Write a concise piece of legal advice advising James of his chances of a successful appeal to the Supreme Court.

James read an advertisement by a firm of London auctioneers to the effect that there would be held in London an auction sale “without reserve” of the famous Gatsby Painting Collection, valued by an independent expert recently at £250,000. He immediately booked a flight from Scotland to the auction rooms in London where the auction was to be held.

He was determined to get the Collection at any price, especially after catching sight of the artist himself at the sale. James was participating spiritedly in the bidding, which was reaching a very high level under the direction of the auctioneer, when Gatsby demanded that the auction cease since he could not after all bear to part with the paintings.  The auctioneer immediately refused to accept any more bids (the last one had been made by James) and went on to the next item. James’s last bid was £150,000.

James brought an action against the auctioneers for breach of contract demanding £100,000 damages (representing the difference between the contract price and the market value of the lot at the date of the breach) on the basis that the advertisement to hold an auction without reserve constituted a unilateral offer to sell the Collection to the highest bidder and that such an offer was accepted by him when he bid at the auction. The County Court, however, found for the auctioneers holding that:

  1. The advertisement to hold an auction without reserve did not amount to an offer to sell the lot to the highest bidder since there were no express words to that effect in the advertisement, merely a statement of fact that the seller had not placed a reserve on the lot.
  2. The auctioneer’s request for bids amounted merely to an invitation to make an offer to buy and that offer was made by bidding. No contract could be completed until the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer.
  3. There was no contract because there was no consideration for the auctioneer’s promise.
  4. In any event, damages would be purely nominal because, as the highest bidder, James was simply deprived of the chance of obtaining the lot at the price which he actually bid. Until the fall of the hammer, it would have been open to other bidders to bid at a higher price.

You are asked to write a concise piece of legal advice advising James of his chances of a successful appeal to the Supreme Court.

Prepare an office memorandum that addresses; whether authorizing the BORS to regulate all interstate commerce violates Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.

Facts: Congress is considering an amendment to the Human Cloning Act that would allow the BORS to:
Regulate all interstate commerce, and Hear all cases appealed from the Federal district courts that involve issues related to cloning.
Senator Caster questions whether this amendment to the HCA is constitutional, and she has sought an opinion from the BORS.
Instructions:

Prepare an office memorandum that addresses the following:

(1) Whether authorizing the BORS to regulate all interstate commerce violates Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution; and

(2) Whether authorizing the BORS to hear all cases appealed from the Federal district courts that involve issues related to cloning violates Article III of the United States Constitution.

Draft a 2–3-page double-spaced memorandum to the CEO, Casandra (Cassie) Cardigan and discuss the following: The elements one must establish to bring a cause of action based on negligence. Potential defenses that CARDWARE and Candie may use against Myra’s claim.

Candie Cardigan has been asked to model CARDWARE’s newest sweater line that is made of thin and yet warm material, called Naturally There, as it can withstand temperatures of 30 below 0. Because this will provide CARDWARE with good publicity of its newest clothing line, she agrees to walk the runway in Fashion City. The modeling event is being held at the Easton Hotel. Celebrities and those involved in the fashion industry will be in attendance. Several models precede Candie and her debut of Naturally There. Clad in a tasteful skirt, 4-inch high heels and a green Naturally There sweater, Candie proceeds to the end of the runway. A small wrinkle in the carpet causes Candie’s left shoe to get caught and she falls over the end of the runway onto the row of judges. Unfortunately, Myra, a judge and world renowned model, suffers a broken nose and cut to her face from one of Candie’s shoes.

Myra wants to bring a lawsuit based on negligence against CARDWARE and Candie.

You are the paralegal working for CARDWARE’s corporate counsel and have been asked to draft a 2–3-page double-spaced memorandum to the CEO, Casandra (Cassie) Cardigan and discuss the following:

  1. The elements one must establish to bring a cause of action based on negligence.
  2. Potential defenses that CARDWARE and Candie may use against Myra’s claim.

Advise Shania on which of the interested persons she should include in her business, in what role(s), and why.

Shania Jackson is a mature Christian thinking of opening a Christian coffeehouse near Denver, Colorado. Her husband, Marvin, is open to making a contribution of capital to the business, but he has no interest in participating in its operation or management.

Shania’s sister, Kelsey, is a new Christian who has told Shania that she’s been looking for an excuse to get out of the house and would love to be a part of the business. Kelsey’s husband, a non-Christian, opposes his wife’s involvement and has told her that he wants her to remain a stay-at-home mom to their 2 children.

Shania’s neighbor, Carlos, is a non-Christian who has also expressed an interest in participating in the business as a way to earn extra income. Carlos thinks the “Christian thing” has potential with all the big churches in the area, including a Mormon temple and a large Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Shania has considered organizing her business as a sole proprietorship, a partnership of some sort, a corporation of some sort, an LLC, or even a joint venture. She is thinking of calling the business “The Gathering Place.”

Thread Prompt:

Advise Shania on the following decisions:

Which of the business entities under consideration best accomplishes her business goals? Thoroughly explain the reasons for your recommendation.

