James was 25 years old when his mother became a US Citizen. James was residing in New Zealand in when his mom became a US Citizen, and he later came to the US as legal permanent resident. Did James automatically acquire US Citizenship after his mom became a US Citizen?

/in /by

Immigration Law 2021 – Quiz 3 Questions – Citizenship

  1. Which of the following is True?
  2. A Legal Permanent Resident can vote in any election in USA
  3. A US Citizen cannot reside outside the US for more than one 6 months
  4. A Legal Permanent Resident will have no issues if he/she claims to be a US Citizen
  5. Someone who is married to a US Citizen can apply for citizenship only after he/she has been a Legal Permanent Resident for 5 years
  6. Someone who is married to a US Citizen can apply for citizenship after being a Legal

Permanent Resident for 3 years

  1. True or False?

A Legal Permanent resident can elect/choose to apply for Citizenship. It is optional and not mandatory.

  1. Which one is True? To be eligible for citizenship based on marriage to a US Citizen, someone must establish good moral character at a minimum for:
  2. The last 3 years to the application for citizenship
  3. The last 5 years prior to the application for citizenship
  4. Which of the following is True? To apply for Citizenship, you must:
  5. Have resided in the US continuously for at least 18 months within the last 3 years if you are married to a US citizen
  6. Have resided in the US continuously for at least 18 months in the last 5 years if you are not married to a US citizen
  7. There are no exceptions to the English language requirements
  8. Your Residency cannot be revoked under any circumstances
  9. True or False?

If you have a physical disability caused by the use of Drugs, you can apply for a waiver of English language requirements during your citizenship test.

  1. True or False?
  2. If I was born to two US Citizen parents who never lived in the United States, I am automatically a US Citizen Immigration Law 2021 – Quiz 3 Questions – Citizenship
  1. Which statement is correct about a Legal Permanent Resident?
  2. If I leave the United States and reside abroad for more than a year, I cannot re-enter the United States never again
  3. If I leave the United States and reside abroad for more than a year, I may be allowed to re-enter the United States If I can show that I intended to return to the United States and my stay abroad for more than a year was for good reasons beyond my control.
  4. True or False?

All people born within the United States and its territories are considered citizens of the United States with some exceptions.

  1. True or False?

If you are a born US Citizenship, you can never lose your citizenship

  1. James was 25 years old when his mother became a US Citizen. James was residing in New Zealand in when his mom became a US Citizen, and he later came to the US as legal permanent resident. Did James automatically acquire US Citizenship after his mom became a US Citizen?

Yes or No?

 

What are your views on legalizing AVs with no driver behind the wheel and what amendments would you make to the report?

/in /by

Legalizing AVs

Respond using oscola to the following post to this student. Max 200 to 300 citing papers regarding the proposal by the law commissioner 2022

What are your views on legalizing AVs with no driver behind the wheel and what amendments would you make to the report?

Is this possible for the UIC to switch off the ADS features [2], take over the driving and apply brakes or can he apply brakes when the ADS is engaged?

What are your thoughts or suggestions on the above scenarios?

 

Provide the purpose and need to understand, define, and analyze terrorism; discussion of behavioral traits, suspicious activity, radicalization and recruitment for and of terrorism; intelligence gathering; enhanced investigation and analysis; what’s past is prologue as it pertains to counterterrorism, and what might we expect from terrorism in the future. How does cyber and social media fit in?

/in /by

Research Paper: A Comprehensive Examination of Counterterrorism

Overview

The student will complete a Comprehensive Examination of Counterterrorism. This paper will be exhaustive. The student will provide the following using these headings: the purpose and need to understand, define, and analyze terrorism; discussion of behavioral traits, suspicious activity, radicalization and recruitment for and of terrorism; intelligence gathering; enhanced investigation and analysis; what’s past is prologue as it pertains to counterterrorism, and what might we expect from terrorism in the future. How does cyber and social media fit in?

Instructions

A minimum of 10-full pages, not counting title and reference pages, research-oriented paper in current APA format.

At least 7 sources .

