The paper should discuss Austin’s words by referencing to 2 seminar readings and it also needs to talk about Austin’s critique’s views such as Hart.

Part A and B must have separate bibliographies. Part B should have sub-titles related those 2 seminar readings and Lecture heading found in Lecture handout. Up to 5% can be lost for incomplete, inconsistent or poor citation.

Language should be British English (Verdana 10). References should be in Oscola Style. There should be footnotes and a bibliography at the end.
use double line spacing;
use Verdana font (size 10);
margins should be set at 2.5 cm (top/bottom/left/right)

No plagiarism, writing should be clear and synthesized, logical, reasonable. The work will be put on TURNITIN to see whether there is a plagiarism.

THE RESEARCH ESSAY

The aim is to provide you with some useful tips and suggestions about approaching and writing the Research Essay. You are also directed towards Understanding Law’s Research Essay Checklist.

PRESENTATION OF ESSAY: A SHORT GUIDEIntroduction

Students are often uncertain about the way in which written work is to be presented. The presentation of written work is very important, but it is rare to find students who are entirely sure about how to present their work. This is unfortunate, as good ideas can easily be marred by the lack of consideration given to how the essay is structured and phrased. However, significant improvements can be made to a piece of work, by little more than developing good habits. These are not difficult to pick up, and if some simple pointers are followed, then the impact of your work can be maximised. What follows is intended as a brief run through of the main ways in which written work can be improved with minimal effort.

Stylistic Matters

Writing Style: There is no one perfect style for a piece of legal writing. As you will already have ascertained, different authors can have very different, yet very effective writing styles. When choosing your own style, it is good to remember the purpose of the piece of work: – It is to communicate your understanding of the issues involved in the question that you are responding to, and your ideas about that question. In order to achieve this, a simple, clear style of writing is probably the easiest to develop. There should not be any use of the word ‘I’.

Headings: Don’t be afraid to use headings if you feel that they are appropriate to your essay plan. The use of headings and sub-headings can often be a very easy way to improve a piece of written work. They help break up the work from a block of writing into manageable pieces. The main reason for their use though, is that they will help impose a structure on the essay.

Academic Matters

Structure: A logical structure for your essay is crucial. An essay that meanders is likely to say less, and be more likely to exceed the page limits than one with a clear structure. Remember that an essay is not an attempt to write down everything that you know about a subject – it is the answer to a question. As already mentioned, one good way of devising a structure is to look at what sections (and headings) you should have. The process of coming up with what sections should be included and how they might fit together, is in itself a considerable step towards developing a coherent structure for the essay. It should help you to decide what is, and what is not relevant to the question, and how important each part is. A well-structured essay is well on the way to being a good essay.

Originality: It is always a good idea to try to show that you have thought about the question yourself, rather than simply skimming your lecture and seminar notes and any required reading. Evidence of independent thought will almost always improve the marks given for an essay.

Plagiarism: Don’t do it. Make sure that you properly attribute every quote that you use, as well as any other person’s ideas that you adopt.

Citation / Referencing: Citation/referencing is an extremely important part of essay writing – it is not simply a way of demonstrating that you have read the works of others, but is also a matter of courtesy to the people whose ideas you use. Sources should be fully and correctly cited/referenced in a consistent manner. Check Understanding Law’s Guide to Legal Citation available from Moodle later this term.