Perform a corporate name search at this website to determine if the name Shania is considering is available for use in the State of Colorado. Also assess whether the name is available as a trademark. Even if the name is available, advise Shania on whether it is a good choice. Thoroughly explain the reasons for your recommendations.

Advise Shania on which of the interested persons she should include in her business, in what role(s), and why. Your analysis must include Biblical perspectives, such as Biblical considerations of marriage, and business relationships with non-believers. Thoroughly explain the reasons for your recommendations.

Does institutional racism exists in our criminal justice system? Select one of the following aspects of our criminal justice system (courts, police, corrections, or probation/parole) and, citing at least two authoritative sources , make the case to support your position on this issue.

1.Does institutional racism exists in our criminal justice system?

Select one of the following aspects of our criminal justice system (courts, police, corrections, or probation/parole) and, citing at least two authoritative sources (not the textbook), make the case to support your position on this issue.

Make sure that you consider this question from a legal and ethical point of view, as opposed to an emotional one. Provide support for the position you adopt using credible sources such as statistics and case law. You may also use secondary sources such as media reports.

  1. In your reading, Souryal has posted a question: To what extent does a morally good end justify an illegal or unethical means to its achievement? Is overstepping authority in order to achieve what one perceives to be a higher good justified?

Consider these questions as they relate to the role of a police officer in our society. In a well developed argument, first take the position that ‘the end justifies the means’ is an ethical approach to policing. Then, in a following argument, take the opposite position.

For each position, select one Master who would support that position and use his theory of ethics to support your argument. In addition, for each approach please include at least one original example to illustrate the position you are arguing.

  1. In the 1976 case of Estelle v Gamble, 429 US 97 (1976), the US Supreme Court established that prisoners in the US have a “right to healthcare” and that to deny them that right might, in some cases, rise to the level of a violation of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. But in 2015, that same Court refused to hear a case in which an inmate in Massachusetts sought gender reassignment surgery (GRS), thus leaving in place a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denying the inmate that surgery. In your initial post, please address the following:

Does an ethical obligation exist to provide this surgery to an inmate?

Is the inmate’s sentence a consideration? (For example, in the MA case, the inmate was serving LWOP. Can we ethically consider that in determining if the surgery should be provided?)

Is there a case to be made that the Court’s denial of the appeal in the MA case results in a violation of the inmate’s 8th Amendment rights?

Where does one house an inmate sentenced to LWOP who was born a male but is living as a female, with or without GRS?

4 In recent years there has been a push to reduce our reliance on traditional models of corrections and to embrace community-based corrections, which encompasses pretrial supervision, parole and probation. For this question you will write two persuasive paragraphs.

The first should be a persuasive essay in which you take a “pro” position on community-based corrections.

The second should be an equally persuasive essay in which you will take a “con” position on community-based corrections.

In your arguments please provide legal, ethical, and social reform arguments to support your position.

State whether you agree with the court’s holding(s) in the case, and briefly explain why. Explain how a hypothetical change to the fact(s) you identified would have resulted in a different holding(s)

Conduct research using free legal research websites (e.g. Justia, Google Scholar, Findlaw, CourtListener) to find the decision in Alridge v. Rite Aid of Washington, D.C., Inc., issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in 2015. Once you have located the case, please do the following:

(1) Summarize the key facts (those that, if different, would have changed the outcome of the case), the issue(s), and the holding(s)
(2) State whether you agree with the court’s holding(s) in the case, and briefly explain why
(3) Explain how a hypothetical change to the fact(s) you identified would have resulted in a different holding(s)
(4) Provide links to the decision in two separate legal research databases (e.g. Findlaw, Google Scholar,
CourtListener etc.).

Apply the following: Aristotle’s Golden Mean to the dilemma, Utilitarianism to the dilemma, Natural Law ethics to the dilemma. Which of those three theories works best ethically speaking? Why that one? Why do the other two not work or not work as well?

Instructions Return to the topic you chose in the week three assignment. Articulate a specific dilemma in a situation faced by a particular person based on that topic. The situation can be real or fictional. Summarize the dilemma.

Define any needed key terms associated with the dilemma. Analyze the conflicts or controversies involved in the dilemma. Revise and rewrite based on any feedback you received in your previous draft (week three). Reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, etc. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties or conflicts between loyalty to self and loyalty to a community or nation. What in your view is the most moral thing for that person to do in that dilemma? Why is that the most moral thing?

Use moral values and logical reasoning to justify your answer

Next, apply the following: Aristotle’s Golden Mean to the dilemma Utilitarianism to the dilemma Natural Law ethics to the dilemma Which of those three theories works best ethically speaking? Why that one? Why do the other two not work or not work as well? Is it the same as what you said is the most moral thing earlier? Why or why not?