 

Refer to the OSCOLA Quick Guide and OSCOLA Referencing Guidelines, it is vital that you correctly reference any parts of your assignment that are not your original work.

/in /by

Assignment question
Denver would like your advice in relation to two property matters, one concerning 53 Cross Street and the other concerning Swettenham Cottage.

53 Cross Street

Denver and his brother, Watson, purchased an investment property in Sheffield together in 2005, which they have since rented out to students. They purchased the property for £200,000, with Denver contributing £50,000 and Watson contributing £150,000. Denver did not wish to be named on the legal title at that time, for reasons which are not relevant here. As a result, the property was registered in the sole name of Watson. Both Denver and Watson were preoccupied with personal matters at the time of the purchase and did not discuss the ownership of the property, nor did they complete any paperwork regarding how they owned the property as a result of their contributions.

In 2010, Denver paid £10,000 for some repairs to the property. During this time, the property was not rented out and Denver paid the utility bills in full for 6 months, amounting to £8,000. Following a family argument, Denver and Watson are now estranged. Watson is in the process of selling the property at its current value of £300,000 and Denver wants to know what interest, if any, he has in the property and what he is entitled to financially, if anything, from the sale.

Swettenham Cottage

In 2010, Denver and his girlfriend, Petra, purchased for £400,000 and immediately moved into Swettenham Cottage, a 19th century property in Oxfordshire. Denver contributed £200,000 to the purchase price, Petra contributed £100,000 and they took out a bank loan for the balance, secured by a mortgage in their joint names. Swettenham Cottage was registered in Denver and Petra’s joint names. Despite their unequal contributions, they did not agree anything with regard to their beneficial ownership and the transfer did not contain any declaration to this effect, nor is there any other paperwork in this respect.

In the early years of their ownership of Swettenham Cottage, Denver and Petra both worked on a full-time basis, both earning good salaries, and they both paid equal amounts to the mortgage and the outgoings for the property. In 2015, they had a daughter, Sia, and the following year a son, Tobias. Denver and Petra agreed that Petra would give up her job to look after Sia and Tobias. For the past 5 years, Denver has paid the mortgage and outgoings on the property from his salary. Petra has taken on occasional work on a freelance basis, which she has used to pay for occasional childcare for the children, a cleaner for the house and clothes and other items for the children. She also used some of her freelance earnings to pay for the children’s bedrooms to be redecorated in 2018.

Denver and Petra have recently separated following a turbulent time in their relationship and have agreed to sell the property and move on separately, with shared custody and maintenance of the children. They have found a buyer for the property and are selling it for £600,000 and Denver is of the view that, once the property has been sold and the outstanding mortgage repaid, he should be entitled to twice the amount of the sale proceeds as Petra, having contributed twice as much initially.

Problem Based Exercise Questions
Your assignment should be written in the third person with a word count of 4,000 words. If you exceed the word count by more than 10%, then your assignment grade will be reduced by 10% grade points.
Please refer to the OSCOLA Quick Guide and OSCOLA Referencing Guidelines, it is vital that you correctly reference any parts of your assignment that are not your original work.

What is/was the issue facing the community? Who did they engage with in order to resolve the issue? What were barriers to their success? What or who assisted in resolving the issue?

/in /by

Community Engagement/Mobilization Paper (750 words)

Applying the concepts of community mobilization, partnership(s) and problem- oriented policing, and utilizing the principles of problem solving, this assignment tasks you to connect with a community member(s) that may know about local crime/social issue which could potentially impact community safety. This might include elders, city officials, clergy, teachers, community organizers, or service-providers. In this assignment, individually, you will interview (electronically, telephone, or remotely  a member of your community. Through this engagement, identify a situation or issue – what risk factors were identified, who was or would potentially be impacted, and potential ways that this information would benefit broader community safety and well-being.

This report shall reflect concepts of problem-oriented policing and community mobilization.

