In week 3, we discussed the Dilemmas in the Deterrence of Terrorists (Chapter 4 in The Counter Terrorism Puzzle). Why is deterring terrorists a challenge? Do you think terrorists can be deterred? Address both sides of the argument (through diplomacy, information, military, economic, financial, intelligence and law enforcement (D.I.M.E.F.I.L.) means).
The U.S. Government published the most recent National Strategy for Counterterrorism (NSCT) in October 2018. For this second topic you are to develop a framework for a brand-new National Strategy for Counter Terrorism of the United States. Address both domestic (homeland) components and offensive overseas elements. Make sure to address how you will balance domestic security with civil liberties at home and how you will be effective in dealing with terrorists abroad without creating even more terrorists in the process.
Make sure your framework employs all elements of national power (diplomatic, informational, military, economic, intelligence, law enforcement, financial). Also describe the importance of gathering all sources of domestic and overseas intelligence for effective counter terrorism efforts. You do not need to write an entire strategy, just the outline or framework for a new NSCT; an executive summary or details of your pillars or plan of action for a comprehensive strategy.
Each question should be about two paragraphs. You can use outside sources to define and explain your answers. As long as they are scholarly sources, you do not have to write this in the paper form, just answer the questions.
Week 4: The states are invested with various police powers. However, the federal government limits that police power. Do you think that the control of police power best lies in the federal or state governments?
Week 5: Are Terry stops more in line with the crime control or due process model of criminal justice?
Week 6: Police officers are permitted to approach citizens, ask questions, and even ask for consent to search. These stops are allowed if a reasonable person would feel free to disregard the officer and go about his or her business. At what point does a reasonable person feel that he or she is being detained? When does a consensual stop turn into a seizure?
Week 7: The Supreme Court gives the police some leeway when assessing the legality of police use of force when affecting an arrest. Why does the Court give the police this leeway? Why has the Court not given a “bright line” rule to determine if the force use was excessive?
Week 8: Search warrants must identify the place to be searched and the items to be searched for. Why is this necessary?
RESEARCH PAPER:
Collect data of about 6000 words “from lawsuit civil vs criminal cases as mentioned in the file Johnny Depp and etc” Use the application UAM CorpusTool to run these texts and conduct the corpus/all methodology Chi-square and an analysis.
Literature review: Show your voice while reviewing the literature. Show where there is an unanswered question”gap “.End with your research questions.
Methodology: Research design- Methodology: (Describe the study materials or data collection techniques”the corps”)
Data analysis tools (Justify your use of SFL linguistic tools)
validity & reliability (Calculate the frequencies per 100 words.
Education
Bachelor of Science: Accounting and Finance May 2020
York College of Pennsylvania York, PA
Campus Leadership
Forward-thinking Accountant. Superb technical and communications skills leading to desired achievements in fast-paced environment.
Skills
| · QuickBooks Online & Desktop – Software
· Sage 50 – Software · Excel – Software · Python – Language · Swift – Language · Concur – Software
|
· Salesforce – Software
· Yardi – Software · Financial Accounting · Corporate Accounting · Real Estate Accounting · Private Equity Accounting |
Professional Work Experience
Fund Staff Accountant April 2021 – Current
Standish Management Baltimore, MD
Advisory Associate May 2020 – Apr 2021
Cohen & Company Hunt Valley, MD
Financial Planning & Analysis Intern Jun 2019 – Aug 2019
United Health Group – Optum Northwest, DC
Tax Accountant Intern Spring 2019 & Spring 2020 RKL LLP. York, PA
This week’s readings included the 2020 Drug Threat Assessment report by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the 2015 National Gang Threat Assessment by the National Gang Intelligence Center of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Both provide detailed looks at these significant issues in criminal justice, which include those organizations’ predictions (“Outlook” section) about the future of drug and gang prevalence in the United States.
Pick one of the reports and answer the following questions based on the totality of the report:
Your response will be judged on your ability to provide evidence in support of your statements and choices.
