Discuss whether Bob has a claim against Abe for the intentional tort of assault? Discuss whether Carl has a claim against Abe for the intentional tort of assault?

/in /by

Intentional tort of assault

Essay Prompt:

Abe was the head coach of the fifth-grade girls’ basketball team at Elementary School. Bob, the assistant coach, blamed Abe for the team’s poor performance. Frustrated after a painful loss, Bob loudly opined that Abe was, “the worst coach ever.”

Abe overheard Bob’s comment and angrily replied, “I’ll get you for that.” Then, Abe picked up a nearby basketball and threw it at Bob.  Seeing the basketball flying toward his head, Bob ducked and yelled “watch out” as he knew some players and parents were standing behind him.  The ball nearly struck Carl, a parent, in the back of the head.

Discuss whether Bob has a claim against Abe for the intentional tort of assault?

Discuss whether Carl has a claim against Abe for the intentional tort of assault?

 

Use IRAC method to analyze problem in the attached document. Pick a side based on the facts of the problem as well as the holdings of the cases provided.

/in /by

Property Law – Landlord Liability for Personal Injuries

Use IRAC method to analyze problem in the attached document. Pick a side based on the facts of the problem as well as the holdings of the cases provided. The cases provided are the only sources to be used. Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion (IRAC)

Cases: Asper v. Haffley – 312 Pa. Super. 424; Merrill v. Jansma – 86 P.3d; Peterson v. Superior Court of Riverside County– 10 Cal. 4th; Trentacost v. Brusell – 82 NJ 214

 

Is there a profit from which the directors can pay a dividend to the shareholders? Does the company have a profit, and should the directors exercise their discretion and pay out the dividend of 15% to the shareholders? If you recommend the directors pay a dividend how much would you recommend?

/in /by

SINGAPORE COMPANY AND FINANCE LAW

Multicoin Pte Ltd (Multicoin) is a private company established in 1976 by Yohan Le Mesurier and Stephen Chung. The two had previously worked for large financial institutions and then decided to establish their own company to develop and sell financial products.

The company has the following directors and senior officers:

  • Yohan Le Mesurier Chairperson
  • Stephen Chung: Managing director
  • Li Ma: Chief Financial Officer
  • Suren Chandra: Sales and marketing director
  • Victoria Moser: Product Development Director
  • Yohan, Stephen, and Li have asked for the meeting because they have the following issues, they would like advice on.

Issue 1:

The company since early 2021 has been losing money on due to the volatility in the financial markets, raising interest rates and lack of investor confidence. The draft financial statements for Multicoin prepared by Li show that this would result in the company for the year ended 31 December 2022 making a trading loss of $7,200,000. Other factors attributing to the loss were staff costs, operating expenses, and the cost of funding the development of new IT infrastructure to comply with MAS guidelines. The company currently has retained earnings as at 1 January 2022 of $15,864,372 and after the estimated trading losses of $7,200,000 for 31 December 2022, this would decrease to $8,664,372. The directors are mindful of the need to retain funds for working capital and estimate the company needs working capital of at least $6,500,000.

Issue they seek advice on:

  • Is there a profit from which the directors can pay a dividend to the shareholders?
  • Does the company have a profit, and should the directors exercise their discretion and pay out the dividend of 15% to the shareholders?
  • If you recommend the directors pay a dividend how much would you recommend?

Issue 2:

The company has its own constitution (previously a memorandum and articles of association). In the constitution it stated that the A class preference shareholders were entitled to a dividend of 6.5% each year. The directors would like to reduce this rate to 2.25% given the current financial position of the company and propose replacing the existing rule with a new rule reducing the dividend to 2.25%.

Issue they seek advice on:

  • Can the A class preference shareholders prevent the company from changing the constitution to reduce the dividend rate?

Issue 3:

During the current financial year Suren was looking for new markets to sell Multicoin’s products. A large financial planning organisation in Indonesia was happy to promote Multicoin’s products. Suren entered negotiations with the Indonesian organisation and signed a contract with them that Multicoin would develop new financial products and provide training for the financial planning organisation staff. The fees payable to the financial planning organisation in Indonesia was .85% of the value of the products sold.

Under Suren’s contract of employment he was only entitled to enter contacts up to .5% of the value of the products sold.