To the writer:
I hope you are well and safe during the pandemic. I trust the confidentiality and I hope you will help me with this coursework. It is hard but the main reason why I want help is I have been going through a lot at the moment and I appreciate if you can do your best research and your best writing. As this paper is about UK law, I had some concerns as this website is located in US

Demonstrate an understanding of English co-ownership law;

/in /by

JUDGMENT QUESTION Judgment: Imagine that the events in Bernard v Josephs [1982] Ch 391 took place many years later than they did in reality: so that the parties purchased their home in 2009 and that the case heard in 2019 in the High Court. Write the leading judgment in the Court of Appeal, using modern conventions of judgment-writing and applying today’s law of co-ownership. Students are advised to consult Feminist Judgments, ed. R.Hunter, C. McGlynn and E. Rackley (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010, available in an on-line version in the library) for examples of alternative judgments, and a useful discussion in the introductory chapters about the challenges involved in writing them.
Judgment: not more than 4 pages which must be formatted in accordance with the School of Law’s Assessed Work Rules (otherwise penalties will apply). NB Only the formatting need comply with the Assessed Work Rules, not the content. The judgment should look like the judgment part of a case report, not an essay.
Specific assessment criteria for this exercise: • Accurate exposition of relevant law • Correct application to facts • Appreciation of social context • Modern terminology • Correct judgment-writing conventions and style (as in modern law reports) • A judgment – not simply advice, but a decision. Learning Outcomes: Students will •Demonstrate an understanding of English co-ownership law; • Apply law to given facts, showing an appreciation of the interplay of facts and law in their social context; • Write like a judge using modern English judgment-writing conventions.
note: THIS IS UK LAW
Times new roman (font 12) space 1.5
NOTE: the professor is a feminist so please try to lean to a feminist approach
I have provided a few files to help:
1. Assessed_JUDGEMENT is the question provided to us
2. GENERIC FEEDBACK is the general outline of how the assignment should be. Please follow the guidelines stated.
3. FOR REFERENCE is a recent case I found online that may be helpful as a template
4. L2 & 10 is optional. In ‘GENERIC FEEDBACK’ , a lot of the feedback is related back to Lecture 2 and 10, therefore I’ve included it to help you out.

Describe whether the proposed Secret Terrorism Trial Bill violate the Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against you.

/in /by

Prior to beginning your written assignment read the Criminal Procedure (Links to an external site.) article, Right to a Speedy and Public Trial – Public Trial (Links to an external site.) article, the Right to Confront Witness (Links to an external site.) article, Right to Counsel (Links to an external site.) article and review the Supreme Court Opinions synopses.
Read the following case scenario:
In the ongoing war on terrorism, the new president has proposed expanding the jurisdiction of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA). FISA is a U.S. federal court established and authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to oversee requests for surveillance warrants against foreign spies inside the United States by federal law. The new president’s proposed Secret Terrorism Trial Bill will expand the jurisdiction of the FISA to hold secret, non-public trials of accused terrorists for any planned or actual acts of terrorism on U.S. soil. The bill will also allow witnesses to testify before the FISA Court by remote video with their identities kept secret from the accused and any defense team. The stated purpose for the secrecy is to allow trials of terrorists without giving them a public platform for their radical ideology and to allow witnesses to testify without fear of reprisals from terrorist groups such as ISIS or Al-Qaeda.
Write a paper addressing the following:
Explain whether the proposed Secret Terrorism Trial Bill violates the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial,
Describe whether the proposed Secret Terrorism Trial Bill violate the Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against you.
Explain whether the government’s overriding need to fight terrorism outweighs the Sixth Amendment rights of the accused.
Identify whether the Sixth Amendment applies to terrorists since the writers of the Constitution could not have envisioned mass shootings and suicide bombers.

Identify and explain the seven essential criteria for good policy

/in /by

Using Gene Bonham’s Chapter 1 (R&B), identify and explain the seven essential criteria for good policy. Make sure you use your own words. Take the time to identify and explain each of the seven criteria. Use your own words to explain what they mean. Use examples of a real or imagined policy to explain each criterion, so that it is clear to a reader who has not read this article and has little knowledge about criminal justice. What are the key ideas and concepts to keep in mind and apply as we go through the course?

Make sure to practice criminal justice in-text citations and references in all your assignments. It is especially critical for weeks where we have multiple sources. Submit as a Word document, 500-700 words, 20 points

The right to life, contained in article 2 of the european convention on human rights, is adequately protected in the UK. Discuss.