Use the 5 articles from your annotated bibliography to support your answers. (Additional academic scholarly research from the past 5 years can be included as well.) Include a reference page at the end of your paper in APA format that includes your bibliography with the annotations removed and any other sources used in your final paper. Writing Requirements (APA format) Length: 4-5 pages (not including title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References page (minimum of 5 scholarly sources)

The value of Georgia’s gold necklace increased dramatically in the six months since she purchased it from Shephard. Can Sam Shephard disaffirm the contract, return the $350.00 and get the necklace back? Why or why not?

A new client, Georgia, has retained Attorney Liberty to advise her about how her minority age affects contracts that she entered into before she turned 18 years.

Liberty wants you to prepare a brief summary report response to Georgia’s questions and concerns.

Facts: Before beginning college, Georgia, who is 17 years old entered into two contracts, one for the purchase of a do, and another for the purchase of a necklace. She wants to know about the enforceability of these contracts. Specifically, she asks the following questions:

1. Should she have the same length of time after reaching majority age (18 years) to disaffirm each of the following contracts? Explain why and compare the two contracts in your analysis/discussion.

Georgia entered into a contract with a local dog breeder who is 35 year old, to buy a Golden Retriever puppy for $250.00.
Georgia entered into a contract to buy a gold necklace for $350.00 from Sam Shephard, an adult who is 40 years old.
2. The value of Georgia’s gold necklace increased dramatically in the six months since she purchased it from Shephard. Can Sam Shephard disaffirm the contract, return the $350.00 and get the necklace back? Why or why not? (Georgia is not yet 18 years old.)

Instructions:

Write a summary report Liberty to respond to Georgia’s questions. Label each part of the Summary.

Canada brought a case against Singapore to the WTO dispute settlement system. Canada argued that it was also recognized as a “control country” under the OIE criteria along with Chile. Explain major issues and conclusions in your opinion for this WTO dispute.

 Suppose that the foot and mouth disease for swine was reported in Canada 10 years ago and since then the import of Canadian swine meat was prohibited in Singapore. On the other hand, the foot and mouth disease for swine also occurred in Chile six years ago. The swine meat from Chile was permitted for importation in Singapore after Singapore and Chile established a free trade agreement (FTA) the last year, although an FTA does not justify a discriminatory treatment for SPS measures. In fact, the Singaporean government pointed out the fact that Chile was designated as a “control country” under the OIE criteria when Chile rapidly implemented all necessary measures to contain potential risks from distribution channels of the market.

Canada brought a case against Singapore to the WTO dispute settlement system. Canada argued that it was also recognized as a “control country” under the OIE criteria along with Chile. Explain major issues and conclusions in your opinion for this WTO dispute.

1.2 Suppose that Singapore found the packaging for swine meat to be hazardous when it contained too much chemicals for facilitating refrigeration. So, Singapore enacted a new law to prohibit any residue of such chemicals in swine meat packaging. Consequently, Canadian swine meat import was almost stopped in Singapore because packaging to use chemicals facilitating refrigeration was invented in Canada and their exportation heavily relies on this method. All other countries use typically plastic containers for swine meat transportation and thereby are not affected by this new law. On the other hand, a similar packaging method is allowed for chicken meats that are supplied mostly by domestic producers.

Canada brought a case against Singapore to the WTO dispute settlement system. Explain major issues and conclusions in your opinion for this WTO dispute.

Identify, to the extent discernible, Bastiat’s ontology, epistemology, axiology, and teleology; Judge his use of political language. Does Bastiat define terms such as authority, power, liberty, equality, and justice biblically?

Read and evaluate Bastiat’s The Law. More specifically, you are to:

  1. Identify, to the extent discernible, Bastiat’s ontology, epistemology, axiology, and teleology;
  2. Judge his use of political language. Does Bastiat define terms such as authority, power, liberty, equality, and justice biblically?
  3. Express and defend your general agreement/disagreement with the content therein.

The paper is to 2-3 pages in length in current Turabian format.

M/W4 – O. W. Holmes, Jr Paper

Read and evaluate the Harvard Law Review article entitled The Path of the Law by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. More specifically, you are to:

  1. Identify, to the extent discernible, Holmes’s ontology, epistemology, axiology, and teleology;
  2. Demonstrate which, if any, of Llewellyn’s 9-Point Manifesto of Legal Realism, are present in the article.
  3. Appraise the general tone and tenor of Holmes’ view of the nature and function of the law.

The paper is to be 2-3 pages in length in current Turabian format.

M/W6 – A Biblical Defense of Rights and Justice

In this paper you are to:

  1. Put forth a spirited, lucid, and above all, scriptural argument for the existence of the right to life, liberty, and property;
  2. Define justice considering the existence of said rights.
  3. In your analysis, utilize the conceptual distinction between negative and positive rights.

The paper is to be 2-3 pages in length in current Turabian format.

Submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 6.

M/W8 – The Future of American Jurisprudence

In this 4-5 page paper, written in current Turabian format, you are to:

  1. Briefly review the basic premises of the major schools of jurisprudence—biblical/natural, legal positivism, legal realism, and critical legal theory;
  2. Assess the state of the current American legal landscape; and
  3. Predict, using sound logic, the future of American jurisprudence.