If the amount of the contract was greater than this, then under Multicoin’s internal processes he was to get Stephen’s approval. Suren did not do so as Stephen was on holidays at the time.

Issue they seek advice on:

  • Is Multicoin bound to pay the commission rate of .85%?

Issue 4:

Victoria the product development director employed Natasha Fernandez as a senior product manager.

Natasha had only been working for 2 years as a junior product manager in another firm. Natasha does not have much managerial or experience in senior roles. Victoria is aware of this but still employed her because Natasha’s father is the managing director of Iron Shark Ltd an investment bank that could help Multicoin raise funds and find new clients.

Issue they seek advice on:

  • Natasha has made several errors that has cost Multicoin $95,000 in additional expenses. Who can Multicoin recover this money from?

Issue 5:

Given the downturn in the financial markets around the world, financial institutions like Multicoin are suffering from severe cash burn.

Li has indicated that Multicoin only has sufficient cash at bank to fund 6 months of operations. Yohan, Stephen and Li are looking at various financing options and are considering:

  • A rights issue
  • Private placement
  • The shareholders of the company are:
  • Employees: 5%
  • Stephen:12%
  • Chung:5.5%
  • Li: 2.5%

Tiger Investments Ltd 30% (an investment bank based in New York, USA) Paradise Merchant Bank Ltd: 25% (a venture capitalist) based in Melbourne Australia. The 20% (42 shareholders on the register) There are 18,000,000 shares on issue. The current market price is $10.50 which represents a decrease of 30% since the beginning of the year. Ah Chee advises the directors that the price of a rights issue should be at a 30% discount to current market price.

Issue they seek advice on:

  • How much could Multicoin raise by way of the rights issue? In setting the price of then rights issue what are the risks to Multicoin given the current economic and financial markets turmoil?
  • Can they just do a rights issue to Tiger Investments Ltd and Paradise Merchant Bank Ltd and not the public shareholders and themselves?
  • Li has heard of crowd sourced funding. Would this be easier and better for Multicoin to raise the money?

 

Select at least six articles on a topic of your choice. The articles should be on the same topic but feature different perspectives, research methods, opinions, or conclusions about some aspects of the topic.

/in /by

Essay on: Social justice Influence on Law Enforcement

Summary of assignment

Task: The six-source essay asks you to synthesize the arguments of six sources

Length: Minimum of 1300 words.

Continue with the topic you have selected and will conduct additional searches in the library databases.

For this essay, you will select at least six articles on a topic of your choice. The articles should be on the same topic but feature different perspectives, research methods, opinions, or conclusions about some aspects of the topic.

For this essay, you will use third-person point of view.

  • In addition, do not use second-person point of view (“you” or “your”) in writing this essay.
  • In summary, you should observe the following:
  • Use one-inch margins. Double space.
  • Include a running head.
  • Include page numbers.
  • Include a title page.
  • Include a “References” page on which you list the articles in APA style

 

Write 300 words about fourth amendment, add a direct citation and include the works cited page.

/in /by

Fourth Amendment

Write 300 words about fourth amendment, add a direct citation and include the works cited page.

 

Briefly describe the case of Andrea Yates. Which disciplines or career fields intersected with the Andrea Yates case? What did they do well? What could they have done differently?

/in /by

Andrea Yates case

Prompt: Addressing domestic violence and child abuse most effectively often requires a multi-disciplinary approach.

Directions: Watch videos #1 (Links to an external site.) and #2 (Links to an external site.). Then, research the Andrea Yates case. Finally, answer the questions below.

  1. What are the differences between postpartum psychosis (Video #1 (Links to an external site.)) and postpartum depression (Video #2 (Links to an external site.))? Is this the same as ‘baby blues’? How so?
  2. Briefly describe the case of Andrea Yates.
  3. Which disciplines or career fields intersected with the Andrea Yates case? What did they do well? What could they have done differently?
  4. Discuss implications of domestic violence on public health and public policy. You may find this resource Download this resource helpful. cite any additional sources below in APA format.

here are the Video links: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_3NlTtybIA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qgV7Yug-xs

 

Review the links above and analyze the pros and cons of federalism, unitary and confederal systems. Discuss all three systems of power organization. Explain to me whether you believe that we should keep our federal system or whether we should abandon it in favchoor of a different one.