As you are aware, Big Mike’s Construction (“Big Mike’s”) is a Texas-based company with one location in Dallas, Texas. Our office facility has two levels. Big Mike’s superintendents, carpenters, and general construction employees are on the lower level. All executive offices (including my executive suite, accounting, and human resources) are on the upper level. Big Mike’s consistently employs 50 employees, 38 of whom work on the lower level. Three years ago, Big Mike’s hired Samantha Michael as a carpenter. Ms. Michael was 55 years old when hired, and the only female carpenter during her tenure. I am not sure if it is relevant, but she was unmarried, had a short haircut, and never wore makeup. It is my understanding that the male carpenters and general construction employees began to treat Ms. Michael cruelly. They called her names such as “butch,” “old maid,” “spinster,” and “geriatric.” They would make comments telling her to “file for social security” and “we have reserved you a nursing home.” They also told her to “get a makeover” and “no man would ever marry you.” They would frequently make comments on her appearance. Ms. Michael would pretend she did not hear it, or she would respond with, “Please just stop.” She stayed pretty quiet and kept to herself. It is my understanding that her work was exceptional. She has never had any employment issues, write-ups, or performance improvement plans (PIPs). The men did not treat other men the way they treated Ms. Michael. She also never reacted or responded similarly to the employees who mistreated her. When we formed Big Mike’s, we were sure to include an anti-harassment policy which our lawyers assisted us with drafting. You can find that policy in the uploaded materials. Our policy directs all employees to contact the HR Manager, Melinda if they believe they have been subjected to any type of harassment. Ms. Michael never reported any of this behavior to Ms. z as she feared the other employees would retaliate and make her life worse. Six months ago, Ms. called Ms. Michael into her office stating that she was investigating the alleged misbehavior of carpenters at Big Mike’s. Ms. asked Ms. Ml if she ever observed any such behavior. Ms. Michael burst into tears and told Ms. Sanchez in detail about how the male carpenters and general construction employees constantly harassed her. A week after Ms. M met with Ms. S, she was placed on “suspension without pay for rudeness to coworkers” pending an internal investigation. Ms. Michael was the only employee disciplined for rudeness to coworkers. Big Mike’s permitted Ms. Mto return to work 30 days later, determining she had not been rude to co-workers, and issuing her full pay for all of the workdays missed during the suspension. Supervisors have now shared that when Ms. Ml returned to work, the male carpenters and general construction employees resumed their mistreatment of Ms.. However, now they included “snitch” and “rat” to their name-calling. They would remove her tools when she was not looking. Again, Ms. M did not report these actions to Ms. , her supervisor, or any executive, for fear of further actions by her colleagues. It is my understanding that the supervisors did oversee and overhear these actions but did not intervene or report to Ms. Yesterday, I learned of all of this from Ms. S after Ms. Ml turned in her resignation. I am told she left stating, “I can’t endure the abuse any longer” and immediately departed the building. I have attempted to reach her but Ms. M will not return my phone call. Since you recently completed your M.Jur. degree from University School of Law, I thought you might be the best person to review this fact pattern, initially, as we think through whether we should consult our litigation counsel further.
Write a memorandum highlighting any potential risks that you believe we may have (maximum 2,000 words) which should address the following:
In 2006, Lilly Ledbetter filed a class action law suit claiming discrimination on the basis of her gender. What is a class action law suit?
Did Ledbetter win her law suit? Why or why not? What did the US Supreme Court decide on appeal and what was the basis of the US Supreme Court’s decision?
Your response must be two pages, double spaced and with one-inch margins on all sides. All of the abochove questions must be answered
The Intro to Law Enforcement Proficiency Project is divided into three parts. Each “part” must contain a cover sheet properly identifying what the assignment regards, the identity of the author/student, date submitted, etc. A sample “cover sheet” is included in CANVAS. Each part or assignment, must be uploaded per guidelines in CANVAS and submitted before; or, by the date due….or in other words….:
The “total assignment” (title page and document) will need to be submitted as a WORD DOCUMENT, UPLOADED as an attached file to the assignments in CANVAS by the due date. To submit the assignment click on the “Submit Assignment” tab, choose your file and once file is loaded, click on the “Submit Assignment” tab. (Upload the same way as your Writing Assignments).
Part One, Proficiency Project Topic
Students will write a one-page paper presenting the law enforcement agency they would like to work for. This assignment should briefly describe the agency, the specific position the student is interested in, and why they have chosen the agency. This is only an introduction to the entire project and should not exceed one page.
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.