Briefly discuss and explain the different elements involved in the request for documents, including how depositions, interrogatories, and subpoenas are enlisted. Distinguish between these legal processes.

/in /by

Civil Litigation

Read chapters 9 & 10 of the book: “Civil Litigation” (by Kerley, Hames, & Sukys). If you do not have access to this book, use my credentials below to gain access. After reading, answer the prompt in detail while using the book as a scholarly source. Cite the book in Bluebook format.

Link: https://www.cengage.com

Sign-In info:

PROMPT: Briefly discuss and explain the different elements involved in the request for documents, including how depositions, interrogatories, and subpoenas are enlisted. Distinguish between these legal processes.

Cite the scholarly source in Bluebook format. Below is assistance on how to cite a book in Bluebook format ***Bluebook Resource:

Bluebook Resources

What security measures are different pre 9/11 to post 9/11 in transportation areas such as the airport and what are some needed adjustments to improve current security measures?

/in /by

INTERNATIONAL LAW

Submit your final research proposal.

Note: You will not actually carry out your research project in this class. You are writing a proposal for this assignment . It is not a complete research paper. Thus, you will propose the collection of data to test your hypothesis, but you will not actually get to do it. Your proposal should have the following sections:

Research Proposal: Transportation Security

Research Question: What security measures are different pre 9/11 to post 9/11 in transportation areas such as the airport and what are some needed adjustments to improve current security measures?

Hypothesis: If security measures in transportation areas such as the airport were the same as pre 9/11, where would the country be now with the ability to protect itself against terrorist and other criminals?

Title Page: Your title page should include the working title of your research project proposal, your name, date, and course title.

Introduction: The introduction is where you identify your specific research question and where you set the general context for the study. In this section you need to include:

  • a research hook that will encourage the reader to keep reading;
  • an introduction to the topic and its larger context, including a discussion of why it is important to study. It provides the current state of accumulated knowledge as it relates to your specific research question.
  • a statement of the problem and context leading to a clear statement of the specific research question.
  • background and contextual material justifying why this case or topic should be studied; and a purpose statement.
  • promote the importance of your own research. How will your research fit within this larger body of knowledge? What are you doing differently? What gaps will your research fill?

 

Define stewardship of government resources and illustrate the kind of leadership which creates transformation in government service. Cite a law, policy, program or project that was launched, prioritized or enhanced which improved public welfare during natural calamities in the Philippines.

/in /by

Ethics and accountability in public governance

  1. Define stewardship of government resources and illustrate the kind of leadership which creates transformation in government service. Cite a law, policy, program or project that was launched, prioritized or enhanced which improved public welfare during natural calamities in the Philippines.
  2. Discuss how accountability is monitored in a democratic form of governance. Cite the principles of accountability.

Take note that laws, policies, and programs mentioned should originate from the Philippines. Answer should be no less than 800 to 1000 words. Kindly use reputable rereferences only.

 

Focus on past and future criminological theories and policies behind the issue. Given your analysis of the issue, discuss the impact on society and what problems need to be addressed to remedy the negative ramifications.

/in /by

Negatively impacting the delivery of criminal justice

For this assignment, you will select a contemporary issue that is negatively impacting the delivery of criminal justice—one that will be the focus of your final case analysis and recommendation brief. Although you may choose your own topic, you may not choose public policy. In this draft, you will demonstrate your understanding of the issue and its history, evolution, and development. You will need to focus on past and future criminological theories and policies behind the issue. Given your analysis of the issue, discuss the impact on society and what problems need to be addressed to remedy the negative ramifications.

Your submission should include reference to recent peer-reviewed articles, be 1 to 2 pages in length and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use APA style to cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.

 

Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile. Identify the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.

/in /by

CASE STUDY

Jim and Laura Buyer visit the local car dealership because they are interested in buying a new car. The car they currently have is aging and is starting to have mechanical problems. Jim and Laura would share the new car, and use it to go back and forth to work and school. Before going to the dealership, Jim and Laura decide that they can only afford $400.00 a month in car payments.

Once at the car dealership, Jim and Laura meet Stan Salesman. Stan shows them several vehicles and Jim and Laura test-drive several of the cars. Jim and Laura particularly like the blue 4-door sedan. Therefore, they agree to give Stan Salesman a $100.00 deposit to hold the car for a day. Stan Salesman does not give them the receipt but guarantees that the $100.00 is refundable. No documents were signed.

The next day, Stan Salesman calls Jim and Laura to ask them when they would like to take delivery of the car. Jim and Laura, on the way home from the dealership, decided that they were not going to buy the car because they did not want to spend that money each month. Therefore, Jim and Laura tell Stan Salesman that they have decided not to buy the car and request their $100.00 deposit back.