/in /by

Federalism – Dividing Power between States and the United States

Read Chapter 3 textbook and review the links below:

  • Explaining Federalism: https://billmoyers.com/story/federalism-explained/
  • Explaining Unitary: https://vittana.org/12-unitary-system-pros-and-cons
  • Explaining Unitary: https://apecsec.org/pros-and-cons-of-unitary-government/
  • Explaining Confederate: https://vittana.org/11-pros-and-cons-of-articles-of-confederation
  • Explaining all 3: http://fhsboyd.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/6/2/5562296

/__s1i_pdf_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_federal_confederate_and_unitary_systems_of.pdf Explaining all 3: https://guides.skylinecollege.edu/c.php?g=279117

Academics Believe Unitary is Superior (specifically for non-large countries): http://www.bu.edu/sthacker/files/2012/01

/Are-Federal-Systems-Better-than-Unitary-Systems.pdf Interesting Mix

Decentralized Unitary states (Netherlands) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402388708424654?journalCode=fwep20

Essay Question:

Review the links above and analyze the pros and cons of federalism, unitary and confederal systems.

Discuss all three systems of power organization.

In the end, explain to me whether you believe that we should keep our federal system or whether we should abandon it in favchoor of a different one.

 

State an issue, discuss and evaluate the status quo and the relevant laws or policies, offer future prospects (if the status quo and the current laws/policies were continued), and give reasonable and justified recommendations.

/in /by

Laws or policies

Task: State an issue, discuss and evaluate the status quo and the relevant laws or policies, offer future prospects (if the status quo and the current laws/policies were continued), and give reasonable and justified recommendations.

Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.

/in /by

EVALUATION PROPOSAL

The focus of the Final Paper will be on the creation of an evaluation proposal suitable for presentation in a criminal justice setting or agency. The proposal will center on needs assessment, impact monitoring, and the application of quantitative and/or qualitative techniques in the assessment of the selected program or policy. Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman (2004) discuss the social context of evaluation. Your evaluation proposal should assess the effectiveness of a program or policy, addressing a specific problem proposed or developed as a solution to a contemporary issue in your chosen area of specialization within the Masters in Criminal Justice program: Law Enforcement and Corrections Administration, Cybercrime and Technology, Forensic Science, or Homeland Security.

Utilize research skills to locate a minimum of 15 appropriate scholarly sources to support your statements within the required sections below. Small sections of the evaluation proposal will be completed throughout the progression of the course. Students can use those sections verbatim within the text of the Final Paper if they so choose. The evaluation proposal will be assessed based on the inclusion of the following elements:

Introduction
Present your research question and introduction from the assignment you completed in Week Two.

Literature Review
From the assignment you completed in Week Four, compose a literature review comprised of previous scholarly material and research results relevant to your selected topic.

Program or Policy Description

Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.

Proposal Narrative

Present your measures and methodology from the assignment you completed in Week Three.
Critique the design of the program or policy by describing the methodology, including the data to be collected, the means of collection, and how the data will be used.
Identify a proposed budget and projected schedule for the evaluation.

Summary
Summarize the expected outcomes, the questions to be answered, and the expected results that would indicate success of the program or policy.

Drawing upon the materials set forth in Chapter one of Contending for the Constitution, describe the unique qualifications of the Convention delegates. How did these unique qualifications impact the contributions made? Do you believe there is evidence of divine intervention? Why or why not?

/in /by

Contending For The Constitution

Utilizing the following book, ”Contending For The Constitution: Recalling the Christian Influence on the Writing of the Constitution and the Biblical Basis of American Law and Liberty”

Choose one of the following to discuss:

1) Drawing upon the materials set forth in Chapter one of Contending for the Constitution, describe the unique qualifications of the Convention delegates. How did these unique qualifications impact the contributions made? Do you believe there is evidence of divine intervention? Why or why not?

2) Drawing upon the materials set forth in Chapter two of Contending for the Constitution, explain how the issue of slavery was addressed at the Convention. What is the discrepancy between “ending the slave trade” and “ending slavery” and what was the impact of the federal/state division?

Cite the book in Bluebook format. Below is assistance for how to cite in Bluebook format

Bluebook Resource:

https://www.liberty.edu/casas/academic-success center/bluebook-resources/