Critically explain the ‘Comply or Explain’ approach to corporate governance in comparison to a rules-based approach.
Provide a proposal for a research project, explain why the topic you have chosen is important, what is the core literature, and how you would structure and write such a dissertation in an organized and coherent manner.
You have been hired as a policy advocate or lobbyist for an international environmental, human rights, or public safety organization. You have been asked to write a position paper for, or against, a major policy issue that impacts the environment, human rights, or public safety. Make sure your position paper includes treaties, international laws, statutes, administrative laws, and regulations.
In your position paper, you must include the following:
A description of the local, state, or federal administrative agency you selected for your Final Project (e.g., environmental, human rights, or public safety organization).
A description of the environmental, human rights, or public safety issue you selected.
A description of a major policy related to the issue you selected around which you will create your position. Explain whether you, on behalf of your organization, are for or against this policy. Identify and explain which government agency has promulgated the rules and regulations of the policy issue you identified.
An explanation of how international laws, treaties, regulations, and administrative laws will affect your position.
An explanation of how a presidential transition or leadership transition did, or may, impact your position regarding this policy.
An explanation of which U.S. federal government agencies have responsibility for implementing this policy. Include the statute(s) your agency follows or implements.
An explanation of whether any agency leader(s) within or outside of your organization did, or might, influence the public policy. Be specific.
An explanation of at least two potential challenges to your organization’s position that may arise. Include your solutions to those challenges.
An explanation of any potential court challenges that may arise related to your position. Be specific and include the standards and/or criteria that you believe the Court might use to make a decision.
Your Final Project must demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. Legal citations must follow the proper Bluebook citations. The project should be 14–15 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page, abstract, and references. A minimum of 8 scholarly references must be used in the preparation of this paper.
Ingrid is a CEO of a corporation. Ingrid wants to sell shares in the corporation. She wants to make as much money as possible, so she creates fictional records for how much the
corporation is worth, who the managerial personnel are, how money from the sale of shares will be used, how much property the corporation has, how much liquid assets your corporation has, and whether there are any lawsuits against the corporation. After the first year of selling shares, Ingrid exaggerates the profits the corporation makes every year for the next ten years.
Ingrid learns from an outside source that a project the corporation had been working on was a failure and that the value of the corporation’s shares will plummet as a result. Ingrid calls a meeting of the corporation’s board of directors and tells them the bad news.
Amari is a board member. Amari goes home and tells Amari’s family that they will lose money next week when the shares’ value drops. The next day, Amari’s husband tells his drycleaner the bad news. The drycleaner, Mikhail, owns shares and is worried. Mikhail calls Mikhail’s stockbroker Itsuki and tells Itsuki to sell all of Mikhail’s shares before the price decreases.
Identify each and every 1) law and 2) ethics principle we have covered in class, making sure that you show a clear relationship between each 1) law and 2) ethics principle you identify and 3) the facts that are related to it; and making sure to also provide your own interpretations and conclusions on each issue you discuss and why you arrived at them.
n Unit 1, you learned about the various assumptions of law (four assumptions), along with the various functions and dysfunctions of law. In Unit 2, you learned that there are many different definitions of law. How you define “law” can have a significant impact on your assessment of a legal system.
In a well-written informative essay of roughly 4 pages (900–1,000 words), provide an evaluation of the U.S. legal system today. In your essay you must: (1) incorporate at least two of the four major assumptions of law; (2) describe at least two functions and two dysfunctions of law; and (3) incorporate at least two different definitions of law. Your assessment should explain how each of the selected topics relate to one another: show the connections between your definitions, assumptions, functions, and dysfunctions of the legal system and how these guide the behavior of members of society.
You have been working on this proposal assigment since it started so you should have everything you need to complete the final assignment let me know if you need anything else from me
Exam Content
Over the past 4 weeks, you have developed most of the required components of your grant proposal. In this assignment, you develop the remaining components, revise and finalize previously created components, and compile your final grant proposal. Ensure that your grant proposal includes all of the components in the Grant Proposal Assignment Guide, as well as any additional components required by the application of the funding source you have selected.
Note: Once compiled, your entire grant proposal should total 3,000–4,000 words.
Complete the remaining components of your grant proposal. It is recommended that you develop the following this week:
Compile all grant components in the following order:
What are the legal and contractual features of collaborative procurement and what legal and contractual obstacles can affect the collaborative procurement of UK projects? What different legal and contractual obstacles affect the collaborative procurement of international projects compared to UK projects?
Jefferson County has never had a hospital. To obtain acute care services, residents have to travel 20 to 30 miles to a hospital in an adjacent county. For many years, civic leaders have talked about building a hospital and, for more than ten years, the board of county commissioners has been putting its annual budget surplus in its “hospital fund.” At the present time, the county commissioners have accumulated $25 million in cash, which is earmarked for a hospital, but the commissioners have been informed that $100 million will be required to build and equip a hospital of the appropriate size.
The county commissioners have considered several proposals for developing a hospital:
As you might expect, the board of commissioners has been unable to agree on a proposal, and at the last meeting they almost came to blows. Therefore, the chair has appointed a committee to study the issue and report back at the next meeting. In turn, the committee has hired you as a consultant and wants your advice on the best alternative for the county. The best alternative might be one of the aforementioned three proposals, some combination of those proposals, or a completely different proposal. Before evaluating each alternative, please fill in the chart showing the advantages and disadvantages for each type of legal structure (table). Write a recommendation to the county explaining your reasoning. Incidentally, as they say on television, this story is purely fictional, and any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
To complete this weekly assignment the student will read Current Event number 1 and offer a summary based on the following:
1. Analyze the listed ideas and discuss their relation to the United States Legal System.
2. Reflect on how this subject matter may relate to your life and the life of others as well as popular culture in general.
Problem Statement Checklist
Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s problem statement:
• Is a problem identified that leads to the need for this study?
• Is a rationale or justification for the problem clearly stated?
• Is the problem framed in a way that is consistent with the research approach?
• Does the statement convey how the study will address the problem?
• Are the citations to literature current (i.e., within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)?
Our team has experienced writers that follow all the codes used in professionalism when writing academic essays. We focus our services on satisfied clients. Through critical attention to detail, our writers abide by all the instructions given by clients. Additionally, the paper format is done according to the dictates of the client in respect to the set academic style. We are proud of completing outstanding top-quality papers.