/in /by

The right to life, contained in article 2 of the european convention on human rights, is adequately protected in the UK. Discuss.

The right to life, contained in article 2 of the european convention on human rights, is adequately protected in the UK. Discuss.

/in /by

The right to life, contained in article 2 of the european convention on human rights, is adequately protected in the UK. Discuss.

Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart was successful by learning lessons from Julius Caesar

/in /by

*The final weekly assignment is a little more extensive, .*Two Part Assignment!!Part I:* Specific Instructions: This 10th Week assignment is a two-part document, thus, at least, 4 total pages of analysis, 2 or more for each part.

1.Read Chapter 8 and Chapter 9 (Julius Caesar) in Power, Ambition, Glory.

2.Conduct a leadership analysis on Julius Caesar. What were the key leadership actions, qualities, styles….etc. that directly resulted in his success as a leader? In other words, what was his legacy as a leader?

3.Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart was successful by learning lessons from Julius Caesar
4.Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart failed by not learning lessons from Julius Caesar.
Part II:1.Read Chapter 10 (Augustus) in Power, Ambition, Glory.

2.Conduct a leadership analysis on Augustus Caesar. What were the key leadership actions, qualities, styles….etc. that directly resulted in his success as a leader? In other words, what was his legacy as a leader?

3.Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart was successful by learning lessons from Augustus Caesar.

4.Briefly explain, with evidence, how one modern counterpart failed by not learning lessons from Augustus Caesar.

5.*Cite your sources!6.This exercise should be completed within, at least, a two- page response, single spaced, in 12 pt. times Roman f

Evaluate a theoretical framework to determine appropriateness to the criminal justice leadership and organizational policies and practices.

/in /by

Using the attached paper (Mandatory Sentencing), which identified a problem was identified affecting criminal justice leadership, a criminal justice organisation, and/or organizational policies and practices using theoretical frameworks and provided an analysis of the problem’s background.
In this second component of the final project, use research (attached paper- Mandatory Setencing) to build a deeper understanding of the problem by writing a literature review including at least 10 peer-reviewed resources published within the last 3–5 years. The research you conduct will assist in the development of a theoretical framework for the identified problem. As part of your literature review, evaluate the effectiveness of theories in explaining the problem that is affecting the criminal justice system.
In the assignment, be sure to address the following critical elements, which align with the grading criteria:
Evaluate a theoretical framework to determine appropriateness to the criminal justice leadership and organizational policies and practices.
Articulate with empirical support how issues of diversity and inclusiveness can be intertwined with the problem that you identified.
Synthesize current, relevant, peer-reviewed academic research to uncover various ethical drivers and pressures related to the problem or issue within criminal justice.
Writing Requirements

Length: At least 6 double-spaced pages (excluding the cover page and references list). Include page numbers, headings, and running header.
References: At least 10 peer-reviewed resources formatted following APA guidelines. Note: You must analyze current, relevant, peer-reviewed academic research articles that examine the identified elements and that have been published within the past 3–5 years.
Formatting: Use correct APA style and formatting, paying particular attention to citations and references.
Font size and type: Times New Roman, 12 point.
A scoring rubric communicates expectations of quality around assignment tasks. Be sure to review the Literature Review Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the grading criteria for this assignment.

Critically discuss the extent to which (if at all) the need to establish an intention to create legal relations is recognised in English law