Stan insists that the $100.00 was a deposit on the car and was meant to be part of the contract to buy the car. Stan is very persistent and insistent that Jim and Laura have contracted to buy the car; therefore, the $100.00 will be applied to the purchase price of the car. Jim and Laura are shocked and angry as not only do they not want to spend the money, but now feel as though they are being duped by Stan Salesman.

Jim and Laura have an appointment to see a lawyer in a few days, but know you are a student taking a business law class and come to you for advice. They are very frazzled, and understandably upset that they may have just purchased a car. Since you have been taking business law, you have read and understand the elements of a contract and the defenses to a contract. Therefore, although you are not a lawyer, you provide some basic advice from what you’ve learned in your business law class.

ASSIGNMENT: In three to five (4-5) pages, advise Jim and Laura based on the above facts as presented and the material covered in the lessons. In your paper, be sure to address the following:

Define the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.

Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.

Identify the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.

Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment.

Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.

 

How is Roman law relevant to the law in your jurisdiction -Germany-?

/in /by

Introduction to Roman Law

How is Roman law relevant to the law in your jurisdiction -Germany-?

Write your own opinion within 1000 words using three or more of the following term/maxims.

  • -pacta sunt servanda-
  • -bona fide-
  • -quod nullius est id naturalis occupanti conceditur-
  • -iure naturae aequum est cum alterius detrimento et iniuria fieri locupletior-

Draft three Subpoena Duces Tecum for NYS Supreme Court requesting documents from. Choose a date for the documents to be delivered in 2023 with time and place appropriate.

/in /by

Complaint and Demands

You are a paralegal working in the law office Chesney & Nicholas LLP representing Defendant Bright view Landscape LLC in the lawsuit attached.  I have uploaded the Complaint, the defendant’s demands for discovery, and the plaintiff’s response to some of the discovery demands in the case of Richardson v. Westchester Medical Center Health Care Corporation and Bright view Landscape LLC.

You have been asked by one of the attorneys in our firm to:

  1. Draft three Subpoena Duces Tecum for NYS Supreme Court requesting documents from

(A) Stand-up MRI of the Bronx ,

(B) Dr. Louis C. Rose  and

(C) White Plains Bus Co.

The addresses are on the response letter and you need to read the Complaint and Demands to figure out the relevant time period for each document request – i.e., what documents you are requesting and from what date to what date.  YOU have to list the documents being requested with details.   Choose a date for the documents to be delivered in 2023 with time and place appropriate.

  Analyze.

  1. You also have the include a sample Business Record Certification with each Subpoena and again draft it for THIS case and for each of the three different businesses.  You have to draft three Business Record Certifications -= one to correspond for each of the Subpoenas.  Again, make sure you have the correct company where you are requesting documents for each Certification.
  2. Finally, you have been asked to also draft a Notice of Deposition for the doctor as the attorneys want to ask him specific questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of the plaintiff.  Again I have uploaded an example but don’t just cut and paste.  Choose a date for the Deposition for January 2023 with time and place appropriate.

 

Discuss the legality under international law of Russia’s use of military force against Ukraine. Analyze the concept of “State” under international law.

/in /by

Research Paper

ILST 3652: Introduction to International Law

Research Paper

Drawing upon your knowledge of the relevant concepts of international law, please write a research paper on ONE of the three topics listed below. Follow the writing instructions as provided hereunder.

1- Discuss the legality under international law of Russia’s use of military force against Ukraine.

2- Analyze the concept of “State” under international law.

3- In your opinion, why should States prefer treaties as the main sources of international legal rights and obligations?

Compare and Contrast the US and Canadain terms of: .

/in /by

Compare and Contrast the US and Canadain terms of:

  • Government (Executive, Judicial, Legislative + Monetary/Banking/Markets)
  • Business structure (Corporations, proprietorships, partnerships, etc)
  • Business ownership laws (Foreign ownership issues)

Does Smith’s suit have merit? Analyze what reasons she might have to win the case versus what reasons she might have to lose the case, and decide how you would rule and why?

/in /by

Hospitality and Employment Law

Joanne Smith was an assistant for a group of male and female writers who created scripts for a popular TV show. During her four months with the show(before she and a male assistant were both terminated for typing too slowly), Smith was required to attend the writers’ lewd brainstorming sessions.

When Smith was hired, she was forewarned that the show dealt with sexual matters and that she would listen to and transcribe the writers’ jokes and discussions about sex. However, after being fired, Smith sued three male writers and 45th Century fox for sexual harassment.

According to Smith’s suit, her workplace was filled with coarse and graphic sexual speech, behavior, and images(one writer had a proclivity for enhancing pictures of cheerleaders). Smith testified that the writers regularly told stories of sexual conquests, altered the texts of scripts to spell sexual organs, and engaged in crude speculation about the cast’s sex lives.

Does Smith’s suit have merit? Analyze what reasons she might have to win the case versus what reasons she might have to lose the case, and decide how you would rule and why?