Considerations for this assignment:

Contact a member of/or a community – examples are: clergy, business owner, social agency, local government, Municipal contact, community organizations, volunteer community group leaders. You may not use a friend, family friend or relative for this assignment

Have them identify a community issue which related to community safety/crime prevention

  • What is/was the issue facing the community?
  • Who did they engage with in order to resolve the issue?
  • What were barriers to their success?
  • What or who assisted in resolving the issue?
  • Were they successful in eliminating, reducing or removing the problem?
  • What did you learn from the community member and their experience(s)?
  • How does this apply to what you learned in class?
  • How did this engagement with the community member motivate your work towards crime prevention?

Reference/citation must include two (2) resources from the course material for the purpose of this assignment and be double spaced.

 

Choose 1 policy that has helped or hindered the mitigation of gangs/gang activities- Explain it and talk about what is good and bad.

/in /by

Policy Implications: Gangs

Students will conduct research on previous/current policies which have helped or hindered the mitigation of gangs/gang activities and apply it to their discussion of gangs. Further, students may also develop future recommendations based
on any gaps/issues with current policies/practices.

Policies and Practices can be from anyone of the following sources: Police, Courts, Corrections, Not-for-Profits, Other independent organizations (e.g., UN, Jon Howard Society etc.), State task force

Instructions:
1. Choose 1 policy that has helped or hindered the mitigation of gangs/gang activities- Explain it and talk about what is good and bad.

2. Link the theory to STRAIN THEORY

3.Talk about limitations of the policy and how it can be improved to help mitigation of gangs

How does the law permit the government to regulate science and technology? How does the law protect trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights? What is the mission of the International Criminal Court?

/in /by

Week 9 Law Discussion

Answer the following:

1. How does the law permit the government to regulate science and technology?

2. How does the law protect trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights?

3. What is the mission of the International Criminal Court?

4. What is the European Union?

Describe legal interest/area of study intended as a law student – IP rights. Describe an aspect of yourself different from others.

/in /by

Personal statement for a JD program

Describe legal interest/area of study intended as a law student – IP rights.
The reason why you wish to study law at this school.
Professional plans or goals following completion of your degree.
Describe an aspect of yourself different from others.

Should this evidence be suppressed? Why or Why not? Does your answer change from a Christian worldview perspective? Besides the rule of law, is your answer the same when applying Biblical principles? Based on what you have studied, what level of evidence is needed to make the search or seizure legal?

/in /by

Maryland v. Garrison

Review the United States Supreme Court decision in Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987). After reviewing that decision, write an original post that analyzes the following factual scenario:

A warrant specifies a search for Marijuana and other drugs in the second-floor dwelling of a yellow and red house located at 315 Anderson Street in the City of Lynchburg, Virginia. When the police arrive, they see that the house’s second floor is divided into two separate apartments, one marked “A” and one marked “B.” The police search both apartments and find Marijuana in both.

Should this evidence be suppressed? Why or Why not? Does your answer change from a Christian worldview perspective? Besides the rule of law, is your answer the same when applying Biblical principles? Based on what you have studied, what level of evidence is needed to make the search or seizure legal?

Cite the scholarly source in Bluebook format. Below is assistance on how to cite a book in Bluebook format ***Bluebook Resource:

Bluebook Resources

What is the difference between actual cause and proximate cause? What does the issue of proximate cause boil down to, and why do courts struggle with this concept? What are the facts in Palsgraf ?

/in /by

Tort Law

Read chapter 6 of the book: “Tort Law, 6th Edition” (by J. Stanley Edwards). If you do not have access to this book, use my credentials below to gain access. After reading, answer the prompt in detail while using the book as a scholarly source. Cite the book in Bluebook format.

  • Link: https://www.cengage.com

Sign-In info:
email:
password:

Prompt: After reading Chapter 6, answer the following questions:

1. What is the difference between actual cause and proximate cause?

2. What does the issue of proximate cause boil down to, and why do courts struggle with this concept?

3. What are the facts in Palsgraf ?

  • a) What was the issue before the court?
    b) What did the majority rule, and why?
    c) Why did the dissent disagree?

Cite the scholarly source in Bluebook format. Below is assistance on how to cite a book in Bluebook format ***Bluebook Resource:

Bluebook Resources