/in /by

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
• Answer any two questions from the four provided;
• You should write your answer in the style of an exam answer. For example, you should not use footnotes but should cite authority and secondary materials as you would in an examination;
• You are reminded that the Code of Practice on Assessment applies to this assessment. Penalties for Academic Integrity offences (including collusion and plagiarism etc) will be strictly applied;
• Markers will enforce a word limit of 1,250 words per answer. The marker will stop marking your work after 1,250 words;
• Your answers will be marked against the assessment criteria as they apply to examinations.
PAPER CODE: LAW 105 Page 1 of 3 CONTINUED
1. Norma is a reclusive but world-famous sculptor who handles all aspects of sculpting, advertising, sales and delivery herself. She has completed a sculpture of a politician made from abandoned hospital beds that she calls ‘The Idiot.’ It is the only one that will ever be made. She places an ad in The Guardian newspaper stating ‘My new sculpture is available for purchase for £1,000,000’ and proposes that interested buyers should contact her by letter in relation to any purchase.
On 1 January, Gareth sees the advertisement and writes to her offering £900,000. Norma, like many artists, is temperamental and writes back on 3 January to tell him she isn’t interested in selling to someone who values her work so little. Gareth responds by saying he wishes to accept her initial offer of the sculpture for £1,000,000 and will call around in seven days to pick it up.
Norma begins to regret putting the work up for sale, worrying that it won’t be seen by the public. As a result, on 2 January she writes to the Poncé Gallery in London saying that she will sell to them if they offer her £800,000. On the very same day, and without having seen Norma’s letter, the Poncé Gallery write to her offering to buy the painting for £800,000.
Eric likes what he sees of the sculpture in the advertisement. He writes to her on 1 January saying he accepts her offer to sell the sculpture at £1,000,000. Norma receives this on 4 January and is delighted. She posts a letter that very afternoon at 3pm to say that she is delighted to sell to him on those terms. However, half an hour later, Hank, a fabulously rich billionaire, rings her to say he will buy the sculpture for £2,000,000 as he wants his patronage of artists to get wide publicity. Norma is once more delighted, but tells Hank she is not in a position to conclude any deal until she speaks to another bidder.
She decides to ring Eric to cancel her acceptance of his offer. She vaguely remembers hearing about the concept of ‘revocation’ from her long-ago days of studying law, and is confident that as long as she can instantaneously communicate this to Eric before her letter arrives, a contract will not be complete.
Advise Norma about potential legal liabilities in relation to Gareth, the Poncé Gallery, Eric and Hank.
2. ‘The law has no consistent approach to the question of whether performance of existing legal duty can amount to good consideration’. Discuss in relation to any two of the following:
i) Publicly owed duties
ii) Duties owed to third parties
iii) Duties owed to same promisor
PAPER CODE: LAW 105 Page 2 of 3 CONTINUED

3. Klaus ran a diving school called Phoenix Divers. He had 10 employees who were all master divers. As the business was offering more and more night dives, Klaus went to a store called Dip ’n’ Divers to purchase 10 dive lights (one for each master diver). At the time he bought them, Klaus explained to the shop assistant (Gerard, a new employee who was in training) that he needed the dive lights for night dives so that his master divers could point out sea creatures at a distance and look into dark crevices. Gerard picked up the Sea Dragon Light and said “this will be perfect, it has a 10.5° narrow beam angle underwater for long range use and for pointing out sea life and looking into crevices”. Klaus bought 10 Sea Dragon Lights but 3 of them had a 45° beam angle and consequently were not suitable for long range use to point out sea life or to look into dark crevices. Klaus would like to return all 10 Sea Dragon Lights.
Advise Klaus as to whether or not he is able to return all 10 Sea Dragon Lights.
You should specifically consider whether or not there are any express or statutory implied terms that may assist him.
You do not need to consider terms implied in fact and terms implied in law for the purposes of this question.
Extracts from the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 have been provided in the Resit Assessment folder on VITAL. These extracts may be used to assist you in answering Question 3.
4. ‘To create a contract there must be a common intention of the parties to enter into legal obligations, mutually communicated expressly or impliedly.’
Rose and Frank Co v J R Crompton and Brothers Ltd [1923] 2 KB 261 per Atkin LJ
Critically discuss the extent to which (if at all) the need to establish an intention to create legal relations is recognised in English law.
PAPER CODE: LAW 105 Page 3 of 3 END